A Collaborative Approach: Looking at Student Responses to the SLA Performance Tasks.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention: A Systematic Problem Solving Process Rhode Island RTI Initiative Module One 2007.
Advertisements

CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT FOR STUDENT LEARNING
CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT FOR STUDENT LEARNING
Provincial Report Cards Mathematics Grades 1 to 12.
Collaborating with Families: Partnering for Success
Successful Learning Conference 2013 Making adjustments for students with special education needs, K–6 24 June 2013.
Bringing it all together!
Office of Curriculum, Instruction and School Support 2012 Mathematical Practice 3: Construct Viable Arguments and Critique the Reasoning of Others Mathematics.
Reviewing and refining your moderation processes and systems
Connecting to Curriculum
Chapter 10 Teaching and Learning Strategies
1. Principles Learning Assessment Technology 3 Teaching Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality.
Supporting Teachers to make Overall Teacher Judgments The Consortium for Professional Learning.
SLAs – MAKING THE SHIFT. Session Goals Deepen understanding of Inspiring Education, Literacy and Numeracy Benchmarks (embedded in Curriculum Redesign)
Mathematics 3 – 8 Standards for Mathematical Practice TLQP Tom Sweeney The Sage Colleges.
Aims To revisit reading assessment focuses
Blended Courses: How to have the best of both worlds in higher education By Susan C. Slowey.
Big Ideas and Problem Solving in Junior Math Instruction
COMPONENTS OF AN EFFECTIVE WRITING PROGRAM
Number Sense i n Grades 1 and 2 Liz Fisher N207 April 29, 2014.
Session 12 Self- & Peer-Assessment. Self-Assessment Self-assessment is an essential aspect of the teaching - learning process. Self-assessment promotes.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
Write to Learn K-3 Partner Share With your partner discuss your current understanding and use of writing to learn.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Math Instruction What’s in and What’s out What’s in and What’s out! Common Core Instruction.
Discourse. Student Discourse How would you define student discourse? “IS considered student discourse” “IS NOT considered student discourse”
Literary Response Rubric Analysis Ms. Livingston E9 SWBAT Identify essential elements for an effective literary analysis response; Evaluate an effective.
Assessment FOR, AS and OF learning.  We are a community that challenges its members to act as compassionate, knowledgeable and principled global citizens:
Literacy Partner’s Meeting Wednesday, October 22 nd Moderated Marking: The What, The Why, The How.
ELA SCHOOL TEAM SESSION Welcome to EEA, 2012! 10/2/2015MSDE1.
Using Assessments and Data to Improve Student Learning Day 2 1.
PRESENTED BY DR. LINDA K. GRIFFITH APRIL 29, 2013 Planning for CCSSM Instruction-First Grade.
 Desks in pairs or groups of 3-4  Students engaged in learning, minimal whole group instruction, students in collaborative pairs, small groups, etc.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
Background Approach Design Procedure Conclusions.
What does a ‘Literacy Rich Teaching and Learning Environment’ look like?  Work with colleagues at your table and make a list of what it would look and.
Literacy for All: A Community of Practice for Junior/Senior High Teachers of Students with Significant Disabilities Day Two Karen Loerke, Edmonton Regional.
Activity 4 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
Common Core Mathematics
Sample Close Reading Lesson achieves.org/ achieves.org/ ELA – Close Reading: “The Making of a Scientist”
Fitness Education Chapter 13. Traditional Views of Fitness Goal was to get kids fit Focus was on activities and doing fitness (for example, weight training,
Understand the purpose and benefits of guiding instructional design through the review of student work. Practice a protocol for.
Cubing Rae Pitchford Spring, Differentiated Instruction “Differentiation is simply attending to the learning needs of a particular student or small.
1 Assessment. 2  Formative assessment – assessment for learning  Summative assessment – assessment of learning.
EngageNY.org Module Assessments and Data Cycles. EngageNY.org2 Good Morning! Please Mix It Up… Sit with principals, teachers, and coaches from different.
DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION Ideas taken from: Student Success DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION EDUCATOR’S GUIDE (2010) REACH EVERY STUDENT.
Essay Questions. Two Main Purposes for essay questions 1. to assess students' understanding of and ability to think with subject matter content. 2. to.
Moderation and Validation of Teacher Judgements in School.
Assessing Student Learning Workshop 2: Making on-balance judgements and building consistency.
An AAC Professional Learning Module Book Study based on the AAC publication Scaffolding for Student Success Scaffolding for Student Success Module 3: A.
Literary Response Rubric Analysis Ms. Livingston E9 SWBAT Identify essential elements for an effective literary analysis response; Evaluate an effective.
Why a writing plan? Consistency among k-12 writing instruction Need to address state expectations for writing Data indicated very few students were exceeding.
Framework for Enhancing Student Learning School District 63 (Saanich)
GOING DEEPER INTO STEP 1: UNWRAPPING STANDARDS Welcome!
Grade 3 Student Learning Assessments Year 2 Pilot Collaborative Assessment Session.
Assessment for Learning in Mathematics Classrooms Chris Suurtamm University of Ottawa.
Numeracy at Neilston Primary School. Our Active Approach Children learn best when they are engaged! Increased motivation. Children are challenged appropriately.
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
The Future for Assessment? Assessing Pupil Progress (APP) as a tool for effective Teacher Assessment in Primary Science.
Information for Parents Statutory Assessment Arrangements
Reviewing and refining your moderation processes and systems
AAC Assessment Glossary
Information for Parents Key Stage 3 Statutory Assessment Arrangements
Information for Parents Statutory Assessment Arrangements
Guided Reading Overview Grades K-2
Thinking with Technology Course Module 9
Assessment.
Critical Reading Charting the Text.
Assessment & Reporting
Presentation transcript:

A Collaborative Approach: Looking at Student Responses to the SLA Performance Tasks

Of Critical Importance It is important to remember that the SLA tasks are formative in nature...designed to provide teachers with formative information to assist them in effective programming for the upcoming year. As you examine your students’ work, consider your response to the following questions. o What are the strengths and areas of concern for the group of students you will be teaching this year? o How can you use the information to best help all of your students be successful?

Getting to Know the Standards: What qualities define student work at a variety of levels at the beginning of grade 3?

Understanding Provincial Standards for Early Grade 3 Examine the anchor papers provided by Alberta Education. Engage in a discussion about quality of student response. o How is a Level 5 response different from a level 4 response? o How is a level 4 response different from a level 3 response and so on? Continue the discussion until there is consensus.

Applying the Provincial Standards Practice applying the provincial standards by working with a limited sample of student responses that represent a range of quality. Working in a small group, each teacher selects one piece of student work. Number each paper with a sticky note. Each teacher requires a paper copy of the Alberta Education SLA Performance Descriptor documents for each sample of student work that will be reviewed. Literacy Performance Task Descriptors Numeracy Performance Task Descriptors

Applying the Provincial Standards (continued) Each teacher assesses the work sample independently and records his/her judgments on the paper copy of the Performance Task Descriptor document. At this point, there should be no discussion or sharing. Pass the paper to the right and repeat. Continue to pass the papers until all the student samples have been assessed.

Confirming the Standards When the samples have been assessed by each group member, discuss them in turn. Compare the assessment decisions made by each member of the group. Where there are disagreements, discuss and come to a consensus as to what the most accurate judgement might be.

Critical Decision Time With the standards confirmed, teachers could decide to work collaboratively with a partner to assess work from both classes, or independently assess their own students’ work.

Making a Decision Benefits of Working Collaboratively provides an opportunity to discuss student products in relation to standards reduces the tendency to factor in preconceived ideas about students and instead, attend to the product in relation to the standards provides a sense of what students in another class at your grade level are capable of doing Reasons for Working Independently time efficiency distance from colleagues might prevent collaboration

Time to Begin Work with an elbow partner or work independently to assess student work. When you are unsure or if there is disagreement about how to assess an aspect of the work, include other teachers and engage in a discussion to come to consensus.

Remember… Performance assessment is an essential part of a balanced assessment program. Although time consuming, performance tasks provide valuable information about what students know and can do. The results of the early Grade 3 SLA performance tasks can assist teachers in making sound instructional decisions to support student learning. It’s worth the effort!