We’ve Got Our Assessment Results – Now What?! AAC&U 2014 Institute on Integrative Learning and the Departments Theme 3, Concurrent Session IV Jo Beld,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Advertisements

James M. Sloat, Washington & Jefferson College Kathleen E. Harring, Muhlenberg College Robert Rand Davidson, Ursinus College 2011 AAC&U General Education.
GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,
Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF). All students will be college and career ready. All students will have a safe, orderly, and inviting learning environment.
Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
COLLEGE OF ARTS & SCIENCES NEW CHAIRS AND DIRECTORS ORIENTATION DEAN VIRGINIA SAPIRO 8/28/2014 WHAT IS A DEPARTMENT CHAIR? CAS BOSTON UNIVERSITY.
Strategic Plan Briefing Session Progress and Challenges Spring
IN SUPPORT OF STUDENT INVOLVEMENT IN THE COURSE TRANSFORMATION PROGRAM Senate Resolution 1012.
Utilization-Focused Assessment: Principles and Practices Paula Carlson Vice President & Liaison to the Board of Regents St. Olaf College CHEA Annual Conference.
Office of Academic Affairs June 1, 2007 Academic Priorities: Next Steps Spring Symposium 2007.
Hiring a Diverse Faculty – are we there yet…? A presentation to Highline Community College on some results from a study of changes in full-time faculty.
Practical Strategies for Assessing Student Learning in Departments and Programs: A Utilization-Focused Approach Jo Beld St. Olaf College.
Institutional Accreditation Review Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
Orientation for Academic Program Reviews
Student (and other) Course Evaluations Response Rates, Relevance and Results Kathleen Norris Plymouth State University, NH.
NLII Mapping the Learning Space New Orleans, LA Colleen Carmean NLII Fellow Information Technology Director, ASU West Editor, MERLOT Faculty Development.
Academic Assessment Report for the Academic Year Antioch University New England Office of Academic Assessment Tom Julius, Ed.D., Director Submitted.
Notes by Juan Manfredi February 11,  Passed by Arts and Sciences faculty in April 2002 and published in the A & S Gazette on April 15, 2003 (Vol.
Responding to the changing landscape: The Innovative Learning Institute Jeremy Haefner, Provost September 2012.
Strategic Planning Summit GAP/Committee Chairs/IE December 5,
Augustana’s Five Year Goals To Create a Campus Climate that Fosters Student Learning through Effective Assessment To Articulate Learning Objectives for.
Strategic Priorities for Taking Charge of our Future.
Maureen Noonan Bischof Eden Inoway-Ronnie Office of the Provost Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association Annual Meeting April 22, 2007.
A member of the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system, Bemidji State University is an affirmative action, equal opportunity employer and educator.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Learning Communities in the Community College San Jose City College.
College Board EXCELerator Schools Site Visit Preparation.
Washington State University Strategic Plan Overview and Implementation Process On web site at
The Report of the Provost’s Advisory Group on the SUNY Assessment Initiative September 2009 Tina Good, Ph.D. President Faculty Council of Community Colleges.
Evidence of Student Learning Fall Faculty Seminar Office of Institutional Research and Assessment August 15, 2012.
Faculty Evaluation Committee Workshop. Overview Evaluation Timeline Portfolio as a Whole Portfolio Organization –Teaching –Service (Students, College,
NSSE 2013 How to Use Results (or “Why you should care about NSSE”) 8/26/
Preparing and Evaluating 21 st Century Faculty Aligning Expectations, Competencies and Rewards The NACU Teagle Grant Nancy Hensel, NACU Rick Gillman, Valporaiso.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
ELearning Committee Strategic Plan, A Brief History of the ELC Committee Developed and Charged (2004) CMS Evaluation and RFP Process (2004)
Learning, Engagement, and Responsiveness Faculty of Business Workshop.
Institutional Effectiveness A set of ongoing and systematic actions, processes, steps and practices that include: Planning Assessment of programs and.
Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Conspicuous Excellence: Embracing Accountability, Documenting Impact & Building Trust Nita A. Paris, PhD, Associate.
NSSE 2013 How to Use Results (or “Why you should care about NSSE”)
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
Program Review Section III Training Sacramento City College Student Services Division Fall 2008.
Select Slides… Spring 2013 Training Strengthening Teaching and Learning through the Results of Your Student Assessment of Instruction (SAI) For Faculty.
Efforts to Gauge Culture of Assessment by the Academic Assessment Committee at UF
College of Education and Allied Studies Office of Semester Conversion Academic Programs and Graduate Studies February 4, :00 pm – 4:00 pm Oakland/Concord.
Assessment 101: What do you (really) need to know? Melinda Jackson, SJSU Assessment Director October
Improving, Expanding, and Institutionalizing Civic Learning and Community Engagement Dr. Curt Brungardt Dr. Jill Arensdorf Mr. Brett Bruner Dr. Christie.
Accreditation, Strategic Planning, SPOL Implementation Sigrid Davison Associate Director, Analytics & Research, Office of Institutional Effectiveness Audrey.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
NEASC Annual Meeting Dec 7, 2016
How an Assessment Framework helped revitalize Program Review at JCCC
Curriculum Development Updates
Student Concerns about Faculty Conduct Faculty and staff together provide support to students that help align the student experience with the mission and.
Project-Based Learning
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Improving the First Year: Campus Discussion March 30, 2009
HARNESSING VOICES OF SUPPORT FOR PROGRAM REVIEW
Bring the GWP to Your School
University Community Briefing
Globalizing the Liberal Arts - Capturing the Global Experience
Geoscience program and individual action planning Short (~5-7 minute) interviews – Evaluation & Research team member 2:00-3:15 Work on your institution’s.
Program Review Teaching and learning committee Santa ana college
Dr. James W. Dottin Department Chair Business Administration
Today’s Transfer Students: Building a Foundation
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Minnesota State University, Mankato
Selecting Evidence to Demonstrate Teaching Effectiveness
Elizabeth Crawford The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
Brooklyn College Fall 2019 OFFICE OF Institutional effectiveness August 29th 2019.
Presentation transcript:

We’ve Got Our Assessment Results – Now What?! AAC&U 2014 Institute on Integrative Learning and the Departments Theme 3, Concurrent Session IV Jo Beld, St. Olaf College

Session agenda Why using assessment data is important Why using assessment data is hard Using what you’ve already got Designing for use in the future Building a culture of assessment use

Why use is important Assessment use is: Required by accreditors (all of them!) Engaging for faculty Engaging for other stakeholders A means of stewardship A means of improvement

Why use is hard Institutions are not “rational actors” Your colleagues are busy Your colleagues are smart Data feels distant Data can be ambiguous and short-lived Use requires collaboration

Why use is hard Which obstacle to using assessment is especially salient for your institution? Are there other obstacles we haven’t mentioned?

Using what you’ve already got Take stock Triangulate

Using what you’ve already got Internationalization at St. Olaf

Using what you’ve already got Inventory of: Intended learning outcomes referencing internationalization/global understanding (institutional, GE, program-level) Institutional-level assessment data (NSSE, HEDS-Alumni, local Learning Goals survey) GE assessment data (analysis of student work in selected GE-accredited courses) Program-level assessment data (Study Abroad Learning Assessment, results from selected majors and concentrations)

Using what you’ve already got Think about the project you are working on at this Institute. What data do you already have that might be relevant? If you don’t know, where would you go to find out? What questions do you want to answer? Who can pull that data together for you so you can look for patterns?

Using what you’ve already got Task a group and/or tweak a routine Tell a story

Using what you’ve already got Inst Research & Evaluation Assessment Subcomm Curriculum Committee Provost and Dean’s Council Board Academic Affairs Early fall review of assessment findings from previous spring

Using what you’ve already got Think about the project you are working on at this Institute. Story? Routine? Group(s)?

Designing for use in the future Backward design in assessment Anticipate uses Ask for use Affirm successes Allow time

Designing for use: Anticipate

Intended uses by GE instructors (pp. 6-7): Promoting reflection Enhancing alignment Revising content/pedagogy Improving other courses Supporting tenure/promotion

Designing for use: Anticipate Determining whether curriculum needs revising Guiding faculty development Informing department GE course offerings Enhancing advising Informing Dean’s Council decisions Supporting grant applications Intended uses by departments, offices, and committees

Designing for use: Ask What uses have you made in the past? What potential uses guided your current assessment project? What use will you make of your current results? What help or support do you need for this use? Dean of the College Institutional Research & Evaluation Curriculum Committee Assessment Action Reports

Designing for use: Affirm Use = Sustain as well as change

Designing for use: Allow time Multi-year assessment schedule One program type per year One outcome per program One year to reflect and act instead of gather

Building a culture of use Cite assessment findings yourself Link resource allocation to assessment engagement and use Make assessment part of a larger project people are invested in Ask others to cite findings

Building a culture of use Which of these strategies would you like to try? Are there other strategies that have worked for you? Are there new ones you’d like to suggest? Take stock Triangulate Task a group or tweak a routine Tell a story * * * * * * Anticipate uses Ask for use Affirm continuities Allow time

We’ve Got Our Assessment Results – Now What?! Share your “a-ha” moments!