Channel Migration Hazard Maps for eastern Jefferson County Rivers 2004 Susan Perkins Perkins Geosciences --- Watershed Professionals Network, LLC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VII. 1 VII. Effects Of Transportation Structures On Fluvial Systems A.Riverine Systems 1.Analytical Tools to Evaluate Impacts 2.Single Channel 3.Braided.
Advertisements

Meeting Two More Theory
Streams play an important role in erosion
Digimap for Schools Geography Resources Channel Form and Change © EDINA at University of Edinburgh 2013 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons.
EARTH SCIENCE Geology, the Environment and the Universe
Objectives Describe how surface water can move weathered materials.
2004 Channel Migration Zone (CMZ) STUDY for the Duckabush, Dosewallips, Big Quilcene and Little Quilcene Rivers South Jefferson County by Jeanne E. Klawon.
Lewis Creek Reach M19 Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3.
ENSC 202 – 2004 Phase 1 Steps 2-5 Watershed Assessment (ENSC 202) Phase 1 – Steps 2-5 Extracted from Vermont ANR Stream Geomorphic Assessment Protocols.
Features of depositional environments
ENSC 202 – 2004 Phase 1 Steps 6-10 Watershed Assessment (ENSC 202) Phase 1 – Steps 6-10 Extracted from Vermont ANR Stream Geomorphic Assessment Protocols.
Stream Development.
Sculpting Earth’s Surface
1D SEDIMENT TRANSPORT MORPHODYNAMICS with applications to RIVERS AND TURBIDITY CURRENTS © Gary Parker November, CHAPTER 15: EXTENSION OF 1D MODEL.
RIVERS AND ASSOCIATED LANDFORMS
Erosion and Deposition
Water Cycle - Running Water
Map Modernization Management Support Best Practices Project - FEMA State of Idaho Idaho Department of Water Resources Boise, Idaho November 2008.
Greg Jennings, PhD, PE Professor, Biological & Agricultural Engineering North Carolina State University BAE 579: Stream Restoration Lesson.
Short Course on Gullies and Streams Tom Millard, Vancouver Forest Region.
Running Water Running water Water as an agent of erosion; water in streams, tributaries (larger streams) and rivers that flow down hill therefore changing.
Chapter Fourteen Streams & Floods. Earth’s Water Water in, on, and above Earth is ~ 1.36 billion km 3 (326 million mile 3 ) and this amount is fairly.
Surface Water Chapter 9.
RIVER PROCESSES Introduction to Watershed Science Merritt College Marc Epstein, Instructor.
Step 1: Assess Riparian Resource Function Using PFC §1d. Complete PFC assessment l 17 questions about attributes and processes l Reminder – PFC based on:
Streams Objectives: 1.Definition 2.Importance 3.Hydrologic Cycle 4.Geometry and Dynamics.
Chapter 16: Running Water. Hydrologic cycle The hydrologic cycle is a summary of the circulation of Earth’s water supply Processes involved in the hydrologic.
Stream Processes and Habitat Ryan Johnson. Overview Watershed Processes – Factors and their effects on the watershed as a whole Stream Processes – Factors.
San Pedro Creek: A Longitudinal Profile Study Andrew Georgeades Anne Jurek Mary Snow.
Levees Artificial levees prevent floods Usually made with fine-grained sediments that are easily eroded in floods Higher-quality levees mix coarse.
Surface Water Chapter 9. Water Cycle Also the hydrologic cycle Driving force is the sun Review: condensation, precipitation, transpiration, evaporation,
Channel Migration Zones: What? Why? Where? Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program Washington Department of Ecology Patricia L. Olson.
Comparison of Geomorphic Change in Two Flood Events on the Umatilla River, Oregon Patricia McDowell, Michael L. Hughes, and W. Andrew Marcus Department.
Chapter 4: Weathering and Erosion
McKnight's Physical Geography
Rivers: Fluvial Processes
Surface Water Chapter 9 Notes.
Stream Erosion and Transport
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Running Water Earth, 10e - Chapter 16.
Hyporheic Zone- area where stream water and ground water intermix.
Longitudinal profile Fluvial/River- Areas The path the river follows from its source to mouth is known as the river's course. When studying rivers we.
Characteristics of Straight, Meandering, and Braided Channels
Rivers and Streams. River Systems A river or stream: any body of water flowing downhill in a well defined channel A river or stream: any body of water.
River Systems. Objective  Students will describe factors that affect the erosive ability of a river and the evolution of a river system.
AIM: What are the parts of a stream/river?
Streams and Rivers.
PCWA Study Plan Physical Habitat Characterization Study Plan –Geomorphology Study Plan –Riparian Habitat Mapping Study Plan –Aquatic Habitat Characterization.
Journal #5 What is a flood? Why are floods harmful? What can humans do to prevent floods?
AIM: What is a stream/river? Do Now: Answer the following questions in your notebooks. Where does the water come from that fills streams and rivers? Where.
Water Erosion Chapter 3 Section 2. Standard S 6.2.a – Students know water running downhill is the dominant process in shaping the landscape S 6.2.a.
Rivers meander when they are traveling on top of a relatively flat surface. Meander is a result of friction between the stream and its bed. The pattern.
TRANSPORTATION & DEPOSITION in a Stream System.
NHACC Annual Meeting 2014 New Approaches to Restoring NH’s Rivers Natural Channel Design and Dam Removal Peter J. Walker.
Chapter 9: Surface Water BIG IDEA: Surface water moves materials produced by weathering and shapes the surface of the Earth.
11.2 Stream and River Deposits. Even though flooding along rivers is potentially harmful, many farms are located near rivers. Why do people build along.
Developing a Channel Migration Zone (“CMZ”) for the Clark Fork River
Learning objectives Processes of River Transportation
Surface Water.
What runs but never walks, Has a mouth but never talks, Has a bed but never sleeps, Has a head but never weeps?
Chapter 13 Surface Water.
River System Development
River Erosion / Deposition
Running Water.
Chapter 18.
River Systems Part 2 Features of a Meandering River Levees
Running Water & Groundwater
AIM: What is a stream/river?
Module # 8 Channel Evolution Implications & Drivers of Instability
Stream and River Deposits
Streams play an important role in erosion
Presentation transcript:

Channel Migration Hazard Maps for eastern Jefferson County Rivers 2004 Susan Perkins Perkins Geosciences --- Watershed Professionals Network, LLC

Intent of Hazard Maps FEMA Flood Insurance maps have limited application in planning areas safe for development CMZ delineations help reduce risks to human communities by guiding development away from areas at risk of channel erosion Channel migration is not limited to areas below 100- year flood elevation Channel migration may not be limited to HMZ CMZ delineation allows planners and managers to weigh the relative risks of human development with habitat preservation over time Slide courtesy of Wash. Dept. of Ecology

Channel Migration Hazard Maps CMZs were reclassified into: Disconnected Migration Areas (DMA) High hazard Moderate hazard Low hazard

Disconnected Migration Areas substantial, continuous bank protection structure OR demonstrated commitment and ability of government agencies to prevent future channel migration consulted with Jefferson County Public Works Dept. and Natural Resources Division DMAs may still be subject to flooding

Deltas from Rosgen (1996)

Dosewallips River

Dosewallips River Brinnon levee – Reach B

Duckabush River

Duckabush River failed riprap Reach B

Big Quilcene River

Big Quilcene right bank levee

Little Quilcene River

Hazard Delineation Hazard Level HIGH near river, or low former channel MODERATE LOWfarther from river, surface unchannelized Approx. Time Frame < 50 years years > 100 years

Hazard Delineation Geomorphic channel type Type of channel migration lateral avulsions Sediment regime transport deposition Constraints on channel migration

Geomorphic Channel Types Delta/alluvial fan Wandering river Straight and entrenched currently, but formerly meandering Straight and narrow (always)

Delta/alluvial fan reaches Distributary channels Avulsions Depositional Major constraints on channel migration Cross-floodplain roads Extensive levees or revetments Reaches Little Quilcene A Big Quilcene A Duckabush A Duckabush B Dosewallips A Dosewallips B

Delta/alluvial fan hazard assignment High Hazard Zone HCMZ (+AHZ +EHA where not blocked by constraints) Moderate Hazard Zone Remainder of AHZ and EHA

Wandering river reaches Meandering with bend cutoffs and avulsions Straight at times following avulsions Depositional, or mixed transport and deposition Low, active floodplain No or few constraints on channel migration Reaches Little Quilcene B Little Quilcene D Big Quilcene B Big Quilcene E Duckabush C Dosewallips D Dosewallips G

Wandering river avulsion example -- Duckabush old channel new channel

side channel and island -- Duckabush

Wandering River hazard assignment High Hazard Zone HCMZ +AHZ +1/2 of EHA width Moderate Hazard Zone Remainder of EHA

Straight and Entrenched reaches: CMZ now narrower than historic Minor to no bend growth, or bends occur within a narrower zone than HMZ Sediment transport, or sediment supply where bed has degraded Was channelized in past Entrenched Discontinuous revetments constrain channel migration Reaches Big Quilcene C Big Quilcene D

Straight and Entrenched example – Big Quilcene D

Straight and Entrenched example – Big Quilcene C

Straight and Entrenched hazard assignment High Hazard Zone ½ to 2 EHA widths from the year 2000 active channel edge Moderate Hazard Zone Remainder of EHA

C D B E Big Quilcene

Straight and Narrow reaches Minor to no bank erosion, no bend growth Few bends, held in place by erosion-resistant geology Sediment is transported through reach No man-made constraints on channel migration Bedrock or glacial bluffs constrain channel Reaches Little Quilcene C Big Quilcene F Dosewallips C Dosewallips E Dosewallips F

Straight and Narrow hazard assignment High Hazard Zone HCMZ Moderate Hazard Zone AHZ + EHA

Dosewallips E D

Limitations of CMZ Maps Maps show relative risk, not a precise prediction of time or location Not all High and Moderate hazard areas will be occupied in next 100 yrs Though unlikely, some Low hazard areas could be occupied Maps do not depict flood risk Maps do not depict landslide risk If erosion-resistant bank materials are present, risk would be lower Transitional zones at downstream ends of straight reaches should be reassessed every 10 years.

Confidence Level Generally high 63+ years of historical data Excellent LIDAR maps Field work Migration distance >> map error Lower in upstream ends No LIDAR migration distance < map error

Lower Hoh River historic channels

Lower Hoh River CMZ hazard map

Hoh River 2004