Collaborative Science and Technology Network for Sustainability Progress Review Workshop October 18-19, 2005 Washington DC Ecological Sustainability in.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ecosystem Flows Hydrology and Connectivity Joe Trungale October 2, 2006.
Advertisements

Stream Health Fact Sheet What is impervious land cover? Why is impervious land cover harmful to streams? Impervious land cover includes all hard surfaces,
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Restoration and Regulation Discussion Joseph P. DaVia US Army Corps of Engineers-Baltimore Chief, Maryland.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The Use of Calculated Stream Metabolism in Understanding Nutrients and Algal Measures in Agricultural.
2009 Water Quality Monitoring Report – Fish Creek Vaughn Hauser, B.Sc. Naomi Parker, B.Sc., BIT, CEPIT.
Low Impact Development They took all the trees and put them in a tree museum and they charged all the people a dollar and a half just to see 'em. Don't.
South Llano River: One of 2011’sTop Ten National Fish Habitat Action Plan named SLR as “water to watch” WHY?? –Conserve freshwater, estuarine, and marine.
& Community Design LSU Green Laws Research Project Green Laws Louisiana Department of Agriculture & Forestry EBR Parish Tree And Landscape Commission Louisiana.
Karst Initiatives/Storm Water Management in Berkeley County Brian Hopkins, Ph.D., P.E. Berkeley County Engineering Department.
GREEN ROOFS. What is a green roof? Green roofs are plantings on the roof of a building Used in Europe for more than 25 years to control runoff volume,
WATERSHED INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT Module 7, part C – Assessment.
Wetlands and bioretention systems: Landscape filters in the Bay watershed Andrew H. Baldwin Department of Environmental Science and Technology.
Watershed Introduction. What is a Watershed? An area of land, from ridge top to ridge top, that collects, stores, and releases water to a common point,
Western Washington Hydrology Model Version 3
L-THIA Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment Model ….provides relative estimates of change of runoff and non point source pollutants caused due to land.
U.S. EPA: NCEA/Global Change Research Program Jim Pizzuto and students University of Delaware Changing Climate and Land Use in the Mid-Atlantic: Modeling.
Landscape Ecology, Urban Forestry & Wetlands.  Woody vegetation in populated places  25% of forest canopy in US.
Hydrologic Issues in Mountaintop Mining Areas Ronald Evaldi, USGS-WSC, Charleston, WV Daniel Evans, USGS-WSC, Louisville, KY Hugh Bevans, USGS-WSC, Charleston,
Ground Water and Ecosystems Restoration Division Assessing the Effectiveness of Restoration Technologies Elise Striz and Joe Williams.
Capitol Hill Ocean Week 2007 EPA’s Role in Protecting Coastal Water Quality June 6, 2007 Economics of Coastal Communities Panel Craig Hooks, Director Office.
Ecology and environment, inc. International Specialists in the Environment The McKinstry Creek & Riparian Area NYSDOT Rt. 219 Mitigation Project Analysis.
Next The water that falls on the Chesapeake Bay watershed drains to local streams and rivers and then flows to the Chesapeake.
Water Quality in a Stream Reach SOCoP 2012 Workshop Topic Gary Berg-Cross Nov , 2012 U. S. Geological Survey National Center Sunrise Valley.
Introduction to PA Act 167 Stormwater Management Planning Little Juniata River Watershed April 21, 2005.
Katie Teague County Extension Agent- Agriculture/Water Quality.
Roger Miller, Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Barry Jackson, USGS Arkansas Water Science Center ARKANSAS EXCHANGE NETWORK FOR GROUNDWATER-QUALITY.
Loudoun Watershed Watch “ Restoring Loudoun Streams” LCSA Water Forum Presented by: Darrell Schwalm Loudoun Watershed Watch Loudoun Wildlife Conservancy.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® 2012 Changes to Stream Mitigation Procedures and Guidelines Mike Moxey USACE, Mobile District IRT Chair May.
Agua Hedionda Watershed Management Plan Watershed Planning Group Meeting June 5, 2008 Carlsbad, CA.
Interim Headwater Drainage Feature Guideline: Protecting HDFs through Urbanization Laura C.R. Del Giudice, B.Sc., M.F.C., Senior Planning Ecologist.
Materials Transport & NSCD Material Classes Velocity to Transport Relationships York NSCD Restoration PSY CCREP.
Emily Shimada, Environmental Science, University of Idaho Research Team B: Watershed Management in the Andean Paramo Faculty Advisors: Dr. Alex Fremier,
The Interconnectedness of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Karen Sondak CREST Center for the Integrated Study of Coastal Ecosystem Processes and Dynamics University.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Leetown Science Center Research in the Shenandoah Valley Presented to the Shenandoah Valley Natural.
Hallstead Borough and the Northern Susquehanna River Watershed Association presents Hallstead Borough and the Northern Susquehanna River Watershed Association.
Lessons Learned from BMP evaluation studies in the nontidal streams and river in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman University of Maryland Center.
Why are we here today? To discuss the challenges we face in meeting NPDES Phase II minimum requirements for stormwater control. The NPDES program requires.
North Bay Climate Adaptation Initiative
Horsley Witten Group, Inc. Stormwater Management and Elements of Low Impact Development Protecting Our Water Resources – An Ecological Approach to Land.
Laguna Creek Watershed Council Development of the Laguna Creek Watershed Management Action Plan & It’s Relevance to the Elk Grove Drainage Master Planning.
Alabama Water Watch Citizen Monitoring Program. Today’s Outline: 1.Review: what is a watershed? 2.Alabama Biodiversity 3.The Water Cycle 4.River Continuum.
STORET 1001 and the State of Utah Monitoring Strategy Today you will see: –What kind of attributes are available in STORET –How results, stations, and.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
Cooperating Partners Presentation October 12, 2006 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan (IRWMP) B S Strategies and Objectives C ANTA ARBARA OUNTY.
Lessons Learned from BMP evaluation studies in the nontidal streams and river in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman University of Maryland Center.
State of the Streams Loudoun County: 2005 Loudoun Strategic Watershed Management Planning Conference February 23, 2006 Presented by: Darrell Schwalm Loudoun.
URBAN STORMWATER: A PERFECT STORM FOR CHANGE Jon M. Capacasa Director, Water Protection Division EPA Region III.
North Creek Water Quality Prepared by Jon Rogers and Carie McCoy.
A New Approach to Protecting Water Quality in Gallatin County through Better Site Design Tammy Crone, Water Quality Specialist.
19-Aug-2003MWMC presentation to NWQMC1 Long Term Ground Water Level Monitoring Integrated Hydrologic Monitoring 2003 Annual Conference.
U.S. EPA: NCEA/Global Change Research Program Glenn E. Moglen University of Maryland November 12, 2002 Changing Climate and Land Use in the Mid-Atlantic:
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
RACC High School Training June 26, 2012 Jody Stryker University of Vermont Introduction to Watershed Hydrology.
Comprehensive Thinking and Planning
EVALUATING STREAM COMPENSATION PERFORMANCE: Overcoming the Data Deficit Through Standardized Study Design Kenton L. Sena (EPA VSFS Intern), Joe Morgan,
October 26, 2016 Amanda Gumbert Extension Water Quality Specialist
Watersheds and Hydrology
Physical Characteristics of streams
Liana Prudencio and Sarah E. Null
Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 5.1 and 5.2
Henrico County Stream Assessment / Watershed Management Program
Michael, B. D. , Trice, T. M. , Heyer, C. J. , Stankelis, R. M
Water Testing Project for the North Fork River
Anne Arundel County Maryland
Department of Geology and Geological Engineering
Napa County Resource Conservation District
City of Ithaca Local Flood Hazard Analysis
Reducing Stormwater with Trees and Native Plants
Estimated Available Nutrient Credits
Building a Community of Stewardship Through Water Monitoring
Presentation transcript:

Collaborative Science and Technology Network for Sustainability Progress Review Workshop October 18-19, 2005 Washington DC Ecological Sustainability in Rapidly Urbanizing Watersheds: Evaluating Strategies Designed to Mitigate Impacts on Ecological Sustainability in Rapidly Urbanizing Watersheds: Evaluating Strategies Designed to Mitigate Impacts on Stream Ecosystems Meosotis Curtis, Montgomery County Department of Environmental Protection Laura Craig, University of Maryland-College Park Lead Principal Investigator: Margaret Palmer, University of Maryland-College Park Co-Principal Investigators: Amy Hennessey, Kevin Kelly, Keith Van NessAmy HennesseyKevin KellyKeith Van Ness

Background October 052 The Palmer Lab Montgomery County Department of Environmental Protection ESA, Inc. USGS-Water Resources Division EPA Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center Collaborators

Background October 053 Project Goals Determine environmental responses as urbanization occurs –off channel (groundwater) –in-channel (surface water and streambed) –below channel (hyporheic) Evaluate long-term effectiveness of stormwater management technologies –in mitigating impacts from urbanization –sustaining structure and function of headwater streams

Background October 054 MD 2000 Stormwater Management Design Manual Unified Sizing Criteria –Water Quality Volume –Recharge Volume –Channel Protection Volume –Overbank Flood Protection –Extreme Flood Protection Include credits for innovative site planning –non-structural practices –site design techniques sand filter bioretention

Background October 055 MD Stormwater Design Manual Monitoring Large Jurisdictions * Required in Permit Anne Arundel Baltimore City Baltimore County Montgomery County Prince George's County Stream Cross-Sections* Stream Profiles* Bank Erodibility Hazard Index Pebble Counts Water Chemistry Suite Bank and channel sediment Water Quality Parameters Biological Habitat Discharge Groundwater Recharge Continuous Temperature Control Site

Background October 056 Benthic MacroInvertebrates Positive Control-no development 3 Test Areas-MD 2000 SWM Manual Negative Control-prior SWM Manual

Background October 057 Preliminary Results- Preliminary Results-- comparing rainfall to runoff positive control test area

Background October Positive Control Area 2 (Soper’s Branch) Cross Section 1 - Facing Upstream in Years 2003 and 2004

Background October 059 Stream ecosystem function How does nutrient processing differ across watersheds? How does metabolism (GPP, CR & NDM) differ across watersheds? Measure nutrient uptake using short- term solute injections Measure GPP, CR and NDM using whole-stream methods

Background October 0510 Stream ecosystem structure How does water quality differ across watersheds? How does the availability of organic matter differ across watersheds? How do substrate characteristics differ across watersheds? Survey of structural metrics

Background October 0511 Identifying mechanisms that contribute to differences in structure and function How does GW-SW exchange differ across watersheds? How does groundwater quality differ across watersheds? Measure GW-SW exchange Measure streamside and hyporheic water quality

Background October 0512 How do streams draining watersheds being developed with new SWM strategies change over time?