Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Emily Shimada, Environmental Science, University of Idaho Research Team B: Watershed Management in the Andean Paramo Faculty Advisors: Dr. Alex Fremier,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Emily Shimada, Environmental Science, University of Idaho Research Team B: Watershed Management in the Andean Paramo Faculty Advisors: Dr. Alex Fremier,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Emily Shimada, Environmental Science, University of Idaho Research Team B: Watershed Management in the Andean Paramo Faculty Advisors: Dr. Alex Fremier, Department of Fish & Wildlife Resources, University of Idaho Carlos Iñiguez A. Instituto de Ecología Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja

2 Introduction: Sediment in Fluvial Environments Bedload (D>1mm) Suspended load (D<0.05mm) Wash load (D<0.0063mm) NameDiameter (mm) Boulders Cobbles Gravel Sand Silt Clay >256 64-256 2-64 0.062-2.004-.062 <0.004 Texture Classification

3 Introduction: Cause & Effect of Increased Fluvial Sediment SourceImpact NaturalAnthropogenicCourse grain/ BedloadFine grain/ Suspended load Climate Vegetation Topography Geology & soil Tectonics Base level Surface erodibility Time/history Mining Agriculture Deforestation Urbanization Dams Traffic/Roads/Construct ion Grazing Increased water level Flooding potential Alterations in channel dimensions Alterations in the stream substrates Alterations in aquatic organism habitat Increased flow viscosity & reduced settling velocity - >increase transport grain size & bedload Reduced depth for sunlight penetration ->hinders photosynthesis

4 Background: Tropical Mountain Stream Ecosystems SourceImpact NaturalAnthropogenicMining Course sedient build up-> increases channel bed elevation (decreasing flow) Decreased aquatic biological activity Steep topography Tropical Climate High rainfall Abundant vegetation Land use management Mining activities

5 Research Objectives 1. What is the observed grain size distribution in: Streams considered “un-impacted” from human land use activities (mining) Impacted stream Above & Below sites with changes in land use 2. What is the predicted grain size distribution based on measurable stream dimensions in: Streams considered “un-impacted” from human land use activities (mining) Impacted stream- Above & Below sites with changes in land use 3. Is there a relationship between: Observed & predicted D50 in different streams and stream reaches Land use gradient & observed grain size distribution Physical stream properties & ecological functioning of the stream? Study Site

6 Site Selection Impacted & un-impacted Above & Below areas of distinct land use differences (mining) Establish sites at the Stream Reach scale Length = approx. 10X Width Relatively uniform slope, dimensions, velocity Methods: 1) Field Work Sediment Property Measurements Pebble Count  Median Grain Size (D 50 ) Wet Sieving  Median Grain Size (D 50 ) For sediment diameters 1mm & 2mm 64mm 1mm General Stream Measurements Velocity Cross-sectional Area Wetted Perimeter Turbidity Slope Depth Bankfull width

7 Methods: 2) Analytical Work 1) Predicted grain size distribution: D 50 that moves at observed flow D 50 that moves at bankfull flow  bf =  gRS Additional Measurements Discharge Q=VA Turbidity Manning’s roughness Initiation of Motion 2) Establish relationship between predicted & observed D 50 : Between & within un-impacted stream reaches Between & within impacted stream reaches (above and below land use site) 3) Compare grain size distribution between impacted & un-impacted streams Is there a clear correlation of grain size distribution to land use gradient? Is there an ecological impact?  G =  gRS (shear stress)  

8 Relevance & Connection Physical Impact of current land uses Bio-indicator Framework Current watershed uses & policies Cultural & political Perceptions of watershed use & resulting impacts Is there an observed ecological impact? What is the relationship between land use and ecological impact? What needs to be done? Is there an interest and/or agenda for watershed protection? What can be done at the local & international level order to accommodate cultural values and stakeholders’ interests, while promoting sustainable land use practices and policies? Watershed use & policy jurisdiction (stakeholders) Societal/Political affect on watershed use & the ecosystem

9 Thanks & References Images: http://www.amazonrainforestnews.com/2011_04_01_archive.htmlhttp://www.amazonrainforestnews.com/2011_04_01_archive.html http://www.nativerevegetation.org/learn/manual/ch_5.aspx http://www.amazonconservation.org/news/newsletter/0812/index.html http://www.uwsp.edu/geo/faculty/lemke/geomorphology/lectures/03_stream_sediment.html


Download ppt "Emily Shimada, Environmental Science, University of Idaho Research Team B: Watershed Management in the Andean Paramo Faculty Advisors: Dr. Alex Fremier,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google