No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Track Performance Division of Performance Accountability.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NYC Teacher Data Initiative: An introduction for Teachers ESO Focus on Professional Development December 2008.
Advertisements

Future Ready Schools ABCs/AYP Background Briefing August 23, 2007 Lou Fabrizio, Ph.D. Director of Accountability Services NC Department of Public.
Newark Kids Count 2011 A City Profile of Child Well-Being Advocates for Children of New Jersey 35 Halsey Street Newark, NJ
Federal NCLB Regulations
Student Performance Overview of State Performance Plan Indicators 3 – State Assessment Performance, 7 – Early Childhood Outcomes.
1 SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY IN DELAWARE July 31, 2009 For the School Year.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress Report July 22, 2009.
Safe Harbor A Method of Calculating AYP October 15, 2008 Information for this presentation are adapted from CDDRE (2008) handouts. Title I 2008 OBJECTIVES.
Closing the Achievement Gap Using Safe Harbor To Target Students Not Making AYP October 23, 2008 Information for this presentation are adapted from CDDRE.
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress January 2008, Updated.
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress February 2007, Updated.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress 2005 Status Report Research, Assessment & Accountability November 2, 2005 Oakland Unified School District.
1 School Grades and Adequate Yearly Progress 2004 and Beyond.
1 School Grades and Adequate Yearly Progress Changes 2005 and Beyond.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
Annual Progress Report Submitted to The Iowa Department of Education by the Cedar Rapids Community School District.
MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL May 2012 CST Data Presentation.
CELEBRATE OUR SUCCESS! School Year 1 st Year of Transformation.
SPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY Title I For additional information contact the school at
Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.
No Child Left Behind The reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), also known as the “No Child Left Behind Act,” will have.
Middle School 8 period day. Rationale Low performing academic scores on Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) - specifically in mathematics.
School Improvement Advisory Committee October 15, 2008 Welcome!
Title I School Improvement in North Carolina. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) determines if a Title I school goes into Title I School Improvement.
Massachusetts School and District Accountability System 2003 Mid-Cycle AYP Determinations State Report December 4, 2003.
AYP: Making Adequate Yearly Progress in Washington State Spring 2012.
Contents: Module 2 The Needs Assessment Needs Assessment Drives the Plan Needs Assessment Drives the Plan Data to be Analyzed Data to be Analyzed How to.
Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.
Assessing Student Growth to Foster School Excellence Coalition for Psychology in Schools and Education Education Leadership Conference American Psychological.
School Grades Model and Historical Background
Columbus Tustin Middle School 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
North Santiam School District State Report Cards
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Pitt County Schools Testing & Accountability The ABC’s of Public Education.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
1 Utah Performance Assessment System for Students U-PASS Accountability Plan Judy W. Park Assessment & Accountability Director Utah State Office of Education.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Board Presentation March 25, 2008.
Flexibility in Determining AYP for Students with Disabilities Background Information—Slides 2—4 School Eligibility Criteria—Slide 5 Calculation of the.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
1 Prepared by: Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly Progress.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress Fresno Unified School District 2005 Data Review.
SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.
1 Putting It All Together Training August 18, 2009 School Name (and motto or theme) ODMS PD SIP.
Know the Rules Nancy E. Brito, NBCT, Accountability Specialist Department of Educational Data Warehouse, Accountability, and School Improvement
AYP Prediction By Diagnostics in the Educational Data Warehouse.
Annual Student Performance Report October Overview NCLB requirements related to AYP 2012 ISAT performance and AYP status Next steps.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
1 School Grades and AYP for New Accountability Coordinators.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Special Populations Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 1 ABCs/AYP Background Briefing Lou Fabrizio Director.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
2012 Accountability Progress Report (APR) Office of Accountability October 23, 2012.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Online Data Workshop SIP Office of Curriculum and Instruction Office of School Improvement.
Presentation transcript:

No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Track Performance Division of Performance Accountability

Purpose Review current AYP Rules and Calculations AYP and EDW AYP and Formative Assessment through The Princeton Review

 All public schools, including Charter Schools Alternative Schools What schools are included in AYP?

Total Race/Ethnic Groups  White (W)  Black (B)  Hispanic (H)  Asian (A)  American Indian (I) What are the groups?

Economically Disadvantaged English Language Learners (ELL) Students with Disabilities (SWD) What are the groups?

Economically Disadvantaged  Eligible for Free or Reduced-Price Lunch What are the groups?

English Language Learners (ELL)  LY (currently active in program) and  LF (up to 2 years monitoring after exit from program) What are the groups?

Students With Disabilities  Students with exceptionality other than gifted What are the groups?

 Greater than or equal to 30 and at least 15% of total school population or  At least 100 students in the subgroup count How many students are needed to calculate a groups proficiency?

95% What is the Participation Rate Target? S tudents in Survey 3 (February )

What is the proficiency rate target? Year Reading % Proficient Mathematics % Proficient was now Students in Survey 2 (October) and Survey 3 (February)

What is the writing proficiency rate target? All groups  At least 90% of students earn a score of 3.0 points or greater or 1% improvement from previous year

What is the graduation rate target? High Schools only  85% or greater or 1% improvement from previous year

 All students Students with FCAT scores or Alternate Assessments (SWD only) What students are included in AYP?

What is considered proficient? FCAT & FAAR FCAT Reading and Math FCAT Writing FAAR Achievement Levels Level 3 and above Score 3 and above Level 3 and above

 School Grade  Participation Rate  Graduation Rate  Proficiency in  Writing  Reading  Mathematics  Safe Harbor  Growth Model What are the components of the AYP Calculation?

School Grade Proficiency Target in both Reading and Math Participation Rate What are the components of the AYP Calculation? Writing & Graduation (HS) Criteria

Did each group not proficient meet Safe Harbor? Safe Harbor Did each group not meeting Safe Harbor meet the Growth Model? Growth Model Did the school meet the Writing & Graduation Criteria? Writing & Graduation (HS) Criteria Did each group meet Proficiency Target in both Reading and Math? Proficiency Target in both Reading and Math Did the school test 95% of every group? Participation Rate Did the school receive a D or F? School Grade AYP NOT MADE! MADE AYP! AYP NOT MADE! NO YES W&GW&G Did each group meet the Writing & Graduation Criteria? What are the components of the AYP Calculation? AYP NOT MADE! NO

Percent Tested and Proficiency Levels How does it work?

Percent Tested and Proficiency Levels A school or school district makes AYP if 95% of each group is tested, and if each group meets the proficiency targets in reading and mathematics, and if the school-wide writing percent proficient and graduation rate increases.*

AYP Report

FY2007 Data with FY2007 Criteria Pct Tsted

FY2007 Data with FY2007 Criteria Pct Prof.

FY2007 Data with FY2007 Criteria Writing

AYP What I know? What I want to know? What I learned? % Tested & Proficiency Levels 1. Background 2.3.? Safe Harbor 4.?5. ?6. Growth Model

SAFE HARBOR How does it work?

Safe Harbor Safe Harbor If group does not meet the proficiency target, but the % in group below proficiency target reduced by at least 10% from previous year, and group makes progress in writing proficiency and graduation rate.*

FY2007 Data with FY2007 Criteria < Grd Lvl: R Safe Harbor

FY2007 Data with FY2007 Criteria < Grd Lvl: M Safe Harbor

10% of 63 = 763-7= 56 Safe Harbor Reading 10% of 66 = 7 10% of 56 = 656-6= = 59 You try next three

10% of 63 = 763-7= 56 Safe Harbor Reading 10% of 66 = 7 10% of 62 = 7 10% of 56 = 6 10% of 81 = 9 10% of 56 = 656-6= = = = = 59

10% of 57 = 657-6= 51 10% of 53 = 653-6= 47 10% of 64 = 764-7= 57 Safe Harbor Math

Calculating FY2008 Safe Harbor % Below GroupFY2007FY2008 Total43? White Black47? Hispanic39? Asian Am. Ind. ED44? ELL45? SWD60?

Calculating FY2008 Safe Harbor % Below GroupFY2007FY2008 Total43? White Black47? Hispanic39? Asian Am. Ind. ED44? ELL45? SWD60? 38 10% of 43 = 5; 43-5=

Calculating FY2008 Safe Harbor % Below % Proficient GroupFY2007FY2008 Total White Black Hispanic Asian Am. Ind. ED ELL SWD605446

AYP What I know? What I want to know? What I learned? % Tested & Proficiency Levels Safe Harbor ? Growth Model 7. ?8. ?9.

GROWTH MODEL How does it work?

GROWTH MODEL If any group does not meet the proficiency and safe harbor requirements, the percentage of students in that group who are on track to be proficient within three years meet criteria in reading and math, and that group must also make progress in writing proficiency and graduation rate.*

Grades 4-10  Students in Survey 2 (October) and Survey 3 (February)  Students with prior year FCAT DSS Grade 3  Students in Survey 2 (October) and Survey 3 (February)  First Time (no DSS available)  Retained GROWTH MODEL Who is included in the GROWTH MODEL ?

Proficiency within 3 years GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

FY 2007 Current Grade

DSS from FY 2006 (previous year) Base score for trajectory GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

Count three years from FY2006 (Base Score) GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

Determine the Proficiency Target GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

Subtract Proficiency Target from Base Score GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

Divide difference By 3 GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

285/3 = 95 Divide difference by 3 GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

+ 95 = 1525 GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined? Determine Trajectory

+ 95 = 1620 Year 1 DSS + 95 = 1525 GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

Determine Trajectory GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined? Year 1 DSS + 95 = 1620

Determine Trajectory Year 2 DSS GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined? Year 1 DSS + 95 = 1620

Determine Trajectory + 95 =1715 GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined? Year 2 DSS Year 1 DSS

Determine Trajectory Year 3 DSS GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined? + 95 =1715 Year 2 DSS Year 1 DSS

Trajectory Set GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

FY07 Year 1 – Student 1 On track: YES

Current Grade 5 Student 2

FY07 Year 1 – Student 2 On track: NO

FY08 Year 2 – Student 2 On track: NO

FY08 Year 3 – Student 2 On track: YES

Current Grade 6 Level 3 Student

Trajectory Set GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

Current Grade 3 First Time Proficient: YES Non-proficient: NO

Current Grade 3 Retained

Current Grade 3 Retained Student 3rd rd th th 2009 Current Grade

Current Grade 3 Retained Student 3rd rd th th 2009 Current Grade DSS from FY 2006 (previous year) Base score for trajectory

Current Grade 3 Retained Student 3rd rd th th 2009 Current Grade Proficiency Target Based on Grade 6 Level 3 DSS

Current Grade 3 Retained Student 3rd rd th th 2009 Current Grade Trajectory Set

Current Grade 8 Level 5 Student

Proficient: YES On track: YES Current Grade 8 Level 5 Student - Year 3

Current Grade Grade Used As The Basis For Trajectory Grade Used As Target For Proficiency Years in Trajectory Percent Of Difference Closed Per year % % % % GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

Current Grade Grade Used As The Basis For Trajectory Grade Used As Target For Proficiency Years in Trajectory Percent Of Difference Closed Per year % % % % GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

Current Grade Grade Used As The Basis For Trajectory Grade Used As Target For Proficiency Years in Trajectory Percent Of Difference Closed Per year % % % % GROWTH MODEL How is the GROWTH MODEL trajectory determined?

Improving an achievement level maintaining a proficient level from the prior year: i.e.,  3 to 3  4 to 4  5 to 5 How is the growth of SWD students with FAAR scores determined? ?

GROWTH How is a School’s GROWTH percent calculated? 100Students are in survey 2 and 3 and have prior DSS scores 50Students met growth criteria 50%School’s Growth Percent

What is the proficiency rate target? Year Reading % Proficient Mathematics % Proficient School was now

 Greater than or equal to 30 and at least 15% of total school population or  At least 100 students in the subgroup count GROWTH How many students are needed to calculate a School’s GROWTH percent?

FY2007 Data with FY2007 Criteria < Grw R Grw Model

FY2007 Data with FY2007 Criteria < Grw M

*AYP Rules at Bottom of Report AYP Writing and Graduation Rules & Reporting Rules % Tested & Proficiency Levels Safe Harbor Growth Model

AYP What I know? What I want to know? What I learned? % Tested & Proficiency Levels Safe Harbor Growth Model ?

Review of your AYP Report