Kat and Cai What to do about clash?. What is clash? Clash is vital to debate. Why? Interact with the other team Simply put, clash is pointing out the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Basics of Logical Argument Two Kinds of Argument The Deductive argument: true premises guarantee a true conclusion. e.g. All men are mortal. Socrates.
Advertisements

Argumentation.
Passage Based Reading for the Sat
1st Proposition Speech 1.Statement of the Resolution 2.Definition of Essential Terms (should be clear to the average person) 3.Outline Arguments/Pillars.
With examples from Number Theory
STRUCTURES & STRATAGIES PRINCIPLES OF PLACE
H OW TO R EBUT The Key to Success. R OADMAPPING AND S IGN -P OSTING Roadmapping is the act of telling the order of your speech before you give it. Sign-Posting.
 Cross Examination SCFI 2011 SJK. Why is CX Important?  Clarification  Concessions  Control.
An Introduction to Persuasion and Argument
Rebuttals.
Staying with ‘NO’ Max C. Steckling. We Know It’s Hard!  Hard being heard and respected when saying ‘ no ’.  It damages relationships.  Its not hard.
TOPICALITY Where debate begins.
 You will be given an old argument prompt from an AP exam.  You will need to come up with a thesis statement that fits the prompt.  You will need to.
Briefing for Judges.
Formulating a Thesis Thesis = the ultimate goal of the focusing process Main point Theme Position Central idea Perspective Hypothesis Argument Claim Conclusion.
Argumentative Essay. What is an Argumentative essay? An argumentative essay is an essay in which we agree or disagree with an issue, using reasons to.
Mock Trial Procedures You and the Law. There are 2 sides: Prosecution Prosecution Responsible for proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused committed.
The Value/Criterion Debate and Voters. Aaron Overheim.
Moral Relativism, Cultural Differences and Bioethics Prof. Eric Barnes.
Writing an Argumentative Paragraph
Rebuttal Workshop Good Shepherd Debating. Rebuttal To illustrate this point, it is a useful to think of a team case as a large tree. The overall proposition.
Lincoln-Douglas Debate An Examination of Values. OBJECTIVES: The student will 1. Demonstrate understanding of the concepts that underlie Lincoln-Douglas.
Inductive Reasoning The role of argument forms in evaluating probabilities.
Part 3 – REFUTING OPPOSING ARGUMENTS.  Before you start writing an argumentative essay, I strongly suggest you to prepare an outline and first, write.
Debate Terms 1. Proposition – a statement of the issue to be debated
Revising Introductions and Body Paragraphs
Arguments The basics and beyond…. The the form of an argument A B A B In words: If A then B, A is true, Therefore B is true…
Logical Fallacies. Syllogism (not a fallacy) A logical argument presented in terms of two statements and a conclusion which must be true if the two statements.
An Introduction to Persuasion and Argument Writing Moving people to a belief, position, or course of action.
DEBATESDEBATES. Debates develop the skills of research analysis reasoning effective communicatio n expressing and defending the opinions.
Test Taking Strategies Types of Tests. 2 Before Taking Any Test read the question carefully try to answer the question before looking at the given answers.
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF THE SPEECHES
Writing an Argument The Argumentative Research Project This presentation was created following the Fair Use Guidelines for Educational Multimedia. Certain.
Critical Analysis Key ideas to remember. What's the Point? Here are some questions you can ask yourself to help you analyze: So what? How is this significant?
Persuasive Writing.
3.OPPONENTS ATTACKING FORMATION 4. OPPONENTS DEFENDING FORMATION TEAM TASK: a) In boxes 1 and 2, draw your attacking and defending formations. b) Play.
Speech Unit III: Intro to Debate!
FORMAT (RULES AND PROCEDURES) OMS INSIGHTS Parliamentary Debate.
Lincoln-Douglas Debate RefutationRefutation. Step One: Briefly restate your opponent’s argument. The purpose of restating is to provide geographic marker.
LINCOLN DOUGLAS DEBATE. Table of Contents  What is it  LD Debate Structure  Terms to Know  Constructive Arguments  Affirmative  Negative  Cross.
Week 14.  Tuesday:  Five 2-on-2 debates (20Ss)  Wednesday:  Three 2-on-2 debates (12Ss)  Grading:  First speakers: 1 st constructive (intro), 1.
Module 2.2.  Learn the importance of using probing questions during the tutoring session.
The First Negative Constructive. Steps 1.Introduction 2.Address Definitions 3.Rebut the Aff Contentions 4.Outline Neg Contentions 5.Summation.
Position Paper Writing about The Heart of Darkness.
Debate Ch. 18 Group One.
Our life will make more sense We will discover the truth We will avoid being lied to or used by others.
Introduction to Debating. What Is Debating? A debate is when two teams present opposite sides of an issue before judges.
Warm up - Getting started! In groups of 3 or 4, freeze frame a moment from a rite of passage, for the rest of the class to guess, e-refs for the best examples.
1 DEBATES SPEECH ADJUDICATION Adopted by rs from NoorAlbar/English/04/09.
IV. Argument 4.1 Introduction to Argument. Arguing a position on a controversial issue Argument isn’t like fighting with your roommate. fighting with.
Argumentative Essay with a Counterargument. Argumentative Essay  Your Salem Witch essay is a one-sided argument  Your thesis statement answers the question:
A presentation by: Kenneth Joe Galloway CEO - Knowledge, Growth & Support, Ltd.
WHY!? Sponsored by:. Recap 4 teams of 2 people, with 2 teams in favour of each side 4 teams of 2 people, with 2 teams in favour of each side 15 minutes.
Its about the plan – advantages/disadvantages/solving a problem Example: Resolved: The United States Federal Government should substantially increase.
Tips for being effective in Parliamentary Debate By Jim Hanson and Diana Thompson Courtesy of West Coast Debate.
Introduction to Argument Writing. Introduction Argument: Argument: is persuasive is persuasive has a strong thesis has a strong thesis includes support.
Standing up for the SQUO
Argument.
LD Debate Study Information
Argumentation MS.Maisoon Dorra
Points of information.
Debate prep class Date: Warm-up: clearly label your speeches and swap
Debate Terms 1. Proposition – a statement of the issue to be debated
Argumentative Writing
Thinking like a Policy Debater
FCAT Science Standard Arianna Medina.
Four Debate Characteristics
Interpretation Interprets the evidence and how it supports your claim (explains why and how the evidence proves the claim) A reasonable interpretation.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

Kat and Cai What to do about clash?

What is clash? Clash is vital to debate. Why? Interact with the other team Simply put, clash is pointing out the differences between your arguments and your opposition’s arguments Basically it is your offensive tactic Better to stumble a bit on your clash, then have no clash at all

What to clash? You trying to convince to your judge’s that you’re right and you have to prove why your opponents are wrong Clash with every MAJOR notion, assertion (statement without reason), argument, example and statistic or anything else that will bring the other team down Don’t judge your opponents, it’s not your role to inform the judges that they went over their time or that they were stuttering You’re pointing out flaws with their case

Clashing with Themes Easy way – target the main idea in their opposition’s case Don’t make the mistake of clashing with one sentence of your opposition’s case that they have called their theme More experienced, identify and attack the ideas that are the pillars of their case and refer their to your opposition’s theme while doing this

Clashing with Themes cont. Simple Approach “The main problem with our opposition’s case is their theme, which states [X]. This theme is wrong because....” Difficult Approach “The main problem with our opposition’s case is their assumption that [Y]. This assumption is vital to the oppositions’ case. For example their theme stated [X]. Now, the assumption is not true...”

Clashing Examples and Statistics Examples and statistics by themselves prove nothing. You do need to constantly consider and discuss their relevance and context in the debate round. In simple terms, it can be effective to clash with an example or statistic, if you show how your opposition’s case was reliant on that material. Be careful about trying to take a machine gun to all their examples and making the debate ‘argument by example’ where the debate becomes all about examples and statistics instead of principles and arguments.

“If our opposition has managed to attack one of our arguments, should we let this act stand?”

YES just kidding, no.

Clashing with Clash You should always answer the opposition’s attack. Defence of your case is important BUT, the goal of your clash is to ultimately attack your opponent’s case It’s important to spend time to clash with some of their clash, but don’t waste too much time getting defensive Be careful and don’t clash with the fact that they clash but defend your own constructive arguments.

Conclusions Premise Paradigm Conclusions: A and B are true, but do not lead to C Premises : A and/or B are false Paradigm: Even if A and B led to C, NONE OF THESE ARE GOOD.