Efficient Shipping with Low Emissions Bengt Ramne, ScandiNAOS AB EffShip Bengt Ramne, ScandiNAOS AB, Technical project manager EffShip Set the scene Explain the background Research and development project Vinnova 2015 the conditions for shipping will change considerably 10 Partners Develop products and systems to make shipping more efficient with lower Emissions - - - - - - - - - Förklara bakgrunden 2015 förustättingarna frör sjöfarten Efficient Shipping with Low Emissions Bengt Ramne, ScandiNAOS AB test

EffShip – Efficient Shipping with low emissions The EffShip project is a research and development project partly funded by Vinnova in their program for “Environment innovations”. The projected started in December 2009 and runs for 40 months until March 2013.  The EffShip project is based on the vision of a sustainable and successful maritime transport industry – one which is energy efficient and has minimal environmental impacts One of the main objectives of the project is to identify the best and most effective way for the shipping industry to comply with the upcoming regulations regarding emissions Work packages WP1 Project Management WP2 Present and Future Maritime Fuels WP3 Exhaust Gas Cleaning WP4 Energy Efficiency and Heat Recovery WP5 Energy Transformers WP6 System Impact when Using Wind, Wave and Solar Energy WP7 Logistic system analysis WP8 Demonstration of Findings WP9 Final Reporting, Dissemination and Future Projects test

EffShip – Efficient Shipping with low emissions Partners SSPA ScandiNAOS Wärtsilä S-MAN DEC Chalmers StoraEnso Göteborg Energi Svenska Orient Linjen Stena Rederi Funding Vinnova 60%, Partners 40% Duration Dec 2009 – March 2013 Work packages WP1 Project Management WP2 Present and Future Maritime Fuels WP3 Exhaust Gas Cleaning WP4 Energy Efficiency and Heat Recovery WP5 Energy Transformers WP6 System Impact when Using Wind, Wave and Solar Energy WP7 Logistic system analysis WP8 Demonstration of Findings WP9 Final Reporting, Dissemination and Future Projects test

EffShip – Work packages WP1 Project Management WP2 Present and Future Maritime Fuels WP3 Exhaust Gas Cleaning WP4 Energy Efficiency and Heat Recovery WP5 Energy Transformers WP6 System Impact when Using Wind, Wave and Solar Energy WP7 Logistic system analysis WP8 Demonstration of Findings WP9 Final Reporting, Dissemination and Future Projects

EffShip – WP2 Present and Future Maritime Fuels Fossile fuel Bio fuel Oil Gas test

Sulphur levels Marine fuel in SECA area Euro IV Euro V, City diesel 0.1% = 1000 ppm Euro IV Max 50 ppm Euro V, City diesel Max 10 ppm

Sulphur levels Presented by Sören Eriksson Preem at EffShip seminar 2010-11-16

EffShip – WP2 Present and Future Maritime Fuels HFO LSHFO ULSHFO MDO MGO LNG Biofuel DME Methanol Synthetic diesel Fossile fuel Bio fuel Oil Gas test

Where can we find alternatives to HFO?

EffShip – WP2 Present and Future Maritime Fuels LNG From natural gas Complicated distribution and storage system Methanol From natural gas, biomass, hydration of H2 and CO2 Conventional distribution and storage systems Similar fuel characteristics as LNG DME Similar storage and system distribution as LPG Better diesel fuel characteristics than methanol Gas to liquid, GTL Multiple fraction fuel More expensive to produce than methanol

EffShip – WP3 Exhaust Gas Cleaning SOx Acidification , acid rain NOx Contribute to smog and increased levels of ground-level ozone GHG Contributes to global warming SCR, selective catalytic cleaning HAM, humid air motor SAM, saturated air motor WETPAC EGR, exhaust gas recycling CGR, combustion air recycling Scrubber CSNOx test

EffShip – WP3 Emissions SCR, selective catalytic cleaning HAM, humid air motor SAM, saturated air motor WETPAC EGR, exhaust gas recycling CGR, combustion air recycling Scrubber CSNOx Data from Eyring et al. J Geophys Res 110 (2005) - Presented by Erik Fridell test

SO2 + 2NaOH -> Na2SO3 + H2O test

EffShip – WP4 Energy Efficiency and Heat Recovery Jacket water cooler 6.3% Heat radiation 0.6% Exhaust gas 25.4% Lube oil cooler 4.3% Air cooler 14.1% Fuel energy content 100% Insulation Heat exchangers Exhaust gas boilers Charge air and Scavenge air cooler Jacket water cooler Lube oil coolers Frequency control pumps and fans Low energy lightning Shaft power output 49.3% test

ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) EffShip – WP5 Energy Transformers Turbine Generator Condenser Evaporator EGB ORC 1 Thermal oil 500-1000 kW Air intake Turbine Generator Condenser Evaporator ORC 2 Jacket cooling out Jacket cooling in 250-500 kW Compressed air Air cooling HT out Air cooling HT in ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) LO COOLER LO cool LO cool Compressed and cooled air Air cooling LT out 10 MW Air cooling LT in Lube oil Central cooler

För avsikt att installera ombord på lämligt fartyg test

50-80% av kontiuerliga elbehovet test

EffShip – WP6 System Impact when Using Wind, Wave and Solar Energy Vind test

EffShip – WP6 System Impact when Using Wind, Wave and Solar Energy test

EffShip – WP6 System Impact when Using Wind, Wave and Solar Energy test

EffShip – WP7 Logistic system analysis Short sea Deep sea Roro Volumes Liner service – tramp Frequency Ship size Ship speed Route planning Contract size Contract conditions Demurrage Cargo handling speed Container Tank Bulk Systemanalys Jämföra de tekniska åtgärderna med systemopyimering Compare the technical measures versus system optimization test

EffShip – WP7 Order of relevance Logistic system Utilization of ship Selection of main parameters Capacity and speed Cargo handling Time in port, speed at sea Operation routines Speed profile, weather routing Hull shape Propeller size and propeller design Main engine selection Energy preservation and recovery Systemanalys Jämföra de tekniska åtgärderna med systemopyimering Compare the technical measures versus system optimization test

EffShip – WP8 Demonstration of Findings Findings from WP 2 to WP7 to be implemented in the design of 14 000 DWT Short sea roro 80 000 DWT Product tanker Platoforms to apply the developed technology Platformar för att applicerqa den utvecklade tekniken Very much work in the different work packages is dependant on the fuel test

EffShip Expected results Identification and quantification of the best alternatives to HFO operation Detailed knowledge of cost and complexity for the installation and retrofitting of the best alternatives for exhaust gas cleaning Detailed mapping of actual energy use and saving potential in short sea and deep sea shipping operation Detailed knowledge of cost and complexity for the installation and retrofitting of the and organic rankine cycle, ORC generator Conceptual design and performance prediction of most promising wind assistance system

EffShip Expected spin off projects The methanol alternative Large scale production for marine fuel Distribution system for marine fuel On board arrangement of tanks Methanol to DME reformation Development of an online process Methanol and DME operation Engine modifications Engine performance Small scale flexible intermodal LNG transport and distribution system development of prototypes SOx scrubber Installation of full scale prototype ORC generator Wind assistance system Conceptual design and performance prediction 1/5 scale prototype installation

EffShip EffShip projektet har som sin uttalade målsättning att konkret bidra till sjöfartens utveckling vad det gäller bästa möjliga energieffektivitet och minsta möjliga miljöpåverkan. Deltagarna i Effship: SSPA, ScandiNAOS, Wärtsilä, S-MAN, DEC, Chalmers Tekniska Högskola, StoraEnso, Göteborg Energi, Svenska Orient Linjen, Stena Rederi representerar de flesta sektorer inom sjöfarten. Bredden från design, akademi och underleverantörer via rederi till lastägare ger projektet en unik möjlighet att både ha helhetsperspektivet – bredden och detaljkompetensen – djupet, för att ta fram konkreta lösningar som för utvecklingen framåt.

Thank you Excited and Great expectations Managed to get together a number of very knowledgeable, interesting distinguished speakers Förväntansfull inför resten av dagen Välkomponerad talarlista med Unik möjligheten att få ta del av bränsleproblematiken från olika perspektiv test

Sulphur Svavel test

Emission control area (SECA + NECA) Europe test

Emission control area (SECA + NECA) Proposal for North America test

Global energy use 140 000 TWh

Global marine fuel oil consumption 4000 TWh or 330 000 000 ton 2.8% of global energy use 3.5% of global fosil fuel use 8.5% of global oil use Sources: www.bp.com JRC reference report Regulating Air Emissions from Ships, The State of the Art on Methodologies,Technologies and Policy Options IMO 2009 expert estimate

EffShip – WP5 Energy Transformers Steam turbine Turbo compound Organic Rankine Cycle, ORC Absorption chiller Generators Power take in, PTI Heat pumps Högsbo kraftvärme verk 3 naturgas dieslar 12MW el, 15 MW värme Organic rankine cycle test

Marine fuel consumption, bio fuel production StoraEnso marine transport system 8 vessels 100 000 ton HFO per year, 1.2 TWh Total biofuel production in Sweden 2008 4.4 TWh Gothenburg Biomass Gasification Project, GoBiGas Planned production 2020 - 1TWh Målet är att Sverige år 2030 ska ha en fordonsflotta som är oberoende av fossila bränslen.

EffShip – Energy Efficiency and Heat Recovery PDF DWG