New Jersey’s Approach to Using Volunteer Monitoring Data by Danielle Donkersloot Volunteer Monitoring Coordinator NJDEP Division of Watershed Management.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Invasive Species as a Trilateral Challenge Preventing the Introduction and Spread of Aquatic Invasives Species in North America Commission for Environmental.
Advertisements

Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish- Wit Watershed Assessment and Restoration Plan Now A Regional Support Program Sponsored by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal.
Water Monitoring and Assessment Alfred L. Korndoerfer Jr., Chief Bureau of Freshwater & Biological Monitoring Water Monitoring and Standards NJDEP Presented.
Marylands Approach to Success Stories Presented to the Region III States Meeting May 12, 2009 Presented by Jim George.
Summary of Aquatic Programs Administered by the WV Division of Natural Resources Dan Cincotta WVDNR P. O. Box 67 Elkins, WV
Motivation for the Forum Coordination Tri-State Partnership (on-going cooperation) Tri-State Partnership (on-going cooperation) Corps Watershed Plan Corps.
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
Division of State Lands’ Wetlands Program. Issues That Spawned State Wetlands Program (SB 3) Lack of detailed wetlands inventory information or guidance.
Integrated State-Federal Partnership for Aquatic Resource Monitoring in the United States Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen USEPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division.
James Beckley. Virginia and DEQ Virginia has > 52,255 miles of rivers and streams 116,364 acres of significant lakes and reservoirs 2,684 square miles.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Utah’s Blue Ribbon Fisheries An overview Craig Walker Special Projects Coordinator Utah Division of Wildlife Resources.
Laying the Ground Work. Successful Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Programs are…. Well organized Well organized Sound scientific basis Sound scientific.
NJ Watershed Watch Network Department of Environmental Protection Danielle Donkersloot Volunteer Monitoring Program Coordinator EPA Quality Conference.
Mattabesset River Watershed Management Plan Julie Foley.
The Paso del Norte Watershed Council Promoting ecosystem health and economic sustainability in the Paso del Norte Watershed.
1 National Hydrography Dataset Applications Overview Symposium on Terrain Analysis for Water Resources Applications Austin, Texas December 16, 2002.
Watershed Watch Network NJ Department of Environmental Protection Danielle Donkersloot Volunteer Monitoring Coordinator.
California’s Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program SWAMP Today Emilie L. Reyes November 29, 2007.
1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee Building the scientific foundation for sound environmental decisions U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office.
New England is one of 10 regions making up the 406 National Water Program, “A partnership of USDA CSREES and the Land Grant System”
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment National Water Quality Monitoring Council Meeting August 20, 2003.
Region III Activities to Implement National Vision to Improve Water Quality Monitoring National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.
Todd Ambs Water Division Administrator, WDNR October 26, 2009 Sustaining the Water Belt of North America.
Currents of Change Workshop Currents of Change Environmental Status & Trends of the Narragansett Bay Region May 1, 2009.
Support of the Framework for Monitoring Office of Management and Budget March 26, 2003.
The Regional Environmental Centre Centrul Regional de Mediu Save Our Streams in MOLDOVA Victor Cotruta REC Moldova.
1 Proposed Adoption of Biological and Toxicological Water Quality Data Elements and WQDE Guide LeAnne Astin Interstate Commission on the Potomac River.
Communication is Key to Sustaining Long-Term Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Programs Jacob Daniel Apodaca Colorado River Watch Network.
ESIP Federation Air Quality Cluster Partner Agencies.
ESIP Federation Air Quality Cluster Partner Agencies.
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
1 EPA Regulatory Authority and PPCPs Octavia Conerly Health and Ecological Criteria Division Office of Water Office of Water October 26, 2005 October 26,
Getting Started in Volunteer Monitoring: Overview USDA-CSREES Southern Region Conference Lexington, Kentucky October 2005 Linda Green USDA-CSREES Volunteer.
Who We Are What I Do Great Lakes Commission. Great Lakes Basin.
A Framework for Monitoring March 26, Mission: Provide a national forum to coordinate consistent and scientifically defensible methods and strategies.
An Overview of Quality Assurance Project Plans Kuskokwim Watershed Council Water Quality Training Workshop August 2007 Facilitated by Zender Environmental.
Increasing Momentum in the Formation of State and Regional Monitoring Councils Linda Green, co-chair, Collaboration and Outreach Workgroup, National Water.
Starting and Sustaining a Volunteer Watershed Monitoring Program.
Florida Keys Water Watch
Qikiqtani Inuit Association Nunavut Water Board Technical Meeting and Pre-Hearing Conference January 16 th and 17 th, 2013.
1 An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century. 2 The U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy 16-member, independent, bi- partisan group 26 scientific advisors 16.
Kitsap County Department of Community Development Updating Kitsap County’s Shoreline Master Program (SMP) – process overview, public outreach, involvement.
1 Linda Green University of RI Cooperative Extension CSREES Volunteer Water Quality National Facilitation Project Danielle Donkersloot New Jersey Watershed.
ECOS Information Session Draft EPA Quality Documents February 13, 2013 Presented by EPA Quality Staff, Office of Environmental Information For meeting.
Integrating a Continuous Water Quality Monitoring Network into Texas’ Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program Jill D. Csekitz, Aquatic Scientist Texas.
Stream Health Outcome Biennial Workplan Neely L. Law, PhD Center for Watershed Protection Chesapeake Bay Program Sediment & Stream Coordinator Habitat.
Protecting Alabama’s Water Resources “It’s A Data Driven Process” Presented by: Chris Johnson Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) 2006.
A Tool to Evaluate the Health of Streams and Rivers within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman 1, Claire Buchanan 2, Adam Griggs 2, Andrea Nagel.
ORSANCO’s FY16 Technical Program. WQ Monitoring Programs Bimonthly & Clean Metals Sampling – Metals & traditional 15 mainstem, 14 tribs,
Water Quality Monitoring in Michigan, : A Decade of Program Evolution By: Gerald Saalfeld, MI Department of Environmental Quality.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
Department of Environmental Quality Coastal Habitat Protection Plan (CHPP) 2 Department of Environmental Quality Environmental Management Commission.
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Office of Subsistence Management Federal Subsistence Board January 12-13, 2016 Work Session.
DELAWARE NATIONAL ESTUARINE RESEARCH RESERVE Promoting stewardship of the nation’s coastal areas through science and education …
MRERP Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and Environmental Impact Statement One River ▪ One Vision A Component of the Missouri River Recovery Program.
New Ecological Science Advice for Ecosystem Protection The EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office supports three external scientific advisory committees.
Chesapeake Monitoring Cooperative
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment Mid-Atlantic States
Sean D. Rafferty Research Director and Associate Director
AmeriCorps NJ Watershed Ambassador Program
CMC: Who we are and how we can collaborate with the
Mulberry Watershed Management Plan
Program Manager, Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay
Environmental Management Commission Information Item January 8, 2015
Watershed Literacy & Engagement
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment Mid-Atlantic States
Presentation transcript:

New Jersey’s Approach to Using Volunteer Monitoring Data by Danielle Donkersloot Volunteer Monitoring Coordinator NJDEP Division of Watershed Management Education and Outreach Program

Summary: NJ overviewNJ overview EPA’s viewEPA’s view Changing the stereotypes of Volunteer Collected DataChanging the stereotypes of Volunteer Collected Data PartnershipsPartnerships TiersTiers Data Users/Data UsesData Users/Data Uses Addressing Quality AssuranceAddressing Quality Assurance Next StepsNext Steps

NJ Population NJ (2003) 8,638,396 7,417 square miles 1,134.4 persons per square mile Approximately 6,450 miles of rivers Approximately 243,000 acres of coastal or tidal wetlands Approximately, 24,000 acres of lakes, reservoirs, and ponds

Since 1988 EPA has encouraged States to use volunteer data collected by properly trained volunteersSince 1988 EPA has encouraged States to use volunteer data collected by properly trained volunteers

EPA Suggested Uses of Volunteer Data Ongoing monitoring of ecological conditionsOngoing monitoring of ecological conditions Identifying trends or changes in water quality Identifying trends or changes in water quality Aid scientists investigating problems such as nonpoint source pollution, & nutrient enrichment.Aid scientists investigating problems such as nonpoint source pollution, & nutrient enrichment.

EPA Suggested Uses of Volunteer Data, cont. To report nuisance algae bloomsTo report nuisance algae blooms Identification of fish and wildlife habitatsIdentification of fish and wildlife habitats Education and stewardship developmentEducation and stewardship development

The Start of the Watershed Watch Network

Myths of Using Volunteers Quality Assurance and Quality Control Volunteers have “hidden agendas” Volunteers are not scientists

Reality of Using Volunteers We need more data at a higher frequency of collection EPA has been encouraging in using volunteer collected data Volunteers want to do it right

Internal Advisory Committee  Fresh Water and Biological Monitoring  Division of Science and Research  Division of Watershed Mgt.  TMDL team  319 team  NPS team  Watershed Area Managers  Office of Quality Assurance

Watershed Watch Network Advisory Council  NGO, Volunteer Monitoring Program Coordinators  Office of Quality Assurance  Bureau of Fresh Water and Biological Monitoring  Meadowlands Environmental Research Ins.  Rutgers Co-op Extension  Delaware River Basis Commission  EPA Region 2  Others as needed

The Tiered Approach Allows for volunteers to pick their level of monitoring involvement based on:Allows for volunteers to pick their level of monitoring involvement based on: –Intended purpose for monitoring –Intended data use –Intended data users

Options for Involvement Tier A: Environmental EducationTier A: Environmental Education Tier B: StewardshipTier B: Stewardship Tier C: Community AssessmentTier C: Community Assessment Tier D: Indicators/Regulatory ResponseTier D: Indicators/Regulatory Response

Tier A: Environmental Education Data Users Participants Students Watershed residents Promote stewardship Raise their level of understanding of watershed ecology Low level of rigor, but use sound science Wide variety of study designs are acceptable Quality assurance (QA) optional Data UseQuality Needed

Tier B: Stewardship Participants Watershed residents Landowners Local decision makers (optional) Understanding of existing conditions and how any changes over time Screen for and identify problems and positive attributes Low to medium rigor Variety of study designs is acceptable Training Formal/Informal Internal QAPP recommended Data UserData Use Quality Needed

Tier C: Community &/or Watershed Assessment Local decision- makers Watershed association Environmental organizations Possibly DEP Assess current conditions Track trends Source track down of Nonpoint source pollution Medium/high level of rigor Data needs to reliably detect changes over time & space QAPP approved & on file w/ intended data user. Training required Data UsersData Use Quality Needed

Tier D: Indicators & Regulatory Response NJDEP Local decision- makers Watershed associations Environmental organizations Assess current conditions and impairments Supplement agency data collection Research Evaluate best management practices (BMP) measures Regulatory Response High level of rigor Study design & methods need to be equivalent & recognized by agencies using data Training required QAPP approved by Office of Quality Assurance & data user, annual recertification Possible audit Data Users Data Use Quality Needed

NJDEP Data Users Watershed Area ManagersWatershed Area Managers Water Assessment TeamWater Assessment Team Modeling TeamModeling Team NPS ProgramNPS Program 319 Program319 Program TMDL ProgramTMDL Program Other Programs or Divisions within the DEP in need of dataOther Programs or Divisions within the DEP in need of data

Potential Data Uses Education Problem Identification Local Decisions Research NPS Assessment Regulatory Response 303d & 305b Integrated Report Watershed Planning/Open Space acquisition Identification of “action now” projects Monitoring the success/failure of restoration projects

Addressing Data Quality Issues Quality Assurance criteria for each tierQuality Assurance criteria for each tier Coordinator & data users review the QAPP or study design of the monitoring groupCoordinator & data users review the QAPP or study design of the monitoring group Program specific training and supportProgram specific training and support Communication, communication, communicationCommunication, communication, communication

Next Steps The Tiers are a Living DocumentThe Tiers are a Living Document –Individual Volunteer Monitoring Projects will be Assigned to each Tier –Data users will be Assigned to each Tier –Criteria for Data Submission will be defined for each Tier

Next Steps Service Provider NetworkService Provider Network –Trainings and Workshops will be hosted throughout the State for groups and associations. Individual attention will be given to groups that would like to gear up to be classified in a Tier.Individual attention will be given to groups that would like to gear up to be classified in a Tier.

“The outstanding discovery of the 20 th century is not television, or radio, but rather the complexity of the land organism. Only those who know about it can appreciate how little we know about it…” Aldo Leopold, Round River