Department of Medicine Three Year Review Job Descriptions Job description should be defined when started in the Department of Medicine – last minute changes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Department of Medicine Three Year Review Workshop November 11, 2013 Frank L. Silver Joan Wither Co-Chairs, Three Year Review Joan Wither Co-Chair, Three.
Advertisements

Promotion and Tenure in Department of Family Medicine Faculty Development Workshop August 12, 2011.
1 Whats All This Fuss About Promotion & Tenure? Sandra Burge, Ph.D. Dept. Family & Community Medicine Sandra Burge, Ph.D. Dept. Family & Community Medicine.
Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
Appointments and Promotions Lynn M Schnapp Professor, Dept of Medicine University of Washington Thanks to Ginny Broudy, Brad Anawalt.
Faculty Promotion and Tenure Program
Service to the University, Discipline and Community Academic Promotions Briefing Session Chair, Academic Board Peter McCallum.
Professor of Teaching Tenure Track Stream at UBC Anna M. Kindler, Vice Provost and AVP Academic May 2013.
Head teacher Performance Management
How to Document Your Role in Teaching/Education Shiphra Ginsburg MD, MEd, FRCPC Mount Sinai Hospital Department of Medicine Wilson Centre for Research.
Department of Medicine Three Year Review Workshop Job Descriptions November 21, 2012 Joan Wither Co-Chair, Three Year Review Joan Wither Co-Chair, Three.
Department of Medicine Three Year Review Workshop January 20, 2011 Joan Wither & Frank L. Silver Co-Chairs, Three Year Review Joan Wither Co-Chair, Three.
Department of Medicine Three Year Review Workshop January 26, 2012 Joan Wither & Frank L. Silver Co-Chairs, Three Year Review Joan Wither Co-Chair, Three.
Department of Medicine Three Year Review Workshop November 21, 2012 Frank L. Silver Co-Chair, Three Year Review Joan Wither Co-Chair, Three Year Review.
Department of Medicine Junior Faculty Review Workshop November 10, 2014 Frank L. Silver Joan Wither Co-Chairs, Three Year Review Joan Wither Co-Chair,
Service to the University, Discipline and Community Academic Promotions Briefing Session Chair, Academic Board Peter McCallum.
Tenure and Promotion for Extension Faculty: Tips for the Evaluated and the Evaluators Larry Smith Executive Senior Vice Provost Utah State University Annual.
Career Planning in Academic Medicine David Coleman, M.D. Faculty Development Seminar Tuesday, September 18, 2007.
What they never taught me about being a clinician investigator.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 2 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
FACULTY DEVELOPMENT DAY Brown Bag on Merit Advancement Christine Miaskowski, Shari L. Dworkin & Sally Marshall.
“Tales from the Promotion and Tenure Committee: An Insider’s View and In Depth Analysis of What It Takes to Get Promoted” Dr. Gerard Silvestri and Dr.
Faculty Promotion and Tenure NYU SOM. Faculty Tracks Criteria for appointments and promotions Q&A Faculty Appointments NYU SOM.
Meeting of Assistant Professors Discussion of Promotion and Tenure July 25, 2011.
Stacy A. Rudnicki, M.D. Brendan C. Stack, Jr., M.D., FACS, FACE.
Mathematics and Science Teaching Programs Grant Proposal Workshop Panel Discussion: Writing Successful STEM Education Proposals - Principal Investigator.
McLean Promotion to Associate Professor at Harvard Medical School Maureen T. Connelly, MD, MPH McLean Hospital February 3, 2010.
Overview of RPT Process and Guidelines John C. Carey, M.D., M.P.H. Chair, ad hoc RPT & DAC Committees.
Graduate Program Review Prof. Emad Ali. Major Review Steps Self-study Report External evaluation Apply actions for improvement.
Mentor Champion Meeting October 16, pm 628HE CSB.
Scholarship in Clinical Education: What it is and… How to establish and document a teaching portfolio.
Wishwa N. Kapoor, MD, MPH, Director Doris M. Rubio, PhD, Co-Director Multidisciplinary Clinical Research Scholars Program.
A Practitioner’s Tips for Balancing Teaching, Service and Scholarship Kelly M. Smith, PharmD, FASHP Associate Professor, Pharmacy Practice and Science.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WORKSHOP. What is the Professional Development Plan? The Professional Development Plan is a directed planning and evaluation.
Promotion Expectations and Preparation Dianne Delva.
Meeting of Assistant Professors Discussion of Promotion and Tenure July 26, 2010.
PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL ATTENDINGS Rhonda Dick, M.D. Tim Martin, M.D.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Academic Promotion in Different Career Paths David J. Bjorkman, MD, MSPH Florida Atlantic University.
PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL SCIENTISTS – BOTH PATHWAYS Peter Emanuel, M.D. Laura Lamps, M.D.
NSF IGERT proposals Yang Zhao Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Wayne State University.
+ Meeting of Assistant Professors June 29, Faculty and Academic Affairs Leadership Steven Abramson, M.D., Vice Dean for Education, Faculty and.
Promotion Process A how-to for DEOs. How is a promotion review initiated? Required in the final probationary year of a tenure track appointment (year.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
Agenda Review of Faculty Tracks Mentoring Committees Third- and Sixth-Year Reviews Tenure Statistics Pre- and Post- “Artman”
Promotions on the Clinician Educator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology & Immunology.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
Demystifying Academic Appointments and Promotions Karen Freund MD MPH Chair, Appointments and Promotions Boston University School of Medicine FDDC September.
PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL EDUCATORS Laura Lamps, M.D. Stacy Rudnicki, M.D.
Promotion guide Understanding the tracks Librarian – tenure and non-tenure tracks Clinicians and Researchers - tenure and two non-tenure tracks –Tenure.
Wishwa N. Kapoor, MD, MPH, Director Doris M. Rubio, PhD, Co-Director Multidisciplinary Clinical Research Scholars Program.
DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #3 June 17, 2014  CV and Summary Statements (feedback)  Review Teaching Statement of Endeavors and Supporting.
What Your Program Needs to Know about Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA.
PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR BASIC SCIENTISTS – BOTH PATHWAYS Dana Gaddy, Ph.D. Patricia Wight, Ph.D.
Promotions on the Physician Scientist/Basic Science Investigator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology.
MUSC College of Medicine Appointments, Promotion, and Tenure Process and Procedures.
Surprising and Not So Surprising Similarities and Differences 1 Richard E. Klabunde, Ph.D. Department of Biomedical Sciences Ohio University College of.
University p&t forum Introductions April 24, 2017.
The Application Process Understanding the IERs (Institutional Eligibility Requirements ) 2106 TRACS Annual Conference.
Outstanding Professor Award Committee Presents:
Faculty Toolkit: Promotion & Tenure
Your Career at Queen’s: Merit Review and Renewal, Tenure, & Promotion New Faculty Orientation August 24, 2017 Teri Shearer Deputy Provost (Academic.
Appointments and Promotions
Planning and Managing your Academic Career: Deciding Where to Go and How to Get There Iain Young MD, CM, FRCPC Professor, Department of Pathology & Molecular.
Department of Medicine Michael Farkouh, Vice-Chair Research michael
Terri Magruder, MD, MPH Sept. 22, 2017
Promotions on the Physician Scientist/Basic Science Investigator Track
Promotion on the Clinician Educator and Clinical Practice Tracks
Early Career Participation in Professional Societies: Service with Benefits Jean Bahr UW - Madison.
Presentation transcript:

Department of Medicine Three Year Review Job Descriptions Job description should be defined when started in the Department of Medicine – last minute changes not advised Define the criteria by which your success will be judged Review at 3 years permits determination of whether your job description is appropriate for the work that you do Allows review of supports in place to permit remediation if necessary Full job descriptions are located at b.htm b.htm

Department of Medicine Three Year Review Clinician Scientist – Expectations Expected productivity principal investigator on an established research program Holds as PI at least one peer-reviewed grant ≥ 2 peer-reviewed manuscripts per year as 1 st or senior author

Department of Medicine Three Year Review Scientist – Expectations Expected productivity principal investigator on an established research program Holds as PI at least one peer-reviewed grant ≥ 2-3 peer-reviewed manuscripts per year as 1 st or senior author

Department of Medicine Three Year Review Clinician Scientist/Scientist – Application Tips Judged predominantly on your research success, however evidence of effective teaching and administration will also be sought Cover letter should highlight your achievements and future goals in research – a focused research program is an asset Opportunity to outline any impediments to success – such as protected time, research environment, mentorship, financial support Funding Very important that your role in grants defined Publications Outline clearly how you contributed to the publication (especially important if publishing with previous supervisor)

Department of Medicine Three Year Review Clinician Investigator – Expectations Expected productivity principal investigator in clinical research Holds one peer-reviewed grant or major industry grant – local site-PI does not qualify ≥ 1 peer-reviewed manuscript per year as 1 st or senior author

Department of Medicine Three Year Review Clinician Investigator – Application Tips Judged on the strength of your clinical program and your research success Cover letter should highlight your achievements and future goals in research – a focused clinical/research program is an asset Opportunity to outline any impediments to success Funding Very important that your role in grants defined – especially important for industry funded grants and research contracts Some evidence of intellectual contribution to grant process is required Publications Outline clearly how you contributed to the publication

Department of Medicine Three Year Review Clinician Educator – Expectations Expected benchmarks Excellence in teaching Participant in educational research or other scholarly activities Senior administrative responsibilities Chair of major departmental/hospital committee

Department of Medicine Three Year Review Clinician Educator – Application tips Evaluated on excellence in teaching and evidence of participation in education-based research or other scholarly education-based activities required Cover letter should highlight your achievements in education and future goals in education-based scholarly activity Impact of your scholarly activity on education should be outlined Inclusion of all teaching evaluations and teaching awards important

Department of Medicine Three Year Review Clinician Teacher – Expectations Expected benchmarks Excellence in teaching Important clinical contribution to Department of Medicine expected to be involved in centrally scheduled, evaluated undergraduate teaching

Department of Medicine Three Year Review Clinician Teacher – Application tips Evaluated on excellence in teaching and clinical contribution to departments Cover letter should highlight your clinical program and teaching commitments Inclusion of all teaching evaluations and teaching awards important

Department of Medicine Three Year Review Clinician Administrator – Expectations and Application tips Expected benchmarks Senior administrative responsibilities at the Departmental or Faculty levels Tip Important to document effectiveness in position

Department of Medicine Three Year Review Clinician in Quality and Innovation – Expectations and Application tips Expected benchmarks Significant engagement in improvement, translational or innovation activities, such as leading a divisional QI project, or contributing significantly to one sub- component of institution-wide/multisite QI initiatives Tip Provide evidence that carried out in a scholarly way ongoing evaluation to assess the impact of the work