Using Data to Meet Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Middle School Principal’s Breakout Session November 16, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Adequate Yearly Progress 2005 Status Report Research, Assessment & Accountability November 2, 2005 Oakland Unified School District.
Advertisements

MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL May 2012 CST Data Presentation.
Created By: Peter S. Lindquist School Psychologist Yolo County Office of Education CAN MY STUDENT TAKE THE CMA? START Exit This presentation is designed.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 6, 2011.
1 Joe Serna, Jr. Charter School Annual Report Lodi Unified School District Board of Education November 16, 2010 Michael Gillespie, Principal.
Cutoff Points Patrick Traynor, Ph.D., Director of Assessment and Evaluation Colton Joint Unified School District
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
Executive Summary  Did not meet API/AYP goals in language arts for the school or significant subgroups.  Did not meet API/AYP goals in math for the school.
2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.
Alaska’s New Accountability System for Schools 1.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
District Accountability Update May February 2007.
A few of the Achievement Outcomes for San Francisco Unified School District’s California Math and Science Partnership Grant- Working together to Improve.
ON TARGET WITH AMAOS 1, 2, 3 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS September 29, 2009 Welcome.
Flexibility in Determining AYP for Students with Disabilities Background Information—Slides 2—4 School Eligibility Criteria—Slide 5 Calculation of the.
1 The New York State Education Department New York State’s Student Reporting and Accountability System.
Fontana Unified School District Student Achievement Data September 17, 2008 Instructional Services Assessment & Evaluation.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
California Standards Test and CAHSEE Correlation Use of Student Data for Targeted Preemptive Intervention November 1, 2006 Dr. Janis Fries-Martinez, Principal.
Title I Coordinators’ Meeting: Guiding Students to Proficiency December 07, 2005.
MELROSE PUBLIC SCHOOLS MELROSE VETERANS MEMORIAL MIDDLE SCHOOL OCTOBER 2013 MCAS Spring 2013 Results.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) and Assessing California Standards Test (CST) Data.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress Fresno Unified School District 2005 Data Review.
Michigan’s Accountability Scorecards A Brief Introduction.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations.
A Closer Look at Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski Conference.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Spring 2012 Testing Results. GRANT API HISTORY
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) and Analysis of the Mathematics Section of the California Standards Test (CST) Data Elementary.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
Your High School Name 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Parents as Partners: How Parents and Schools Work Together to Close the Achievement Gap.
Meeting AYP and Generating API: Preventing “Leakage”
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 1.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
Sample Elementary School 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
Target Practice with AMAOs 1, 2, 3. AMAOs 1,2,3 District level targets for EL under Title III Accountability They show how all of the EL in a cohort are.
Swampscott Elementary Schools MCAS Results Grade 3 ELA Performance Level Above Proficient Proficient Needs Improvement
2007 – 2008 Assessment and Accountability Report LVUSD Report to the Board September 23, 2008 Presented by Mary Schillinger, Assistant Superintendent Education.
MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.
Response to Intervention Does it work for ELL & Poverty Children Highland Pacific Elementary School San Bernardino City Unified School District CASP March.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District Catch A Rising STAR Understanding Your STAR Student Report (Revised 2012)
1 Testing Various Models in Support of Improving API Scores.
Department of Research and Evaluation
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
What is API? The Academic Performance Index (API) is the cornerstone of California's Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). It is required.
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
STAR CST Reports and AYP Predictions
Using Data to Drive Your School’s Instructional Program
Wade Hayashida Local District 8
Key Concepts & Questions Adequate Yearly Progress
Data Review CST (AYP) inserted into your SPSA by DTS
Alaska School Performance Index Annual Measurable Objectives Results
CLINTON HIGH SCHOOL 2010 MCAS Presentation October 26, 2010.
Academic Achievement Report for Meadow Homes Elementary School
Academic Achievement Report for Washington Manor Middle School
Presentation transcript:

Using Data to Meet Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Middle School Principal’s Breakout Session November 16, 2005

Purpose of the Session: 1.How Many Do We Need? To determining the number of students schoolwide and in each subgroup that must be targeted to allow the school to meet AYP. 2.Who Are They? Identify the students who may be targeted to move to Proficiency. 3.How Can We Take Them to Proficiency? Key step is to accurately assess CST test results so a school may customize interventions and changes in classroom practice.

Key to Meeting Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP): Positive Annual Gains

Goal: Move One Testing Level Per Year regardless of assessed level.

Figure #1- California Standards Test (CST) Levels: Language Arts Far Below BasicBelow BasicBasicProficientAdvanced 150 to to to to to 600 State Target for All Students

#1 How Many Do We Need? Determine the number of students schoolwide and in each subgroup that must be targeted to allow the school to meet AYP.

Analysis of 2005 AYP Accountability Progress Report Individual School Reports

Work Period: Calculating #of Proficient or above to meet AMO ELA: Multiply.244 times the number of valid scores in a significant subgroup to determine how many students must be at Proficient or better to meet the AMO. Math: Multiply.265 times the number of valid scores in a significant subgroup to determine how many students must be at Proficient or better to meet the AMO

#2 Who Are They? Identify the students who may be targeted to move to Proficiency.

Figure #5- California Standards Test (CST) Levels: Language Arts Far Below BasicBelow BasicBasicProficientAdvanced 150 to to to to to 600 State Target for All Students

Break 7 Minutes

#3 How Do We Get Them To Proficiency? Use of Assessment Tool to customize interventions and changes in classroom practices to meet the needs indicated by the CST results

Procedure: 1. Use STAR Master List to assess individual CST Reporting Clusters by each separate grade and quintile level 2. Use the Introduction/CST Test Release Questions as a tool for assessing the summarized weaknesses to: 1. Better customized targeted interventions. 2. Assist in determining the need for any tactical changes in classroom practice.

CST Assessment Protocol: Use STAR Master List to assess individual CST Reporting Cluster by each separate grade and quintile level: Far Below Basic Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced

Figure #1- California Standards Test (CST) Levels: Language Arts Far Below BasicBelow BasicBasicProficientAdvanced 150 to to to to to 600 State Target for All Students

CST Assessment Protocol: In each Reporting Cluster, simplify the percentage correct by rounding to the nearest single digit number. 76% is 8; 35% is 3.5; 64% is 6

CST Assessment Protocol: Record the rounded single digit representation on the CST Analysis Form under the proper Reporting Cluster for all students in the same grade and quintile level. Add all simplified scores. Divide by the total number of students recorded. Calculate score for each Recording Cluster

Work Period 5 to 10 minutes

CST Assessment Protocol: Read Test Release Questions Introduction (20 minutes) Ask the following questions in job alike groups: Which Reporting Cluster has the greatest number of questions asked on the test? The least number of questions? In reading the Introduction to the Test Release Questions, is there a Reporting Cluster which has significant influence on a student’s ability to master the other Reporting Clusters? In reading the standards within each Reporting Cluster, are there key standards which have significant influence on a student’s ability to master the other standards within that Reporting Cluster?

CST Assessment Protocol: Determine areas of strength and weakness. By consensus prioritize top three needs. Chart

CST Assessment Protocol: Begin brainstorming to determine the need for any tactical changes in classroom practice and/or to develop specific targeted interventions.

Purpose of the Session: 1.How Many Do We Need? To determining the number of students schoolwide and in each subgroup that must be targeted to allow the school to meet AYP. 2.Who Are They? Identify the students who may be targeted to move to Proficiency. 3.How Can We Take Them to Proficiency? Key step is to accurately assess CST test results so a school may customize interventions and changes in classroom practice.

Janice Hackett Jeff Jacobson Fleming M.S Wade Hayashida Local District