Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Using Data to Drive Your School’s Instructional Program

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Using Data to Drive Your School’s Instructional Program"— Presentation transcript:

1 Using Data to Drive Your School’s Instructional Program
Marilyn Anderson Randy Benigno Annette Star

2 Data Systems in LAUSD SIS – Elementary (ESIS) and Secondary (SSIS)
Primary data entry system for student data ISIS – Integrated Student Information System Will replace ESIS and SSIS Currently tracking grades and attendance in secondary SOAR – Student Online Assessment Reports Data entry and reporting for Open Court Edusoft Data scanning and reporting for Periodic Assessments in Math, English Language Arts and Science DSS – Decision Support System Reporting system that draws data from SIS, SOAR, Edusoft and other data systems Facilitator Notes: Take about 5 minutes to review these data systems slides (8-10). Phase 2 of ISIS is only secondary and is slated for April 2006; only doing grades and attendance, right now. There is also the SOAR system where Open Court data for elementary schools is housed. Beginning, last school year, the district began administering periodic assessments. This data is collected on the Edusoft system. Finally, there is a reporting system called the Decision Support System. Before we take a look at what resides in each of these systems let’s talk about different data systems and how they differ.

3 How can you use this data in presentations to staff and parents?

4 SAMPLE 2005 STAR Results Chanel Public School #9

5 Looking at the Data Today: California Standards Test (CST) API/AYP
In the future: CAT6 CAPA EDUSOFT SOAR

6 Elementary CST Comparison English Language Arts 2002-2005

7 California – CST ELA Percentage of students Proficient and Advance

8 LAUSD – CST ELA Percentage of students Proficient and Advance

9 District One – CST ELA Percentage of students Proficient and Advance

10 Chanel School

11 Percent Scoring Proficient or Advanced Elementary
2005 CST ELA Percent Scoring Proficient or Advanced Elementary California LAUSD District One Chanel #9 School

12 2002 2003 2004 2005 Grade 2 30 54 45 43 Grade 3 42 40 36 25 Grade 4 37 46 58 Grade 5 39 48 47

13 CST Comparison Mathematics
Elementary CST Comparison Mathematics

14 California CST Math

15 LAUSD – CST Math

16 District One – CST Math

17 Chanel School +15 +10 +23 +17 +14 +17 +9 +35

18 CST Mathematics Percent Scoring Proficient or Advanced in Grades 2-5
California LAUSD Chanel #9 School District One

19 AYP and API Accountability Progress Reports, with preliminary AYP and API data, were released on August 31, 2005. AYP measures students moving from basic, below basic, and far below basic to proficient and advanced performance levels. API measures student movement between all performance levels. The greatest growth occurs as students move from far below basic to below basic and from below basic to basic.

20 California Standards Tests Scaled Score Ranges for Performance Levels
Grade FBB BB Basic Pro Adv ELA 2 <262 >401 Math <236 >413 3 <259 4 <268 >392 <245 >400 5 <271 >394 <248 >429

21 AYP and AMO Annual Measurable Objectives
English Language Arts Mathematics State Target for 2006 24.4% 26.5% Chanel School 2004 41.7% 56.1% 2005 48.8% 55.8%

22 API 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 LAUSD 520 570 610 655 695 705 ??? 602 665 687 719 774 775 790 Local District One 627 672 706 745 785 791 Chanel School

23 API Your School

24 Local District One District One trends are important,
but each school’s CST data is unique and must be analyzed: grade by grade teacher by teacher group by group student by student

25 Trend Analysis

26 Trend Analysis Take 5 minutes individually to review
the data that is contained in your packet and record any trends that you observe.

27 Trend Analysis Talk with your grade level peers about your observations and then discuss the following questions together: What trends do you see when looking at the data for “your school”? In what way are these trends consistent with District One or the State of California data? In what ways are these trends different from District One and or the State’s data?

28 Trend Analysis What specific action did “your school” take that caused these results? What specific actions did your grade level take that caused these results?

29 What specific action should “your school” take to further improve
Trend Analysis What specific action should “your school” take to further improve student achievement over the next year?

30 What other sources of data can we use to drive instruction? Overheads….

31 School Information System
Log-on (with your username) ____________ Enter your MD Password _______________ At Main Menu, enter again Main Menu Screen Select 7 for Testing Menu Select CST Menu (or CAT6, CAPA or Aprenda) Option 3 – Previous teacher class results Option 2 – Current teacher class results

32 3rd grade class – Previous Teacher Attachment A

33 4th grade class – Current Teacher Attachment B

34 5th grade class - current teacher Attachment C

35 SIS INTERVENTION -intervention record keeping -data collection
-attendance -student history of intervention Sentence: SORT XXXX WITH 658 = “7/6/05” BY GRN BREAK-ON GRN NAME NAME GRADE (N)

36 Intervention records for individual students Attachment D

37 DSS Log-on to Inside LAUSD Enter Username (e-mail address) ________
Enter Password ______________________ Select DSS

38 Attachment E

39 Math Performance Over the Last 3 Years
Attachment F Math Performance Over the Last 3 Years Facilitator Notes: So, as you can see fewer 5th graders were proficient and advanced compared to the other grade levels for in all 3 years.

40 Coordinator, Elementary Mathematics
Marilyn Anderson Coordinator, Elementary Mathematics Local District One (818) EDUSOFT

41 Attachment G

42 Attachment H

43

44 Attachment I

45

46 Attachment J

47 Coordinator, Elementary Literacy
Annette Star Coordinator, Elementary Literacy Local District One (818) SOAR

48 Steps to Access and Use SOAR (For new users)
Attachment J2 Steps to Access and Use SOAR (For new users) Enter user name (usually employee number) Enter password Click on: Student Online Assessment Report (SOAR) Click on: Continue to SOAR Click on: Create a Grade Level Report Check for 2000/2002 Program Select criteria for report Create report Create PDF Can create graph Click on: Teacher name Create a class report (once again, select criteria) Click on child’s name For assistance or to set up an account, please contact Annette Star at (818)

49 Levels of SOAR Available
Grade Level Reports Class Reports Student Reports

50 Attachment K Grade Level Report

51 Attachment L Class Report

52 Attachment M Student Report

53 Attachment N Graphs

54 Types of SOAR Available
Types of Reports By Assessment Period (all content areas) By Assessment Area (all periods) Disaggregate by Subgroup

55 Attachment O

56 Disaggregate by Subgroup
By Teacher By Teacher – Anonymous All Students Gender Ethnicity Special Education Placement Language Proficiency Gifted Designation

57 Assessment Information (Regular/Reading Teacher)
Attachment P

58 Master Plan Information
Attachment Q Master Plan Information

59 Attachment R Demographics

60 Looking at First Grade Data
Every student should be scoring at 8, 9 and 10 in spelling and word reading on the first 3 assessments. Consider a special intervention program within classrooms or across the grade to catch children early. If more than 5 students in a class are not being successful, consider in class support to insure that all the daily lessons are skillfully taught.

61

62 California Department of Education Website
Randy Benigno Coordinator, Testing & Intervention Local District One (818) California Department of Education Website

63 Then click on “Reports”
CDE Website California Department of Education Click on Testing & Accountability Click on: STAR - or API – AYP – Then click on “Reports”

64

65

66 School Accountability report
AYP School Accountability report School Summary - Attachment U School API Index Chart - Attachment V School AYP Overview - Attachment W School AYP Report - Attachment X School AYP Chart – Attachment Y School PI Report – Attachment Z

67 Monitoring Student Progress

68 Monitoring Student Progress
Periodic Assessments -Language Arts -Mathematics -Science Student Work Samples -Class assignments -Teacher Designed Exams STAR -CST, CAT6, CAPA and Aprenda

69


Download ppt "Using Data to Drive Your School’s Instructional Program"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google