Summer Leadership Conference August 10, 2012 Dr. Susan Moxley, Superintendent.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2 Casa 15m Perspectiva Lateral Izquierda.
Advertisements

1 A B C
OnCourse Innovation Keynote The Mind of an Innovator © 2012 Patricia Harmon, Ph.D.
Simplifications of Context-Free Grammars
AP STUDY SESSION 2.
1
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Select from the most commonly used minutes below.
STATISTICS INTERVAL ESTIMATION Professor Ke-Sheng Cheng Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering National Taiwan University.
Multiplication X 1 1 x 1 = 1 2 x 1 = 2 3 x 1 = 3 4 x 1 = 4 5 x 1 = 5 6 x 1 = 6 7 x 1 = 7 8 x 1 = 8 9 x 1 = 9 10 x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = 12 X 2 1.
Division ÷ 1 1 ÷ 1 = 1 2 ÷ 1 = 2 3 ÷ 1 = 3 4 ÷ 1 = 4 5 ÷ 1 = 5 6 ÷ 1 = 6 7 ÷ 1 = 7 8 ÷ 1 = 8 9 ÷ 1 = 9 10 ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = 12 ÷ 2 2 ÷ 2 =
ALGEBRA Number Walls
David Burdett May 11, 2004 Package Binding for WS CDL.
Teaching and Learning Science & Assessment Informational Webinars Presenter: Linda Cabe Smith, Science Assessment Specialist Ellen Ebert, Science Director,Teaching.
Local Customization Chapter 2. Local Customization 2-2 Objectives Customization Considerations Types of Data Elements Location for Locally Defined Data.
Create an Application Title 1Y - Youth Chapter 5.
CALENDAR.
Leon County Schools Next Generation Content Area Reading Professional Development (NGCARPD) Summer 2012 Using Common Core to Enhance your Instruction 1.
CHAPTER 18 The Ankle and Lower Leg
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
WHMS RUC2 Ready?. C2 Readiness The Common Core State Standards provide a consistent, clear understanding of what students are expected to learn, so teachers.
Which ones are you using?
The 5S numbers game..
Media-Monitoring Final Report April - May 2010 News.
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
Division- the bus stop method
Factoring Quadratics — ax² + bx + c Topic
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
Look at This PowerPoint for help on you times tables
K ONTRAK PERKULIAHAN I Made Gatot K, ST. MT 1. PENILAIAN Kehadiran min 75 % : 5 % Tugas: 20 % Diskusi / Presentasi: 20 % UTS: 25 % UAS: 30 % TOTAL: 100%
1 The Royal Doulton Company The Royal Doulton Company is an English company producing tableware and collectables, dating to Operating originally.
Operating Systems Operating Systems - Winter 2012 Chapter 4 – Memory Management Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Operating Systems Operating Systems - Winter 2010 Chapter 3 – Input/Output Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
Biology 2 Plant Kingdom Identification Test Review.
Chapter 1: Expressions, Equations, & Inequalities
1 TV Viewing Trends Rivière-du-Loup EM - Diary Updated Spring 2014.
Adding Up In Chunks.
FAFSA on the Web Preview Presentation December 2013.
SLP – Endless Possibilities What can SLP do for your school? Everything you need to know about SLP – past, present and future.
MaK_Full ahead loaded 1 Alarm Page Directory (F11)
Artificial Intelligence
OAA Spring 2010 Grade 8 Math Item Analysis Patterns, Functions and Algebra (PA)A 7%B 7%C 26%D 60% (*) Percent Correct SchoolState 6054.
Understanding the Basics
Before Between After.
12 October, 2014 St Joseph's College ADVANCED HIGHER REVISION 1 ADVANCED HIGHER MATHS REVISION AND FORMULAE UNIT 2.
Subtraction: Adding UP
1 Lab 17-1 ONLINE LESSON. 2 If viewing this lesson in Powerpoint Use down or up arrows to navigate.
Bell Busters! Unit 1 #1-61. Purposes of Government 1. Purposes of government 2. Preamble to the Constitution 3. Domestic tranquility 4. Common defense.
: 3 00.
5 minutes.
1 hi at no doifpi me be go we of at be do go hi if me no of pi we Inorder Traversal Inorder traversal. n Visit the left subtree. n Visit the node. n Visit.
Speak Up for Safety Dr. Susan Strauss Harassment & Bullying Consultant November 9, 2012.
Essential Cell Biology
Converting a Fraction to %
CSE20 Lecture 15 Karnaugh Maps Professor CK Cheng CSE Dept. UC San Diego 1.
Clock will move after 1 minute
famous photographer Ara Guler famous photographer ARA GULER.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Physics for Scientists & Engineers, 3rd Edition
Select a time to count down from the clock above
Copyright Tim Morris/St Stephen's School
Columbus Tustin Middle School 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
1.step PMIT start + initial project data input Concept Concept.
1 Dr. Scott Schaefer Least Squares Curves, Rational Representations, Splines and Continuity.
Meat Identification Quiz
Elmer is not C2 Ready… R U?. R U C2 Ready? 2012 FCAT/School Grade Data The Villages Elementary of Lady Lake.
Presentation transcript:

Summer Leadership Conference August 10, 2012 Dr. Susan Moxley, Superintendent

Elementary Results – Reading FCAT 2.0 District Compared to State 2012 Mean Scale Score Grade 3Grade 4Grade (=)213 (=)220 (-1) % Scoring Levels 3-5 Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5 56 (=)61 (=)60 (-1) % Scoring Level 1 Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5 17 (-1)12 (=)15 (=)

Elementary Results – Reading FCAT 2.0 District Changes from Mean Scale Score Grade 3Grade 4Grade (=)213 (+2)220 (+1) % Scoring Levels 3-5 Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5 56 (-3)61 (+5)60 (+1) % Scoring Level 1 Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5 17 (+1)12 (-3)15 (-1)

Middle School Results – FCAT 2.0 Reading District Compared to State 2012 Mean Scale Score Grade 6Grade 7Grade (-1)231 (=)237 (=) % Scoring Levels 3-5 Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8 56 (-1)56 (-2)54 (-1) % Scoring Level 1 Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8 18 (-1)17(-1)17 (=)

Middle School Results – FCAT 2.0 Reading District Changes from 2011 to 2012 Mean Scale Score Grade 6Grade 7Grade (-1)231 (=)237 (+1) % Scoring Levels 3-5 Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8 56 (=)56 (=)54 (+4) % Scoring Level 1 Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8 18 (=)17(-1)17 (-1)

High School Results – FCAT 2.0 Reading District Compared to State 2012 Mean Scale Score Grade 9Grade (-1)241 (-3) % Scoring Levels 3-5 Grade 9Grade (-3)45 (-5) % Scoring Level 1 Grade 9Grade (=)23 (+3)

High School Results – Reading FCAT 2.0 District Changes from Mean Scale Score Grade 9Grade (+1)241 (-1) % Scoring Levels 3-5 Grade 9Grade (+1)45 (=) % Scoring Level 1 Grade 9Grade (-3)23 (+1)

Elementary Results – Math FCAT 2.0 District Compared to State 2012 Mean Scale Score Grade 3Grade 4Grade (-1)214 (-1)221 (-1) % Scoring Levels 3-5 Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5 56 (=)60 (=)55 (-2) % Scoring Level 1 Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5 18 (-2)18 (=)19 (=)

Elementary Results – Math FCAT 2.0 District Changes from Mean Scale Score Grade 3Grade 4Grade (+3)214 (+2)221 (+1) % Scoring Levels 3-5 Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5 56 (+4)60 (+6)55 (+1) % Scoring Level 1 Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5 18 (-4)18 (-4)19 (-1)

Middle School Results – FCAT 2.0 Math District Compared to State 2012 Mean Scale Score Grade 6Grade 7Grade (-2)234 (-2)241 (-2) % Scoring Levels 3-5 Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8 51 (-2)52 (-4)52 (-5) % Scoring Level 1 Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8 22 (-1)22 (+2)23 (+1)

Middle School Results – FCAT 2.0 Math District Changes from Mean Scale Score Grade 6Grade 7Grade (-1)234 (=)241 (-1) % Scoring Levels 3-5 Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8 51 (-1)52 (-2)52 (-4) % Scoring Level 1 Grade 6Grade 7Grade 8 22 (-2)22 (=)23 (+2)

Elementary Results – FCAT Writing Grade 4 Essay Score 3.2 (-.8)

Elementary Results – FCAT Writing Grade 4 % Scoring Level 3.0 and above

Middle School Results – FCAT Writing Grade 8 Essay Score 3.2 (-.9)

Middle School Results – FCAT Writing Grade 8 % Scoring Level 3.0 and above

High School Results – FCAT Writing Grade 10 Essay Score 3.3 (-.5)

High School Results – FCAT Writing Grade 10 % Scoring Level 3.0 and above

Elementary Results – FCAT Science Grade 5 % Scoring Level 3.0 and above

Middle School Results – FCAT Science Grade 8 % Scoring Level 3.0 and above

Winter Algebra 1 EOC District Results First-Time Tests and Retakes Mean Scale Score District 392 State 391 Percent at Level 1 District 22% State 25% Percent => Level 3 District 46 State 44

Spring Algebra 1 EOC District Results First-Time Tests and Retakes Mean Scale Score District 400 State 402 Percent at Level 1 District 15% State 15% Percent => Level 3 District 56 (+3 from 2011) State 59

Spring Geometry EOC District Results First-Time Tests and Retakes Mean Scale Score District 48 State 49 Percent in Bottom Third District 36% State 35% Percent in Top Third District 27% State 34%

Spring Biology EOC District Results First-Time Tests and Retakes Mean Scale Score District 48 State 49 Percent in Bottom Third District 36% State 35% Percent in Top Third District 27% State 34%

School Grade Comparison School Grade Number of Schools by Year 2011 Projected by FLDOE in February * A B C 6215 D 121 F 120 * Eight school grades still pending

R U C2 Ready? What is Required? Why is it Important How to do it? (Schools) How to do it? (Businesses) College and Career Readiness 21 st Century ThinkersShifts in PedagogyShifts in Partnerships Critical/Creative Thinkers Solution Seekers Innovators Collaborators Ethical Decision-Makers Effective Oral and Written Communicators Entrepreneurship Industry Demand Career fields not yet Created Technology not yet Developed Information not yet Discovered Learning Targets Level of Cognitive Demand Complex Text Non-Fiction Information Text Independence Project based learning A range of writing for a variety of purposes across all content areas Practical Internships After School and Youth Development Mentorships Adopt-a-School Program Teach-In

RUC2 Ready? WE WIN, TOGETHER! Lake County Schools Investing In Excellence! College and Career Readiness