In Re Gault Julie Martinez Block 2. “Neither the Fourteenth Amendment nor the Bill of Rights is for adults alone”

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Supreme Court First Amendment Case Freedom of Speech

Advertisements

Good News Club v. Milford Central School

TOPEKA, KANSAS BY: BRENNAN NEBRIG Brown v. Board of Education.

Citizens United v. FEC Kaitlyn Wood. Official Name of Case Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission.

Clayton Sommer Roe vs. Wade.

Korematsu vs US. Korematsu v. United States Argued: October 11-12, 1944 Decided: December 18, 1944.

Gregg vs. Georgia Ethan Reinheimer 10/28/13 Block 2.

Supreme Court Cases Notes in p. 89 (Right Side)

EOC PRACTICE JUDICIAL 3. EOC JUDICIAL 1.The Supreme Court ruled that an indigent defendant in a criminal trial has a fundamental right to the assistance.

American Government and Politics Today

JUVENILE LAW CREATED BY REBECCA SWINNEY, UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA LAW STUDENT, STREET LAW COURSE, 2010

A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corporation vs. The United States By: Nandan Patel Civic and Economics Honors 10/26/2013.

Supreme Court Cases. Solem V. Helm Issue: Was Helm’s constitutional right of freedom from cruel and unusual punishment violated?

The Supreme Court at Work. Basic Facts About the Supreme Court 9 Justices on the Court Each “term” begins first Monday in October and lasts until they.

Unit Eight The Judicial Branch.

The Due Process Clause of The Fourteenth Amendment Unit 3, Lesson 18.

Ch. 12 The Supreme Court. Petitions Stage: by what Routes can Cases Reach the Supreme Court? 1)Petition for Writ of Certiorari – most common Supreme Court.

THURSDAY, JANUARY 22 ND ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTION(S) IN YOUR WRITING FOLDER/SPIRAL: 2. Which category list represents military law? SS.7.C.3.10 A.

Mapp v Ohio By: Gavin Koonts 10/27/13 Block 2. Mapp v Ohio  Dollree Mapp v State of Ohio  Argued: March 29, 1961  Decided: June 19, 1961.

Mr. Valanzano Business Law. Dispute Resolution Litigate – ________________________________________________ In some cases, people decided too quickly to.

Court Cases dealing with Individual Rights (Bill of Rights) J. Worley Civics.

The Supreme Court Of the United States. The Supreme Court is the highest court in the nation. Its decisions are final and cannot be appealed, or heard.

Structure of the American Court System. Justices of the Supreme Court.

Griffin Honeycutt Block 2 October 29,  Official Name- Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sandford  The defendant’s name was actually Sanford, but was misspelled.

 The US court system is an adversarial system.  This means that the trial is a contest between two sides.  The judge makes rulings on the law and manages.

Chapter 16.3 Young People and the Courts. Causes of Juvenile Delinquency In most states, anyone under age 18 is considered a juvenile – not yet legally.

Crime and Justice Tuesday, January 21, Review Packet Due Tomorrow… In order to qualify for a retake on the test, the packet is due ▫At the BEGINNING.

Jennifer Koch Civics and Economics Block 2.   Official Name: New York Times Company vs. Sullivan  Case Heard: January of 1964  Case Decided: March.

Rights of the Accused Under the Criminal Due Process System Rights when 1 st Apprehended: 1.Free from “bills of attainder” – to put someone in jail without.

 Brown v. Board of Education  Engle v. Vitale  Gideon v. Wainwright  Lemon v. Kurtzman  Mapp v. Ohio  Marbury v. Madison  McCulloch v. Maryland.

New Jersey v. T.L.O By Luke Wills and Caroline Weschler.

JUVENILE LAW. History of Juvenile Law  Originally, juvenile offenders were treated the same as adult criminals  Beginning in 1899, states began forming.

Rachel Pleasants  In December 1965, a group of students met to discuss plans of wearing armbands to school throughout the holiday season and fasting.

Juvenile Crimes. North Carolina In North Carolina, you are considered an adult at the age of 18, however you can still be charged as an adult at 16 and.

8.4 The Supreme Court at Work. Court Procedures The Supreme Court meets about 9 months each year, each term begins the first Monday in October and runs.

The Organization and Structure of the Judicial Branch As you read and highlight the excerpt from The Majesty of the Law, Look for the following concepts:

In re Gault The Supreme Court Establishes Rules for Juveniles.

How have the decisions of the Supreme Court protected people accused of crimes? What rights are accused people guaranteed? Landmark Supreme Court Cases.

Miranda v. Arizona GREYSON PETTUS PLS 211 MR. NOEL DECEMBER 2ND, 2015.

American Government and Politics Today

Baker vs. Carr Spencer Albright. Charles W. Baker et al. v. Joe. C. Carr et al. The Baker vs. Carr case was first argued on April There was.

Juvenile Justice System. Goal of Juvenile Justice To rehabilitate or correct the behavior of juvenile delinquents rather than punish. In North Carolina.

Civics EOC Review The Judicial Branch and The Law Day 4.

United States v. Nixon (1974) Ciera Dalton Block 2 10/26/13.

United States v. Nixon In re Gault Bush v. Gore Marbury v. Madison

How have the decisions of the Supreme Court protected people accused of crimes? What rights are accused people guaranteed? Landmark Supreme Court Cases.

American Government and Politics Today Chapter 15 The Courts.

The Court System Chapter 5. Courts  Trial Courts- two parties Plaintiff- in civil trial is the person bringing the legal action Prosecutor- in criminal.

 March 1931 nine black youth got into a fight on a train with some white boys.  They were asked to leave the train.  After that two white girls accused.

Mackenzie, Isaac, Leon, Tristen. Argued: October 10, 1932 Decided: November 7, 1932 POWELL V ALABAMA (1932)

D UE P ROCESS OF L AW Part 7. D UE P ROCESS 5 th Amendment “Federal Government cannot deprive any person of Life, Liberty or property, without due process.

Mickale J. Massey Mr. Fernandez Practical Law 1st

The Judicial Branch and The Law Day 4

Section 3 Due Process and the Fourteenth Amendment

Chapter 8 Section 3 Mr. Gordon.

Landmark Supreme Court Cases

Roe v. Wade Consider: One of the most debated/controversial decisions in American History Two sides to this idea:

The Supreme Court At Work

Chapter 8 Section 3 Mr. Plude.

LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES

The Court System Appeals.

Judicial Branch.

The Supreme Court At Work

YOU WILL NEED YOUR STUDY GUIDE OUT & A BLANK PIECE OF PAPER

Landmark Supreme Court Cases

Miranda v. Arizona Matthew & Noah.

Presentation transcript:

In Re Gault Julie Martinez Block 2

“Neither the Fourteenth Amendment nor the Bill of Rights is for adults alone”

In Regards to Gault 0 Argued Tuesday, December 6, Decided Monday, May 5, 1967 "Facts and Case Summary: In Re Gault." USCOURTS.GOV. United States Court, n.d. Web. 28 Oct

Summary 0 Gerald Gault (15) was arrested for making an obscene phone call 0 No notice given to parents 0 Sent to reform school until he was 21 "Facts and Case Summary: In Re Gault." USCOURTS.GOV. United States Court, n.d. Web. 28 Oct

Public Policy 0 Juveniles over 14 tried as adults 0 Juveniles did not receive Due Process Friedman, Benjamin E. "Protecting Truth: An Argument for Juvenile Rights and a Return to In Re Gault." UCLA Law Review. UCLA Law Review, n.d. Web. 28 Oct

Arguments of Plaintiff 0 Gault represented by Mr. Norman Dorsen 0 Arizona Juvenile Court was unconstitutional 0 Gault was denied procedural rights IN RE GAULT. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 22 October

Argument of Defendant 0 Arizona defended by Mr. Frank A. Parks 0 Juvenile be treated like an adult 0 Opportunity to avoid self incrimination would interfere with investigation IN RE GAULT. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 22 October

Third Party Amicus Curiae Briefs 0 American Parents Committee four Gault 0 Merritt W. Green for the Ohio Association of Juvenile Court Judges 0 Urged affirmance IN RE GAULT. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 22 October

Supreme Court Ruling 0 8 to 1 in favor of Gault 0 Case violated 14 th Amendment 0 Court failed to meet child’s best interest 0 Precedent- Granted juveniles procedural rights "Facts and Case Summary: In Re Gault." USCOURTS.GOV. United States Court, n.d. Web. 28 Oct

Dissenting Opinion 0 Mr. Justice Stewart 0 Juvenile proceedings are not criminal trials 0 Juvenile court and criminal court have opposite missions

Long Term Effects 0 Every juvenile case afterwards was changed 0 Juveniles must be given Due Process Patton, William W. "HISTORY OF JUVENILE COURTS." StateUniversity.com. State University, n.d. Web. 28 Oct