. Shoebury Common Flood Risk Management Scheme What is this exhibition for? This exhibition explains the various options considered for improving protection.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bewdley Flood Alleviation Scheme. Bewdley, November 2000.
Advertisements

Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance.  Legal means for communities to set standards for regulating floodplain development  Dependent upon type of mapping.
May 22, 2012 Charlotte-Mecklenburg Flood Risk Assessment and Risk Reduction Plan ASFPM 2012 Annual Conference Timothy J. Trautman, P.E., CFM Flood Mitigation.
Case study: coastal management in Holderness
Rebuilding in flood hazard areas. Impact of flood Area directly impacted spans 55,000 square kilometres Evacuations of almost 100,000 people 10,000 homes.
What should happen to the Holderness coastline? Learning Objective: To practice decision making skills required for the SDME in June 2014.
Huntly Flood Alleviation Scheme
Background on coastal issues on the Manhood Peninsula Rachel Carless Coastal Literacy Officer, Coastnet.
Workshop September 2004 Sandilands, United Kingdom COMRISK Subproject 8 “Risk Assessment Lincolnshire, Pilot Studies” (SP8)
National Centre for Risk Analysis and Options Appraisal Risk Assessment, RASP and IMPACT Ian Meadowcroft.
Coastal Impacts: Beaches, Sand Spits, and Bluffs Amber Moore University of Washington School of Marine Affairs 12 February 2009 Amber Moore University.
What do all these pictures have in common? 3 answers required.
What affect does this have on people and the environment?
Severn Tidal Power Feasibility Study Background to the study Terms of reference announced in January 08 Aim of the study: To enable Government to decide.
Coastal management Coastal management The four options Fotolia.
Coastal erosion is the wearing away of land or the removal of beach or dune sediments by wave action, tidal currents, wave currents. Costal erosion is.
Sec 2 IDS, 2010 Coastal Management. You will learn: 1.Evaluate the feasibility of coastal protection measures at Pulau Ubin.
Local Adaptation Efforts Along the Massachusetts Coast Julia Knisel Coastal Shoreline & Floodplain Manager.
Foresight future floding Ian Meadowcroft, Environment Agency JimHall University of Bristol, Department of Civil Engineering Paul Sayers, HR Wallingford.
How does it look? Imagine a small area of land – a plot on a site big enough for one ‘executive style’ house. Here it is, with some figures Variation 1:
WELCOME TO National Student & Thought Leadership Awards IPAC/CAPPA.
Correlating Qualitative with Quantitative Measurement of Sea Level Rise in Florida Bay Douglas J. Leaffer, MSCE, PG, EIT.
Strategic Planning for Coastal Flooding and Erosion Nick Hardiman Senior Coastal Adviser Environment Agency Strategic Overview.
Sea-level changes and their impacts on critical infrastructure in South Tarawa Doug Ramsay, Scott Stephens & Rob Bell, NIWA Kabure Yeeting, Mike Foon,
Chapter 33 Dam Construction. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Give reasons why.
Prediction and Prevention of the effects of coastal flooding by forecasting, building, design, planning and education.
National-scale quantified analysis of future flood risk in the UK Paul Sayers Head of Floods and Water Management HR Wallingford, UK Jim Hall Professor.
The Coast 1. The Sea 2 Wind Waves The Sea 3 TidesCurrents 1.Long-Shore 2.Cross-Shore.
Severn Estuary Forum Flood Risk and the Severn Barrage 19 th September 2009 Nick Lyness Wessex Flood &Coast Erosion Risk Manager.
FLOOD DEFENCES ALONG THE R. MEDWAY AROUND TONBRIDGE.
Galveston coastal fieldwork Task question:. texas/houston/article/Sea-swallowing-Galveston-faster-than-
San Francisco Ocean Beach-Great Highway Erosion Control Project.
A coastal habitat and its management Wallasea Island.
Alde & Ore Estuary Partnership A partnership set up by the community for the community to protect homes, businesses and our environment from flooding.
Ethical and democratic issues that impact on rural communities Or
Explorers Education Programme: Flooding & Coastal Communities.
Introducing the Invisible Flood Control Wall (IFCW™) From Flood Control America The IFCW™ is not a traditional flood control system. It is absolutely the.
COMRISK Sub-Project 8 Lincshore: Risk Management Options Pete Floyd, Risk & Policy Analysts Ltd., working with Halcrow and the Environment Agency.
Reconstruction of coastal recreational parkland in Nova Kakhovka Project idea: landscaping of the city park along the Dnipro River (length is 1 km), development.
Bay Club Marina Reconstruction Coastal Commission Hearing December 15, 2010; Agenda Item W16b These materials have been provided to the Coastal Commission.
Redevelopment in the Resort Housing District To the Sanibel- Captiva Chamber of Commerce Nov. 29, 2011 Prepared by: Planning Department.
Geotubes on Galveston Island Laura Mullaney Mars 485 Spring 2003.
11,000 new council homes by 2043, 1,500 by 2018 Build the right kind of homes to meet a range of needs Build high quality and well integrated homes Meaningful.
SURF BEACH CATCHMENT, KIAMA Floodplain Risk Management Study & Draft Plan Community Information Newsletter March 2016 The study area investigated in the.
International Levee Handbook Overview of the handbook Chapter 10 Construction.
11 October 2011 JANE MOON IMPACT OF THE TERMINAL GROYNE ON SEDIMENT TRANSPORT IN MINEHEAD BAY SENIOR GEOMORPHOLOGIST.
SEA WALL Description Concrete or rock barrier built at the foot of cliffs or at the top of a beach. Has a curved face to reflect the waves back into the.
Hightown Dune Restoration Scheme and the River Alt Update – September 2013 Graham Lymbery Sefton Council.
Climate Change Threat Sea-Level Rise 1. Potential Impacts from Sea-Level Rise How might our community be impacted by sea-level rise? 2.
Neighbourhood Planning in Haringey Myddleton Road Strategic Group 7 th November 2013.
What would you do? You are a planning officer responsible for choosing the best coastal defences to use for a number of different places. You need to look.
Making decisions about the Holderness coast
Stormwatch UK Andy Bradbury   .
Managing flood risk on the River Elwy
Stormwatch UK Andy Bradbury   .
How successful are the coastal defences in Christchurch Bay?
Introduction Breach Gravel Barrier Salt Marsh
COASTAL MANAGEMENT What is the impact of people on coasts?
Responses Drivers Residential properties Damage to buildings
Measure A Financial Oversight Committee August 7, 2013
Prepared By: Cutcher & Associates, Inc. Coastal Engineers
Coastal defence (management) against flooding and erosion.
Managing the Coastline
Severn Tidal Power Feasibility Study
Lesson 6: Swanage Case Study
Adam Hosking and Rachel Fowler (Halcrow)
Hard Engineering Case Study
Exe Estuary FCRM Strategy
Moratorium Session 7 Oceanfront Development Proposals: December 3rd Folly Beach Planning Commission Reminder that this presentation, as well as past.
Bunkers Hill Residents Update – April 2016
Presentation transcript:

. Shoebury Common Flood Risk Management Scheme What is this exhibition for? This exhibition explains the various options considered for improving protection against coastal flooding at Shoebury Common. Why do we need the project? The existing sea defences are lower than elsewhere in the borough, presenting a higher risk of coastal flooding. This risk will increase in the future as sea levels rise in response to global climate change. By undertaking works to this frontage, we can improve the existing protection to over 200 homes plus commercial properties now, increasing to over 500 properties as sea levels rise in the future. These properties would otherwise be at risk from more frequent coastal flooding as sea levels rise in the future. Where will the works be required? Taking into consideration technical, environmental and economic aspects we have identified that the defences need to be enhanced along the frontage approximately between Marcus Avenue and Ness Road. The location of this low section is shown on the map below.

Shoebury Common Flood Risk Management Scheme Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk The Shoebury Common frontage forms part of the line of coastal defence that protects the flood risk area of Shoeburyness. The map below shows the area at risk of coastal flooding from an event with an Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP) of 0.5% (i.e. Chance of occurrence in any given year is 1 in 200), with 50 years of sea level rise. In addition to the coastal flood risk, the land adjacent to the coast is at risk of erosion. This erosion pressure will also increase as sea levels rise. The area at risk from coastal flooding is urban, consisting of residential housing, commercial properties and open park land. The land closest to the coast is used for amenity, including visitor car parking, beach huts, walking, cycling and other recreational activities. The coastal road is also at risk from flooding and (in time) erosion.

Shoebury Common Flood Risk Management Scheme Option Development In undertaking our option appraisal process, we have investigated the feasibility of a range of options to improve the current and future protection against coastal flooding. In general terms, the options that we have considered fall into the following categories: Set back defence along the length of the frontage: This involves construction of a new defence (within the Shoebury Common area) set back from the existing seawall. The existing coastal defences, including the seawall, will be maintained in their present form. Further set back defence along road: This involves a combination of road raising, flood walls and embankments to join up the existing areas of higher ground landward of Thorpe Esplanade / Shoebury Common Road. This new set back line of defence would need to join up to the existing front line coastal defences to create a continuous line of defence for Shoebury and, therefore, the defence needs to cross the coastal road. Improve the existing defences: This typically involves raising the existing defences in order to protect against rising sea levels and reduce the wave overtopping that leads to coastal flooding. However, this is dependant on the type and condition of the existing seawall and is likely to require a substantial amount of beach recharge (importation of beach material) to support and protect the existing seawall. Replace the existing defences: This involves replacing the existing defences with a higher like-for-like or equivalent structure in order to protect against rising sea levels and reduce the wave overtopping that leads to coastal flooding.

Shoebury Common Flood Risk Management Scheme Options Considered Option 1: Landscaped floodwall through Shoebury Common and raising of existing seawall west of the Common Option 2: Floodwall along Lodwick, Ness Road and Waterford Road with high flood gate across road Option 3: Floodwall along Lodwick, Ness Road and Waterford Road with raised road and low flood gate Option 4: Raise existing seawall and promenade with beach recharge Option 5: New seawall and raise promenade

Shoebury Common Flood Risk Management Scheme Option 4 West of Common – Raise existing seawall to 5.8mAOD (by approx. 0.7m max) with a new brick wall facade and install flood gates at the various beach access points. In front of Common – Raise existing seawall to 5.8mAOD (by approx. 0.8m), and raise the level of both the promenade and beach huts behind the seawall with a landscaped embankment tying the elevated promenade back into the common. This option will also require the beach levels to be significantly increased (and maintained) in order to support the newly raised seawall and promenade. Cost ItemValue Initial Construction£6.0m Beach Recharge£1.8m* Pros: Sea views from promenade and beach huts remain unaffected Improved flood protection to beach huts, Uncle Tom’s Cabin, public toilets and car park Enhanced beach levels and larger promenade will improve the beach’s amenity use Beach huts and promenade remain visible from the road Beach access will be modified Cons: Cost prohibitive beach recharge (both initially and in future to maintain levels) is required to support additional wall loading (note that future funding for repeated beach recharge activities will not be guaranteed) Importation of beach material within an internationally and nationally designated site of nature conservation Disruptive to local services/utilities during construction 169 beach huts will have to be temporarily moved and stored (significant risk of damage) New embankment will change the landscape of the common Existing wall and revetment will require substantial repair before they can be raised (may prove to be cost prohibitive) Sea views from both Leitrim Avenue and Lodwick will be detrimentally affected *Assumes mobilisation fees for beach recharge are shared with other frontages

Shoebury Common Flood Risk Management Scheme Option 5 West of Common – Raise existing seawall to 5.8mAOD (approx. an additional 0.7m max.) with a new brick wall facade and install flood gates at the various beach access points. In front of Common – Replace existing seawall with a sheet piled wall with concrete facing and capping beam (piling through existing revetment, burying the existing wall under the newly raised promenade) to 5.8mAOD (approx. 0.8m higher than existing seawall). Raise the level of the promenade and beach huts with a landscaped embankment, tying the elevated promenade back into the Common. Pros: Sea views from promenade and beach huts remain unaffected Improved flood protection to beach huts, Uncle Tom’s Cabin, public toilets and car park Cost prohibitive beach recharge is not required (as new wall will not require support from beach) Enlarged promenade will improve amenity use Beach huts and promenade remain visible from the road Cons: Beach access will have to be enhanced Disruptive to local services/utilities during construction All beach huts will have to be temporarily moved and stored (significant risk of damage) and will not be available for use over the construction period New embankment will change the landscape of the Common Sea views from both Leitrim Avenue and Lodwick will be detrimentally affected Highest initial capital cost Cost ItemValue Initial Construction£6.8m Beach RechargeN/A

Shoebury Common Flood Risk Management Scheme What happens next? Over the next few months we will: -Collate and analyse responses to this consultation to inform the choice of project for which planning consent will be sought. -Seek funding approval for our proposals and, if successful, progress into the detailed design of the proposed works. -We will continue to work with both residents and other local stakeholders to refine the design. Have your say We welcome your feedback on our proposals. During this exhibition please take the time to fill out a feedback form and tell us what you think of the scheme. We will then consider your comments in developing the details of the scheme. If you have any questions please feel free to contact us (see details below). High Tide at Shoebury Common Tel: ext Department for Place Southend-on-Sea Borough Council Civic Centre Victoria Avenue Southend-on-Sea Essex SS2 6ER