THE COLLEGE READY PROMISE The Running Record & Global Scholar: Evaluate.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ohio Improvement Process - OIP
Advertisements

Rhode Island Model for Educator Evaluation Systems August 2010.
Mississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric (M-STAR)
DATA TEAMS AT STANTON NETWORK SCHOOL IN THE CONTEXT OF THE SEED TEACHER EVAL PROGRAM PRESENTED BY BILLIE SHEA & JANE COOK ADAPTED FROM MATERIALS DEVELOPED.
The Content Side of the ACPS Professional Learning Plan (PLP)
Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation Pilot September 1, 2011 – September 30, 2012 NJ State Board of Education, July 13, 2011.
NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System
Difficult Conversations
Springboro Community City School District Todd Petrey, Superintendent Jamie Miles, 8 th Grade Science Teacher SEA Vice-President.
Special Education Survey Barnstable Public Schools September 17 – October 2, 2012.
The SCPS Professional Growth System
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
PA Core Standards. The end in mind PSSA Assessments Implementation Plan for PA Core Standards Instructional Shifts and Rigor of PA Core Standards ELA.
NJDOE TALENT DIVISION OVERVIEW prepared for: New Jersey Association of School Administrators April 30,
BTSA Orientation LAUSD BTSA INDUCTION Year 2 Orientation Breakout Session Welcome! LAUSD BTSA INDUCTION Year 2 Orientation Breakout Session.
Educator Evaluation Reform in New Jersey November 16, 2012.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
The Design and Implementation of Educator Evaluation Systems, Variability of Systems and the Role of a Theory of Action Rhode Island Lisa Foehr Rhode Island.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
Osceola School District’s Classroom Instructor Evaluation The Ins and Outs of Our Classroom Instructor Evaluation
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Update on Teacher and Principal Evaluation Implementation of ARS
TEACHER EVALUATION What it is going to look like….
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Preparing for Learning Objectives Review the TAPS component of the Cobb Keys for Teacher Effectiveness Explore the Teacher Performance Standards.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation August 20, 2014 Elizabeth M. Osga, Ph.D.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Teacher Evaluation System LSKD Site Administrator Training August 6, 2014.
PUSD Teacher Evaluation SY12/13 Governing Board Presentation May 10, 2012.
PUSD Teacher Evaluation SY 13/14 Governing Board Presentation May 9, 2013 Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent.
Math Content Network Update The Power of Mistakes Student Engagement Culture of Learning Growth Mindset Congruent Tasks.
Utah Effective Teaching Standards-based Jordan Performance Appraisal System Orientation (UETS-based JPAS)
6 th Annual Focus Users’ Conference Florida Reporting Presented by: Bethany Heslam.
Teacher Evaluation & Developing Goals Glenn Maleyko, Executive Director, Ph.D Haigh Elementary September 8, 2014.
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR NOTE: All that is left for implementation.
Cluster Meeting 1: Steps for Effective Learning
LCSD APPR Introduction: NYS Teaching Standards and the Framework for Teaching Rubric Welcome! Please be seated in the color-coded area (marked off by colored.
Rutland High School Technical Review Visit Looking At Results Planning Next Steps Learning About Resources.
TCRP TEACHER ADVISORY PANEL MEETING December 2011 Derrick Chau, VP Instruction Diane Fiello, TCRP Coach
Silas Deane Middle School Steven J. Cook, Principal Cynthia Fries, Assistant Principal October 22, 2013 Wethersfield Board of Education.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data SLO Process – Step 4 Monitoring Progress and Refining.
Document Review STANDARDEVIDENCE Standard 1 - Professional KnowledgeDocumentation and Observation Standard 2 - Instructional PlanningDocumentation and.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
Ensuring Exemplary Instruction for the Students Behind the Data Linking Informal Observation to Performance Measures.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data SLO Process – Step 5 Reviewing and Establishing a Summative.
Teacher/Principal Eval. Pilot Schools 17 districts/schools Will pilot both the teacher and principal evaluations during Based on the voluntary.
ALLIANCE TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS 2012 July 2012 Derrick Chau, VP TCRP Diane Fiello, TCRP Coach Harris Luu, TCRP Coach
IT’S ALL ABOUT THE BIG PEOPLE Presented by: Sylvia Mijuskovic.
Educator Effectiveness System Overview Training
Race to the Top (RTTT) and the New York State Regents Reform Agenda Dr. Timothy T. Eagen Assistant Superintendent for Instruction & Curriculum South Huntington.
Student Achievement. AchieveNJ for Teachers Nothing impacts student learning in schools more than teachers. All New Jersey students deserve great teachers,
Self Reflection and Professional Growth Synergy of Two Measures of Effectiveness.
Academic Parent Teacher Teams (APTT) ISPR~Early Release PD: Sept. 23, 2015.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
Professional Growth & Effectiveness System. DECISION REQUIRED BY MARCH 2013 Current Evaluation and PD Models The current evaluation plan was last revised.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Getting Started with i-Ready®
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
The Call for Action: Coaching and Supporting Mathematics Instruction
Alliance Teacher effectiveness 2012
Danvers Public Schools: Our Story
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
Summit Hill Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

THE COLLEGE READY PROMISE The Running Record & Global Scholar: Evaluate

Shared Norms Participants will Keep an open mind and be solution oriented Actively engage in discussion Assume the best of colleagues Work collaboratively with the interest of sharing and creating best signature practices

Global Scholar Objectives 1 Teachers will learn about the changes in the evaluation scoring system Teachers will review the decision making process (Teacher Advisory Panel, Leadership Team, Management) Teachers will practice using the Running Record Teachers will review a sample of the Running Record

The Global Scholar-Evaluate System No option for differentiated observations that could impact final scores S2 scores overwrote all S1 scores Teachers will be observed informally One indicator will be school wide 3 indicators will be selected by teacher and coach/observer and will be observed twice per semester informally and once per semester formally. Evidence will be scored on a running record Scores can increase or decrease scores by.5 Teacher receives differentiated support and feedback on the most high need areas (additional opportunities for collaboration and conferences with observers) The remaining indicators will be governed by the same rules (S2 overwrites S1).

What’s New? The Running Record

38 Indicators, 4 levels of performance Framework for Effective Teaching 6 Domain 1 Data-Driven Planning and Preparation Standard 1.1 Establish standards-based learning objectives for instructional plans Indicators A) Selection of objectives B) Measurability of objectives Domain 1 Data-Driven Planning and Preparation Standard 1.1 Establish standards-based learning objectives for instructional plans Indicators A) Selection of objectives B) Measurability of objectives 4 Domains 17 Standards

Multiple Measures of Teacher Effectiveness 7 CST-Tested Subjects Non-CST-Tested Subjects

A Design To Increase the Opportunities for Support: The Running Record Each score in the running record can impact the overall rating Unannounced and Formal observations can increase or decrease scores by 0.5 Formal observation not part of the running record: S2 overwrites S1. Review the sample below of one differentiated observation and one formal observation. StandardsIndicators Observation Date Mid Year Final Scoring Observer Name Admin1 Observation Type UNF F 3.3 Implementation of instructional strategies A) Questioning Observation Rating Overall Rating B) Academic discourse Observation Rating Overall Rating C) Group structures Observation Rating 2 3 Overall Rating 2 3 D) Resources and instructional materials Observation Rating Overall Rating

Sample Running Record

11 Overall Teacher Effectiveness Determination CST-Tested TeachersNon-CST Tested Teachers 30%Teacher SGP25%School-Wide ELA SGP 10%School-Wide SGP for Subject 5%School-Wide Math SGP 40%Average of Teacher Effectiveness Ratings 50%Average of Teacher Effectiveness Ratings 10%Student Survey10%Student Survey 10%School-Wide Parent Survey 10%School-Wide Parent Survey

12 Teacher Effectiveness Levels Effectiveness LevelPerformance Band Highly Effective Effective Achieving Emerging Entry<2.0

Getting Started

What’s new? Informal (diff) Observations On the agenda screen. Click “informal observation”

Generating a report Provides running record data for your conferences and coaching Select reports, year, school, and teacher Be sure to save the pdf version to view all indicators

Sample teacher report

Selecting teachers Use the search box or browse the teacher list to select the teacher being observed, click on the corresponding name, and it will prompt you to choose an evaluation section as shown below.

Professional Growth Plan To provide support to teachers by focusing on specific professional skills and goals known as focus areas. Currently exists as an uploaded document that should be viewed by observers prior to the pre conference.

Formal Observation

Lesson Plan Submission Teachers will upload their Lesson Plans, which will need to be approved by the Evaluators

Lesson Plan Submission Once submitted and approved, the Observer can go in to download and view the Lesson Plan Teachers should self score with the submission of their lesson plan, before delivery of the lesson

Steps 2-4 Lesson Plan Review, Pre-Observation Conference and Classroom Observation: Scoring and notes Narrative/ Quick note input Domains and indicators

Self scoring: teachers complete by stage 6 observers view by stage 8 Click on the Indicator Teachers will click on the level in which they think they should be scored Teachers can validate their scoring with notes and evidence

Reflection submission Teachers will need to submit their Reflection Evidence prior to the Post Observation Conference

Observer Preliminary Scoring Observers score teachers and add in notes on all 38 indicators

Post-observation and Informal Observation Conference View evidence, notes, and scores for each indicator

Let’s take a look at a sample

Now log on