National Embeddedness of German Managers‘ Organizational Know-How in the Inter-War Period (1918 – 1939). - A Cross-Country Inquiry - Erich Frese Cologne.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring innovation South Asian Regional Workshop on Science, Technology and Innovation Statistics Kathmandu, Nepal 6-9 December 2010.
Advertisements

IR2501 Theories of International Relations
Minnesota Theory of Work Adjustment
SETTINGS AS COMPLEX ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS AN INTRODUCTION TO COMPLEXITY SCIENCE FOR HEALTH PROMOTION PROFESSIONALS Nastaran Keshavarz Mohammadi Don Nutbeam,
Engineering Education Larry D. Gruppen, Ph.D. University of Michigan Rigorous Research.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin© 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Introduction to Organizational Behavior Chapter One.
MNC Management PRESENTATION TASKS. Multinational Management Session 2Strategic Management & Structure Group presentations: GROUP 1. Based on Akoorie and.
Sales Force Management 11 th Edition Mark W. Johnston Greg W. Marshall Routledge 2013.
Competitive Advantages in International Trade and International Business Frederick University 2012.
MGTO 630B Managing People Globally for Competitive Advantage Transferring Management Systems: Learning in IJVs Saturday, March 1, 2003 Please note: This.
LOCAL SYSTEM OF INNOVATION CENTERED ON AUDIOVISUAL PRODUCTION Marcelo Matos Fluminense Federal University and RedeSist - IE/UFRJ.
Chapter Five Contingency and Situational Leadership
ICER 2005 Factors Affecting the Success of Non-Majors in Learning to Program Susan Wiedenbeck Drexel University.
Cultural Competencies: The Big Picture Melynda Huskey Office of the Vice President for Equity and Diversity.
© 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in any manner.
Team Composition and Team Role Allocation in Agile Project Teams Brian Turrel 30 March 2015.
Scaling and Attitude Measurement in Travel and Hospitality Research Research Methodologies CHAPTER 11.
Innovativeness & Interaction: Conceptual Research Approach Maria M. Smirnova Sergey P. Kouchtch GSOM Saint Petersburg.
Wladimir Stroh Higher School of Economics Moscow, Russia.
Chapter 17 Motivation.
Concepts of management leadership-motivation and organizational culture B.V.L.Narayana.
MANA 4328 Dennis C. Veit Human Resource Staffing and Performance Management “Beginning the Staffing Process” MANA 4328 Dennis C. Veit
Group 4: Corporate Culture. Abstract In this presentation, we will discuss corporate culture In this presentation, we will discuss corporate culture We.
10 key skills to enhance employability K V Sarma Jonnavithula.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. Outline  Types of Cross-Cultural Research  Method validation studies  Indigenous cultural studies  Cross-cultural comparisons.
Lecture IntentLecture Intent  Position my scholarship within ideas and streams introduced in seminar to this point  Provide initial introduction to.
Strategic Management the art and science of formulating, implementing and evaluating crossfunctional decisions that enable an organization to meet its.
Mechanisms for Resource Integration in Business Networks Dr Linda D Peters Nottingham University Business School Dr Andrew D Pressey Lancaster University.
Rule Dynamics: A Journey into Organizational Intelligence Exploring the tension between performance and accountability.
Environmental Management Leadership Symposium May 2 & 3, 2011 Eco-efficiency, growth and the nature of corporate sustainability Stefano Pogutz and Valerio.
The contrasting environments that early career academics experience in their departmental teaching and on programmes of initial professional development.
HRM 601 Organizational Behavior Session 1 Course Overview, Historical Perspective, & Research Methods.
Data Users Needs & Capacity Building International Programs National Agricultural Statistics Service United States Department of Agriculture November 2009.
Industry Evolution & Strategic Change IMBA May 8, 2009 Te-Kuang Chou.
1 Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. CHAPTER 5 Using Health Care Competencies in Strategic Human Resource Management G. Ross.
How to Define a “Best Practice” Michael J. Spendolini, Ph.D. President, MJS Associates KM World 2000 September 13, 2000.
ADS511 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY AND DATA ANALYSYS
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1-1 Organizational Theory, Design, and Change Sixth Edition Gareth R. Jones Chapter.
Ecologists and Institutionalist: Friends or Foes
Organizational Behaviour What is an organization? Is a group of individuals working together to achieve common goals and structured into a division of.
Chapter Thirteen – Organizational Effectiveness.  Be able to define organizational effectiveness  Understand the issues underpinning measuring organizational.
1 Introduction to Global Marketing. Learning Objectives Describe the development of global marketing. Explain the importance of global marketing and the.
Unit 9/Week 9 – PP 101 Instructor Flentroy-Parker.
BUS 660 Entire Course (2 Sets) FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT This Tutorial contains 2 Sets of Papers for each Assignment (Check Details Below)
Methods of Performance Evaluation. Methods of Performance Evaluation (contd)
BY Dr Rosy Walia.  Leadership is a process by which a person influences others to accomplish an objective and directs the organization in a way that.
OT 301 A & B OT 603 & 604 Foundations of Practice
Autonomous Learning Behavior in Informal Science Learning
Oct. 27, 2015 Weihua Gan.
PSYC 206 Lifespan Development Bilge Yagmurlu.
Motivation Chapter 5 IBUS 681, DR. Yang.
CREATED BY T.ALAA AL AMOUDI
Mrs. Veena Rao Assistant Professor (Fashion Design)
Health Education THeories
RECRUITMENT GAP November 2017, SOFIA
O rganizational Behavior
O rganizational Behavior
O rganizational Behavior
O rganizational Behavior
O rganizational Behavior
O rganizational Behavior
O rganizational Behavior
O rganizational Behavior
O rganizational Behavior
O rganizational Behavior
O rganizational Behavior
O rganizational Behavior
O rganizational Behavior
Motivation Chapter 5 IBUS 681, DR. Yang.
Presentation transcript:

National Embeddedness of German Managers‘ Organizational Know-How in the Inter-War Period (1918 – 1939). - A Cross-Country Inquiry - Erich Frese Cologne University Academy of Management Annual Meeting Montreal 2010

2 German Managers‘ Inter-War Org. Know-How Frese AoM 2010 Level of organizational know-how in large German companies ( ) Organizational Know-How: Capability to meet new organizational challenges with successful structural solutions developed by own effort 1. Object of Inquiry

3 German Managers‘ Inter-War Org. Know-How Frese AoM 2010 German and U.S. managers are guided by the same cognitive organizational paradigm (systems engineering) Managers perceiving and solving organizational problems are exploiting the available know-how with different degrees of intensity  Prevalent organizational structures often do not indicate the national state of organizational know-how Country-specific factors influence managers‘ exploitation of given organizational know-how  Which organizational theories contribute to explain national differences in the exploitation of given organizational know-how? 2. Key Notions of Inquiry

4 German Managers‘ Inter-War Org. Know-How Frese AoM 2010 Measuring different levels of organizational know-how  ordinal, not cardinal scale (G USA)  paradigmatic benchmark: exploitation of given rules (systems engineering)  identifying given, but not exploited org. know-how Cross-country validity of systems engineering  elaborating the cognitive structure of systems engineering  assumed coordination and motivation effects  proving the cross-country dominance of systems engineering (Fig. 1) Empirical foundation of theoretical reasoning sample of companies (Du Pont, General Motors; I.G. Farben, Siemens)  no own archival work  literature covering the inter-war period  literature and interviews covering the post-war period 3. Methodological Requirements

5 German Managers‘ Inter-War Org. Know-How Frese AoM 2010 Fig. 1 Prevalent Org. Structures of Large U.S. Companies Org. Paradigms of U.S. Managers Reference Model Country-specific Features of Large German Companies Prevalent Org. Structures of Large German Companies Legend: AB B reconstructed from A AB proof of conceptional correspondence AB consideration of A when conceptional correspondence is proved

6 German Managers‘ Inter-War Org. Know-How Frese AoM 2010 Differentiating factors explaining prevalent German organizational structures Culture: self-efficacy of acting (planning)  basic theory: perceived locus of control (Rotter 1972) Institutional rules: pressure for acting  basic theory: adaptive behavior (Cyert & March 1963) Personal traits: professionalizing of acting  basic theory: power and influence (Thompson 1967) Differentiating factors and profit seeking behavior (Fig. 2) Comprehensive model: country-specific determinants of organizational structures (Fig. 3) 4. Country-specific organizational Factors Shaping large German Companies

7 German Managers‘ Inter-War Org. Know-How Frese AoM 2010 Fig. 2 Profit Seeking Behavior Position of Profit Goal Aspiration Level for Profit Goal Personal Traits Self-Containment Technical Goals Institutions Self-Containment Co-operative Goals Culture Planning Scepticism Institutions Market Regulations Legend ABAcausesB Legend ABAcausesB

8 German Managers‘ Inter-War Org. Know-How Frese AoM 2010 Fig. 3 Culture Self-efficacy of Planning Capabilities Personal Traits Influence of Technicians Profit Seeking Behavior Institutions Market Affinity of Institutional Rules Organization Structure Legend AB A causes B

9 Shape of prevailing organizational structures (G  USA) competence system: similar level of sophistication control system: rudimentary state of German company-wide planning systems State of German planning systems and level of org. know-how Prevalent state does not indicate substantial deficits in organizational know-how  increasing post-war competition intensified exploitation of available (mostly inter-war) organizational know-how  in early post-war times systems engineering was still the dominating paradigm German Managers‘ Inter-War Org. Know-How Frese AoM Main Results