Living in harmony with nature HIGH-LEVEL PANEL ON GLOBAL ASSESSMENT OF RESOURCES FOR IMPLEMENTING THE STRATEGIC PLAN FOR BIODIVERSITY 2011-2020.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBD & National Accounting Systems Opportunities and Challenges 1 Expert meeting on the SEEA revision, May 2011, Copenhagen Didier Babin CBD Secretariat.
Advertisements

UNEP World Conservation
ASSESSMENT ISSUES An EU Perspective Ladislav Miko Director, Protecting the Natural Environment, DG Environment, European Commission.
1 DG Regio Evaluation Network Meeting Albert Borschette, Brussels, 14 October 2010 Ex post evaluation of Interreg III - Presentation of Final Results Pasi.
EU biodiversity policy
Trend of international discussions on the UNFCCC
FOREST EUROPE Preparing the Sixth Ministerial Conference, including a possible legal instrument on forests EFI Annual Conference 15 September 2010, Dresden,
Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (UNEP/CMS) Development of a Strategic Plan for Migratory Species
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Introduction to the CHM and Links to the Planning and Reporting Processes Olivier de Munck Programme Officer, CHM, CBD Secretariat.
January 23, 2013 How does the proposed Caribbean Harmonised Reporting template (CHART) work to meet reporting obligations for MEAs ? Thera Edwards.
Which initiatives do exist and what is UNEP TEEB doing? UNEP TEEB Office Jasmin Hundorf 22 May 2013 TEEB Country Studies Learning from Experience and how.
Workshops for implementing the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity through the National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans CBD Secretariat April 2011.
WGP-AS UNDP/RBAS Water Governance Programme for Arab States (WGP-AS) NATIONAL CAPACITY NEEDS FOR THE EFFECTIVE JOINT MANAGEMENT OF SHARED WATER RESOURCES.
SAI Performance Measurement Framework
A Decade for Biodiversity Supporting Implementation of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity and other Aichi-Nagoya Outcomes David Cooper, CBD Secretariat.
Biodiversity and The Future We Want Supporting Implementation of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity and other Aichi-Nagoya Outcomes.
Introduction and Overview
Biodiversity is life Biodiversity is our life. Biodiversity is life Biodiversity is our life I. The Convention on Biological Diversity Adopted in 1992.
Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 Claudia Olazábal Deputy Head of Unit Biodiversity Unit DG Environment European.
Current UK and EU Policy on Water Management Thames Tunnel Commission 29/7/11.
CBD and the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity Opportunities for synchronizing with the SEEA revision process Sixth meeting of the CEEA New York,
European Clearing-House Mechanism Portal Toolkit Expert Group Meeting
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
6th European University-Business Forum PARTNERSHIPS FOR JOBS AND GROWTH Social Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship Ellen Shipley, Partnership &
References to Economic Instruments in Selected MEAs Matthew Stilwell Matthew Stilwell.
The European Biodiversity Action Plan - State of Play and prospects after 2010 EPF 18 March 2009 Anne Teller, DG ENV.B2.
Co-operation on Health and Biodiversity IUFRO Forests and Health Seminar, Marrakesh, Morocco, 30 th April 2008.
Developing Biodiversity Indicators Measuring Conservation Impact at Global and Project Scales Valerie Kapos.
Living in harmony with nature.
UNFCCC Workshops on Synergies and Cooperation with other Conventions Espoo, Finland, 2-4 July 2003 Biological Diversity Perspectives David Cooper, CBD.
EBSAs to Marine Spatial Planning toward achieving Aichi Targets in marine and coastal areas in support of Blue Economy 8 th Meeting of the Conference of.
Workshops for implementing the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity through the National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans CBD Secretariat April 2011.
and National Implementation
The IUCN Programme Nature+ Proposal, May 2011.
GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop Windhoek, Namibia February 17-18, 2015 GEF 6 Programming Strategic Plan for Biodiversity,
Living in harmony with nature. -The Role of Biodiversity in drought management -The Convention on Biological Diversity and drought management.
European environment policy update
Implementation of TARGET 2 of the EU 2020 Biodiversity Strategy Claudia Olazábal Unit – Biodiversity DG ENV European Commission Nature Directors Meeting.
ODA and EU recent financing initiatives Biodiversity Unit, DG Environment, European Commission CBD Dialogue Seminar on Scaling up biodiversity financing,
Technology Transfer under the CBD Opportunities for Cooperation CBD - UNFCCC Technology Transfer under the CBD Opportunities for Cooperation CBD - UNFCCC.
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Biodiversity GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop April 5 – 7, 2011 Da Lat, Vietnam.
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) 1992 (entered into force in December 1993) website: Dr Mahfuzul Haque.
Contributions of IPs and LCs and community conservation to Global Biodiversity and the Aichi targets Panajachel, Guatemala 11 June, John Scott Senior.
Living in harmony with nature
CBD Presentation A Decade for Biodiversity: Implementation of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity and other Aichi-Nagoya Outcomes GEF Expanded Constituency.
SEBI Indicator developments Katarzyna Biała European Environment Agency Katarzyna Biała, European Environment Agency The Global Biodiversity targets –
Expanded Constituency Workshop (ECW) October 30 - November 1, 2012 Arusha, Tanzania. Ravi Sharma CBD Secretariat.
CPPS Workshop on Integrated Regional Ocean Policy
François WAKENHUT Head of Nature and Biodiversity Unit, DG Environment European Commission Training on Biodiversity Policy and Practice 1 st of June 2010.
The Convention on Biological Diversity and its Protocols Status of Implementation GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop Minsk, Belarus, September 2015.
GEF Familiarization Seminar January 17 – 19, 2012 Mark Zimsky, Biodiversity Coordinator Senior Biodiversity Specialist, Global Environment Facility GEF-5.
The Message from Nagoya, CBD COP10 Martin Brasher, Defra.
A world where biodiversity counts Matt Walpole UNEP-WCMC Cambridge, UK.
Division of Technology, Industry, and Economics Economics and Trade Branch Incorporating Biodiversity into Trade-Related Integrated Assessments Presentation.
The Convention on Biological Diversity Progress report Marjo Vierros Secretariat Convention on Biological Diversity ICRI General Meeting Palau, 31 October.
MPAs and CBD Marjo Vierros Secretariat Convention on Biological Diversity ICRI General Meeting Palau, 31 October - 2 November 2005.
Convention on Biological Diversity 3 Rio Conventions – UNFCCC, UNCCD and CBD The CBD is an international legally-binding biodiversity treaty with three.
Options for harmonizing national reporting to biodiversity-related agreements Peter Herkenrath UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre.
African Training Workshop on Community Protocols, Indicators on Traditional Knowledge and Customary Sustainable Use under the Convention on Biological.
A review of the benefits, costs and resource needs associated with the delivery of the Aichi biodiversity targets Matt Rayment, ICF International James.
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and implications for South Africa
EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 Towards implementation & monitoring
CGBN Co-ordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature
Water and Marine Directors meeting Spa, 2-3 December 2010
References to Economic Instruments in Selected MEAs
CGBN Co-ordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature
Multi-annual Financial Framework and Biodiversity Financing
Synergies in implementing the CBD and other MEAs
Side Event: Review of Action Strategy for Nature Conservation
Presentation transcript:

Living in harmony with nature HIGH-LEVEL PANEL ON GLOBAL ASSESSMENT OF RESOURCES FOR IMPLEMENTING THE STRATEGIC PLAN FOR BIODIVERSITY

In 2012, the first High-Level Panel reported on ‘Resourcing the Aichi Biodiversity Targets’ to COP-11. In Decision XI/4, COP-11 welcomed the initial findings, and invited the Panel, in collaboration with other relevant initiatives that could provide a more bottom- up approach, to continue its work with a broadened composition and to report back on the results of its work to COP-12. The High-Level Panel has been expanded to create a regionally-balanced Panel of fifteen members. For further information, visit or Introduction to the High- Level Panel

The Panel produced eight key messages: 1.Implementation and delivery of the Targets requires the development of an appropriate and coherent political and institutional framework and strong political will, particularly at the national and regional level. 2.Investment in natural capital will deliver significant co-benefits for sustainable development. 3.Existing evidence suggests that benefits are likely to significantly outweigh costs. 4.There are clear differences in the relative scale of investment required to deliver the various Targets. In addition, the investment needed to deliver a Target is not necessarily correlated to its importance. Results of the High-Level Panel (Phase I) For further information, visit or

5.Many factors affect the magnitude of the estimates of the investments needed to achieve each of the Targets. These include the scope of the activities to be costed and associated investment opportunities and the potential synergies among Targets as well as uncertainties arising from limitations in data and methodologies. 6.There are many inter-linkages and co-dependencies to consider both between the Targets themselves, and between the Targets and other national policy goals. 7.Funding from a diverse range of international and national sources, and across different policy areas is required to secure the full range of economic and social benefits to be gained from meeting the Aichi Targets. 8.Further research is vital to help further develop and refine the estimates. Results of the High-Level Panel (Phase I) For further information, visit or

It was estimated that one-off investments account for between 60% and 70% of the overall global resource needs for delivering the Targets over the 2013 to 2020 period. Through simple addition of the resource requirements identified for each Target, the costs for implementing the twenty Aichi Biodiversity Targets were estimated at between US$ 150 billion and US$ 440 billion per year. However, it is expected that these resource requirements neither should nor could be met by biodiversity finance alone, and there is potential for considerable synergies among the Targets, so that coordinated action could substantially reduce the total estimate. Results of the High-Level Panel (Phase I) For further information, visit or

Strategic GoalTarget Investment needs (US$ million) Recurrent expenditure per annum (US$ million) Average annual expenditure (2013 – 2020) (US$ million) A: Address the underlying causes of biodiversity loss by mainstreaming biodiversity across government and society 1: Awareness raising54440 – 1, – 890 2: Biodiversity values450 – – – 160 3: Incentives1,300 – 2,0008 – – 270 4: Sustainable consumption & production 55 – 1078 – 1512 – 23 B: Reduce the direct pressures on biodiversity and promote sustainable use 5: Reducing habitat loss (forests and wetlands) 152,300 – 288,80013,300 – 13,70039,200 – 52,100 6: Fisheries129,900 – 292, – 3,20016,900 – 40,000 7: Sustainable Agriculture, Aquaculture and Forestry 20,800 – 21,70010,700 – 11,00013,200 – 13,600 8: Pollution77,600 – 772,70024,400 – 42,70035,400 – 139,200 9: Invasive alien species34,100 – 43,90021,005 – 50,10023,300 – 52,900 10: Coral reefs600 – 9606 – 1080 – 130 C: To improve the status of biodiversity by safeguarding ecosystems, species and genetic diversity 11: Protected areas (terrestrial and marine) 66,100 – 626, – 6,7009,200 – 85,000 12: Species conservation–3,400 – 4,800 13: Genetic diversity550 – 1,40015 – 1780 – 190 D: Enhance the benefits to all from biodiversity and ecosystem services 14: Ecosystem restoration30,000 – 299,900–3,750 – 37,500 15: Restoration of forests1006,400 16: Nagoya Protocol55 – 313–7 – 39 E: Enhance implementation through participatory planning, knowledge management and capacity building 17: NBSAPs114 – 1, – – : Traditional knowledge210 – : Science base1,800 – 4,2001,400 – 1,6001,600 – 2,100 20: Mobilisation of financial resources 10 – 793 – 204 – 30 Results of the High-Level Panel (Phase I) For further information, visit or

The Panel is: providing strategic leadership and guidance to the research and identify the priorities within it; working directly with the Research Team and CBD Secretariat to draw key messages, conclusions and recommendations from the research; engaging with other relevant institutions and initiatives to secure the cooperation and provision of evidence for analysis; engaging with CBD Parties to raise awareness of the study and its findings; and overseeing delivery of a draft report for WGRI-5 consideration and feedback, and a final report for COP-12. Approach of the High-Level Panel For further information, visit or

The High-Level Panel is supported by a Research Team and the CBD Secretariat. The High-Level Panel is also expected to align with intersessional initiatives, e.g.: Within the CBD (e.g., GBO-4) Post-2015 UN Development Agenda and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) processes Approach of the High-Level Panel For further information, visit or

The High-Level Panel is considering the range of the costs of implementing the activities needed to achieve the targets, and identifying the opportunities to most cost effectively secure such benefits through actions both within and outside the biodiversity sector. In response to the following questions, the benefits of meeting the Aichi Biodiversity Targets will be assessed by examining both the positive impacts on biodiversity directly and the wider benefits to society that result from the investments and policy developments required: Benefits Investment needs Resource requirements Policy alignment and development Cost effectiveness Benefits and costs Approach of the High-Level Panel For further information, visit or

Benefits What will be the economic benefits of delivering the Aichi Targets? What evidence is there of the nature, scale and value of these benefits, at national and international levels? Approach of the High-Level Panel For further information, visit or

Investment needs What investments need to be made to deliver the Aichi targets and to secure these benefits? Where would these investments be best directed or focused? Which Targets will these investments help to meet, and what are the synergies and overlaps between Targets? What types of on-going annual expenditures will be required? How do the types of investments and ongoing expenditures identified compare to those identified in the first phase of the HLP research? Approach of the High-Level Panel For further information, visit or

Resource requirements What evidence is there of resource needs at the project and country level? How does this evidence compare with the analysis presented in the HLP’s report to COP-11? What evidence is there for current allocations relative to needs? What are the implications for the resources required to deliver the targets, individually and collectively? Approach of the High-Level Panel For further information, visit or

Policy alignment and development How do the identified investment needs and the benefits they will achieve align with other policy agendas, such as the Post-2015 UN Development Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals? To what extent can we identify synergies and opportunities for joint delivery at the country and programme level? What are the implications for the overall resource requirements to meet the Aichi Targets, and the degree to which additional resources need to be targeted to them? To what extent can improvements in governance, institutional and policy development at the country level contribute in a cost-efficient manner to deliver actions to achieve the Targets? Approach of the High-Level Panel For further information, visit or

Cost effectiveness How can the Aichi Targets be delivered at least cost, taking account of the synergies between the targets and the investments required, the sequencing of actions and the synergies with other policy agendas? What evidence is there of the cost effectiveness of different investments, taking account of biodiversity gain and contribution to the Targets relative to cost? What are the implications for the sequencing and/or prioritisation of investments in moving towards achieving the Targets? Approach of the High-Level Panel For further information, visit or

Benefits and costs What does the evidence as identified above tell us about the balance between the benefits and costs of meeting the Targets? How can this evidence be used to make the case for the investments required? Approach of the High-Level Panel For further information, visit or

30-31 May 2013: 1 st High-Level Panel meeting (Trondheim, Norway) 22 November 2013: 1 st draft report submitted to High-Level Panel 2-4 December 2013: 2 nd High-Level Panel meeting (Chennai, India) 17 March 2014: Revised draft report available for peer review April 2014: 3 rd High-Level Panel meeting (possibly Brazil) 23 May 2014: Delivery of draft report for WGRI-5 to CBD Secretariat June 2014: WGRI-5 (Montreal, Canada) 4 July 2014: Revised draft report to High-Level Panel 31 July 2014: Delivery of final report and 15-page Executive Summary for COP12 to CBD Secretariat 6-17 October 2014: COP12 (Pyeongchang, Korea) Key dates of the High-Level Panel For further information, visit or

GENERAL SLIDES ON BIODIVERSITY, THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY AND THE STRATEGIC PLAN

What is Biodiversity? Eurobarometer: only 38% of Europeans know the meaning of the term, although another 28% have heard of it but do not know its meaning The main reason cited by citizens for their lack of actions to stop biodiversity loss was low awareness of what can be done Members of the public were asked what biodiversity is. The most common answer was "some kind of washing powder" (BBC, 15 Oct 2010)

Biodiversity is threatened Invasive species Climate change Habitat conversion Overexploitation Pollution Indirect drivers Economic activity Demographics (population growth) Social and political factors Cultural and religious factors

The Convention Cartagena Protocol Nagoya Protocol Programmes Information Secretariat 1 of the three Rio Conventions, emerging from the UN Conference on Environment and Development in objectives:Conservation of biological diversity Sustainable use of its components Fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of the utilization of genetic resources 193 Parties (192 countries and the European Union) About the Convention Conference of the Parties Strategic Plan Aichi Biodiversity Targets Implementation UN Decade on Biodiversity

The Convention Cartagena Protocol Nagoya Protocol Programmes Information Secretariat Strategic Plan for Biodiversity Vision Living in harmony with nature. By 2050, biodiversity is valued, conserved, restored and wisely used, maintaining ecosystem services, sustaining a healthy planet and delivering benefits essential for all people Mission Take effective and urgent action to halt the loss of biodiversity in order to ensure that by 2020 ecosystems are resilient and continue to provide essential services, thereby securing the planet’s variety of life, and contributing to human well-being, and poverty eradication About the Convention Conference of the Parties Strategic Plan Aichi Biodiversity Targets Implementation UN Decade on Biodiversity

The Convention Cartagena Protocol Nagoya Protocol Programmes Information Secretariat Strategic Plan for Biodiversity Develop national targets taking into account national circumstances Review, update and revise NBSAPs, in line with the Strategic Plan Monitor and review the implementation of their NBSAPS… and report to COP through the fifth and sixth national reports About the Convention Conference of the Parties Strategic Plan Aichi Biodiversity Targets Implementation UN Decade on Biodiversity

The Convention Cartagena Protocol Nagoya Protocol Programmes Information Secretariat 20 Aichi Biodiversity Targets - 5 Strategic Goals A Address the underlying causes of biodiversity loss by mainstreaming biodiversity across government and society B Reduce the direct pressures on biodiversity and promote sustainable use C To improve the status of biodiversity by safeguarding ecosystems, species and genetic diversity D Enhance the benefits to all from biodiversity and ecosystem services E Enhance implementation through participatory planning, knowledge management and capacity building About the Convention Conference of the Parties Strategic Plan Aichi Biodiversity Targets Implementation UN Decade on Biodiversity