SC-214 / WG-78 Mgt Meeting Nov 2010 Rockville, MD – Lockheed Martin

ATN Baselines 2 & 3 CMCPDLCD-FIS Data Communication Standards Publication Plan DLICAFNAMCACMDCL D- TAXI(t) D- TAXI(g)ACL4DTRADFLIPINTIMPRD-ATISD-OTISD-RVRD-HZWX SPR for ATN Baseline II Interoperability Standard for Data Communication Via ATN Baseline II Interoperability Standard for an ATN Baseline II Ground System Providing Service to FANS-1/A+ Aircraft  SPR for ATN Baseline III Interoperability Standard for Data Communication Via ATN Baseline III Interoperability Standard for an ATN Baseline III Ground System Providing Service to FANS-1/A+ Aircraft

Publication Approach  Proposal FAA DataCom for Two Volumes; end of 2011 and mid 2013  SPR for ATN Baseline II (12/2011)  Support contracting for ground systems  Support non-integrated aircraft  Scope  DLIC, AFN, D-ATIS (subset of D-OTIS), DCL, AMC, ACM, ACL, D-TAXI (text), FLIPINT (incl. EPP), PR  Routine use of complex clearance (ACL extended route variable) requires integrated FMS  Interoperability Standard for Data Communication Via ATN Baseline II (12/2011)  Supports DLIC, D-ATIS (subset D-OTIS), DCL, AMC, ACM, ACL, D-TAXI (text)  Not for routine use of complex clearances  Interoperability Standard for an ATN Baseline II Ground System Providing Service to FANS-1/A+ Aircraft (12/2011)  Supports AFN, FLIPINT, DCL, AMC, ACM, ACL, PR  SPR for ATN Baseline III (6/2013)  Incorporates SPR for ATN Baseline II by reference  Introduces D-OTIS, D-RVR, IM, D-TAXI (graphic), D-HZWX, 4DTRAD  Interoperability Standard for Data Communication Via ATN Baseline III (6/2013)  Incorporates by reference Interoperability Standard for Data Communication Via ATN Baseline II  Introduces D-OTIS, D-RVR, IM, D-TAXI (graphic), D-HZWX, 4DTRAD  Interoperability Standard for an ATN Baseline III Ground System Providing Service to FANS-1/A+ Aircraft (6/2013)  Incorporates by reference Interoperability Standard for an ATN Baseline II Ground System Providing Service to FANS 1/A+ Aircraft  Introduces IM

Resolution to Recs in Pos Papers Paper1: FAA Issues  Airspace change definition  Cannot be acted upon yet, pending JPDO input at a later date, deadline for comments is end of Dec 2010  Operational requirements versus service and application requirements  Response agreed but reference should be to Annex 10/Vol2Ch8, rather than DO306/ED122 – delegated to CSG – work to be completed by mid April 2011  Mixed “data link capable” fleet operations  There is no impact on the SPR. The considerations mentioned in the reply are removed.  Performance-based framework - RCP  Response modified as follows:  FAA-AVS is requested to provide guidance on specification of technical performance criteria for the CM application.  Maintain RCP values for selected DFIS services.  Finalise together with OPLINK the revised RCP values and the operational requirements.. Pending on the outcome, the RCP Manual may be extended with 1 or 2 new RCP values (e.g.RCP 180 & 300). See also item ‘78/214’: Within the constraints of statistical approach align the RCP values with those in the RCP manual.  Delegated to CSG

Resolution to Recs in Pos Papers Paper1: FAA Issues…cont  CPDLC message set and CPDLC indications (modes, incoming messages) and alerts (failures, loss of connection)  CSG will review the CPDLC message set  Deadline mid April 2011 for DCL, AMC, ACM, ACL, D-TAXI (text), IM, D-TAXI Graphic,  Deadline end of 2012 for 4DTRAD  The use of CPDPLC Indications and Alerts Attributes has to be updated, based on feedback from external validation activities. (if some address that specific point)  For 2011 delivery date, JPDO input is needed by January 10-14, /214 SG meeting  Delegated to CSG

Resolution to Recs in Pos Papers Paper1: FAA Issues…cont  Aircraft’s flight guidance system (e.g., FMC) autoload and data transfer (e.g., ADS-C EPP, radio freq, clearance data)  In general, all messages containing the Route variable are candidate for autoload.  A screening of all CPDLC messages for autoload is needed; and the principle needs to be discussed, including all avionics stakeholders  Additional Ors or Safety Requirements for autoload of CPDLC messages may need to be defined  There may a safety issue for LINK2000 avionics that can technically receive complex clearances through UM80; however not all LINK2000 avionics can act upon the received clearance or meet RCP. The LINK2000 local safety cases today limits the uplinking to maximum 2 waypoints.  Delegated to FAA by December , then CSG by Feb 2011

Resolution to Recs in Pos Papers Paper1: FAA Issues…cont  D-TAXI textual/graphical consistency/accuracy  Feedback from validation projects are awaited to confirm the requirement for Graphical D-TAXI  The issue needs to be resolved by end of 2012  Partial CPDLC application – harmonization  We confirm our commitment to not support partial builds  FAA AIR will draft objectively verifiable definition of “routine use of complex clearances” for consideration by CSG at subgroup meetings during the week of 1/10/2011.  We confirm our commitment to not support partial builds.  Accommodate FANS 1/A+ implementation of ADS-C for Ground system implementations of ATN Baselines II & III.  ATN Baseline III implementation requires EPP.  OBE  Partial D-FIS  We confirm our commitment to not support partial builds  Utility of proposed services to be assessed jointly with TOPS at January Subgroup  ATN Baseline II incorporates D-ATIS  ATN Baseline III incorporates all defined D-FIS services.  2.5.x To be addressed in meeting of Ad Hoc Management Group (WEBEX) planned for TBA.

Meetings 2011 SGsJanuary 10-14US, FAA Tech Centre, Atlantic City P12April 11-15Berlin, DFS SGsJune 20-24US SGsAug29 – Sept2Europe P13Sept 26-30Europe SGsOct 31 – Nov 4US P14Dec 5 - 9US – RTCA, DC