Southeastern Association of Educational Opportunity Program Personnel 38 th Annual Conference January 30 – February 3, 2010 Upward Bound Internal & External.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Individual Professional Development Planning for Teachers
Advertisements

Planning Reports and Proposals
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
A Study of State and Local Implementation and Impact The Study of State and Local Implementation and Impact of the Individuals with Disabilities Education.
Copyright © 2002 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1 Computer Systems Organization & Architecture Chapters 8-12 John D. Carpinelli.
Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
2 Session Objectives Increase participant understanding of effective financial monitoring based upon risk assessments of sub-grantees Increase participant.
UNITED NATIONS Shipment Details Report – January 2006.
1 LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION Technology Initiative Grant Program Developing and Submitting TIG Project Evaluation Plans Bristow Hardin, LSC,
Aviation Security Training Module 4 Design and Conduct Exercise II 1.
1 Assessing Health Needs Gilbert Burnham, MD, PhD Johns Hopkins University.
Copyright © 2012 California Department of Education, Child Development Division with WestEd Center for Child & Family Studies, Desired Results T&TA Project.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
1 DPAS II Process and Procedures for Teachers Developed by: Delaware Department of Education.
1 Citrus County 21 st CCLC Progress Report Larry Parman External Evaluator.
Mini-Grant Application: Quality Improvement in the Area of Immunizations Catherine Shoults, M.P.H., Kansas Health Institute Kansas Public Health Conference.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop MICS Technical Assistance MICS Survey Design Workshop.
1 SESSION 5- RECORDING AND REPORTING IN GRADES R-12 Computer Applications Technology Information Technology.
Special Education Survey Barnstable Public Schools September 17 – October 2, 2012.
Time Management F OR A S MALL B USINESS. TIMEMANAGEMENT 2 Welcome 1. Agenda 2. Ground Rules 3. Introductions.
Management Plans: A Roadmap to Successful Implementation
1 Title I Program Evaluation Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session May 23, 2011.
A Roadmap to Successful Implementation Management Plans.
Evaluating Training Programs The Four Levels
1 Quality Indicators for Device Demonstrations April 21, 2009 Lisa Kosh Diana Carl.
Customer Service.
ABC Technology Project
1 Undirected Breadth First Search F A BCG DE H 2 F A BCG DE H Queue: A get Undiscovered Fringe Finished Active 0 distance from A visit(A)
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.
VOORBLAD.
Module 4: Establishing a Data-based Decision- making System.
Evaluation Orientation Meeting Teacher Evaluation System
Directions for this Template  Use the Slide Master to make universal changes to the presentation, including inserting your organization’s logo –“View”
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Understanding Generalist Practice, 5e, Kirst-Ashman/Hull
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: Establishing a Screening Process
Januar MDMDFSSMDMDFSSS
Week 1.
Analyzing Genes and Genomes
Sedex: Registration and Account Set Up Instructions
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
Module 12 WSP quality assurance tool 1. Module 12 WSP quality assurance tool Session structure Introduction About the tool Using the tool Supporting materials.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
Intracellular Compartments and Transport
PSSA Preparation.
Essential Cell Biology
CpSc 3220 Designing a Database
DATA TRACKING AND EVALUATION 1. Goal of the STEP program: To increase the number of STEM graduates within the five-year period of the grant. You have.
Analyzing & Reporting Data– TS & EOC SAEOPP Priority 1 Training PY 2010.
Trini Torres-Carrion. AGENDA Overview of ED 524B Resources Q&A.
Possible TS Objectives Based on Expanded Prior Experience Texas Association of Student Special Services Programs 37 th Annual Conference February 28 –
The Formative & Summative Evaluation Process TS & EOC SAEOPP Priority 1 Training PY 2009.
Analyzing & Reporting Data– TS & EOC SAEOPP Priority 1 Training PY 2009.
1 Chapter 3 - SAEOPP Priority 1 Training SHOW & TELL: TRIO PROJECT EVALUATION Presenter: Elizabeth C. Retamozo.
HEOA Implications on Talent Search Texas Association of Student Special Services Programs 36 th Annual Conference March 8 – 11, 2009.
Presentation transcript:

Southeastern Association of Educational Opportunity Program Personnel 38 th Annual Conference January 30 – February 3, 2010 Upward Bound Internal & External Program Evaluation

Presenter Elizabeth C. Retamozo, Executive Director NOSOTROS Education Center Phone:

Presentation Materials PowerPoint Slide Presentation & Handout Located at: –Go to Resources Page –Register Your Address –Click the Presentations & Links Tab –Click SAEOPP 2010 Folder –UB Internal & External Program Evaluation 3

4 Types of TRIO Evaluation Plans  Outcome-Based Evaluation  Goals-Based Evaluation  Process-Based Evaluation

5 Common Evaluation Plan Terminology Qualitative Values  Expressed by impressions, feelings & perceptions Ex. Surveys, Interviews, Focus Groups, etc. Quantitative Values  Expressed in numerical terms, counted, or compared on a scale Ex. Grade Point Averages, Test Scores, etc.

6 Common Evaluation Plan Terminology Formative Methods  Continuous (daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, semester) assessment to track progress Ex. Monthly Reports Summative Methods  End of year assessment that measures the results or outcomes of a Project Ex. Annual Performance Report

7 Sample TRIO Evaluation Plans  Outcomes Based Evaluation External & Summative Looks at impacts/benefits/changes to your students as a result of your project’s efforts after their participation in your Project (PE OBJECTIVES).

8 Sample TRIO Evaluation Plans  Goals Based Evaluation Internal & Formative Evaluates the extent to which projects are meeting predetermined internal goals or objectives.

9 Sample TRIO Evaluation Plans  Process Based Evaluation External & Summative) Geared to fully understanding how a Project works How does it produce that results that it gets?

10 Outcome Based Evaluation  Outcomes Based Evaluation (External & Summative)  Measures performance on the four (4) established UB Program objectives by the end of each year (summative).  DE Mandated Objectives = Prior Experience

11 Outcome Based Evaluation Plan 1)Identify Major Outcomes (Mandatory Objectives) 2)What Types Of Data Will Be Collected? 3)When Will Various Types Of Data & Reports Be Collected? 4)What Instruments Will Be Developed? 5)How Will The Data Be Analyzed? 6)How Will The Data Collected Determine Accomplishment?

12 Outcome Based Evaluation UB Outcome Based Evaluation Plan

13 Goals Based Evaluation  Goals Based Evaluation (Internal & Formative)  Evaluates the extent to which Project is meeting predetermined internal goals  Project Developed INTERNAL GOALS based on DE Objectives  Includes quantifiable & qualitative measures to track progress during the Project year (formative)  Monitored and reviewed weekly/monthly

14 Goals Based Evaluation 1)What Project goals were established? 2)What is the status of the project’s progress towards achieving the goals? 3)Will the goals be achieved according to the timelines specified in the program implementation or operations plan? 4)Do personnel have adequate resources (supplies, facilities, training, etc)?

15 Goals Based Evaluation 5)How should priorities be changed to focus more on achieving the goals? 6)How should timelines be changed? 7)How should goals be established in the future?

16 Goals Based Evaluation Plan 1)Develop Internal Goals based on External Objectives 2)Activities & Services Needed to Achieve Each Goal 3)Project Staff Responsible to Carry Out Activities & Services 4)Data that Needs to be Collected 5)Instruments (Forms) that Need to be Developed and Collected

17 Goals Based Evaluation Plan 6)When is Data Collected? 7)How is Data Collected Analyzed? 8)Was the Goal Met? Yes/No 9)Needed or Recommended Revisions 10) Unanticipated Outcomes

18 Outcome Based Evaluation Sample UB Internal Goals UB Goals Based Evaluation Plan

19 Process Based Evaluation  Process Based Evaluation (External & Summative)  Geared to fully understanding how a project works  How does it produce the results that it gets?  Usually External Conducted by Program Evaluator

20 External Evaluation Recommended in last grant proposal competitions Must be conducted if included in grant proposals Allowable cost for the project May be paid by the grantee agency/institution May be provided free of charge – in-kind/donation

21 External Evaluation May be conducted by person working/employed by agency/institution BUT not for the Project Must have experience conducting evaluations for educational opportunity programs & TRIO like programs Must state what type of evaluation will be conducted by the evaluator.

22 Process Based Evaluation Plan 1)How does the Project identify, recruit, & select participants? 2)How does the Project decide what specific services & activities to provide to its participants? 3)How does the Project monitor participants’ academic progress? 4)How does the Project deliver services to its participants?

23 Process Based Evaluation Plan 5)How does the Project document services provided to participants? 6)What is the Project’s goals based evaluation plan? 7)What is the Project’s outcome based evaluation plan? 8)How does the Project plan for the next program year?

24 Process Based Evaluation UB Process Based Evaluation Checklist External Process Based Evaluation Report

25 Basic Guide to Program Evaluation Written by Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC. Copyright Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC Adapted from the Field Guide to Nonprofit Program Design, Marketing and Evaluation.Field Guide to Nonprofit Program Design, Marketing and Evaluation Online Guide: A Basic Guide to Program Evaluation.pdf Bibliography & Resources

26 Basic Guide to Goals-Based Evaluation for Nonprofit Organizations with Very Limited Resources Written by Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC. Copyright Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC Online Guide: Basic Guide to Outcomes-Based Evaluation for Nonprofit Organizations with Very Limited Resources.mhtBasic Guide to Outcomes-Based Evaluation for Nonprofit Organizations with Very Limited Resources.mht Bibliography & Resources

27 US Department of Health & Human Services Administration for Children & Families - Office of Planning, Research & Development The Program Manager's Guide to Evaluation ACF OPRE The Program Manager’s Guide to Evaluation website.mht This guide explains program evaluation -what it is, how to understand it, and how to do it. It answers your questions about evaluation and explains how to use evaluation to improve programs and benefit students, families, and staff. Bibliography & Resources

Questions & Answers 28