Ontology Summit 2013 Track D: Software Environments for Evaluating Ontologies Session 6 - Synthesis I Michael Denny (MITRE) Peter Yim (Ontolog, CIM3) 21.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Entry to Student Outcomes (ESO). Objective: Teachers will analyze student data to drive instruction and increase student achievement.
Advertisements

2008 Ontology Summit Launch Event February 7, 2008 OntologySummit2008 is a joint NIST-Ontolog-NCOR initiative, supported by multiple communities and a.
Florida State University PhD Completion Project Phases I & II Nancy Marcus Judith Devine.
National Report on European Language Label in the Czech Republic Raya Stanachkova Project coordinator KU TU Ltd. Sofia, Bulgaria NELLIP project Second.
Empowering tobacco-free coalitions to collect local data on worksite and restaurant smoking policies Mary Michaud, MPP University of Wisconsin-Cooperative.
Summer Internship Program Outline
Internal verification and external standards moderation.
UPCOMING COMPETITIONS Kelvin Chu, Program Director, NSF EPSCoR PD/PA/EOD Meeting Arlington, Virginia 20 May
WM Software Process & Quality Generic Processes - Slide #1  P. Sorenson SPiCE Reference Model - how to read Chapter 5 Capability Levels (process.
Managing Distributed University Courses Sanna-Maria Räisänen Tampere University of Technology Institute of Software Systems.
Research Trends in Software Engineering – CS661 Shafay Shamail Malik Jahan Khan.
Student (and other) Course Evaluations Response Rates, Relevance and Results Kathleen Norris Plymouth State University, NH.
THE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY CENTER (ATEEC) Summative External Evaluation July 1, 2013 – June 30, 2014 PRELIMINARY OUTLINE.
1 Module 6 Putting It All Together. 2 Learning Objectives At the end of this session participants will understand: The monitoring and evaluation process.
User Centered Design April 1-3, 2009 Joshua Ganderson Laura Baalman Jay Trimble.
Evaluations and recommendations for a user support toolkit Christine Cahoon George Munroe.
WEEK 7 Introduction to Project Management. Wk 7 Agenda Review Phase 5: Closing Out the Project Review for test Assignment Discussion Quiz.
1 1 Irish National Student Survey Project Update February 2013.
Sales and Marketing Productivity Team 1 Added Value Analysis TOOL USED IN SALES AND MARKETING PRODUCTIVITY PROJECTS.
Power Point Slides by Ronald J. Shope in collaboration with John W. Creswell Chapter 13 Survey Designs.
Power Point Slides by Ronald J. Shope in collaboration with John W. Creswell Chapter 13 Survey Designs.
PYs 4 and 5 Objectives for Education, Outreach and Training and External Relations Scott Lathrop
Regional Transportation and Complete Mobility Okotoks Presentation June 23, 2014.
1 Crusaders of Learning Overview ©2006 David J. Manley An Electronic Learning Community for Educators, Parents, and Students.
Cheryl Gibbs Beth MacRae July 27, 2011 Office of Postsecondary Education International and Foreign Language Education.
Atlanta Board of Education AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” February 14, 2011.
GS1 Standards Spring Event March 2013 – Dallas Building Standards to Deliver Business Value Technical Publications – How it happens Friday Morning.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | The Next Horizon Incorporating Student Perception Surveys into the Continuous.
TIMES 3 Technological Integrations in Mathematical Environments and Studies Jacksonville State University 2010.
Current and Future Applications of the Generic Statistical Business Process Model at Statistics Canada Laurie Reedman and Claude Julien May 5, 2010.
Interstate Statistical Committee of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS-STAT) Improvement of the Websites of the CIS Statistical Offices and Creation.
@2002 Copyright, Itreya Technologies CMMI kick off July 2005.
Data Management Seminar, 9-12th July 2007, Hamburg 11 ICCS 2009 – Field Trial Survey Operations Overview.
Patient Participation Group Welcome meeting Donnington Medical Practice.
Cumberland United Soccer Club Match Official Development Plan ©2015 Chris Wade.
ARIP Technical Committee Convener Call 07 April
CTI Technical Committee Convener Call 11 May
ARIP Technical Committee Convener Call 07 April
PROMCODE Technical Committee Convener Call 14 February
SoberIT Software Business and Engineering Institute HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY © Tomi Männistö, Varvana Myllärniemi, 2008 T Software Architectures.
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre SSCL. About SHSC Academic Teaching Centre Tertiary Care Centre Regional Trauma Centre 2 Campuses 16,000 OR’s per year.
Ontology Summit 2013: Ontology Evaluation Across the Ontology Lifecycle virtual panel session-11 Hackathon-Clinics Launch: Hackathon-Clinics Process &
VIVO is funded by member institutions. Visit our web site to find out more about becoming a member. vivoweb.org “ VIVO Roadmap Jim Blake, Mike Conlon,
The National Grants Partnership March 11, 2008 Michael Pellegrino
TECHNOLOGY PLANNING WRITING SESSION #3 January 2011 Cyndie Mutka McCarley.
Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field Software Assurance of Web-based Applications SAWbA Tim Kurtz SAIC/GRC Software Assurance Symposium 2004.
Faculty career development through establishing institutionalized mechanisms to address the needs of pre- tenure and post-promotion faculty in the IDEAL.
Wrapup and Next Steps Viable approaches by type Viable approaches by type What should we do next? What should we do next? What should you do? What should.
Collaborative Action Research Option (2013) Staff Development.
Aviation Security Training Module 3 Conducting an Exercise 1.
A Software Engineering Model Based Curriculum Development Approach Leon Pan University of the Fraser Valley.
Collaborative Action Research Option: Staff Development.
Program Assessment – an overview Karen E. Dennis O: sasoue.rutgers.edu.
Dr. Kathleen Haynie Haynie Research and Evaluation November 12, 2010.
Title Training Program Work-plan On Information Management for ACFTU Duration June, 2009 Starting date 13 JUNE, 2009 Language Chinese\English Union.
Chapter 23: Overview of the Occupational Therapy Process and Outcomes
Discussion of the 2003 School District Waste Reduction Survey and Findings April 13-14, 2004.
SPSA Evaluation Reyna Corral
Sample Fit-Gap Kick-off
Evaluation of Priority Gender Equality
CCP: Monitoring and Evaluation
Learning Objectives Learning objective #1 Learning objective #2
Evaluating your Repository
Debrief Case Study Setting
Engaging that Other Audience
Florida State University PhD Completion Project Phases I & II
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
Implementation Part 2: Focus on MAT Implementation
Module 1.1 Overview of Master Facility Lists in Nigeria
Run of Show Goals of RESEA EvalTA (Cycles of Learning and Doing) 0:51
Presentation transcript:

Ontology Summit 2013 Track D: Software Environments for Evaluating Ontologies Session 6 - Synthesis I Michael Denny (MITRE) Peter Yim (Ontolog, CIM3) 21 February 2013

Survey to date… The ontology evaluation factors identified in Tracks A-C were collected and reviewed. Candidate software capabilities that potentially address these ontology quality and fitness factors were compiled into several general phases of ontology development. – Exploration Phase – Management Phase – Design Phase – Build Phase – Validation Phase – Integration & Use Phase – Maintenance Phase Feedback during and after the Track D session 05 was reviewed toward updating the initial list of approximately 100 candidate software capabilities. Initial planning was conducted among Ontology Summit participants for the development and implementation of a suitable ontology evaluation survey. 2

Survey next steps… Review feedback by Friday and finalize the list of software capabilities Finalize plans for the survey instrument, its publication, its promotion, and the compilation of results – E.g., in the form of a Web checklist with open text field at the end of each development phase section – Need champions of each track to promote directly with software providers Publish the survey instrument and appeal Collect and summarize results to be posted on Wiki 3

Survey expectations… 4 Need to filter candidate software capabilities to ensure they directly address ontology quality & fitness outcomes One week to implement survey instrument online Two week period to solicit and obtain the majority of responses from software providers Some period to compile results and post online, unless achieved automatically

“Hackathon” & “Clinic” work… 5 Covered in Mike Dean's upcoming "Approach to the ‘Hackathon’ & ‘Clinics’ Activities" presentation