Comparative Study of ELL and Non-ELL Student Performance in National Standardized Achievement Reading Test: Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RTI 2 ) for Alaska Schools: Scaling Practices to Meet Local Needs Rachel Brown-Chidsey, Ph.D. University of Southern.
Advertisements

Why Students Struggle: Perception vs. Reality
How the Sonday System Product Line is Being Used
1
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1 Computer Systems Organization & Architecture Chapters 8-12 John D. Carpinelli.
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
Myra Shields Training Manager Introduction to OvidSP.
Properties Use, share, or modify this drill on mathematic properties. There is too much material for a single class, so you’ll have to select for your.
ALGEBRA Number Walls
Walking to Improved Reading Outcomes A Flexible Skill Grouping Success Story Sally Helton and Rachell Keys Tigard Tualatin School District, Oregon.
North Carolina CCSA Conference March 21st 8:00 AM
1 North Carolina National Assessment of Education (NAEP) 2009 LEA Training--Session A December 2008 Iris L. Garner, Ph.D. NAEP.
1 Quality Education Investment Act of 2006 (QEIA) 1 Quality Education Investment Act (QEIA) of 2006 County Superintendents Monitoring Responsibilities.
1 RA I Sub-Regional Training Seminar on CLIMAT&CLIMAT TEMP Reporting Casablanca, Morocco, 20 – 22 December 2005 Status of observing programmes in RA I.
New Jersey Statewide Assessment Results: Highlights and Trends State Board of Education, February 6, 2008 Jay Doolan, Ed.D., Assistant Commissioner,
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers U.S. Department of Education 1.
Exit a Customer Chapter 8. Exit a Customer 8-2 Objectives Perform exit summary process consisting of the following steps: Review service records Close.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds
Multiplication Facts Review. 6 x 4 = 24 5 x 5 = 25.
Targeted Assistance & Schoolwide Programs NCLB Technical Assistance Audio April 18, :30 PM April 19, :30 AM Alaska Department of Education.
A presentation to the Board of Education
Response to Intervention RTI. A Three Tiered System Tier 3 Individual or very small group intervention (1-3 kids) Tier 2 Small-group intervention (5-6.
Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment Summit Massachusetts Tiered System of Support MTSS – Academic - AM Massachusetts Department of Elementary and.
Kindergarten: Its About Time Kindergarten Summit March 19, 2008.
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
Oil & Gas Final Sample Analysis April 27, Background Information TXU ED provided a list of ESI IDs with SIC codes indicating Oil & Gas (8,583)
Middle School 8 period day. Rationale Low performing academic scores on Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) - specifically in mathematics.
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
1 RA III - Regional Training Seminar on CLIMAT&CLIMAT TEMP Reporting Buenos Aires, Argentina, 25 – 27 October 2006 Status of observing programmes in RA.
Progress Monitoring in Reading: Why, What, and How
Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge18/20/ Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge8/20/2014.
1..
Emily Scales, Catherine Mackenzie, Victoria Little Nursing 300: Research Methods Donna MacDonald March 24, 2013.
Adding Up In Chunks.
Passport to Reading School Wide Differentiated Reading Instruction Oak Park District 97 Dr. Albert Roberts, Superintendent Longfellow School Angela Dolezal,
Note to the teacher: Was 28. A. to B. you C. said D. on Note to the teacher: Make this slide correct answer be C and sound to be “said”. to said you on.
Model and Relationships 6 M 1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
Subtraction: Adding UP
Responsiveness to Instruction (RtI)
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: Establishing a Screening Process
Analyzing Genes and Genomes
Summative Assessment Kansas State Department of Education ASSESSMENT LITERACY PROJECT1.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
Essential Cell Biology
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
Analyzing the Reading Gap: Using MANOVA with discriminant group design to explore reading differences between young males and females.
PSSA Preparation.
Essential Cell Biology
Energy Generation in Mitochondria and Chlorplasts
SMART GOALS APS TEACHER EVALUATION. AGENDA Purpose Balancing Realism and Rigor Progress Based Goals Three Types of Goals Avoiding Averages Goal.
Educator Evaluation: A Protocol for Developing S.M.A.R.T. Goal Statements.
Beginning-of-Year Administration: Reminders & Updates
Gender effects in a randomized trial of individual tutoring with children in care Robyn Marquis & Robert J. Flynn School of Psychology & Centre for Research.
Data, Now What? Skills for Analyzing and Interpreting Data
Comparison of Half- and Full-Day Kindergarten on Kindergarten Achievement Jack B. Monpas-Huber, Ph.D. Director of Assessment and Student Information.
Schoolwide Reading Improvement Model - RTI Name:___________________________ Grade:___________________________ School:__________________________ CONSULTING.
Progress Monitoring and Response to Intervention Solution.
Dynamic Measurement Group (DMG) Part 2.
DIBELS Overview Kindergarten. What is DIBELS?? Kindergarten Assessments DIBELS Report What can parents do at home?
DIBELS Overview First and Second Grade.
Data Analysis MiBLSi Project September 2005 Based on material by Ed Kameenui Deb Simmons Roland Good Ruth Kaminski Rob Horner George Sugai.
Class Action Research: Treatment for the Nonresponsive Student IL510 Kim Vivanco July 15, 2009
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
DIBELS.
What is AIMSweb? AIMSweb is a benchmark and progress monitoring system based on direct, frequent and continuous student assessment.
Data-Based Leadership
CASD K-6 Transition Plan from DIBELS to DIBELS Next
Weaver Elementary School
Winston-Salem / Forsyth County Schools
Presentation transcript:

Comparative Study of ELL and Non-ELL Student Performance in National Standardized Achievement Reading Test: Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) Dr. Matilde Campos Young

Statement of the Problem Nation wide studies show that the achievement gap between ELL students and other students reading scores on nationally standardized assessments is wide, typically by 20% to 40% (Menken, 2006).

Introduction Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills: (DIBELS): Assessment system

Introduction Response To Intervention: RTI –Educational approach includes Ongoing student assessment High quality instruction Tiered intervention

DIBELS Reading Benchmark Achievement Goals DIBELS Measure Beginning of Year Months 1-3 Middle of Year Months 4-6 End of Year Months 7-10 ScoresStatusScoresStatusScoresStatus Initial Sound Fluency (ISF) At risk Some risk Low risk Deficit Emerging Established Not administered during this assessment period Letter Naming Fluency (LNF) 0 – 1 2 – At risk Some risk Low risk At risk Some risk Low risk 0 – – At risk Some risk Low risk Phoneme Segmentation Fluency (PSF) Not administered during this assessment period 0 – At risk Some risk Low risk 0 – 9 10 – Deficit Emerging Established Nonsense Word Fluency (NWF) Not administered during this assessment period – At risk Some risk Low risk – At risk Some risk Low risk

Purpose of the study To compare the reading scores of ELL and non ELL students in a small suburban Delaware school district to the national reading scores during the school year. To determine if there is an achievement gap in reading scores and if so, if early interventions affected the outcome scores. To determine if there is a direct correlation between early reading interventions and student achievement.

Need for the study Various studies indicate that the achievement ratio for ELL student is about the same across the nation in any given standardized reading test; a 20% to 40% deficit. Data shows that this achievement gap is approximately 25% deficit in Delaware for the year 2007 ( sState.aspx). sState.aspx

Research Question 1 Was there a significant difference between kindergarten ELL students and non-ELL kindergarten students in reading achievement scores (of 306 students) in a small Delaware suburban school district?

Research Question 2 Did the implementation of an early intervention program affect ELL student reading achievement scores in the small Delaware suburban school district?

Research Question 3 Did the implementation of an early intervention program affect non-ELL student reading achievement scores in the small Delaware suburban school district?

Small suburban Delaware School District Profile ( 21.6% 0.4% 3.6% 4.3% 70.1%

National Achievement Reading Scores K-12

Delaware Achievement Reading Scores K-12 Difference in Percentage Compared to the Reference Group Group Name Spring 2004Spring 2005Spring 2006Spring 2007Spring 2008 LEP

Findings and Results: Data Analysis Number of subjects in each category

Findings and Results: Data Analysis (I) Race (J) Race Mean Difference (I-J) Std. ErrorSig * Comparison between DIBELS scores and Race

Findings and Results: Data Analysis SourceFSig. Race ELL Intervention Intervention * Race nELLrisk Multiple comparison utilizing DIBELS scores as a dependent variable

Findings and Results: Data Analysis QUESTION 1 restated: Was there a significant difference between ELL kindergarten students and non-ELL kindergarten students in students reading achievement scores of 306 students in a small Delaware suburban district? –The results of the data suggest that there was a statistically significant difference between ELL kindergarten students and non-ELL kindergarten students in students reading achievement scores of 306 students in a small suburban district in Delaware.

Findings and Results: Data Analysis QUESTION 2 restated: Did the implementation of an early intervention program affects ELL student reading achievement scores in the small Delaware suburban school district? –The data suggest that the implementation of an early intervention program affects ELL student reading achievement scores in the small Delaware suburban school district.

Findings and Results: Data Analysis QUESTION THREE: Did the implementation of an early intervention program affect non-ELL student reading achievement scores in the small suburban district in Delaware? –The data showed that there is an statistically significant difference between the DIBELS reading scores of ELL and non ELL students. The data suggests that the implementation of an early intervention program had no impact on African American students reading achievement scores in the small Delaware suburban school district.

Explanation of Findings Contrary to the National achievement reading scores, ELL kindergarten students reading test scores for the school year in a small suburban Delaware school district achieve at similar rates as non-ELL peers. 97% of the ELL Kindergarten students in the small Delaware suburban school district meet the benchmarks after a brief amount of intensive intervention. The findings from this study suggest that early reading intervention focusing on DIBELS reading scores alone is a good indicator of benchmark achievement.

Future Directions The researcher proposes: –Longitudinal studies be conducted with a larger ELL population of students. –Studies implementing RTI protocol and DIBELS reading data scores should follow the students in this study from kindergarten through third grade. –Careful analysis of any teacher related variables such as training, time spent on each skill, whole-group instruction vs. individual or small group instruction, classroom environment etc. –Investigate how to target all student populations so that early intervention programs have successful impact on all kindergarten students.

Conclusion The results of this study indicated that the implementation of reading interventions (RTI) helped ELL students meet the prescribed benchmarks and close the academic achievement gap between ELL students and non ELL students reading scores for the school year in the small suburban Delaware school district.