-- in other words, logic is

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reason and Argument Chapter 7 (1/2).
Advertisements

Basic Terms in Logic Michael Jhon M. Tamayao.
KEY TERMS Argument: A conclusion together with the premises that support it. Premise: A reason offered as support for another claim. Conclusion: A claim.
Four Rules of Aristotelian Logic 1. Rule of Identity: A is A 2. Rule of Non-Contradiction: A is not (-A) 3. Rule of Excluded Middle: Either A or (-A)
The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
Logic and Reasoning Panther Prep North Central High School.
Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Fall 2007 Dr. Robert Barnard.
Chapter 1 The Logic of Compound Statements. Section 1.3 Valid & Invalid Arguments.
Deduction and Induction
Propositional Logic. Negation Given a proposition p, negation of p is the ‘not’ of p.
Clarke, R. J (2001) L951-08: 1 Critical Issues in Information Systems BUSS 951 Seminar 8 Arguments.
Copyright © Peter Cappello Logical Inferences Goals for propositional logic 1.Introduce notion of a valid argument & rules of inference. 2.Use inference.
Logical and Rule-Based Reasoning Part I. Logical Models and Reasoning Big Question: Do people think logically?
1 Arguments in Philosophy Introduction to Philosophy.
Predicates and Quantifiers
Basic Argumentation.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
Logic and Reason. Deductive Reasoning Reasoning that moves from the general to the particular Watchdogs bark at strangers. The watchdog did not bark at.
Chapter 2 The Logic of Quantified Statements. Section 2.4 Arguments with Quantified Statements.
Deductive versus Inductive Reasoning Consider the following two passages: Argument #1 Mr. Jones is a member of the Academy of Scholarly Fellows and only.
The Science of Good Reasons
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
Unit 1 – Foundations of Logic Reasoning and Arguments.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1-b What is Philosophy? (Part 2) By David Kelsey.
2.8 Methods of Proof PHIL 012 1/26/2001.
Today’s Topics Introduction to Proofs Rules of Inference Rules of Equivalence.
BBI 3420 Critical Reading and Thinking Critical Reading Strategies: Identifying Arguments.
The construction of a formal argument
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. REASONING.
Predicates and Quantifiers Dr. Yasir Ali. 1.Predicates 2.Quantifiers a.Universal Quantifiers b.Existential Quantifiers 3.Negation of Quantifiers 4.Universal.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1-b What is Philosophy? (Part 2) By David Kelsey.
Propositions and Arguments. What is a proposition? A proposition is a predicative sentence that only contains a subject and a predicate S is P.
Understanding the Persuasive Techniques in Developing Arguments How a speech can soothe and inspire a grieving population.
Giving good reasons. When listening to others, we cannot concentrate only on our own feelings and reactions We must listen to what they are saying.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1-b What is Philosophy? (Part 2) By David Kelsey.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning. Deductive reasoning Deductive reasoning begins with a general premise (statement) and moves to a specific conclusion.
Uniqueness Quantifier ROI for Quantified Statement.
Deductive Reasoning. Inductive: premise offers support and evidenceInductive: premise offers support and evidence Deductive: premises offers proof that.
THE NATURE OF ARGUMENT. THE MAIN CONCERN OF LOGIC Basically in logic we deal with ARGUMENTS. Mainly we deal with learning of the principles with which.
Do now Can you make sure that you have finished your Venn diagrams from last lesson. Can you name 5 famous mathematicians (including one that is still.
SYLLOGISM - FORM & LOGICAL REASONING. WHAT IS A SYLLOGISM? Syllogism – the formal structure of logical argument. Three statements - Major Premise, Minor.
Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Arguments
Copyright © Peter Cappello
Deductive reasoning.
a valid argument with true premises.
Critical Thinking Lecture 1 What is Critical Thinking?
Deductive Arguments.
Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning
Introduction to Prolog
Win Every Argument Every Time
Chapter 3 Philosophy: Questions and theories
Introduction to Logic PHIL 240 Sections
Validity and Soundness
Reasoning, Logic, and Position Statements
Formulating an Argument
Discrete Mathematics Lecture 2: Propositional Logic
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1b What is Philosophy? (part 2)
Predicates and Quantifiers
Definitions: Evidence-Based Claims- 1.) the ability to take detailed
6.4 Truth Tables for Arguments
Philosophical Methods
Dr. Unnikrishnan P.C. Professor, EEE
The Persuasive Speech Ch. 24.
Logical and Rule-Based Reasoning Part I
Phil2303 intro to logic.
THE LAWS OF LOGIC Let’s be reasonable!.
Propositional Logic 1) Introduction Copyright 2008, Scott Gray.
Evaluating Deductive Arguments
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

-- in other words, logic is i.e. the study of argument and the use of reason -- in other words, logic is the study of thinking

Logic: differs from Psychology does not deal with all mental phenomena (learning, remembering, daydreaming, etc.), but only with that type of thinking called “reasoning.”

Logic is not concerned with emotional states at all, or with the “inner processes” going on in the mind of the thinker.

Logic is concerned only with reasoning itself, and the formulation of rules that will help us determine if any particular piece of reasoning is logical; i.e. coherent and consistent.

The Structure of Argument The basic unit of logic is the proposition or statement, typically expressed in a declarative sentence: e.g. “Smith loves Jones.” “Socrates is mortal.”

The Structure of Argument The key characteristic of each proposition is that it can be either true or false, but not both. e.g. Either “Socrates is a man” is true, or “Socrates is not a man” is true -- but not both.

The Structure of Argument The chief concern of logic is how the truth of some propositions (premises) is connected with the truth of another (the conclusion).

The Structure of Argument For example: All men are mortal. (premise) Socrates is a man. (premise) Socrates is mortal. (conclusion)

The Structure of Argument The pattern of logic that lets us connect these premises to arrive at the conclusion we call an inference.

The Structure of Argument Without this pattern of inference, we have merely a collection of disjointed propositions. e.g. “My dog has fleas.” “The moon is made of cheese.” “Strawberries are red.”

The Structure of Argument Our primary concern is to evaluate the reliability of inferences, the patterns of reasoning that lead from premises to conclusion in a valid argument.