Symposium Friday, June 28 th, 2013 IPPA, Los Angeles Dr. Kate Hefferon (University of East London) Jacqui Synard (University of Ottawa) Dr. Lea Waters (University of Melbourne) Arabella Ashfield (English Institute of Sport) Where is the 'person' in positive psychology?: A critical reflection on the lack of qualitative research in positive psychology

In the beginning… Positive psychology researchers criticised the humanistic discipline for never developing a respectable empirical basis (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000) Clear delineation between positive psychology and the humanistic movement via the use of the scientific method (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000) Repercussions of this separatist (post-positivistic) stance include: o A dearth of qualitative research o An over-use of surveys and low ecological experimental designs o A quantitative publication bias o Sterile messages of positive human functioning o An oversimplification of human behaviour and neglect of the individual (Langdridge, 2004e; Willig, 2008)

Main aims: To gain an in-depth, intricate understanding of an individual To understand experience (not cause and effect) To offer interpretation of text/narratives (not test predictions about variables) To look for participant defined meanings (not researcher imposed ones) To value contextual (historical, cultural and societal) influences on the data (rather than trying to reduce it) Acknowledge human messiness and complexity (Willig, 2008; Langdridge, 2004b, 2004e) Why qualitative?

Aim of Symposium Highlight the lack of qualitative research in positive psychology Demonstrate what qualitative research can bring to the subject area that is missing from a purely quantitative focus Each presenter will discuss their experience, process and outcomes utilising a different type of qualitative method Focus on the data produced through qualitative approaches which would have been overlooked through quantitative techniques Challenge the monopolization of quantitative research in practice and publication Highlight the possibilities of qualitative inquiry

Dr. Kate Hefferon (University of East London) Jacqui Synard (University of Ottawa) Dr. Lea Waters (University of Melbourne) Arabella Ashfield (English Institute of Sport) Symposium Conclusion

The humanists were on to something…. The humanistic movement introduced and solidified qualitative inquiry as an imperative paradigm to research human thought, behaviour and experience Qualitative inquiry is a viable paradigm for understanding the intricacies of optimal human functioning (positive psychology) Qualitative research can challenge current theories and research practice as well as develop conceptual clarity and formulate an overarching framework There are rigorous analytic processes researchers must go through according to method and methodology Ultimately, Qualitative research gives a human side to a human discipline

The future of positive psychology: Emphasis on Quality AND Quantity Psychology as a whole, needs to focus on the unique individual and the unique factors and experiences that are individual for each person In order to understand the intricate and complex stories of the individuals we study, as well as provide a more holistic perception of the individual, positive psychology must: o Alter either or thinking o Adopt a more integrative and pragmatic approach to research (more advanced/progressive discipline) o Use tools for the job at hand rather than based on methodolatry (method fetishism) o Reduce the monopoly of quantitative publication bias o Acknowledge and privilege the how---the why---the process

Thank you for your time

1800s: Husserl creates Phenomenology (subsequently fragments into Heideggerian and then Duquesne ) 1900s: Ethnography becomes established within anthropological and sociological disciplines 1960s: Sociologists attempt to standardize qualitative inquiry (Glasser & Strauss) 1980s: Psychologists create Participatory Paradigm Action Research, Feminist, Disability Conversation Analysis is born 1990s: Narrative Research takes shape 1995: Smith creates Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis 1999/2000: Researchers introduce major standards for qualitative research 2006: Braun and Clarke solidify Thematic Analysis as a stand alone methodology Brief History of Qualitative Research

Creswell, J. (2008). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3 rd ed). London: SAGE Publications. Elliott, R., Fischer, C.T., & Rennie, D.L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, Langdridge, D. (2004). Introduction to research methods and data analysis in psychology. London: Pearson Education. Smith, J.A., Flowers, P. and Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method, Research. London: Sage. Smith, J.A., & Osborn, M. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J.A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. (2 nd ed., pp.53-80). London: Sage Willig, C. (2008). Introducing qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory and method. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press. Yardley, L. (2000). Dilemmas in qualitative research. Psychology and Health, 15, References and further reading