Verona Area School District Willard R. Daggett, CEO July 18, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Academics and CTE at a Crossroads June 21, 2007.
Advertisements

International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Why Should We Consider School Reform? April 11, 2008.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Community Choices for Wisconsins Young Children March 17, 2010.
Rigor & Relevance for ALL Students
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett What Makes Successful Schools Work June 18, 2008.
Understanding the Classroom Implications of the Transition to the Common Core State Standards Willard R. Daggett, CEO January 10, 2012.
Where Best Practices Meet Next Practices
The Need and Urgency to Personalize Education Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman December 6, 2012.
Take Charge of Preparing Students for their Future Willard R. Daggett, CEO November 18, 2011.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Rigor & Relevance August 22, 2007.
Rigor and Relevance for ALL Students.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Nations Most Successful Secondary Schools Lessons Learned January 9, 2009.
International Center for Leadership in Education
International Center for Leadership in Education
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Leadership Strategies for Integrating CTE and Academic Education Using the R &
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Granite School District January 15, 2009.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Granite School District January 16, 2009.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Preparing Students for Their Future, Not our Past – What They Need for Todays Technological.
WELCOME To 2013 CONNECTION CONFERENCE. Preparing Students for the 21 st Century – Lessons Learned from our Nations Most Rapidly Improving Schools Bill.
Preparing for the Challenges and Opportunities for the Next Three Years Willard R. Daggett, CEO November 21, 2011.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Agricultural Education Leaders Summit February 5, 2009.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett CTE – The Nations Best Rigor & Relevance Programs April 16, 2009.
A Comprehensive Solution to School Improvement Willard R. Daggett, CEO October 7, 2011.
Creating Culture of High Expectations Common Core State Standards Rigor, Relevance, Relationships Willard R. Daggett, Founder and Chairman August 21, 2012.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett What Makes Successful Schools Work November 8, 2010.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Leadership Skills for the 21 st Century February 1, 2011.
Preparing Students for the 21 st Century Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman May 15, 2013.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Rigor and Relevance.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Preparing Students for Their Future April 19, 2009.
Daggett System for Effective Instruction: Creating an Action Plan Willard R. Daggett Raymond McNulty.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Our Changing Education Landscape December 2, 2010.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Components and Characteristics of the Most Successful U.S. Schools October 14,
Preparing Pennsylvanias 21 st Century Workforce: An Education & Workforce Development Symposium Willard R. Daggett, CEO February 21, 2012.
Florida Regional Meeting Broward County Willard R. Daggett, CEO January 25, 2012.
Leading Change During Challenging Times Lessons Learned from our Nations Most Rapidly Improving Schools Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman May 2, 2013.
Leading Change During Challenging Times – Lessons Learned from Our Nations Most Rapidly Improving Schools A Look to the Future Willard R. Daggett, Chairman.
Daggett System for Effective Instruction Deep Dive
Common Core State Standards High Expectations 21 st Century Willard R. Daggett, CEO March 15, 2012.
Preparing Title I Eligible Students for the Challenges and Opportunities of the Common Core State Standards Willard R. Daggett, Founder and Chairman March.
Brunson Elementary – Mr. Jeff Faullin, Principal
Leon County Schools Next Generation Content Area Reading Professional Development (NGCARPD) Summer 2012 Using Common Core to Enhance your Instruction 1.
Common Core Standards: What they havent told you! Mel Riddile Associate Director High School Services
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Scholastic Superintendents Leadership Summit October 9, 2009.
California Common Core State Standards
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Merced Union School District May 18, 2011.
4 R Future Relationships, Relevance, Rigor, Respect/Responsibility Preparing the 21 st century student for their role in a Global Economy.
Lynn Radicello, Lisa Schlegel, Patrick Shaw
Middle School Math Initiative for Florida Rigor Relevance Reading Florida and the Islands Comprehensive Center at ETS International Center for Leadership.
Preparing Students to be College and Career Ready Bill Daggett, Founder and Chairman March 21, 2014.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett High Schools & Careers: The New Value Proposition April 29, 2008.
Francis Tuttle’s Model for Student Success. Pathway to Excellence Update Michelle Keylon.
Preparing Students for Their Future Preparing Students for Their Future Teaching for Rigor & Relevance An Introduction CTE Technical Assistance Center.
International Center for Leadership in Education Richard Jones.
Characteristics of the Nation’s Most Successful Schools Willard R. Daggett, Founder and Chairman June 21, 2012.
21 st Century Learning and Skills Preparing Today’s Students For a Changing World Jim Warford.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Our Changing Education Landscape.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Characteristics of Successful Schools March 28, 2008.
International Center for Leadership in Education Tom Welch Greyhills Academy High School August 8, 2008.
International Center for Leadership in Education
Leading Change in Schools Today Willard R. Daggett, CEO October, 2011.
Common Core State Standards: New York State P-12 Common Core Learning Standards January and February 2011 OCM BOCES CI/A Lynn Radicello, Lisa Schlegel,
LBUSD Professional Learning Community Meeting Working Smarter by Working Together: Quadrant D and Brain Research.
It’s All About Math! Welcome to the Middle School Mathematics Initiative! Institute Theme: Developing Standards Based Content Modules Around Rigor and.
Hebrew proverb Do not confine your children to your own learning, for they were born in another time.
Today’s Theme is… RigorRelevance Relationships. Look into the future through the eyes of a child?
Many Languages: One Core Mr. Stephen R. Adamson and Dr. Freddie A. Bowles ACTFL Annual Conference Many Languages: One United Voice November 16-18, 2012.
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Madison County Business League Salute to Excellence in Education Education = Economic.
Classroom Management: Teaching for Rigor and Relevance.
Successful Practices Network Connecting CTE to the Common Core State Standards And Next Generation Assessments Dale Eggebraaten, Senior.
Presentation transcript:

Verona Area School District Willard R. Daggett, CEO July 18, 2012

School Improvement Growing Gap Readiness Changing World

1.Standards will be higher Challenges

1.Standards will be higher 2.Standards will be different Challenges

1.Standards will be higher 2.Standards will be different 3.Student growth Challenges

1.Standards will be higher 2.Standards will be different 3.Student growth 4.Good to Great Challenges

1.Standards will be higher 2.Standards will be different 3.Student growth 4.Good to Great 5.Financial stress Challenges

1.Standards will be higher Challenges

Text Lexile Measure (L) High School Literature College Literature High School Textbooks College Textbooks Military Personal Use Entry-Level Occupations SAT 1, ACT, AP* * Source of National Test Data: MetaMetrics Reading Study Summary Interquartile Ranges Shown (25% - 75%)

2005 Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Mississippi 88 % Georgia 87 % Wisconsin 83 % Texas 81 % Ohio 77 % Florida 71% Arkansas 53 % Massachusetts 48 %

2009 Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Georgia 87 % Texas 84 % Ohio 82 % Wisconsin 82 % Florida 74% Arkansas 70 % Massachusetts 54 % Mississippi 52 %

2005 Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Mississippi 88 %161 Georgia 87 %175 Wisconsin 82 %189 Texas 81 %190 Ohio 77 %199 Florida 71%202 Arkansas 53 %217 Massachusetts 48 %234

2009 Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Georgia 87 %178 Texas 84 %188 Ohio 82 %192 Wisconsin 82 %189 Florida 74%206 Arkansas 70 %200 Massachusetts 54 %234 Mississippi 52 %210

2009 Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Georgia 87 % (0)178 (+3) Texas 84 % (+3)188 (-2) Ohio 82 % (+5)192 (-7) Wisconsin 82 % (-1)189 (0) Florida 74% (+3)206 (+4) Arkansas 70 % (+17)200 (-17) Massachusetts 54 % (+6)234 (0) Mississippi 52 % (-36)210 (+49)

2009 Proficiency Grade 8 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Texas 94 % (+11)201 (-24) Wisconsin 85 % (-1)232 (+3) Georgia 77 % (-6)209 (-15) Ohio 72 % (-8)251 (+10) Arkansas 71 % (+14)241 (-13) Florida 54 % (+10)262 (-3) Mississippi 48 % (-10)254 (+7) California 48 % (+9)259 (-3)

2009 Proficiency Grade 4 Mathematics Proficient Required NAEP Score Texas 85 % (+3)214 (-5) Wisconsin 81 % (+7)219 (-6) Mississippi 58 % (-21)223 (+17) Georgia 75 % (0)218 (+3) Ohio 78 % (+13)219 (-14) Florida 75 % (+12)225 (-5) Arkansas 78 % (+25)216 (-20) Massachusetts 48 % (+9)255 (0)

2009 Proficiency Grade 8 Mathematics Proficient Required NAEP Score Texas 83 % (+22)254 (-19) Georgia 81 % (+12)247 (-8) Wisconsin 79 % (+4)262 (-1) Florida 66 % (+8)266 (-3) Ohio 59 % (+8)269 (-9) Arkansas 61 % (+27)267 (-21) Mississippi 54 % (+1)264 (+2) Massachusetts 49 % (+7)300 (-1)

1.Standards will be higher 2.Standards will be different Challenges

1.Knowledge in one discipline 2.Application within discipline 3.Application across disciplines 4.Application to real-world predictable situations 5.Application to real-world unpredictable situations Application Model

1.Standards will be higher 2.Standards will be different 3.Student growth Challenges

1.Standards will be higher 2.Standards will be different 3.Student growth 4.Good to Great Challenges

1.Standards will be higher 2.Standards will be different 3.Student growth 4.Good to Great 5.Financial stress Challenges

School Improvement Growing Gap Changing World

School Improvement Growing Gap Changing World

School Improvement Growing Gap Changing World

1.Knowledge in one discipline 2.Application within discipline 3.Application across disciplines 4.Application to real-world predictable situations 5.Application to real-world unpredictable situations Application Model

1.Awareness 2.Comprehension 3.Application 4.Analysis 5.Synthesis 6.Evaluation Knowledge Taxonomy

Levels Blooms CDCDABABCDCDABAB Application

Rigor/Relevance Framework A B D C Express probabilities as fractions, percents, or decimals. Classify triangles according to angle size and/or length of sides. Calculate volume of simple three- dimensional shapes. Given the coordinates of a quadrilateral, plot the quadrilateral on a grid. Analyze the graphs of the perimeters and areas of squares having different-length sides. Determine the largest rectangular area for a fixed perimeter. Identify coordinates for ordered pairs that satisfy an algebraic relation or function. Determine and justify the similarity or congruence for two geometric shapes. Obtain historical data about local weather to predict the chance of snow, rain, or sun during year. Test consumer products and illustrate the data graphically. Plan a large school event and calculate resources (food, decorations, etc.) you need to organize and hold this event. Make a scale drawing of the classroom on grid paper, each group using a different scale. Calculate percentages of advertising in a newspaper. Tour the school building and identify examples of parallel and perpendicular lines, planes, and angles. Determine the median and mode of real data displayed in a histogram Organize and display collected data, using appropriate tables, charts, or graphs.

Rigor/Relevance Framework A B D C Analyze the graphs of the perimeters and areas of squares having different-length sides. Determine the largest rectangular area for a fixed perimeter. Identify coordinates for ordered pairs that satisfy an algebraic relation or function. Determine and justify the similarity or congruence for two geometric shapes. Obtain historical data about local weather to predict the chance of snow, rain, or sun during year. Test consumer products and illustrate the data graphically. Plan a large school event and calculate resources (food, decorations, etc.) you need to organize and hold this event. Make a scale drawing of the classroom on grid paper, each group using a different scale. Calculate percentages of advertising in a newspaper. Tour the school building and identify examples of parallel and perpendicular lines, planes, and angles. Determine the median and mode of real data displayed in a histogram Organize and display collected data, using appropriate tables, charts, or graphs. Express probabilities as fractions, percents, or decimals. Classify triangles according to angle size and/or length of sides. Calculate volume of simple three- dimensional shapes. Given the coordinates of a quadrilateral, plot the quadrilateral on a grid.

Rigor/Relevance Framework A B D C Express probabilities as fractions, percents, or decimals. Classify triangles according to angle size and/or length of sides. Calculate volume of simple three- dimensional shapes. Given the coordinates of a quadrilateral, plot the quadrilateral on a grid. Analyze the graphs of the perimeters and areas of squares having different-length sides. Determine the largest rectangular area for a fixed perimeter. Identify coordinates for ordered pairs that satisfy an algebraic relation or function. Determine and justify the similarity or congruence for two geometric shapes. Obtain historical data about local weather to predict the chance of snow, rain, or sun during year. Test consumer products and illustrate the data graphically. Plan a large school event and calculate resources (food, decorations, etc.) you need to organize and hold this event. Make a scale drawing of the classroom on grid paper, each group using a different scale. Calculate percentages of advertising in a newspaper. Tour the school building and identify examples of parallel and perpendicular lines, planes, and angles. Determine the median and mode of real data displayed in a histogram. Organize and display collected data, using appropriate tables, charts, or graphs.

A B D C

Action Plan

A Look to the Future

Common Core State Standards, Next Generation Assessments and Teacher Evaluation Three Central Challenges

Common Core State Standards, Next Generation Assessments and Teacher Evaluation Financial Stress Three Central Challenges

Schools must find new and innovative ways to improve student performance with increasingly fewer resources.

A Look to the Future More with Less

Effectiveness and Efficiency Framework High Cost Low Cost

High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance EfEffecfecttivenessivenessEfEffecfecttivenessivenesst Effectiveness and Efficiency Framework

High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance EfEffecfecttivenessivenessEfEffecfecttivenessivenesst Effectiveness and Efficiency Framework CDCDABABCDCDABAB

Common Core State Standards, Next Generation Assessments and Teacher Evaluation Financial Stress Change Three Central Challenges

Common Core State Standards, Next Generation Assessments and Teacher Evaluation Financial Stress Change Needs to be Evolutionary Not Revolutionary Three Central Challenges

School Improvement Growing Readiness Gap Readiness Changing World

It Will Require: Proactive Leadership Focused and Sustained Professional Development A Look to the Future

CCSS / NGA

1.Knowledge in one discipline 2.Application within discipline 3.Application across disciplines 4.Application to real-world predictable situations 5.Application to real-world unpredictable situations Application Model

Performance Task drawn from the Ohio Performance Assessment Project. Available at,

A Look to the Future Will Require Proactive Leadership

Focused on CCSS, NGAs, and Teacher Evaluation Reactive Leader Proactive Leader Equally focused on Science, the Arts, CTE, Physical Education

A Look to the Future Will Require a Comprehensive Solution

Common Core State Standards, Next Generation Assessments and Teacher Evaluation Financial Stress Change Needs to be Evolutionary Not Revolutionary Three Central Challenges

– Incremental Change (Improving Core Practices) 2 – Innovative Change ( Fundamental Change of Core Practice) 3 – Transformational Change ( Affect Entire System) Evolution of Change Model

– Saddle 2 – Horse and Wagon 3 – Car Transportation

The world in which our students will live and work A Look to the Future

Information is Everywhere…

1 1 – Google Search Smart Technology

Analyze Documents Keywords and Headers (Google) Meaning / Concepts Wolfram Alpha Siri Complete Task Semantic Web

2 1 1 – Google Search 2 – Google Glasses Smart Technology

Technology should work for youto be there when you need it and get out of your way when you dont. Google X started Project Glass to build this kind of technology, one that helps you explore and share your world, putting you back in the moment. Project Glass

Download any movie, website, or piece of information into your glasses or contact lenses

Students will be able to surf the Internet via their contact lenses. How will you deal with this in your schools? In the Near Future…

Todays students live in a hyper-connected world, except in school OR are they also connected in school but we just dont know it?

Information is everywhere. In this changing world, sense-making and the ability to evaluate the credibility of information are paramount.

– Google Search 2 – Google Glasses 3 – Google Car Smart Technology

3 2 1 K-12 Education – High Impact Factors

The world in which our students will live and work Emerging resources A Look to the Future

Gaming Online Instruction Blended Learning K-12 Education – High Impact Factors

Gaming is increasingly being built based upon brain research.

Gaming is increasingly being built based upon brain research. What is the implication to education?

Downloaded 1 billion times Average of 800 bird launches per download Collectively 800 billion birds launched Over 600 million minutes played per day 400,000 years of time played Angry Birds

1 1 – Sushi Monster Game Theory in Education

Continuous improvement Immediate feedback Addictive Game-based Programs

How do you feel about students being addicted to learning?

Continuous improvement Immediate feedback Addictive Todays education games are often a technologically enhanced version of drill and practice Enabling more personalized learning Game-based Programs

650,000 Apps in the App Store

Personalization Technology Provides

Personalization Repetition Volume Technology Provides Critical to Move from Working to Stored Memory – Needed for Fluency

FASTT Math Next Generation 18 Games A Look to the Future

2 1 1 – Sushi Monster (FASTT Math Next Generation) Game Theory in Education

A Look to the Future iRead

Beastie Hall - A School for Monsters iRead

Your Avatar…

Your Reading Buddy…

Beastie Hall - A School for Monsters Phonics iRead

Beastie Hall - A School for Monsters Phonics Embedded Assessments iRead

2 1 1 – Sushi Monster (FASTT Math Next Generation) 2 – iRead Game Theory in Education

2 1 1 – Sushi Monster (FASTT Math Next Generation) 2 – iRead - Math 180 Game Theory in Education

Math 180 Scope and Sequence tied to CCSS Embedded Assessments like NGAs A Look to the Future

1.Knowledge in one discipline 2.Application within discipline 3.Application across disciplines 4.Application to real-world predictable situations 5.Application to real-world unpredictable situations Application Model

MCAT

Blended Model

Teachers

Guiding Principles Responsibility Contemplation Initiative Perseverance Optimism Courage Respect Compassion Adaptability Honesty Trustworthiness Loyalty

Teachers

1.Knowledge in one discipline 2.Application within discipline 3.Application across disciplines 4.Application to real-world predictable situations 5.Application to real-world unpredictable situations Application Model

Guiding Principles Responsibility Contemplation Initiative Perseverance Optimism Courage Respect Compassion Adaptability Honesty Trustworthiness Loyalty

Blended Model

Online Instruction

30 states have full-time online schools 96% of LEAs have students enrolled in distance education courses at the HS level Online Learning Facts

Fully online model - $6,400 Blended-learning model - $8,900 Traditional school model - $10,000 US Average per Pupil Expenditures

– Sushi Monster (FASTT MATH) 2 – iRead Math – Online Game-based Learning Game Theory in Education

A Look to the Future It Can be Done…

The world in which our students will live and work Emerging resources The nations most successful emerging practices A Look to the Future

– Computer Labs 2 – One-to-One Computing 3 – Bring Your Own Technology (BYOT) Technology in Schools

Pencil Budget

Instruction Professional Development Leadership Development Data Systems Technology is a Tool NOT a Function

Technology needs to do to education what it has done to countless other industries: Disrupt It

– Project-based Learning 2 – Flipped Classroom 3 – Online Game-based System Instruction

– Training all teachers to grade essays 2 – Computer grading of essays 3 – Computer-based grading and immediate instruction based on performance Grading of Papers

1 1 – Learning Together Learning

– Student-run technology P.D. (survey/3 levels) 2 – Teachers are given technology IEP with students as their mentors 3 – Top 1/3 rd students and teachers create alternative instructional delivery system Professional Development

– Paper and Pencil Formative Assessments 2 – Gas Bill -Application based -Multi-disciplined -Quad D 3 – Tablets with instant computer-based scoring and instruction Assessments

1 1 – Status Report – gather and reflect on performance and value added data Use of Data

2 1 1 – Status Report 2 – Predictive Data – i.e. drop out, performance, etc. to assist in decision making of staffing, facilities, course offerings, etc. Use of Data

– Status Report 2 – Predictive Data 3 – Instructional Planning Data – on a student-by- student basis especially in a flipped classroom setting Use of Data

– Integration of Art/Music/CTE into academics and visa-versa - Interdisciplinary Departments Integration

– Integration 2 – Career pathway for ALL students Integration

– Integration 2 – Career pathway for ALL students 3 – Combining blended learning and multiple institutions Integration

Take off the plate

Next Network

State Standards to State Tests Road Map

Wisconsin English LA Achievement Frameworks Subskills/Descriptors Knowledge and Concepts Exam - CRT (WKCE)

State Tests State Standards

National Essential Skills Study (NESS)

Proficiency

NESS & Lexile State Tests State Standards

Common Core Standards NESS & Lexile State Tests State Standards

Common Core Standards NESS & Lexile State Tests State Standards

State Standards to State Tests State Standards to Research State Standards to CCSS CCSS to State Standards Road Map

KS. Standards CCSS

CCSS KS. Standards

State Standards to State Tests State Standards to Research State Standards to CCSS CCSS to State Standards State Tests to CCSS Sample NGAs Road Map

Performance Task drawn from the Ohio Performance Assessment Project. Available at,

Gas Bill in Next Network

State Standards to State Tests State Standards to Research State Standards to CCSS CCSS to State Standards State Tests to CCSS Sample NGAs Road Map

State Test Create a large spinner for a game that has at least eight sectors. Each sector should be assigned a different prize. Prizes should range in value from most appealing to least appealing. Vary the sectors so that the probability to win a desired prize is much less that the probability to win a lesser desired prize. Calculate the theoretical probability of landing on each prize. Conduct multiple trials with the spinner and determine the experimental probability of landing on each prize. Which price has the greatest probability and which prize has the least probability? NGA Source: Next Navigator

A B D C

Common Core Standards NESS & Lexile State Tests State Standards Consortium Assessment DA

Gold Seal Lessons

A Look to the Future Focused and Sustained Professional Development

– Curriculum Matrix 2 – Next Network 3 – Online Game-based System CCSS NGA

– Teaching 2 – Learning 3 – Personalization of Learning Our Mission

School Improvement Growing Readiness Gap Readiness Changing World