In the Post 06 Environment November 9, 2006 Jim Eber Demand Response.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Demand Response in Ontario Paul Grod, CEO, Rodan Energy July 11, 2013.
Advertisements

PJM ©2008 Regional Round-up of Demand Response Developments Susan Covino PJM Interconnection A National Town Meeting on Demand Response Washington, DC.
Demand Response Commissioner Suedeen Kelly June 3, 2008.
1 Demand-Side Management Influence on Reliability NERC Demand-Side Management Task Force (DSMTF) Rick Voytas, Chair November 2007 Presented To The U.S.
PG&Es 2009 Participating Load Pilot. 2 Overview Regulatory Context Pilot Characteristics Lessons Next Steps.
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
NAESB Measurement and Verification Model Business Practice Retail Electric Demand Response 5/29/09 update.
Demand Response: What Is It? John E. Shelk President & CEO, EPSA Harvard Electricity Policy Group Calgary, Alberta – June 13, 2013.
Standard Market Design (SMD) in New England Federal Energy Regulation Commission Conference on Standard Market Design January 22, 2002 David LaPlante Vice.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
A National Perspective On Demand Response Ahmad Faruqui, Ph.D. March 3, 2008 California Energy Commission Sacramento, California.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
Gloria Godson VP, Federal Regulatory Policy Reliability Pricing Model Part 2.
Resource Adequacy in PJM
NARUC-FERC Demand Response Collaborative Meeting NARUC Fall Meeting Anaheim, CA T. Graham Edwards President & CEO November 11, 2007.
1 The Midwest ISO At the Crossroads of America International Meeting of Very Large Power Grid Operators October 24 & 25, 2005 Beijing, China.
University of Pittsburgh School of Law 2013 Energy Law and Policy Institute Eric Matheson Energy Advisor to PAPUC Commissioner James H. Cawley August 2,
Enhancing Interruptible Rates Through MISO Demand Response: WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting,
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
ON IT 1 Con Edison Energy Efficiency Programs Sustaining our Future Rebecca Craft Director of Energy Efficiency.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
1 Demand Response Update April, Strategic Perspective Demand Response  Aligns with PGE’s Strategic Direction; helping to provide exceptional.
California Statewide Pricing Pilot Lessons Learned Roger Levy Demand Response Research Center NARUC Joint Meeting Committee on Energy.
Electric Generation Reliability Remarks Before the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission 2011 Summer Reliability Assessment Meeting June.
Battling Load Growth in NYC Chris Smith NYSERDA NARUC 2007 Summer Meeting.
© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC October 17, 2013 Robert A. Weishaar, Jr. ON SITE ENERGY – INTERPLAY WITH PJM DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS Harrisburg, PA.
Pricing Enabled by AMI What Types? What are the Benefits? Dr. Steven D. Braithwait Christensen Associates Energy Consulting EUCI Webinar September 12,
Overview of OpenADR May 4, 2011 Integrating Demand Response, Efficiency, Renewables and Smart Grid Sila Kiliccote Deputy, Demand Response Research Center.
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
FERC Assessment of Demand Response & Advanced Metering 2006 APPA Business & Financial Conference September 18, 2006 – Session 11 (PMA) Presented by: Larry.
1 New England Demand Response Resources: Present Observations and Future Challenges Henry Yoshimura Demand Resources Department ISO New England, Inc. Holyoke,
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
Joe Polidoro, Sr. Engineer PJM Interconnection, LLC Grid of the Future: Integrating Load Response into the Markets.
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. Existing Demand Response Programs Kurt Castleberry Director, Operating Committee Support May 24, 2007.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Demand Side Products in PJM Joseph BowringCornell University January 17, 2011.
Demand Response: Next Steps OPSI Annual Meeting October 1, 2012 Howard J. Haas.
Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
PJM © 2006 The Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Illinois State University Conference May 12, 2006 Jeff Bladen PJM Interconnection.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Demand Side Working Group Loads in SCED Angelo Marcino Real-Time Market Operations – PJM April 14, 2014.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
OPSI Annual Meeting October 13, Session 6 Reliability Pricing Model: Are Further Changes Necessary? Reluctantly…yes But States should also be.
An Overview of Demand Response in California July 2011.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
ERCOT Public 1 Project Panel 1 Dan Woodfin Director, System Operations August 15, 2014.
New Incentives for Pursuing Demand Response Scott Strauss and Sean Flynn Spiegel & McDiarmid APPA Legal Seminar San Francisco – November 2004.
Document number Anticipated Impacts for FRRS Pilot Program ERCOT TAC Meeting September 7, 2012.
OPSI Annual Meeting October 8 th Should all capacity resources be paid the same? -Demand Response operational deployment.
Role Of ERC in the WESM To enforce the rules and regulations governing the operations of the WESM and monitors the activities of the Market Operator and.
PJM©2014www.pjm.com State of Demand Response Stu Bresler Vice President- Market Operations PJM Interconnection 10 th OPSI Annual Meeting October 13, 2014.
CEC Load Management Standards Workshop March 3, Update on the CPUC’s Demand Response and Advanced Metering Proceedings Bruce Kaneshiro Energy Division.
PPL Electric Utilities Act 129 Phase 3 Non-Residential Programs April 20, 2016.
Demand Response 2010 and Beyond April 28, 2011 Pete Pengilly.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
SMECO Demand Response filing
Overview of the NYISO Demand Response Programs
Asia-Pacific Energy Regulatory Forum
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
Demand Response in the 7th Power Plan
Demand Response in the NW: Overcoming Barriers
The Future of Demand Response in New England

Market Pricing Initiatives Update September 9th, 2003
Energy Supply Business Model enabled by the Clean Energy Package
Presentation transcript:

In the Post 06 Environment November 9, 2006 Jim Eber Demand Response

2 What is DR at ComEd? Commercial and Industrial Programs –ComEds retail DR programs provide mechanisms to transfer market values, and reliability incentives, to participating business customers, with the minimum amount of barriers to participation. –Capacity programs provide fixed and known incentives, based on capacity auction clearing prices, for firm commitments to reduce load, these resources are submitted to PJMs Active Load Management program and result in credits to capacity obligations. Currently 816 participating locations providing 304 MWs –Energy programs provide variable incentives, based on real-time market prices, for voluntary reductions in load, these resources are submitted to PJMs Demand Response Program. Currently 3,700 participating locations providing 820 MWs Residential –ComEds Nature First, Air Conditioner Cycling Program, provides residential customers up to a $40 per year credit in exchange for allowing ComEd to control the AC systems compressor. Currently 56k participants provide 68 MW of capacity and up to 104 MW of load drop Dynamic Pricing –Post 2006 all customers over 3MW, that procure energy from ComEd, will be on hourly pricing –Hourly pricing available as an option for all customers –RHEP – Residential Hourly Energy Pricing 1200 customer pilot program with expansion pending

Long Term Reliability Assessment Shows long term forecast of generation vs. load and tightening of the capacity market

4 PJM DR Framework All DR resources in ComEd are submitted to PJM PJM has rights to call resources ComEd has rights to call resources Both PJM and ComEd structures are changing in 2007 PJM settlement: Goal is to improve long term market signals to support resource development Filed September 29 th, 2006 PJM resource auctions to move from planning period to procuring 3 years in advance

5 Recent Experience The integration of ComEd into PJM enabled a new level of market- based demand response. Resources integrated into the PJM DR framework. Transparent pricing for capacity and energy products. 40 percent of the potential demand response capabilities in PJM. Continued evolution from bundled to market-based. End of transition period will continue portfolio transformation. Have maintained use of all resources for delivery relief, to enhance reliability. After four summers, 2002 to 2005, of no demand response activities, ComEd utilized most of the portfolio to aid system performance and provide resources to the market this summer. Wide scale dispatch of demand response resources. July 31 August 1 August 2

6 PJM DR Framework – Capacity Capacity Active Load Management Load Response Synchronous Emergency Economic Reserves PJM CSPs Retail Customers Retail Product Offerings ResidentialSmall C&ILarge C&I ComEd Products Nature First Capacity Product

7 PJM DR Framework - Energy Capacity Active Load Management PJM CSPs Retail Customers Retail Product Offerings ResidentialSmall C&ILarge C&I ComEd Products Nature First VLR Load Response Synchronous Emergency Economic Reserves Capacity Product

8 PJM DR Framework – Other Providers Capacity Active Load Management Load Response Synchronous Emergency Economic Reserves PJM CSPs Retail Customers Retail Product Offerings ResidentialSmall C&ILarge C&I ComEd Products Other CSPs Nature First CSP X VLR CSP Y Capacity Product

9 ComEd Demand Response Role Stay actively involved in DR for reliability and market efficiency purposes: Continue current transition toward DR programs that are economically viable within PJM framework. Maintain / Expand residential direct load control programs. Facilitate DR markets development over the next 2-3 years: Create Curtailment Service Provider (CSP) friendly environment. Provide access to meter data. Assist in back office activities. Design aggregator options into retail products. Implement RHEP expansion upon ICC approval. Monitor and adjust to DR market development over the next 2-3 years: Watch for continued emergence of Curtailment Service Providers (CSP). Evaluate changes, and continue in the stakeholder process for in PJM DR framework. Track evolving customer interest and participation in DR. Expansion of DR Programs will require utility having the ability for timely and full rate recovery.

10 PJM Market Monitor Report to FERC Taken from PJM report Table 2 presents the zonal distribution of DSR capability in the Emergency Program as of December 31, One zone, ComEd, includes 95 percent of all available sites and 59 percent of all available MW in the Emergency Program.