Outcomes from social prescribing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Impact Assessment
Advertisements

Worcestershire Joint Health and Well Being Strategy
Evaluating Social Prescribing: Towards an Understanding of Social and Economic Impact Presentation to BVSC Conference 9 th July 2014 Chris Dayson Research.
People, families and communities NHS Commissioning Board Children’s Trust Westminster’s Joint Health and Wellbeing Board Local Healthwatch Providers West.
Transforming health and social care in East Sussex East Sussex Better Together.
Right First Time: Update. Overview Making sure Sheffield residents continue to get the best possible health services is the aim of a new partnership between.
South Gloucestershire Rehabilitation, Reablement & Recovery Programme
Information and Communication Technology Research Initiative Supporting the self management of obesity: The role of ICTs University.
Primary Care: Working on a new set of standards
Creating a service Idea. Creating a service Networking / consultation Identify the need Find funding Create a project plan Business Plan.
Satbinder Sanghera, Director of Partnerships and Governance
Objectives 1. Children will be supported in an integrated way through the establishment of a Start Right Community Wrap- Around Programme in the target.
Supporting Adults with Learning Disabilities who Present with Dementia Collaborative project between:  Gwent Healthcare NHS Trust  Monmouthshire Local.
IPC What can Extra Care deliver and how do we know.
1 Self-directed Support – Older People’s Service Providers EVOC thinkSpace 20 June 2014.
What will this presentation do? Explain what Single Assessment Process is and where it comes from Explain how Single Assessment will improve older peoples.
Agreeing Themes for our Work during 2014 – 2015 Vanessa Barrett.
Older People’s Services The Single Assessment Process.
DEMONSTRATING IMPACT IN HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE: HOSPITAL AFTERCARE SERVICE Lesley Dabell, CEO Age UK Rotherham, November 2012.
Care Coordination Patient Case 1.
Name of presentation Improving health in Greenwich: Linking integrated health & social care with primary care.
Middle Managers Workshop 2: Measuring Progress. An opportunity for middle managers… Two linked workshops exploring what it means to implement the Act.
TES (training, education, support) Presented by: John Chiocchi, Paula Slevin, Mark Sampson,
Nurse Led Discharge Mater Misericordiae University Hospital Hilda Dowler, ADON Nursing Quality.
Norfolk Arts and Wellbeing Programme. A major arts and well-being Action Research project across Norfolk to support local arts organisations to pilot.
Logic Models How to Integrate Data Collection into your Everyday Work.
Workforce Repository & Planning Tool
South East London Homeless Health Needs Audit
Evaluating the Quality and Impact of Community Benefit Programs
A model for implementing health outcomes
County Durham, Darlington, Teesside, Hambleton, Richmondshire and Whitby Sustainability and Transformation Plan “Meeting patient needs now and future.
Knowledge for Healthcare: Driver Diagrams October 2016
Tracy Ellis Programme Delivery Lead
How to show your social value – reporting outcomes & impact
THE HEALTHCARE SUPPORT WORKER
Dr Marcello Bertotti, Senior Research Fellow University of East London
Transforming Primary Care Primary Care Home
Care Navigator Service Lucy Garratt – Head of Services
Working with the Voluntary Sector in North East Essex
Sleep Matters – A volunteer delivered sleep support service
Module 9 Designing and using EFGR-responsive evaluation indicators
Strategic Objectives 1. Commission for safer and better health outcomes Why? to improve the performance of our providers and ensure that our citizens.
Workforce & Practice Transformation
Dr Marcello Bertotti Senior Research Fellow
Healing our Health System Models of Care
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.
East Lothian Learning Partnership Conference Demonstrating Impacts and Outcomes – Is it really all that important? Ann Kivlin & Colin Forbes, CLDS.
Dementia Support Service March 2013
National care homes lead, new care models programme, NHS England
Data in the third sector (Health Development Officer)
Independent advocacy Care Act 2014
Technology Enabled Care in Bolton
15/16 Achievements and ambition for 16/17
Fylde Coast End of Life Care
Impact and outcomes – making sure these are central to your case –
Going digital: our next steps
Voluntary Sector Strategic Partners programme Out of hospital care: programme overview and issues going forward October 2016 a.
VCS Neighbourhoods Pilot
Social prescribing in County Durham
Moving Forward Together Programme Overview
Assignment 2 Learning Aim D: Individual Treatment Plan
Community Nursing 2008 Lambeth PCT
Salford Integrated Care Programme
Evaluating Community Link Working in Scotland: Learning from the ‘early adopters’ Jane Ford, NHS Health Scotland Themina Mohammed & Gordon Hunt, NSS Local.
Worcestershire Dementia Dwelling Grants:
The Comprehensive Model for Personalised Care
Live Healthy Live Happy
Articulate your change: Narrative
2. Frailty – Fall Prevention Programme
Patient Activation Measure
Presentation transcript:

Outcomes from social prescribing Evidence from Southwark and elsewhere Jane Harris 16th May 2019

Overview Why measure outcomes in social prescribing? How to choose which outcomes to measure How to choose useful measures of these outcomes What is currently being measured in Southwark? Suggestions for effective indicators to use

A useful way of thinking about outcomes: the logic model IF MONITORING THEN Inputs Activities Outputs Outcomes Impacts £ The resources needed to implement the project / programme, e.g. staff The things the programme does The “products” that result from the activities The immediate consequences and change that are a result of the activities The longer-term results in people’s lives or in a system, which the service or activity may contribute towards, but which go beyond the direct and immediate change

The next step: identifying outcome measures to enable evaluation Outcomes Possible indicators & measurement tools Data collection methods Outcomes for individuals and their carers Improved mental wellbeing Improved scores on SWEMWBS Individual completes every 3 or 6 months (self or 1:1) Increased ability to manage own health Improved PAM scores Outcomes for staff in referral agencies Improved morale Change over time in responses to NHSE survey Electronic or paper? NHSE or local admin? Improved understanding of VCS options Change over time in responses to local survey Possible bespoke e-survey, every 12 months Outcomes for voluntary organisations Increased sustainability Change over time in responses to NHSE VCSE survey Increased capacity to manage referrals Outcomes for the health and care system Reduction in GP consultations Reduction seen per GP records 6 monthly report by GPs? Reduction in hospital bed days Secondary Uses Service (SUS) data Agreement with CSU to supply data for people who give consent

Outcomes being measured in Southwark Increased engagement in activities Increased confidence Increased happiness Increased independence Increased ability to manage own health Improved home environment Reduction in use of health services WAYS OF MEASURING Case studies Bespoke questionnaires (self- report) Friends and Family Test Onward referrals Patient Activation Measure (?) Number of GP appointments (PCN service) Number of A&E visits (PCN service) Hospital admissions (PCN service)

Observations from the review so far Many different approaches being taken to measuring outcomes. Not many services are using validated outcomes measures. Qualitative methods are most popular and in some cases these are most appropriate – for example, some people with dementia may not be able to complete questionnaires. Sometimes there is confusion in reports between outputs and outcomes. There are obvious challenges in devising an approach which is proportionate and feasible within the resources available. In particular, we know it is challenging for voluntary organisations to develop systems for collecting information on outcomes. Accessing health service usage data may be challenging, but worth doing – good partnership working is essential.

Possible criteria for choosing outcome measures Has it been validated and tested to ensure psychometric validity? This is important, because if it has not, the tool is not a reliable measure of the change the service is seeking. How long does it take to complete? Ideally, we would not want to use measures that usually take longer than 5 minutes, as people are less likely to complete them. Who is it aimed at? Is it a measure that is specific to a particular group, or can it be used across service user groups? Is it widely used in similar services? If it is, findings from your service can be compared with findings from elsewhere. Is it free to use? If there is an equivalent measure which is free there will be no need to incur cost. Are there any other considerations? For example, how has the measure generally been received by service users?

Possible tools to use

Thank you and any questions? Finally Thank you and any questions? Jane Harris janeharris@cordisbright.co.uk 020 7330 9170