HRA: Aerospace Challenges

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ways to Improve the Hazard Management Process
Advertisements

Safer lives, safer ships, cleaner seas Human Factors Colin Brown.
© by cellconsult.com Application Testing & Test Management.
Planning: Processes and Techniques
Human Aspects of System Design Introduction –Designing the human element into a system is paramount to its success –One error incorporated by the human.
Software Project Management
1 JHSAT - May 2007 JHSAT SMS Briefing May 2007 AHS Forum 63 – Virginia Beach, VA Jack Drake, HAI Mark Liptak, FAA.
Human Factors Integration for a new chemical plant: Why Bother? Liz Cullen Senior Human Factors Consultant.
Integration of Quality Into Accident Investigation Processes ASQ Columbia Basin Section 614 John Cornelison January 2008.
Human Error: Anatomies of Accidents Anthony J Spurgin IEEE Section Meeting
Extended Cognitive Walkthrough Judy Kay CHAI: Computer human adapted interaction research group School of Information Technologies.
MSIS 110: Introduction to Computers; Instructor: S. Mathiyalakan1 Systems Design, Implementation, Maintenance, and Review Chapter 13.
CSC 402, Fall Requirements Analysis for Special Properties Systems Engineering (def?) –why? increasing complexity –ICBM’s (then TMI, Therac, Challenger...)
System Implementation
Hazards Analysis & Risks Assessment By Sebastien A. Daleyden Vincent M. Goussen.
Software Verification and Validation (V&V) By Roger U. Fujii Presented by Donovan Faustino.
Safety Management System Performance Based on Organizational Factors of “Seveso” sites Papadakis Georgios A., Kokkinos Konstantinos G. & Machaira Paschalia.
Commercial Database Applications Testing. Test Plan Testing Strategy Testing Planning Testing Design (covered in other modules) Unit Testing (covered.
Audits & Assessments: What are the Differences and How Do We Learn from the Results? Brown Bag March 12, 2009 Sal Rubano – Director, Office of the Vice.
Threat and Error Management in Aviation
Risk Management - the process of identifying and controlling hazards to protect the force.  It’s five steps represent a logical thought process from.
1 Can We Trust the Computer? What Can Go Wrong? Case Study: The Therac-25 Increasing Reliability and Safety Perspectives on Failures, Dependence, Risk,
Protecting the Public, Astronauts and Pilots, the NASA Workforce, and High-Value Equipment and Property Mission Success Starts With Safety Believe it or.
Principles of Information Systems, Sixth Edition Systems Design, Implementation, Maintenance, and Review Chapter 13.
Systems Life Cycle 1.Project Idenification 2. Initial Investigation 3. Feasibilty Study 4. Analysis 5. Design 6. Development and testing 7. Implementation.
 CS 5380 Software Engineering Chapter 2 – Software Processes Chapter 2 Software Processes1.
Mitigating Culture: Human Error in the Operational ATC World Anthony Smoker RAeS Human Factors Group Mitigating Human Error Conference 15 th October 2003.
1 Advanced Software Architecture Muhammad Bilal Bashir PhD Scholar (Computer Science) Mohammad Ali Jinnah University.
Copyright  2003 by Dr. Gallimore, Wright State University Department of Biomedical, Industrial Engineering & Human Factors Engineering Human Aspects of.
Design Process TED 105 Fall Define the Problem (ask) Clearly state the problem –Problem statement –Needs assessment –Design criteria & goals.
Methods of Installing a new computer-based system.
Business Analysis. Business Analysis Concepts Enterprise Analysis ► Identify business opportunities ► Understand the business strategy ► Identify Business.
Principles of Information Systems, Sixth Edition 1 Systems Design, Implementation, Maintenance, and Review Chapter 13.
RLV Reliability Analysis Guidelines Terry Hardy AST-300/Systems Engineering and Training Division October 26, 2004.
Ch7: Software Production Process. 1 Waterfall models  Invented in the late 1950s for large air defense systems, popularized in the 1970s  Main characteristics:
Human Reliability HUMAN RELIABILITY HUMAN ERROR
 Software Testing Software Testing  Characteristics of Testable Software Characteristics of Testable Software  A Testing Life Cycle A Testing Life.
Beyond procedures: safety and security culture as a preparation for the unexpected Filomena Ricco DCTA – Department of Aerospace Science and Technology.
Probabilistic Risk Assessment and Conceptual Design Bryan C Fuqua – SAIC Diana DeMott – SAIC
Safety Documentation How do we organize it and what will be the contents? A. Funken, LIU Project Meeting, 26 th September 2013.
Revision N° 11ICAO Safety Management Systems (SMS) Course01/01/08 Module N° 9 – SMS operation.
Karsten Thiel ICAO EUR/NAT Regional Director AVIATION SAFETY Almaty, 5 to 9 September 2005.
SueDon Ltd - Business Continuity Management BCM Overview ©1999 SueDon Ltd Business Continuity Management.
Project Life Presented by Chuck Ray, PMP ITS Project Manager.
Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis
SAFETY AND HEALTH IN PROCESS INDUSTRIES(MKKK1653) 2015/2016 ASSIGNMENT Failure mode, effect and critical analysis (FMECA) By Yahya Gambo (MKK152006) SUBMITTED.
Slide 3.1 © The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 SOFTWARE LIFE-CYCLE MODELS.
Software Engineering Management
What does Success mean to you?
PRA: Validation versus Participation in Risk Analysis PRA as a Risk Informed Decision Making Tool Richard T. Banke– SAIC
A Risk-based Approach to Training Paul Cheeseman & Kerry MacDonald
The Software Quality Challenge
CRMSG meeting 18th March 2010.
Problem Solving Updated Jun 2016.
Safety and Risk.
Developing Information Systems
BUS 519 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com.
BUS 519 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Assessing and Modifying Risks for Older Drivers
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XXII Human performance Case Studies Version 1.0, May 2015 This material was prepared by the IAEA.
Minimally Invasive Surgery
PowerPoint® Slides to Accompany
Chapter 13: Systems Analysis and Design
Group Truck Technology, Powetrain Engineering, Control Systems dept.
Regulatory Oversight of HOF in Finland
Margin Management Configuration Management Benchmarking Group
Knowing When to Stop: An Examination of Methods to Minimize the False Negative Risk of Automated Abort Triggers RAM XI Training Summit October 2018 Patrick.
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
6 Chapter Training Evaluation.
Hazards Analysis & Risks Assessment
Presentation transcript:

HRA: Aerospace Challenges Including Human Reliability In Considerations for Risk Diana DeMott – SAIC diana.l.demott@nasa.gov 281.335.2056

What is HRA? Human Reliability Assessment (HRA) The human in the loop directly causes a failure or accident The human does something to make a failure worse The human fails to correct the problem

Types of Human Actions (that can contribute to failures) Direct actions (push the button, switch) Monitor (verify information or programmed activities) Support (provide information which influences direct action) Evaluate (cognitive process to determine the course of action to be taken) Errors of omission versus commission Test and maintenance errors Procedural errors (not following or skipping steps) Errors leading to inappropriate actions Recovery errors

Why Use HRA? Identify how human actions (or inactions) affect accidents or failures Identify human-in-the-loop contribution to reduce the risk Complete the risk picture Performed during the design phase, HRA can highlight human interfaces and postulated failures and influence design (Risk Informed Decision Making) Determine if the risk can be mitigated by modifying the design Feedback to system design, Human Factor Engineers, operations procedures, and simulator training scenario development Design redundancy issues could use the HRA assessments for cost / benefit trade studies Comparison of competing designs Prioritization of design considerations

HRA Challenges Individual Human Action Being Assessed End User of HRA Results Perception Accused of not performing job properly Machines are more reliable than people Results What actions are most important based on risk Where to concentrate efforts for reducing risk Understanding What can be done to eliminate or mitigate human errors People are part of any process with advantages and disadvantages Results Understanding

Examples of Human Reliability Pilot preparing for take-off – actions important for the safety of all Passengers – actions important for individual safety

Conclusion HRA is another tool that can be used to improve designs and/or operations to reduce overall risk and provide information for Risk Informed Decision Making When using a tool: Know what the tool can do for you Use the right tool for the job Know how to use the tool effectively