RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accelerating Achievement in Boston Public Schools: Academic Achievement Framework.
Advertisements

Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
November 2009 Oregon RTI Project Cadre 5.  Participants will understand both general IDEA evaluation requirements and evaluation requirements for Specific.
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon
*This is a small school district of fewer than 1000 students located in northern Illinois. *The district consists of: an Elementary School (Pre-K--4 th.
RTI & MTI: Building the Foundation TTSD RTI Site Visit October 21, 2008.
Universal Screening: Answers to District Leaders Questions Are you uncertain about the practical matters of Response to Intervention?
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
What To Do When A Student Does Not Respond To An Academic Intervention Brian Lloyd Ed. S., NCSP May 2 nd, 2013.
RTI Data-based Decisions Marilyn Bechtel Psychologist/Elliott Elementary School Lincoln Public Schools July 30, 2007.
Oregon Reading First (2009)1 Oregon Reading First Webinar Data-based Action Planning Winter 2009.
Oregon Reading First (2010)1 Winter 2010 Data Based Planning for Instructional Focus Groups.
1 A Behavior and Reading Improvement Center Presentation Integrating Academic and Behavior Support Richard White and Bob Algozzine Integrated Systems for.
 Kingsport City Schools.  The foundation of our work with RTI is to support all student needs using a solutions-focused approach. We will utilize evidence-based.
What we found in TTSD About students (per school) who need a comprehensive reading program Middle schools: 1000 students High Schools:2000 students.
Student Support Team (SST) Training A Humanware Strategic Plan Activity Cleveland Metropolitan School District 1.
Tigard-Tualatin Spring site visit overview April 23, 2008.
Systems Requirements for RTI The nuts and bolts that hold it all together!
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
RtI in Georgia: Student Achievement Pyramid of Intervention
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
What is RTI? May 14, 2008 National Center on Response to Intervention.
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project Jennifer Doolittle Oregon Department of Education, January 27, 2006.
Using Data in the EBIS System Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.
Response to Instruction Training Wednesday, October 30, 2013.
Foundations and Critical Features of Successful R.T.I. Implementation Erin Lolich, OrRTI project Dean Richards, OrRTI project Tigard-Tualatin School District.
From Screening to Verification: The RTI Process at Westside Jolene Johnson, Ed.S. Monica McKevitt, Ed.S.
The Role of the Teacher. Basically, the state believes that teachers, along with the school district, are responsible for students that fail. If a student.
Training for Problem Solving Teams Susan Clay Jefferson County Board of Education Fall 2014.
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
RTI in Tigard-Tualatin School District: Effective Behavior & Instructional Support (EBIS) National SEA Conference on SLD Determination April 20, 2006 Erin.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Report Oregon RTI Project Sustaining Districts Trainings
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
Secondary Systems Overview What to Know Before Venturing Out of Bounds OrRTI Project January 15, 2009.
RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading -DIBELS.
Data-Based Decision Making: Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.
Evaluation and Eligibility Using RTI Crook County School District February 26, 2010.
EBIS Effective Behavior & Instructional Supports Tina Rodriguez June 23, 2013.
DIBELS: Doing it Right –. Big Ideas of Today’s Presentation Reading success is built upon a foundation of skills DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early.
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.
 October 29,2009. Define Response to Intervention Provide an overview of EBIS implementation Learn about TTSD’s history, demographics, program and outcomes.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
UNIVERSAL SCREENING AND PROGRESS MONITORING IN READING Secondary Level.
Building RTI Capacity Through the Lens of a Coach Curriculum and Instruction Department.
1 Implementing RTI in Tigard- Tualatin School District OSEP Leadership Conference March 30, 2005 Carol Sadler, Ph.D
Progress Monitoring Goal Setting Overview of Measures Keith Drieberg, Director of Psychological Services John Oliveri, School Psychologist Cathleen Geraghty,
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development August 18, 2009.
RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading - AIMS.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
RSU #38 Response to Intervention
Data-Driven Decision Making
Response to Intervention
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Welcome to Second Grade Curriculum Night
Module 10 Assessment Logistics
Data-Based Leadership
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support
Owingsville Elementary School September 9, 2012
Special Education Process
Implementation of Data-Based Decision-Making in an Urban Elementary School Doug Marston Jane Thompson Minneapolis Public Schools March 26, 2009.
Special Education teacher progress monitoring refresher training
Ensuring Success for Every Reader
Richard Edwards Elementary School
Liberty Elementary staff training
Presentation transcript:

RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project Jennifer Doolittle Oregon Department of Education, January 27, 2006

Grades 1-5 Decision Rules Individualize Instruction Rule: If less than 80% of students are not meeting benchmarks, review core program(s) 20% Decision Rule: Students below benchmark with academic skills that place them in the lowest 20% compared to their peers and/or with chronic behavior needs* are placed in Individualize Instruction Rule: When students fail to progress after two (2) consecutive small group interventions small group instruction Change Small Group or Individual Interventions Rule: When progress data is below aimline on three (3) consecutive days, or when six (6) data points produce a flat or a decreasing trendline Refer for Special Education Evaluation Rule: When students fail to progress after one individually-designed intervention

EBIS EARLY IDENTIFICATION PROCESS Tigard-Tualatin School District, Tigard, Oregon TEAMWORK TIMELINES: EBIS teams meet fall, winter & spring to review data and make decisions about school-wide progress. EBIS teams / Grade level teacher teams meet monthly to review data, plan and adjust interventions. ALL STUDENTS RECEIVE QUALITY BEHAVIOR AND ACADEMIC INSTRUCTION AND SUPPORT All Students Are Screened for Additional Instructional Needs (Fall, Winter & Spring DIBELS, DORF, TESA, ODRs, etc.) Small Group Interventions are designed by teacher teams with EBIS support *More than 5 absences or more than 3 counseling or discipline referrals in a 30 day period Interventions are further individualized

Special Education referral is initiated Daisy participates in the general curriculum EBIS Team reviews screening data and places Daisy in group intervention Daisy isn’t doing well Daisy may recycle Daisy doesn’t improve Daisy improves EBIS Team designs individual intervention Resumes general program Daisy may recycle Daisy improves Daisy doesn’t improve Improvement is good and other factors are suspected as cause Intervention is intense and LD is suspected Special Education referral is initiated

EBIS DECISION RULES - Kindergarten BEGINNING OF THE YEAR: October Place students in Level 1 or Level 2 intervention groups by October 15th based on fall DIBELS data. Level 1 support (Strategic): Add 10-15 minutes of phonemic awareness instruction daily Level 2 support (Intensive): Add 30 minutes of Early Reading Intervention daily Monitor and graph progress monthly (end of October, November and December) Applies to all students so not special education procedures.

MIDDLE OF THE YEAR: January Regroup students after January DIBELS has been completed. Place students according into the following groups: Strategic support: Add 10-15 minutes of phonemic awareness instruction daily Intensive support: Add 30 minutes of Early Reading Intervention daily. Monitor and graph progress 2 times per month for the students receiving strategic support and weekly for those receiving intensive support through mid April.

END OF THE YEAR: April For those students still not making adequate progress, EBIS teams should complete the Individual Problem Solving Worksheet and do one of the following: Revise the intervention and continue with implementation and data collection Refer to Special Education Referral to special education can still occur anywhere on the continuum, but

TTSD Standard Reading Protocol Grade Primary Level: Time Program Options Secondary Level: Time &Group Size Tertiary Level: Time and Group Size K 60 minutes daily Open Court SFA Add 10-15 minutes daily of PA activities Large group *Ladders to Literacy *PA in Young Children *Road to the Code Add 30 minutes daily Small group ((varies based on progress) *Early Reading Intervention *Language for Learning 1 60-90 minutes daily Small group *Open Court Booster *SFA Tutoring Add 30 minutes *Reading Mastery 2 Add 45 minutes daily *Phonics For Reading AND *Read Naturally Add 2 45 minute sessions *Language for Thinking

Planning for the Individual Student In place Partially in Place Not in Place Planning for the Individual Student Next Steps 1. The EBIS Team Meeting Notice is sent to parents 2. The EBIS team reviews the students’ cumulative record using the Effective Support Process (or EBIS K-5) Individual Problem Solving Worksheet. An Action Plan is completed for each student identified for individualized intervention. 3. Case Managers are assigned and start a Student Intervention Profile for each student. 4. Case Managers report back to the EBIS team on a monthly basis to report on the progress of the students under their supervision. 5. Using this process the team has made special education referral(s). 6. The completed Student Intervention Profile was attached to the Special Education Referral Form. 7. Parent involvement and notification procedures as required by Special Education are followed.

Communication with Parents EFFECTIVE BEHAVIOR AND INSTRUCTION SUPPORT (EBIS) TEAM MEETING NOTICE Dear ____________________________: (Parent / Guardian) ________________________has been referred to the Effective Behavior and Instruction (Child) Support Team (EBIS) for an assessment of his/her needs. The referral is based on the concerns that were discussed with you over the phone on _____________________. The concerns included: _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ . The team will meet at school to discuss your child’s needs and plan an EBIS program during the week of: ____________________________. (Date) You are welcome to attend this meeting. If you would like to do so, please contact ___________________________at __________________for more specific information on (Team Coordinator) (Phone Number) the time and place.

INDIVIDUAL PROBLEM SOLVING WORKSHEET File Review and Problem Identification Date: School: Grade: Teacher: Current Services: Student Name: Team Members: ATTENDANCE REVIEW (based on an average of 171 school days per year) Grade K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 School Year School Attended Days Total 171 342 513 684 855 1026 1197 1368 1539 1710 1881 2052 2223 Student’s Attendance per Year Student Total for all Years Grand Total of Days of School Attended:______ Divide by 171:______. Years + Months of Actual Attendance:______

File Review and Problem Identification (continued) INDIVIDUAL PROBLEM SOLVING WORKSHEET File Review and Problem Identification (continued) Review of report cards, progress reports, and teacher remarks by grade level significant for: Reading achievement: Math achievement: Behavior (including attending skills): Language skills: Other:

INDIVIDUAL PROBLEM SOLVING WORKSHEET (continued) STUDENT:___________________DATE: _________ ACHIEVEMENT REVIEW – READING Grade K 1 2 3 4 BENCHMARKS PSF: 35 NWF: 25 NWF: 50 (Winter) ORF: 40-60 ORF: 90 ORF: 110 OSA: 201 ORF: 118 OSA: 208 EXPECTED GAINS N/A ORF: 1.5 Words per Week ORF: 1.5 Words per Week OSA: 7 points STUDENT SCORE PSF: NWF: ORF: OSA: SIGNIFICANCE

INDIVIDUAL PROBLEM SOLVING WORKSHEET (continued) STUDENT:___________________DATE: _________ ACHIEVEMENT REVIEW – READING Grade 5 6 7 8 10 BENCHMARKS ORF: 124 OSA: 215 ORF: 125 OSA: 220 OSA: 226 OSA: 231 OSA: 239 EXPECTED GAINS ORF: 1.5 Words per Week OSA: 7 points OSA: 5 points OSA: 6 points OSA: 8 points STUDENT SCORE ORF: OSA: SIGNIFICANCE Other information: Summary of teacher concerns, referral questions, etc.

INDIVIDUAL PROBLEM SOLVING WORKSHEET (continued) STUDENT:___________________DATE: _________ ACHIEVEMENT REVIEW – READING Grade 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 BENCHMARKS OSA: 202 OSA: 208 OSA: 215 OSA: 220 OSA: 226 OSA: 231 OSA: 239 EXPECTED GAINS N/A OSA: 6 points OSA: 7 points OSA: 5 points OSA: 8 points STUDENT SCORE OSA: SIGNIFICANCE Other information: Summary of teacher concerns, referral questions, etc.

INDIVIDUAL PROBLEM SOLVING WORKSHEET (continued) STUDENT:___________________DATE: _________ ACHIEVEMENT REVIEW - WRITING Grade 4 Grade 7 Grade 10 COMPOSITE BENCHMARK 32 to 39 (28 to 31 may conditionally meet. The district may declare the student met if all work sample requirements are met) Minimum of 3 in each trait. 40 to 49 (35 to 39 may conditionally meet. The district may declare the student met if all work sample requirements are met) Minimum of 3 in each trait. 40 (35 to 39 may conditionally meet. The district may declare the student met if all work sample requirements are met) Minimum of 3 in each trait. STUDENT SCORE (Note areas of concern by traits)

INDIVIDUAL PROBLEM SOLVING WORKSHEET (continued) STUDENT:___________________DATE: _________ HYPOTHESIS DEVELOPMENT Summarizing evidence above, address questions below: 1. Does evidence support that the student’s problems may be primarily due to problems with attention, motivation, or other behavioral difficulty? 2. Does evidence support that the student’s problems may be primarily due to attendance problems, or frequent school interruptions? If so, indicate reasons for absences and interruptions. 3. Does evidence support that the student’s problems may be primarily due to other concerns like trauma, family concerns, or other disabilities? Describe. Be sure to note when these issues occurred and their correlations with any academic concerns. 4. Does evidence suggest the student may have a learning disability? Indicate next steps.

EBIS INDIVIDUAL STUDENT ACTION PLAN Student: __________________________ Date: ________ What is the educational problem? What is the team’s hypothesis regarding the source of the problem? What will be done to address the hypothesis? Who is going to do the intervention? Who will be the case manager? When will the team reconvene to check progress and determine next steps?