BAIRWMP Update 10/1/2010 Background Prop 50 Supplemental funding Prop 1-E- Flood Management Prop 84 Planning Grant IRWMP Implementation

Background Prop 50 supplemental -BAIRWMP not funded 7 applicants Funded-Total $7,389,000 Monterey County Water Resources Authority $997,000 North Coast IRWM $2,176,860 Tahoe Sierra IRWM $2,115,272 Upper Kings Basin IWMA $2,099,868 Prop 1-E Applications due April 2011

Planning Guidelines $20 million statewide $ 1 million max per grant 25 % match New Plan elements Land use Climate Change Must commit to update plan if you get Implementation funds

BAIRWMP Plan Proposal Submitted September 27, 2010 MMWD is applicant Grant request-$842,556 Match- $569,761 ( ~ 40 %) Cash- $210,494 In kind- $359,267 Includes- SVCSD -Groundwater plan Salt and Nutrient Management Planning $205k request & 50% match ( 25 % cash, 25% in kind)

F u n d I n g Areas

Implementation DWR Guidelines IRWM implementation grant competition is slightly different in that funding is allocated to individual funding areas. If there are multiple IRWM regions in a funding area, those IRWM regions are competing for the funding allocated to that funding area. DWR will make funding decisions based on application scores within a funding area. In order to ensure wise investments of State general obligation bond funds, minimum scores for various criteria may be implemented to ensure that quality proposals are awarded funding.

Implementation Proposal “Regional” projects Reviewed by Project Screening Sub committee Decision by BAIRWMP Coordinating Committee Application due January 7 http://bairwmp.org/draft-project-descriptions/prop-84-regional-project-2010-drafts

Proposals as of 9/21/2010 Regional Drought Relief & Water Conservation ($6.5 m) Regional Recycling ($6 m) Regional Green Infrastructure Capacity Building($10.9 m) Bay Area Wetland Ecosystem Restoration ($3 m) Disadvantaged Communities Watershed program (1.2 m) Interactive Flood and Waterways Infrastructure Map($.75k) Evaluating Regional Ecosystem Restoration using Steelhead ($.371k)

Drought Relief &Water Conservation 11 water districts MMWD, City of Napa, SCWA, Solano This consists of 5-6 rebate elements (outdoor & indoor) Education and training element (StopWaste.org), Regional outdoor landscape calculator element ($375 k). $6.5 million request, & $8.5 million match ~ $485/care foot

Recycling BACWA presented ~ 54 projects totaling ~ $500 million West-1 East- 4 North-14 South- 35 Directed to develop $5-6 million proposal

Green Infrastructure SFEP- “ catalyst” for more projects Request $ 10.9 million, $7.9 million match North- $1.675 SCWA ($ 850 k) and Napa FCWCD ($825k) East- $3.75 m San Pablo Avenue- West- $1.93 m, 3 projects South-$ 3.245 m SFEP/SFEI-$300k

Wetlands State Coastal Conservancy Requested $ 3 million for 3 projects North-Sears Point $1 million request, $14 million match South –Bair Island $1 million request Dutch slough-outside region (dropped 9/30/10) $1 million request-9/30/10-will identify replacement

Floodplains Mapping -BAFPAA & SFEI DAC & Watersheds Request $750 k , $250 k match DAC & Watersheds -Request $1.2 million, $ 650 k match - Marin City (out), Richmond, San Francisquito, Pescadero Combined- (9/30/10) $ 1.5 million total Steelhead Monitoring- CEMAR -Request $382 k, match-$114k (< 25%)*

Screening Process Projects total ~ $29 million- Evaluation of projects $15 Million likely available Evaluation of projects Score-Plan and DWR scoring –IRWMP (28-46) + Cost/Benefit (15)+ Preferences (10) Screening factors timeliness/ feasibility/ CEQA

Scoring 84 50 Workplan 15 Funding match /////// 5 (10%) Scientific Merit //////// F. A Balance? (5) //// Budget 5 Schedule Mon. & Ass..& Perf. Meas. WS-Econ. Anal.-Cost/benefit (20)-> 15 W Q & Other benefits (5)-> 15 10 Flood Damage-C/B ? Program Preferences Total 85 80

-Efficient use of resources Develop Options Minimize number of projects Emphasize scoring or objective(s) or CA preferences . . . Proportionally reduce all eligible regional projects Emphasize Effectiveness and Economic Analysis ?? Combination, Other & Criteria -Efficient use of resources - Maintain stakeholder involvement ?Encourage regional collaboration ? Anticipate plan update Recommendation to Coordinating Committee- October 25

DWR questions 1) How is DWR approaching the first round of Prop 84 funding?- State overview- Raps approved and available funding. 2) What are DWR preferences and priorities? 3) What are expectations for future rounds of funding? 4) How is DWR approaching the 3 IRWM areas that are coterminous with the funding region (North Coast, Bay Area, SAWPA)? 5) Will DWR defer to the BAIRWMP Project Selection Process? 6) How will cost benefit analysis be applied for the 3 coterminous regions?