Critical Issues in Evaluating Educational Technology Mark Hawkes Dakota State University Presentation at the American Evaluation Association Annual Conference,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Link to the Future Where is Education Going with Technology?
Advertisements

TFPAI Training: Technology Facilitators
Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.
Second Information Technology in Education Study (SITES) A Project of the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA)
WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
Professional Learning Communities At Glasgow High School.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
Orientation to the Planning 10 IRP  How does Planning 10 fit into the 2004 Graduation Program?  How was Planning 10 developed?  What’s the difference.
Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Robert J. Marzano.
Elementary School Counselor
Technology Plan EDLD 5362 Casey Smith.
STaR Chart Comparison Carol McMillan EDLE 672. STaR Chart Comparison Review of key areas - Teaching and learning - Educators preparation and development.
IT in Education. No. of Students Enrollment Rate Annual Increase Employees Schools Budget General Education 1,100,000 98,7% 6% 47, US$M.
Best Practices. Overview of Best Practices Literacy Best Practice Documents: Were developed by curriculum staff and area specialists, with coaches’ and.
“ Every Student Deserves to Hold the World in their Hands” DEVELOPING HIGH SCHOOL COUNSELING PROGRAMS… IMPROVING STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT… SCHOOL COUNSELOR’S.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Milwaukee Digital Inclusion Program Draft: January 26, 2007, Milwaukee Department of Administration.
Chapter 6 Exploring the World Wide Web in the Classroom.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
KEYS to School Improvement Missouri National Education Association Teaching and Learning Director.
How many balls can you juggle at one time?. Identify 7 balls extension middle managers juggle every day in leading the extension program Identify strategies.
Technology Leadership
Evidence-Based Practice: Proving That What You Do Makes a Difference Audrey Church Longwood University VEMA 2004.
21 st Century Skills/ Technology Data to Support.
 Center for Innovative Leadership Development  Leadership Group of the Carolinas  Leadership Conferences  Expanding Graduate Programs  Doctoral Cohorts.
1 PI 34 and RtI Connecting the Dots Linda Helf Teacher, Manitowoc Public School District Chairperson, Professional Standards Council for Teachers.
Improve Achievement for EACH PreK-12 Student Areas of Focus Preview GREENWICH PUBLIC SCHOOLS October 11, 2007.
Using Technology in the Classroom. State of Education Low test scores Funding issues Poverty Lack of support Standardized testing.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
By Raquel Cantu Lamar University, EDLD 5362, ET8021.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Dr. Tayseer Al Nahar Al Noaimi Ministry of Education- Jordan
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Dallas Independent School District Technology Plan Ronald R. Pugh ET8011 May 15, 2011.
Final Portfolio The Roles of the School Library Media Specialist Stephanie Warmoth Spring 2012.
Onslow County Schools Division of Media and Instructional Technology This presentation was prepared under fair use exemption of the U.S. Copyright Law.
The game is changing. It isn't just about math and science anymore. It's about creativity, imagination, and, above all, innovation.” –Business Week Magazine.
The New York State School Improvement Grant Initiative Five Years On Office of Professional Research & Development, Syracuse University, NY.
Standard 1 School Library Media Coordinators Demonstrate Leadership Staff development documentation Newsletters Conference documentation Websites School.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
EVAL Self Assessment (Adapted from LaConner School Improvement Presentation) Your Name Your District Your Date.
By Billye Darlene Jones EDLD 5362 Section ET8004-1B February, 2010.
Teachers Discovering Computers Integrating Technology and Digital Media in the Classroom 5 th Edition Lesson 6 Technology, Digital Media and Curriculum.
Technology, Digital Media, and Curriculum Integration
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
What does it mean to be a RETA Instructor this project? Consortium for 21 st Century Learning C21CL
2010 NATIONAL EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY PLAN Eva Perez EDIT 654 OL.
Initial Comparisons February, Crosswalk with SEPs InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards The Learning and Learning 1. Learner Development (11 standards)
Campus Texas STaR Chart Presentation for Los Fresnos HS Technology Leadership EDTC Project 2 Jaime Villarreal.
Technology Plan SMITA PIMPLAPURE Final Project Technology and Educational Restructuring December 11, 2003.
Creative Intervention Planning through Universal Design for Learning MariBeth Plankers, M.S. CCC-SLP Page 127.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
+ Professional Development Characteristics Alternatives Stages Extending the Concept.
Education.state.mn.us Principal Evaluation Components in Legislation Work Plan for Meeting Rose Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education.
What do you think should be the goal of technology in education?
Ohio’s Mathematics Science Partnership All New OMSP Programs must use the Survey of Enacted Curriculum.
Professional Learning Communities Creating powerful and effective learning for teachers and students.
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
Evaluation of An Urban Natural Science Initiative
Chapter 18: Professional Development
Collaborative Leadership
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Critical Issues in Evaluating Educational Technology Mark Hawkes Dakota State University Presentation at the American Evaluation Association Annual Conference, Nov. 2, 2000

School Expenditure on Technology $5.2 Billion $6.0 Billion $7.2 Billion

The Secretarys Conference on Educational Technology Evaluating the Effectiveness of Technology The effectiveness of technology is embedded in the effectiveness of other school improvement efforts. Standardized test scores offer limited formative information with which to drive the development of a schools technology program.

Critical Issues… Current evaluation practices need broadening. Schools must document and report their evaluation findings in ways that satisfy diverse stakeholders need to know. Everyone must agree on a common language and standards of practice for measuring how schools achieve that end.

Critical Issues... The role of teachers is crucial in evaluating the effectiveness of technology in schools. Some existing policies need to be transformed to match the new needs of schools using technology.

Scope of Evaluation: status then Technology focus: Drill-and-practice software, integrated learning systems, videotaped lessons, computer-animated picture books, low-level problem-solving and simulation computer software Professional Development: Participation, topics, accessibility, quality Hardware capability: Processing speed, memory, application functionality Student products Rate of implementation

Scope of Evaluation: status now Technology: information-processing and productivity tool Professional Development: relationship to student performance with technology Breadth of technology vision Level and breadth of ownership Community involvement Propensity for new practice

Metrics: status then Standardized measures (IGAP, ITBS, CTBS) Student-to-computer ratio Survey: Self-report (competency, nature of use) Affect oriented Behavioral indicators Attendance/Graduation rates Principal referrals Post-secondary options Teacher discourse: Technology-centered

Metrics: status now Critical incident analysis Incidents of learning activities that reflect job- related skills and performances Token Economies Media Production Comparative science Nature of discourse, signs of: Teacher-centerednature of pedagogy Student centeredconstructivist pedagogy Classroom observation of innovative uses

Role of Teacher: status then Hands on time with the technology Trips to the lab Types of activities Tools used Report affective measures Student attitudes toward technology Document categories of outcomes (motivational, behavioral)

Role of Teacher: status now Teacher activity logs Journaling on how teachers implemented technology facilitated instructional strategies with corresponding outcomes Content area professionals in examining how technology is linked to state learning standards Examining relationship between instructional practices and teaching and learning roles

Technology Policy: status then Lab topology; limited access detached form the learning experience Access to technology resources (equity) Focus with use policy and security Acceptable Internet use accounts

Technology Policy: status now Aligning school support systems with technology outcomes Libraries as information centers Continuous financial support to sustain system components Exploring technology use opportunities that extends learning beyond the school day Extended lab hours Lap top check-out

Inputs Outputs Infrastructure Student motivation Wireless features Accessibility Restructured leadership Improved PD New roles for Improved use of support services services Individual Staff Renewed teacher development plans skill building Competitive Improved efficiency collaboration grants in technology use

Over the two years... Continued reliance on standardized measures Policy at all levels remain prohibitive in many cases Improved support for technology purchases and professional development Limited examination of systemic indicators: - Vision of technology use - Support for technology implementation - Community roles and involvement - Administrative effectiveness

Over the two years... Parsing the effects of technology from the numerous school improvement ventures in the school proves virtually impossible Growth needed in collaborative gap analysis and deployment of technology to address those gaps Efforts to evaluate look quasi- experimental, have more attributes of research than evaluation

Slides available at: Presentations.htm Paper available at: sum.html