Physics Requirements for Conventional Facilities

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Wine Cellar Split System Basics. Definitions Split System – A cooling unit that “splits” the cooling coil and the condenser apart into two remote pieces.
Advertisements

Zachary Wolf Undulator Tuning November 12, Undulator Tuning Status Z. Wolf, S. Anderson, R. Colon, S. Jansson, D. Jensen,
XFEL Undulator Efforts at DESY and Thoughts on LCLS-II H.-D. Nuhn June 30, 2010.
Experience Report with the Alignment Diagnostic System Georg Gassner September 17 th 2010.
J. Welch 4/7/05 Facility Advisory Committee Meeting Physics Issues for Conventional Facilities Review and Update 4/7/05 J. Welch.
Jo Beth Folger MMF Site and October 14, Conventional Facilities – MMF Presentation Outline Facility Design.
Undulator Physics Requirements April 7, 2005 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS Facility Advisory Committee Meeting Undulator Physics.
Zachary Wolf Undulator Tuning June 17, 2008 Undulator Tuning Status Z. Wolf, S. Anderson, R. Colon, S. Jansson, S.Kaplunenko,
LCLS Undulators October 14, 2004 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL MMF Review Introduction to the LCLS Undulators Heinz-Dieter Nuhn,
1 Chapter 27 Current and Resistance. 2 Electric Current Electric current is the rate of flow of charge through some region of space The SI unit of current.
Javier A. Sevilla MMF FAC Review October 27, Magnetic Measuring Facility (MMF) Outline Summary of Facility Requirements.
Yurii Levashov Undula t or fiducialization test Oct. 14, 2004 Undulator Fiducialization Test Results Fiducialization Tolerances.
Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center LCLS Undulator Systems.
Wire Position System LCLS Undulator Alignment and Motion Review, Oct. 22, Franz Peters Wire Position System The Undulator.
J. Welch 10/12/04 Facility Advisory Committee Meeting Physics Issues for Conventional Facilities Review and Update 10/12/04 J.
Pine, Bldg 48, Room 232 J. 4/29/04 Physics Requirements for Conventional Facilities Thermal, Settlement, and Vibration Issues.
Robert Ruland Installation Alignment -Magnetic Measurements – Fiducialization April 7-8, 2005 FAC Meeting 1 Installation Alignment,
Robert Ruland MMF Introduction, Schedule, Budget October 14, 2004 MMF Review 1 MMF Introduction, Schedule, Budget Robert Ruland.
Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center LCLS Undulator Physics.
Robert Ruland Intra Girder Assembly and Alignment - October 20, 2005 Internal LCLS Undulator Alignment and Motion Review 1 Intra.
Robert Ruland MMF Layout, Workflow October 14, 2004 MMF Review 1 MMF Layout, Workflow Robert Ruland Magnetic Measurements Facility.
Stability of Mechanical Systems S. Sharma and V. Ravindranath.
J. Welch Talk MMF 10/14/04 LCLS Magnetic Measurement Facility Requirements Functional Temperature Vibration Earth's.
Javier A. Sevilla April 5, Magnetic Measuring Facility (MMF) Outline Organizational Chart Facility Design Criteria,
19 Nov 08,ILC08Cherrill Spencer Rotating Coil System Description 1 Short description of the SLAC rotating coil system used to measure the CIEMAT-made prototype.
Central Region Discussion Power and Cooling GDE Beijing-CFS.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS – II EFAC Review Conventional Facilities Briefing Marty Fallier Director for Conventional Facilities National Synchrotron.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Conventional Facilities & Beam Stability Marty Fallier Director for Conventional Facilities NSLS-II Beam Stability Workshop.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS – II ASAC Review Conventional Facilities Briefing Marty Fallier Director for Conventional Facilities National Synchrotron.
Undulator Orientation & Electron Beam Spacing Should the undulator frames be toward the central aisle or the tunnel walls? What is the optimum spacing.
SCU Segmented Cryostat Concept M. Leitner, S. Prestemon, D. Arbelaez, S. Myers September 2 nd, 2014.
Technical Challenges and Concerns S. Sharma and R. Alforque, R. Beuman, C. Foerster, E. Haas, E. Hu, P. Montanez, P. Mortazavi, S. Pjerov, J. Skaritka,
Orbit Control For Diamond Light Source Ian Martin Joint Accelerator Workshop Rutherford Appleton Laboratory28 th -29 th April 2004.
NLC MAC Meeting 6-8 Nov Linac Girder Studies and Plans C. Boffo Slide 1 Linac Girder Studies and Plans C. Boffo – E. Borissov – H. Carter Fermilab,
Option – 5m Undulators What is the optimum length for an LCLS undulator?  XFEL is using 5m undulator segments.  Is this optimum?  What are the advantages.
LCLS-II Physics Meeting, May 08, 2013 LCLS-II Undulator Tolerances Heinz-Dieter Nuhn LCLS-II Undulator Physics Manager May 8, 2013.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES EFAC Review Conventional Facilities Update Marty Fallier Director for Conventional Facilities May 10, 2007.
CLIC Workshop th -17 th October 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC 1 CLIC Main Linac Quadrupoles Preliminary design of a quadrupole for the stabilization.
Catherine LeCocq, SLAC Alignment Plan for the LCLS Undulator IWAA 2006,1 Alignment Plan for the LCLS Undulator Catherine.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project James T Volk 10/03/2001 Report on Magnet Group Status May 7 th 2002 J Volk, C Spencer, B Parker.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Beam Stability Overview NSLS-II CFAC Meeting May 8, 2007 S. Krinsky.
Summary of Presentation 1. Tolerances i. Vertical tolerances on BPMs (rf-BPM: ± 0.2μm, user BPMs: ±0.1μm, and X-BPMs: ± 0.1μm) ii. Tolerances on magnets’
Magnetic Measurements At SLAC
Tutorial On Fiducialization Of Accelerator Magnets And Undulators
ALIGNMENT OF THE NEW TRIPLETS
Orbit Control For Diamond Light Source
SOIL, GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Magnetic Measurements For The LCLS Undulator System
LCLS Undulator Fiducialization
Undulator Tolerances for LCLS-II using SCUs
SCU Next Phase Meeting July 8, 2014.
CF Organization & Schedule
Preliminary design of foundation for HEPS
Maintenance at ALBA facility: Strategy for the conventional services
Thermal Environment & Mechanical Support
Undulator Cost & Schedule Patric Den Hartog, ANL April 24, 2002
Magnetic Measurements and Alignment at SLAC Robert Ruland & Zack Wolf
Undulator Tuning Status Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS for Zack Wolf, Yurii Levashov, Achim Weidemann, Seva Kaplounenko, Scott Jansson, Ralph Colon, Dave.
Physics Requirements for Conventional Facilities
LCLS Undulator System Status and Schedule
Conventional Facilities WBS 1.9
Motivation Technique Simulations LCLS LCLS DOE Review, April 24, 2002
Heinz-Dieter Nuhn – LCLS Undulator Group Leader May 14, 2009
Fixed Support Design & Testing
Undulator Alignment Plan
CF Scope, Management & Organization
Alignment Diagnostic System Status
Breakout Session SC3 – Undulator
Physics Requirements for Conventional Facilities
Undulator Hall Power Dissipation
Presentation transcript:

Physics Requirements for Conventional Facilities May 2005 Lehman Review May 11, 2005 J. Welch, welch@slac.stanford.edu

J. Welch, welch@slac.stanford.edu Topics MMF status Undulator Hall Ground motion Temperature stability Tolerances May 11, 2005 J. Welch, welch@slac.stanford.edu

J. Welch, welch@slac.stanford.edu MMF Status Reviewed by Javier Sevilla 100% Title II Vibration mitigation included Isolated slabs Large slab under magnet measurement bench Mechanical equipment moved as far away as feasible Isolators under the HVAC equipment May 11, 2005 J. Welch, welch@slac.stanford.edu

J. Welch, welch@slac.stanford.edu MMF Status (cont.) Thermal control +- 0.1 C in critical areas: (~1600 sf) Air washes down on equipment and is returned near the bottom of the walls. Excess heat sources are water cooled Racks and computers are put near the end of the airstream. May 11, 2005 J. Welch, welch@slac.stanford.edu

Undulator Hall Temperature Control Experience base Heat sources in the Undulator Hall Effect of changing the temperature tolerance May 11, 2005 J. Welch, welch@slac.stanford.edu

Temperature control at other labs Temporal Stability ± ˚C Spatial Stability ± ˚C Description LCLS UH 0.2 Tunnel, below ground LCLS MMF 0.1 Air shower ALS A few degrees Lab in bldg APS ring 1 A couple of degrees APS MMF 0.3 NSSRRC, Taiwan “several degrees” Tunnel, above ground NIST, AML 0.01 - 0.3 Diamond 0.5 NIF, target building 0.28 May 11, 2005 J. Welch, welch@slac.stanford.edu

Jacobs HVAC Experience Confidential client +/- 0.3 C +/- 2% RH National Semiconductor +/- 0.17 C Linear Technology +/- 1.1 F +/- 3% RH Rockwell Semiconductor +/- 1.7 C Atmel Semiconductor +/- 0.6 F May 11, 2005 J. Welch, welch@slac.stanford.edu

LCLS Tunnel Heat Sources No high power electromagnets EM quads less than 27 W Undulator magnets are permanent magnets No high temperature “cooling water” Tempered cooling water delivered and returned near ambient air No high power electronics Almost all racks are in three service buildings on the surface and are accessible during operation Budget for equipment and lighting load +- 50 W per meter of tunnel length transmitted to air May 11, 2005 J. Welch, welch@slac.stanford.edu

J. Welch, welch@slac.stanford.edu Heat Source Variables Lighting load Requirement is two level lighting, 5 fc (~ covered parking lot) for operation and 30 fc (~ conference room) for access Systems will take a few hours to recover from extended access. AC response is in minutes. Motors Design not fixed, might include significant variable local heating Vacuum pumps Depend on pressures Tunnel walls Warm very slowly, respond to groundwater, essentially no transient effect May 11, 2005 J. Welch, welch@slac.stanford.edu

Tolerance to Temperature Assumed MMF Temperature Tolerance is 1/2 of Undulator Hall May 11, 2005 J. Welch, welch@slac.stanford.edu

Differential Settlement in the Undulator Hall Physics Requirement  “Ground Motion Model”  0.2 mm rms / year @ 10 m separation Fits with once per week BBA with on 10 - 20% chance of going out of tolerance. Linac Performance 0.08 mm rms / year @ 10 m Averaged over the first 17 years of operation Jacobs is required to design to the Linac value Tunnel / Floor design is actively underway Stretched wires and a hydrostatic leveling systems developed in parallel to provide a straightness reference. (R. Ruland) May 11, 2005 J. Welch, welch@slac.stanford.edu

J. Welch, welch@slac.stanford.edu Ground Motion Model Based mainly on the SLAC Linac. Best estimate of average motion of the floor of the Undulator Hall during the first three years of operation, if the Undulator Hall performed exactly like the linac structure. May 11, 2005 J. Welch, welch@slac.stanford.edu

Correlation with Distance Relative motion correlates with distance between measurement points. LCLS will have support points around 10 m apart, and quad separation of 4 m. Stiffness of foundation may improve this correlation. May 11, 2005 J. Welch, welch@slac.stanford.edu

J. Welch, welch@slac.stanford.edu Startup Effect PEP data Much greater velocities occur in the first few years after construction Motion continues at a signficant level indefinitely SLAC Linac data Model of Seryi and Raubenheimer give about a factor of two between 17 year average rate and first three average rate May 11, 2005 J. Welch, welch@slac.stanford.edu

Tolerance to Ground Motion A total phase error of roughtly 360 degrees is sufficient to lose one gain length and start to reduce the FEL performance This calculation assumes the phase error is produced only by ground motion transmitted directly to the quadrupole positions May 11, 2005 J. Welch, welch@slac.stanford.edu

Support system quadrupole stability tolerance The phase error that results if only the quadrupoles are allowed to move. May 11, 2005 J. Welch, welch@slac.stanford.edu

Segment axis stability tolerance Phase error that results if only the average position of the segment axes are allowed to move with respect to the axes connecting the adjacent quadrupoles May 11, 2005 J. Welch, welch@slac.stanford.edu

BBA residual phase error The phase error leftover after Beam based alignment is performed. Should have average slope of unity. Typical value is 180 degrees May 11, 2005 J. Welch, welch@slac.stanford.edu

Fiducialization Tolerance The true magnetic axis will not exactly coincide with the axis derived from the fiducials on the segments. Furthermore, when the segment is aligned in the tunnel, the fiducials will not exactly align with the beam axis. This tolerance is to account for the combined effect of these errors May 11, 2005 J. Welch, welch@slac.stanford.edu

J. Welch, welch@slac.stanford.edu Summary Practical designs were found to address the vibration and temperature tolerances for the MMF A general tolerance model, including the Undulator Hall ground stabilty and temperature stability, has been developed and tolerance space is being explored Various UH tunnel and floor designs are actively being studied by Jacob since Title II started Basics for good temperature control are in place. Flow studies would be nice. May 11, 2005 J. Welch, welch@slac.stanford.edu