Welcome, Panel of Examiner and Process Development Members! Washington State Quality Award PEPD #1 Training 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CSWA Provider: Program and Tech Review
Advertisements

2017/3/25 Test Case Upgrade from “Test Case-Training Material v1.4.ppt” of Testing basics Authors: NganVK Version: 1.4 Last Update: Dec-2005.
Chapter 5 Transfer of Training
Steps to Success with Team National
Bernard Casier Member Quality Audit Cell The Flemish Quality Audit System Brussels, 26 th June 2012.
Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
Science Subject Leader Training
ASTM International Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Pat Picariello, Director, Developmental Operations 1 Strategic Planning & New Activity Development.
September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop Strategic Planning & New Activity Development September 2013.
Task Group Chairman and Technical Contact Responsibilities ASTM International Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Scott Orthey and Steve Mawn 1.
Membership & Roster Maintenance Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Kevin Shanahan 1.
ASYCUDA Overview … a summary of the objectives of ASYCUDA implementation projects and features of the software for the Customs computer system.
Aviation Security Training Module 4 Design and Conduct Exercise II 1.
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
The National Connection for Local Public Health Model Practice Reviewer Guide April - May 2010.
New Jersey Schools to Watch Growing, Learning, and Succeeding!
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
1 DPAS II Process and Procedures for Teachers Developed by: Delaware Department of Education.
Leading for High Performance. PKR, Inc., for Cedar Rapids 10/04 2 Everythings Up-to-Date in Cedar Rapids! Working at classroom, building, and district.
Plan My Care Brokerage Training Working in partnership with Improvement and Efficiency South East.
American Society for Quality Certification Programs Presented 21 July 2009 by Diane G. Kulisek
40 Tips Leveraging the New APICS.org to the Benefit of Your Organization, Members, and Customers! 1.
1 European benchmarking with the CAF ROME 17-18th of November 2003.
Gaining Senior Leadership Support for Continuity of Operations
Site Visit Review Just-in-Time Training. Pre-work and Training Judging Examiner Evaluation Process Stage 1 Independent Review Stage 2 Consensus Review.
REVIEW: Arthropod ID. 1. Name the subphylum. 2. Name the subphylum. 3. Name the order.
International Conference on Implementation of the Common Assessment Framework Thessaloniki, on 10 & 11 June 2010 CAF Enforcement in the Regional Administration.
Using Baldrige to Create Organizational Alignment & Integration
Feedback Session Supervisory Workshop
EVALUATOR TIPS FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT WRITING The following slides were excerpted from an evaluator training session presented as part of the June 2011.
June 2002QPRC 2002, Tempe, Arizona A Workshop on Assessing to the Baldrige Criteria Cheryl L. Jennings, Motorola Lynn Kelley, Textron.
Chairman, RBNQA Award Committee, IMC Managing Director, Qimpro
Community Action Workshop Manual A Brief Tutorial Community Action Workshop Manual A Brief Tutorial Harmony Foundation of Canada.
Georgia has Led the Nation for 3 Consecutive Years.
Achieving Success as Vice President Education Achieving Success as Vice President Education Club Leadership Training Session.
Session 2: Introduction to the Quality Criteria. Session Overview Your facilitator, ___________________. [Add details of facilitators background, including.
Slide #1 of 39 / {ESC} Return to Main Menu / F1 Help PCS - Parish Computer System The NEXT Generation of Parish Software Archdiocese of Los Angeles PCS.
Planning for Progress Judith Lindenau, CAE, RCE
Facilitating Learning Teams
Directions for this Template  Use the Slide Master to make universal changes to the presentation, including inserting your organization’s logo –“View”
What is Pay & Performance?
Promoting Regulatory Excellence Self Assessment & Physiotherapy: the Ontario Model Jan Robinson, Registrar & CEO, College of Physiotherapists of Ontario.
Target Costing If you cannot find the time to do it right, how will you find the time to do it over?
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Data Management Seminar, 8-11th July 2008, Hamburg Survey System – Overview & Changes from the Field Trial.
Understanding Generalist Practice, 5e, Kirst-Ashman/Hull
TNCPE Site Visit Opening Meeting. Site Visit Agenda Introductions What is TNCPE? Where we are in the process Site visit expectations Confidentiality and.
25 seconds left…...
Internal Control and Control Risk
Module 12 WSP quality assurance tool 1. Module 12 WSP quality assurance tool Session structure Introduction About the tool Using the tool Supporting materials.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
Marketing Strategy and the Marketing Plan
PSSA Preparation.
Training objectives & notes to the presenter… This training module is designed for an administrative commissioner ( Council Commissioner, Assistant Council.
1 Office of New Teacher Induction Introducing NTIMS New Teacher Induction Mentoring System A Tool for Documenting School Based Mentoring Mentors’ Guide.
School Improvement Panel (ScIP): Data, Decisions, Direction

WSQA PEPD Mentor Training Session 1: Mentoring role and responsibilities.
THE STERLING MANAGEMENT MODEL… Is it right for you?
2015 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Producing a High-Quality Scorebook 2015 Presentation for Senior and Alumni Examiners.
Scoring 1. Scoring Categories 1 – 6 (Process Categories) Examiners select a score (0-100) to summarize their observed strengths and opportunities for.
WSQA PEPD Mentor Training Session 2: Mentor’s role during site visit.
2010 AHCA/NCAL National Quality Award Program - Silver Overview - Session One Lance Reynolds Kevin Warren Tim Case.
Welcome, Examiners! Washington State Quality Award Return Examiner Training 2009.
Site Visit Opening Meeting. Washington State Quality Award Council2 WSQA MISSION Make Washington State a better place to live, learn, and work by helping.
Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | New Examiner Orientation and Examiner Training Experience Welcome to … BALDRIGE.
2016 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Producing “Straight A” Feedback for Baldrige Applicants 2016 Presentation for Senior.
Finalizing Award Recommendations
Presentation transcript:

Welcome, Panel of Examiner and Process Development Members! Washington State Quality Award PEPD #1 Training 2008

WSQA Return Examiner First things first! THANK YOU! WSQAs mission: Improving the way we live, learn, and work in Washington by helping organizations improve through the use of the Baldrige Criteria for Performance Excellence

WSQA Return Examiner Objectives For This Class WSQA Overview Ethics Review PEPD Time commitment PEPD Roles and Responsibilities Lite and Full Examination Process Review

WSQA Return Examiner Introductions Name, organization, what you do Questions and expectations? What do you like to do when youre not working? PEPD Members

1. WSQA organization overview

WSQA Return Examiner What is WSQA? Created by State law to: Promote excellence Recognize achievement Educate and train Patterned after the Baldrige National Quality Award Awards presented annually by the Governor Awarded to private, public, and not-for-profit organizations in manufacturing, service, education, and healthcare

WSQA Return Examiner What is WSQA? WSQA is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization supported by Corporate donations Individual memberships Workshop, collaborative and conference fees Many (many, many!) volunteer hours

WSQA Return Examiner Who is WSQA? Examiners Lite Assessment Full Assessment Certification follows assessment Senior Examiners Level 3 Team Leads Scorebook Editors Panel of Examiner & Process Development (PEPD) Mentors Panel of Judges Board of Directors Advisory Panel Executive Director and support team

WSQA Return Examiner WSQA Ethics Review Ethics Statement Conflict of Interest form and statement 9

WSQA Return Examiner Conflict of interest issues WSQA seeks to avoid conflict of interest to protect process integrity Conflicts are frequent! First step in assignment process: determine any conflicts

WSQA Return Examiner 2008 Conflict of Interest Exercise Pick any organization (not yours) Complete the Conflict of Interest form for that organization 11

WSQA Return Examiner PEPD Time Commitments Monthly meeting 1 ½ hour Lite team mentoring Quarterly s ½ hour Review examiner inputs stage hour Follow up with team members-.5-1hour Review consensus comments- 2 hours Consensus meeting 4-6 hours TOTAL 10 hours for lite process Team involvement 1-2 hours /month (optional) TOTAL TIME COMMITMENT: 4- 6 hours/month 12

WSQA Return Examiner PEPD Roles & Responsibilities Process Ethics Process Integrity- Team follows process Process Completion Examiner growth- Mentoring Process Improvement Monthly meetings Examiner training input Process improvement input 13

WSQA Return Examiner 2008 PEPD TEAMS Examiner Training Process Review Governance Repeat Applicant Process 14

WSQA Return Examiner WSQA Full and Lite Process Comparison Table- website Time Table – website 15

Stages of the Assessment Process

WSQA Return Examiner Preparing for independent review Read the criteria Read the application Familiarize yourself with the online tool Site: Login information in from WSQA Training at (part 1) and (part 2) Check in with Team Lead on Key Factors and after entering category 1 and associated results

WSQA Return Examiner Independent review 1.Select the most relevant Key Factors (from list) 2.Read the criteria for the category 3.Read (and annotate) the relevant section of the application 4.Identify and record the applicants processes 5.Record observations. Note missing responses and significant observations 6.Recommend a scoring range for the category

WSQA Return Examiner Independent review steps - process 1.Review related criteria 2.Read the category under review, take notes 3.Select relevant key factors from list 4.Identify & record processes 5.Record observations on ADLI: Approach Deployment Learning Integration 6.Identify any significant or missing responses

WSQA Return Examiner Record observations on ADLI Learning refers to Refining the approach through cycles of evaluation and improvement Encouraging breakthrough change to your approach (innovation) Sharing refinements and innovations with other relevant work units and processes

WSQA Return Examiner Record observations on ADLI Integration refers to the harmonization of Plans Processes Information Resource decisions Actions Results Analyses to support key, organization-wide goals

WSQA Return Examiner Record observations on ADLI Questions to ask in analyzing Integration Do the individual components of a performance management system operate as a fully interconnected unit? Is the approach aligned with the organizational needs identified in the Organizational Profile?

WSQA Return Examiner Process diagnosis: key concepts Integration examples: Alignment of objectives and action plans with strategic challenges AND mission, vision, values Alignment of product/service delivery methods with KEY customer requirements Alignment of key process measures with KEY customer requirements

WSQA Return Examiner Results evaluation: key concepts Letci

WSQA Return Examiner 2008 WSQA Consensus: Step-by-step

WSQA Return Examiner 2008 WSQA Consensus: Step-by-step

WSQA Return Examiner 2008 WSQA Consensus: Step-by-step

WSQA Return Examiner Consensus preparation and call(s) Each Examiner responds with agreement, suggestions for changes, or disagreement, stating rationales Category Lead facilitates consensus Team Lead and/or PEPD mentor leads final scoring discussion Can take anywhere from 4-8 hours (depending on what?)

WSQA Return Examiner Comment, scoring considerations Benefit of the doubt Give credit for whats in the application Dont penalize for incidental exceptions Not every process must show complete DLI Not every results example must include TCI

WSQA Return Examiner Comment, scoring considerations For LITE, only one score for entire results Category 7 Propose a score for results related to your categories Be prepared to reach team consensus for all of Category 7 Using scoring language can help the applicant understand comments and score

WSQA Return Examiner Examiner Software Down load manual and webinar from our website: Log on to Examiner software at: 31

WSQA Return Examiner THANK YOU!! Your support and participation as Examiners helps us all by helping WSQA fulfill its mission!