Significant (2- tailed)

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Advertisements

Intermediate-level learner

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

Figure 3. Comparison of class performance

Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App

Total Number of persons Tested

Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value

Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description

Teachers Response (N= 11)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

student achievement scores

Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group

No. 8, doi: /education Table 9. t-Test Analysis Based on Average Quiz Scores from Last Six Quizzes t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal.

in the last evaluation of the software

Table 2. Student's t–test (Tensile Strength)

Table 4. Percentage of post-harvest waste reported by the farmers

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language

Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.

Table 2. Test of Normality

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )

Number of questionnaires sent out

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

Training Programs in Management and Leadership

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Behavioral strategies

Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

t-test for Equality of Means

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. Correlation of PC, MC, RC & IC at the Supervisory level

chemistry that are involved in peer group

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

post intervention (n=60)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

Table 1. Sampled Size by Status and Qualification of Academic Staff

Table 1. Illiteracy distribution by Gender and Place (No. in million)

Geometry and Mensuration

Table 3. The Result of Post-test Data Normality Test

Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment

Table 2. Pre and Post Test Scores for the Plaid Condition(N=16)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Educational Attainment

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 4. Independent Samples Test Application of ICT by Gender

Table 6. Range Comparisons amongst Subgroups and grade levels

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Gender N Mean S.D Df t-cal P

Presentation transcript:

Significant (2- tailed) Table 3. T-Test of Post Test Scores Between Group A and B Treatment N Mean SD df t Significant (2- tailed) Analogy (group A) 41 69.71 10.25 80 8.66 0.00 Control (group B) 48.71 11.46 UGWUMBA AUGUSTINE OKORONKA et al. Effects of Analogy Instructional Strategy, Cognitive Style and Gender on Senior Secondary School Students Achievement in Some Physics Concepts in Mubi Metropolis, Nigeria. American Journal of Educational Research, 2014, Vol. 2, No. 9, 788-792. doi:10.12691/education-2-9-13 © The Author(s) 2014. Published by Science and Education Publishing.