Towards Harmonized Dangerous Goods Controls The German View (Waterways Police Hamburg, R. Gildemeister)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EuropeAid PARTICIPATORY SESSION 2: Managing contract/Managing project… Question 1 : What do you think are the expectations and concerns of the EC task.
Advertisements

PROTECT Dangerous goods message scenario A global, trustworthy and recognised standard for the world-wide Shipping industry!
This project is funded by the EUAnd implemented by a consortium led by MWH RCBI ‘handover’ meeting Estonia-Latvia-Russia ENPI CBC Programme Riga, 20 March.
Protect Group. 2 Who is PROTECT (little bit history) Why the association has been founded Their role towards UN Relation to EPCSA Message format and their.
Port of Hamburg Marketing Range of services Bengt van Beuningen
Panel themes of the International Conference “Europe against Counterfeit Medicines” G.N. Gildeeva, Deputy head of the Department of Registration of Medicines.
© Cengage Learning – Purchasing & Supply Chain Management 4 ed ( ) Practice 16. Negotiating techniques and rules of conduct.
COMPRIS Demonstrator, Bratislava, 30th September 2005page: 1 Cross Border Information Services Lucia Karpatyova VUD – Transport Research Institute.
The Process of Including Pan-European Corridor X (Xa) in the Rail Freight Corridor Network (in Line with Regulation 913/2010/EU)
Verifying the Gross Mass of a Container FONASBA Gothenburg 2014.
How the countries in South East Europe are dealing with DWCP’s P. Morgado de Carvalho Dusseldorf, 6 November 2009.
Teacher Development and Supervision – The Role of Principals in Icelandic Compulsory Schools Börkur Hansen and Steinunn Helga Lárusdóttir School of Education,
TWINNING PROGRAM 2009 Phase III Stella Maris Centre, Santos, Brazil to Montreal seafarers centre in Canada Stella Maris Centre, Santos, Brazil to Montreal.
“Participatory approaches towards water management: transboundary cooperation in the River Lielupe (Latvia/Lithuania) ” 9 June 2005, St. Petersburg,
1 Transport sustainability and green corridors TransBaltic Project 1-2 February 2010, Gdańsk Prepared by: Urszula Kowalczyk, Marcin Burchacz Maritime Institute.
Trailblazing! Welcome to InterRail TSES!
Best Practices in Enforcement and Prosecution CWIT Final Conference/Lyon/INTERPOL Headquarters/26th June 2015 Presented by Jürgen Braun/Polizei Bremen.
First part: Objectives (15 minutes) Second part: Work groups (20 minutes) Third part: Proposal of work groups (10 minutes) REPORT OF WORK METHODOLOGY.
Gender Analyze in Project cycle. The pre-planning stage of a project is the stage when you or your partner organisation start to draw up ideas for a project.
Logistics Performance in Baltic Sea Area Managing Director Mikko Melasniemi Finnish Association of Purchasing and Logistics LOGY.
Geneva, May 2009 Trade Facilitation: An Introduction.
Seminar K M A 12 – 13 June 2007 Christer Bergquist – Kalmar Maritime Academy1 SAFE TRANSPORTATION AT SEA A Baltic Sea perspective – Requirements on vessels.
Towards an integrated transport system in the Baltic Sea Region Presentation at the IX All-Russian Forum, ‘Strategic Planning in the Regions and Cities.
10 Years of IT Service Management Cornelis A. Winkler Prins senior consultant & partner Service Management Partners, Inc.
Proposal for a new UNECE regulation on recyclability of motor vehicles Informal Document GRPE Reply to the Comments of the Russian Federation Informal.
Transport Henrik Drake "Ports and Inland Navigation" European Commission, DG Mobility and Transport (DG MOVE ) Common Issues Meeting on RIS Zagreb, 13.
SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Example of a single national regulator responsible for both transport.
Institutional and Legal Issues in Managing shared Water Resources The Arab Region's Experience Chara Ksia League of Arab States.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Transport Division United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Transport Division Konstantin Glukhenkiy,
Agence Education Formation-Europe Tips for a good application.
June 7-8, 2012 XV International Conference TransBaltica Harmonizing Approaches in Safety and Security of Heavy Good Traffic in the BSR: Experience.
1 NOT LEGALLY BINDING Energy Info day FP7-ENERGY-2008-RUSSIA 13th December 2007 International Co-operation FP7 Energy Theme Energy EU-Russia Call European.
T.R Governorship of Kocaeli EU Projects Coordination Centre.
Perspectives of cross-border ticketing in Eastern Baltics Allan Alaküla Head of Tallinn EU Office Turku-Helsinki-Tallinn-Riga Särgava residence,Tallinn,
The network of the Immigration Liaison Officers – tasks and personal experiences Mr. Gergely Szabó Head of Administrative Department Regional Directorate.
Part-financed by the European Union Partnership Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Applicant Seminar for 1st application round Hamburg, April 2008.
Forwarding in the port of Novorossiysk, container shipping operations over Russia and CIS, customs clearance and forwarding inside port. “South Trans.
Phare Programme 2003 and Transition Facility 2004 – overview on status for Pilot Projects Estonia Mare Zaneva Head of International Co-operation Serevice.
| 1 European Maritime Day 2010 Gijon Workshop 2.9 Shipping in the Common European Maritime Space Gijón, 21 May 2010 European maritime transport space without.
Final Examination Comment. Visiting Arrangement Problems: - Involved too many departments in this brief visit. publicity, design, marketing, customer.
Good Management Effective Organisations Bjørn Bauer PlanMiljø.
The Riga Initiative. Back ground Sigulda Workshop in September 2001 Riga Conference in August Purpose - Participants - Result * Strategy * Work.
Mobility of Collections German EU Presidency 2007 Building up Trust and Networking and the role of NEMO NEMO Annual Meeting, 24 November 2006, Helsinki.
Lifelong Learning Programme Call for Proposals Learning partnerships Agence Education Formation - Europe FROM THE FIRST IDEA… TO THE REAL.
Program of the development of Japan-Russia business relations in the domain of construction by means of conducting regular business meetings International.
1 DaGoB key objectives and experiences Prof. Lauri Ojala DaGoB Seminar, Brussels 13 June 2007
Safe and Realiable Transport Chains of Dangerous Good in the Baltic Sea Region Community Initiative Programme Baltic Sea Region INTERREG III.
Regional Action Plan for Sustainable Transport of Dangerous Goods along the Mekong River Final Regional Workshop, October 2014 Bangkok, Thailand.
Road Information System / Road Data Bank 10 April 2013 Lars Bergman M. Sc. In Civil Engineering Long Term Planning Swedish Transport Administration.
AREA REP SUPPORT SKILLS A. 2 This is intended as beginning training only. It is assumed that all Area Reps will continue with Support Skills B, as well.
BALTICOM- BALTIC Transport Communication and Regional Development WP12 Spatial Evaluation of Transport Chains and General Recommendations for Baltic Sea.
MUUGA CT First in the World Igor Zimin, Commercial Director Muuga Container Terminal.
1 Safe and Reliable Transport of Dangerous Goods in the Baltic Sea Region (DaGoB) WP4 main results.
Capacity-building from the perspective of the ECE Industrial Accidents Convention Virginia Fusé, UNECE secretariatIspra26/03/2015.
Employment and honest competition in the electro-technical sector Anny Piessens (VOLTA – Belgium) Meeting AIE Stockholm May 2016.
STRENGTH FROM NETWORKING TO HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND WORKING LIFE CO-OPERATION - KAMoon VEVO
1 Safe and Reliable Transport of Dangerous Goods in the Baltic Sea Region (DaGoB) Introduction.
March 2016 # UN-CEFACT / IPCSA / PROTECT meeting
Blue Belt Pilot Project
Safe and Reliable Transport of Dangerous Goods in the Baltic Sea Region (DaGoB) WP1 main results.
Safe and Reliable Transport of Dangerous Goods in the Baltic Sea Region (DaGoB) Introduction.
Safe and Reliable Transport of Dangerous Goods in the Baltic Sea Region (DaGoB) WP1 main results.
Unit 3: Leading and Managing Recovery
EU Reference Centres for Animal Welfare
Multi-Sectoral Nutrition Action Planning Training Module
FINLAND (Baltico Meeting 2018)
Projects is financed By South Baltic Cross-border
STRUCTURE AND METHODS OF CO-OPERATION
Concrete steps towards simplification, harmonisation and digitalisation of border controls Belgrade | 4th December 2018 | Simon Hartl.
INTERNATIONAL MARITIME SECURITY.
Presentation transcript:

Towards Harmonized Dangerous Goods Controls The German View (Waterways Police Hamburg, R. Gildemeister)

How everything started In April 2006, Mr. Dirk Spengler and Mr. Jan Prahm arrived at the office of the Hamburg Waterways Police, WSP 032 and tried to win me over the DaGoB-Projekt. I could embrace the goals of DaGoB very quickly. From a meeting with Hamburg responsible authorities and TuTech

as a DaGoB partner, we drew the conclusion that Hamburg will be part of this project. After this completion of the contract with the president of Hamburg´s City Police (Mr. Jantosch) and the head of the Hamburg Waterways Police (Mr. Spöntjes), I started at the beginning of 2006 as the project leader for the Waterways Police Hamburg.

The project´s implementation was planned to base on two following cornerstones to reach of DaGoB´s goals for the practis sector: I. cornerstone: The partner meetings In the first week of October 2006 a meeting of the dangerous goods excerices was scheduled un Turku.

Here the Waterways Police Hamburg took part with six colleagues from the dangerous goods department. This was our first direct contact with DaGoB and its partners. Already at this stage the foundation for a very close cooperation with some state-owned-organsiation was laid; in particular with the Finnish-Traffic-Police,

the finnish Customs and the finnish Border Guard. Later, during October 2006, DaGoB-partners visited the port of St. Petersburg to get to know the local dangerous goods authorities as well. This way Russia could get involved to cooperate for a safe transport of dangerous goods.

Here too, a personal contact was established which proved to be very helpful later on. By the end of November 2006, a DaGoB Mid Term Partner meeting took place in Hamburg, including a Russian delegation. This gave the possibility to deepen the excisting contacts at different activities with the Hamburg dangerous goods department and their IT-partner Dakosy

The next meeting was in February 2007 in Riga, which dealt with the Harmonisation of Training of DG Control Officers. To this topic all partners could explain their training systems, from which in the result all positive realizations were gathered to have there a basis for common training in the danger proberty range for all partner countries.

It showed up straight in these partially controversies discussions that our good trusting cooperation led to the fact that we could lead an honest and respectful dialogue.

In April 2007 the next partner meeting in Malmö took place. Again it was of great advantage that the participants of the partner countries already know and respect each other very well. Particularly in the round table discussion over our Major Common Problems this became very clearly.

The partner meeting in August 2007 in Helsinki was controlled mainly by the topic IT Applications in DG transports and logistics. These topics move us all in our daily work life, so that it was quite important to look for the dialogue with different company representatives to this topic as well. The short concluding discussion showed us that we are thereby with all involved ones on a line.

The partner meeting in Riga in September 2007 showed that it is urgently necessary to pursue our common goal of the project DaGoB in the future: This way the dangerous goods transports between partner countries could be handled safely and reliably. The informal discussions were again the most important components of the meeting and showed, that we always get closer, as soon as we can meet personally and talk with one another about our operational sequences.

So, the interim conclusion from the first cornerstone, i.e. the partner meetings is: We are getting a lot closer to our common goals from DaGoB 1. Good knowledge of the respective organisation 2. Adjustment of the way of working at the inspections 3. Trusting human contacts with the partner members

II. Cornerstone The staff exchange The partner organisations agreed with a Staff exchange, in order to learn about the respective way of working and operational sequences at the inspections. This mutual sharing of experience and understanding profits both parties

The first staff exchange took place in Hamburg with the Finnish colleagues of the Turku Traffic Police Unit. This way the colleagues could become acquainted with the way of working of the DG officers of the Hamburg Waterways Police. The exchange of Hamburgs colleagues to Turku took place approximately one month later.

Exactly the same way it was realized with the Swedish Coast Guard, where likewise a mutual exchange was arranged. After these two exchanges all involved ones could state, that the work methods and the operational sequences are very similar. Nevertheless every exchange partner won new ideas and experiences which were implemented in the own country.

As an example, Hamburg will adopt different teaching methods from a partner country. Within the range of technical equipment we have already shared our knowledge which led to the purchase of different devices between the partner countries. Likewise an exchange between two Baltic States and Hamburg was realized.

This exchange was so successful and instructive, that we will urge to organize this kind of small meeting in the future. This will lead to an ongoing dialogue between the partner countries to ensure, that we all get a good knowledge of the safety of dangerous goods transports. One of the most important realizations from the second cornerstone, i.e. the staff exchange, is:

One needs the personal contact to the respective DG authorities in the partner countries in order to have a direct contact when solving a particular dangerous goods problem. By now we have already profited frequently by these personal contacts in our daily practise: 1. Transport of a container to Gothenborg with unclear cargo

2. Incoming vessel from Hamburg to St. Petersburg with three unclear tankcontainers (leakage) 3. Inquiry in Hamburg for dangerous goods transport in Georgia, Russia and Belarus (Kl. 1) 4. In the meantime always recurring questions for the DaGoB partner countries in Hamburg (Estonia, Latvia, Lituania) 6. Exchange of knowledge of technical equipment 7. Mediation of contacts for other EU countries (NL,GB,B) to the DaGoB project

It turns out more and more that the cooperation on this basis works well. This realizations will also spread to the dangerous goods companies. The same phenomenon we found within the cooperation with the ports of the eu-northrange (Le Havre, Antwerp, Rotterdam, Bremen/Bremerhaven, Southampton, Felixstowe)

Conclusions: From our perspective the EU project DaGoB with the principal purpose: safe and reliable transport chain…. has fulfilled its goals: A very effective start was made, in which all partner countries`dangerous goods officers have exchanged their ideas and experiences. In addition, the growing friendship between the DaGoB members, has laid the foundation-stone of the project success.

To ensure that this success will stay in the future, it is absolutely necessary to keep and deepen the personal contacts. Furthermore it should be a goal to involve more countries bordering the Baltic Sea in the DaGoB project, to integrate their efforts towards a safe and reliable transportation chain.

Last but not least: Hamburg Waterways Police is responsible for 4 common carriers (sea, road, rail and inland navigation). All the staff exchanges with the partner countries mainly the dangerous goods transports via roads were regarded. The common carrier rail and sea were regarded only partially and the inland navigation was neglected a little.

The competence for the railway is divided in Hamburg: 1. Hamburg Waterways Police for the trains inside the port of Hamburg 2. Federal Railway Authority (EBA) for the Deutsche Bahn outside the port of Hamburg The control officials of the EBA could not participate in the DaGoB meetings for different reasons. Therfore I was in a constant contact with the responsible person of the EBA.

I informed Mr. Heckner about all our discussions concerning the railway. Due to this information exchange, the EBA agreed to host a meeting with the control officers of the Swedish Railway Agency, the Finnish Railway Agency and the Estonian Railway Inspectorate in Cologne. This way to the EBA was able to obtain an intensive and comprehensive view of the respective activities and operational sequences of the different DaGoB partners. This meeting was evaluated as particularly successful by the involved parties. Again we see: Without personal contacts and an exchange of the working ways it is almost impossible to establish an international cooperation.