India Additional Comments on

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Current status of alternative warming up procedure Annex 4 § (OIL#19) WLTP-06-25e T. Yamaguchi, Japan
Advertisements

WLTP-06-31e WLTP correction algorithms progress report from TUG (chassis dynamometer corrections) and TNO (coast down corrections) preliminary results.
PERFORMANCES IN ELECTRIC AUTOMOBILES Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Zaragoza 1 ANALYSIS OF PERFORMANCES IN ELECTRIC AUTOMOBILES PROF.
Resistance Forces on A Vehicle P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Estimation of Vehicle Demands ….
WLTP normalization rotational Mass
WLTP Phase 1B Main Open Issues Road and Dyno Load Presentation at WLTP IG Meeting Geneva Open Issues Road and Dyno Load- K. Kolesa Working paper.
Working group L-EPPR 07 June 2013
1 Proposal for a downscaling procedure for the extra high speed phases of the WLTC for low powered vehicles within a vehicle class Technical justification.
Warm Up  1. Find the range of a 4 kg projectile launched at a 45 degree angle with an initial velocity of 7 m/s.  2. Define Force.
Overview of India’s concerns Presentation to GTR - BR members for the 6/MCGTR/Informal meeting 6 th - 7 th June 2006 NHTSA Office, Washington DC Presentation.
WIND TUNNEL METHOD Christoph Lueginger (BMW), Céline Vallaude (UTAC), Folko Rohde (VW) on behalf of Annex 4 taskforce CHASSIS DYNO PRESCRIPTION.
Rigid Body Particle Object without extent Point in space Solid body with small dimensions.
1 Effect of wheelbase and centre of gravity height variances on the control functions “Directional Control” and “Roll- over Control” within a vehicle stability.
Proposed by Japan GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT), Japan Japanese proposal on evapo –gtr 8 Sep JAPAN proposal on EVAP-GTR to add Japanese.
GTR amendments Japan #14 WLTP IWG at Paris WLTP-14-08e.
Japan’s proposal for EPPR (India comment for EPPR-14-06e) (India comment for EPPR-14-06e) 3/Mar/ 2016 JAPAN AUTOMOBILE STANDARDS INTERNATIONALIZATION.
India Comments on EPPR-16-05e Proposal for a new global technical regulation on the measurement procedure for two- or three-wheeled motor vehicles with.
OIL#23 Requirements for 4WD dynamometers WLTP-08-05e by Japan.
India’s Comments on EPPR-19-17(PART - B1)
(After the EPPR telephone conference on 11/May/2016)
India’s Comments on EPPR (Part-B2)
EPPR India comments on B1 Text 15th September 2017
Starting notes for Annex 4 Phase2a Issues
India proposals on part B1 & B2 text
Transient Power of A Vehicle
WLTP - GTR No. 15 WLTP-13-15e ECE-TRANS-WP29-GRPE e
Assignments cont’d… 1. Determine
Improvement of Wind tunnel Measurement Process Status report
Random Cycle Generator
Heavy Duty Vehicle Requirements in EVS-GTR for HFCV-GTR Discussions
Status of the draft GTR 65th GRPE, January 2013.
Drafting Subgroup Meeting Part of IWG #16, The Hague, October 2016
Status report of the cycle and gearshift issues task force (GSTF)
R101 amendment Proposal from German
Lab Process Internal Combustion Engines
WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-229
Worked example 1: Deadweight carrier
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 1/2/2019.
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 1/2/2019.
01 General requirements Road load matrix family vehicle definition 02 Annex 4 Wind tunnel for road load matrix family 03 Annex 6 CO2 interpolation range.
WLTP Validation2 for RLD ~ Validation test plan by Japan ~
Tianjin Motorcycle Technical Center
Vehicle warm up and stabilisation – RLD and dyno
UTAC/ICE_Lab C. Vallaude, Brussels, 14-15/11/12
India comments on EPPR 23-33
WLTP Correlation measurement
WLTP GTR 15 WLTP-09-18e Report by Drafting Coordinator, Serge Dubuc
Table of running resistances – PSA proposal
Tianjin Motorcycle Technical Center
Japan’s position and proposal on draft of -gtr 2
Proposal for part B1, Table B1-6 and B1-7 from IMMA
WLTP Validation3 test result ~ Road load determination ~
WLTP/DHC meeting on 29th March 2012 at Ispra, Italy.
Reg 85: Measurement of Net Power
Status report 4WD dynamometer taskforce
Japan’s proposal for EPPR-11-15e-Rev.1
JAPAN AUTOMOBILE STANDARDS INTERNATIONALIZATION CENTER
Specifications for 4WD Chassis Dynamometer in WLTP
India Comments on EPPR
OBD2CG OBD2 Phase 1 consolidated draft
Title : Alternative warm-up procedure WLTP rev1e by Japan
India Proposal on part B4 GTR-2 Amendment Criteria for % CO2 variation
WLTP/DHC meeting on 29th March 2012 at Ispra, Italy.
Japan’s proposal for EPPR-11-15e-Rev.1
Proposed changes / additions are given in BLUE colour
Open Issue: Warm up Cycle and Temperatures Proposal By India
Japan’s proposal for EPPR-16-09
Japan’s proposal for EPPR-11-15e-Rev.1
India Comments on EPPR
Presentation transcript:

India Additional Comments on EPPR – 28-05

Comment-1: Annex-4 Appendix-1 Symbols Coefficient of aerodynamic function: N/(km/h)2 : This should be superscript EPPR secretariat to check the symbols for superscript and subscript in relation to terms Comment-2: Figure A4.App12/5: Title of the figure has to be changed “WMTC for vehicles with a maximum design vehicle speed of 45km/h and 25km/h low engine displacement or maximum net or continuous rated power” Legend has to be changed For red colour line: Vehicle class 1 0-2 45km/h limit. For blue colour line: Vehicle class 1 0-1 25km/h limit. Figure A4.App12/6:

Comment-3: Table A4.App12/25 “WMTC. part 1. class 1 0-1. applicable for vehicles with a maximum design vehicle speed (25 km/h) and a low engine displacement (< 50 cm3). cold or warm. 0 to 180 s” Comment-4: Table A4.App12/29 “WMTC. part 1. class 1 0-2. applicable for vehicles with a maximum design vehicle speed (where applicable truncated at 45 km/h. respectively at 50 km/h) and a low engine displacement (< 50 cm3). cold or warm. 0 to 180 s

Comment-5: Annex-1: Clause no : 3.4.6.2.1. The chassis dynamometer may be set by the use of the running resistance table instead of the running resistance force obtained by the coast-down method. In this table method, the chassis dynamometer shall be set by the mass in running order reference mass (mref) regardless of particular vehicle characteristics. Justification: To set the chassis dynamometer by using the running resistance table we need to use reference mass from where we can get equivalent inertia and rolling resistance coefficients from Table A4/App 4/1 of Appendix 4 of Annex 4. In this clause instead of reference mass the term used is mass in running order, which is not appropriate to follow the procedure as per appendix 4 of Annex 4. Hence this modification is proposed. Comment-6: Annex 4 - Appendix 9 Clause no 2.1.1: Mass in running order Unladen mass (mk): ...... Kg Clause no 2.1.1.1. Distribution of mass in running order Unladen mass (mk) between the axles: ...... kg Justification: To use the defined term of unladen mass. To declare the vehicle characteristics as mentioned in Appendix 9 of Annex 4.

Comment-7: Annex-1: Clause no : 3.4.6.1.2.1. The equivalent inertia mass mi for the chassis dynamometer shall be the flywheel equivalent inertia mass, mfi, closest to the sum of the mass in running order Unladen mass (mk) of the vehicle, and the mass of the driver (75 kg). Alternatively, the equivalent inertia mass mi can be derived from Appendix 4 to Annex 4.   Justification: To set the equivalent inertia as per Appendix 4 of Annex 4 we need to use reference mass, which is the sum of unladen mass and mass of the driver.

THANKS