Modelling atmospheric transport of Benzo(a)Pyrene with CMAQ

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Some recent studies using Models-3 Ian Rodgers Presentation to APRIL meeting London 4 th March 2003.
Advertisements

A numerical simulation of urban and regional meteorology and assessment of its impact on pollution transport A. Starchenko Tomsk State University.
Gas/Particle Partitioning. Why is gas/particle partitioning important? Dispersion of Pollutants Introduced into the Atmosphere as Determined by Residence.
Title EMEP Unified model Importance of observations for model evaluation Svetlana Tsyro MSC-W / EMEP TFMM workshop, Lillestrøm, 19 October 2010.
Title Performance of the EMEP aerosol model: current results and further needs Presented by Svetlana Tsyro (EMEP/MSC-W) EMEP workshop on Particulate Matter.
Climate, Fire and Air Quality Climate Impacts Group June 1, 2006.
The AIRPACT-3 Photochemical Air Quality Forecast System: Evaluation and Enhancements Jack Chen, Farren Thorpe, Jeremy Avis, Matt Porter, Joseph Vaughan,
Hans von Storch, Frauke Feser, Ralf Weisse and Matthias Zahn Institute for Coastal Research, GKSS Research Center, Germany and KlimaCampus, U of Hamburg,
Atmospheric modelling activities inside the Danish AMAP program Jesper H. Christensen NERI-ATMI, Frederiksborgvej Roskilde.
Air Quality-Climate Interactions Aijun Xiu Carolina Environmental Program.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Carolina Environmental Programs Emissions and meteorological Aspects of the 2001 ICAP Simulation Adel Hanna,
The AIRPACT-3 Photochemical Air Quality Forecast System: Evaluation and Enhancements Jack Chen, Farren Thorpe, Jeremy Avis, Matt Porter, Joseph Vaughan,
Next Gen AQ model Need AQ modeling at Global to Continental to Regional to Urban scales – Current systems using cascading nests is cumbersome – Duplicative.
CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.
1 1 Model studies of some atmospheric aerosols and comparisons with measurements K. G e o r g i e v I P P – B A S, S o f i a, B u l g a r i a.
Simulation of European emissions impacts on particulate matter concentrations in 2010 using Models-3 Rob Lennard, Steve Griffiths and Paul Sutton (RWE.
A Modeling Investigation of the Climate Effects of Air Pollutants Aijun Xiu 1, Rohit Mathur 2, Adel Hanna 1, Uma Shankar 1, Frank Binkowski 1, Carlie Coats.
Ny-Ålesund Seminars, October Black carbon (BC) belongs to what is generally termed Short Lived Climate Forcers (SLCF). This means that the.
National/Regional Air Quality Modeling Assessment Over China and Taiwan Using Models-3/CMAQ Modeling System Joshua S. Fu 1, Carey Jang 2, David Streets.
Contribution from Natural Sources of Aerosol Particles to PM in Canada Sunling Gong Scientific Team: Tianliang Zhao, David Lavoue, Richard Leaitch,
Page1 PAGE 1 The influence of MM5 nudging schemes on CMAQ simulations of benzo(a)pyrene concentrations and depositions in Europe Volker Matthias, GKSS.
Impact of Emissions on Intercontinental Long-Range Transport Joshua Fu, Yun-Fat Lam and Yang Gao, University of Tennessee, USA Rokjin Park, Seoul National.
Air Quality Forecasting Bas Mijling Ronald van der A AMFIC Annual Meeting ● Beijing ● October 2008.
1 Using Hemispheric-CMAQ to Provide Initial and Boundary Conditions for Regional Modeling Joshua S. Fu 1, Xinyi Dong 1, Kan Huang 1, and Carey Jang 2 1.
Modelling perspective: Key limitations of current country projection data in transboundary modelling activities. What improvements are needed? Jan Eiof.
Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5 Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture Megan Gore, D.Q. Tong, V.P. Aneja, and M. Houyoux Department of.
CMAS Conference 2009 Johannes Bieser, Institute for Coastal Research – GKSS Science Center CMAS Conference 2009 Enhancing SMOKE to create European emissions.
Models-3 Workshop, Swindon, UK, Markus Quante Using CMAQ for modelling the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon distribution over coastal Europe:
Air Quality Forecasting in China using a regional model Bas Mijling Ronald van der A Henk Eskes Hennie Kelder.
TEMIS user workshop, Frascati, 8-9 October 2007 TEMIS – VITO activities Felix Deutsch Koen De Ridder Jean Vankerkom VITO – Flemish Institute for Technological.
CMAS Conference 2011 Comparative analysis of CMAQ simulations of a particulate matter episode over Germany Chapel Hill, October 26, 2011 V. Matthias, A.
K.S Carslaw, L. A. Lee, C. L. Reddington, K. J. Pringle, A. Rap, P. M. Forster, G.W. Mann, D. V. Spracklen, M. T. Woodhouse, L. A. Regayre and J. R. Pierce.
Modeling Regional Haze in Big Bend National Park with CMAQ Betty Pun, Christian Seigneur & Shiang-Yuh Wu AER, San Ramon Naresh Kumar EPRI, Palo Alto CMAQ.
GEOS-CHEM Modeling for Boundary Conditions and Natural Background James W. Boylan Georgia Department of Natural Resources - VISTAS National RPO Modeling.
Seasonal Modeling of the Export of Pollutants from North America using the Multiscale Air Quality Simulation Platform (MAQSIP) Adel Hanna, 1 Rohit Mathur,
TFEIP Workshop, Istanbul, May 2013 Emissions data for of heavy metal and POP modelling Oleg Travnikov, Alexey Gusev, Ilia Ilyin, Olga Rozovskaya, Victor.
Georgia Institute of Technology SUPPORTING INTEX THROUGH INTEGRATED ANALYSIS OF SATELLITE AND SUB-ORBITAL MEASUREMENTS WITH GLOBAL AND REGIONAL 3-D MODELS:
Dust aerosols in NU-WRF – background and current status Mian Chin, Dongchul Kim, Zhining Tao.
PAGE 1 An adaptation of SMOKE for Europe Johannes Bieser Armin Aulinger, Volker Matthias, Markus Quante GKSS Research Center Geesthacht, Germany.
Initial Results from the Diurnal Land/Atmosphere Coupling Experiment (DICE) Weizhong Zheng, Michael Ek, Ruiyu Sun, Jongil Han, Jiarui Dong and Helin Wei.
W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.
Sensitivity of PM 2.5 Species to Emissions in the Southeast Sun-Kyoung Park and Armistead G. Russell Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of PM.
Transport Simulation of the April 1998 Chinese Dust Event Prepared by: Bret A. Schichtel And Rudolf B. Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend.
The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra.
Joint thematic session on B(a)P pollution: main activities and results
Lupu, Semeniuk, Kaminski, Mamun, McConnell
A Performance Evaluation of Lightning-NO Algorithms in CMAQ
Modeling of Air Pollutants Dispersion from
A model of sea salt aerosol for Cape Grim Preliminary investigations
Charles University in Prague
Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division,
A 1-year simulation of atmospheric concentrations and deposition over Europe and UK Alan Cocks, Vicky Lucas, Ian Rodgers, and Ian Teasdale RWEInnogy Environment.
Changes to the Multi-Pollutant version in the CMAQ 4.7
Hans von Storch Institute for Coastal Research
M. Samaali, M. Sassi, V. Bouchet
Steve Griffiths, Rob Lennard and Paul Sutton* (*RWE npower)
A. Aulinger, V. Matthias, M. Quante, Institute for Coastal Research
Joanna Struzewska Warsaw University of Technology
Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov, Olga Rozovskaya, Nadejda Vulyh
Alison Redington* and Derrick Ryall* Dick Derwent**
Multicompartment modelling of POPs
On-going developments of SinG: particles
MSC-E: Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov, Olga Rozovskaya, Nadejda Vulykh
CMAQ model as a tool for generating input data for HM and POP modeling
Jan Eiof Jonson, Peter Wind EMEP/MSC-W
PM modelling assessment in Northern Italy
Michael Moran Air Quality Research Branch
Multi-scale approach to HM and POP modelling
Wish list for modelling (first priority)
Current Research on 3-D Air Quality Modeling: wildfire!
Presentation transcript:

Modelling atmospheric transport of Benzo(a)Pyrene with CMAQ The need for time resolved emissions V. Matthias, A. Aulinger GKSS Research Centre, Geesthacht, Germany

Research Objectives Investigation and assessment of air pollution , i.e. persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in Europe Deposition of POPs into the North and Baltic Sea Focus on coastal regions Evaluation of past and forecast of future developments (scenarios) on time scales of decades Assessment of the impact of regulations

CMAQ model domain and nest 54x54 km2 grid 18x18 km2 grid 30 vertical layers

BaP was included as a new substance into CMAQ is mainly particle bound we consider 3 particle modes and the gas phase model results can be compared to (few) measurements

Meteorology, initial and boundary conditions Meteorological fields are calculated with MM5 Boundary Layer: MRF (Hong and Pan, 1996) Microphysics: Reisner 2, incl. ice, snow and graupel (Reisner et al., 1998). Cumulus: Kain Fritsch 2, (Kain and Fritsch, 1993) One year is represented by four months (January, April, July and October), selected years will be calculated (starting with 2001) Interest in long term runs / use of met. fields from other models (e.g. CLM) ICs: constant profiles, one day spinoff time for each month BCs: Either constant profiles or daily means from a global CTM (MOZART)

Emissions Hourly anthropogenic emissions of 2000 for CO, NOx, SO2 , NH3 , NMVOC (in RADM speciation), PM2.5 and PM10 on the 54 km and 18 km CMAQ grid provided by the IER Stuttgart. Biogenic emissions of terpenes and isoprene from POET database (monthly values for 2000 on 1° x 1°), addition of a diurnal cycle for isoprene, no diurnal cycle for terpenes Sea salt emissions internally considered by CMAQ (depending on wind speed)

BaP Emissions Available data: Annual BaP emissions for 1970, 1975, 1980, 1985, 1990, 1993/1995, provided by Dr. Knut Breivik on the 50 x 50 km² polar stereographic EMEP grid. Annual BaP emissions (in 5 sectors) based on TNO report for 2000 also on the EMEP grid but: no temporal resolution available Main sources are residential heating traffic industry (steel and coke) Annual, weekly and diurnal cycles need to be considered

Temporal cycle of BaP Emissions season Residential heating: depends on season Traffic: depends on working times Industrial emissions: depend on working days week day

Example BaP Emissions (1) Based on 1993/1995 annual emissions

Example BaP Emissions (2) Based on 2000 annual emissions

Model Results (1) Jan /July 2001 based on 1995 emissions

Model Results (2) Monthly concentrationmeans of 2001 based on 1995 emissions in North Sea areas

Wet deposition 1995 vs 2000 emissions

Comparison to measurements - January blue: 1995 emissions red: 2000 emissions black: measurements (monthly means)

Comparison to measurements - July blue: 1995 emissions black: measurements (monthly means)

Summary and Outlook First results of BaP simulations with CMAQ look promising BaP emissions need improvement ( incl. ship emissions) Reconstruction of BaP concentrations 1970 –2000 based on EMEP emissions Include other POPs (eg. PAHs, PCBs, PFOS) Include second nest simulations

Partitioning

Measured size distributions

Simulated particulate BaP concentrations Aspvreten Kosetice

Simulations vs. ground measurements Measured mean Model mean

Simulations vs. ground measurements Model mean Measured mean

Simulated particulate BaP concentrations in September 2001 Bornhöved Zingst

Simulations vs. ground measurements

Simulations vs. ground measurements

CMAQ in a ´very small´ domain Run CMAQ on a 1x 1 grid to investigate processes Example: BaP wet deposition under predefined conditions:

Nitrogen deposition into the North Sea

Nitrogen deposition into the North Sea: influence of meteorological fields control run / shallow convection run

Adsorption to dry surface Φad adsorbed fraction of compound c Junge parameter θ surface of adsorbat pL subcooled liquid vapor pressure

Absorption into organic matter Φab absorbed fraction of compound Kp gas/particle partitioning constant Kp octanol/air partitioning constant fOC fraction of organic carbon TSP total suspended particles mass

Absorption into aerosol water Φaq absorbed fraction of compound Kp gas/particle partitioning constant Kp water/air partitioning constant fOC fraction of aerosol water TSP total suspended particles mass

Simulated gaseous BaP concentrations in September 2001

Total simulated BaP depositions in September 2001

Interest in long term runs / use of met. fields from other models Meteorology Meteorological fields are calculated with MM5 Boundary Layer: MRF (Hong and Pan, 1996), based on Troen and Mahrt (1986) nonlocal diffusion concept. Microphysics: Reisner 2, incl. ice, snow and graupel (Reisner et al., 1998). Cumulus: Kain Fritsch 2, conservation of mass, thermal energy, total moisture and momentum (Kain and Fritsch, 1993) Interest in long term runs / use of met. fields from other models

Processes BaP is emitted as accumulation mode aerosol (with 0.1% in Aitken-mode) Gas-particle partitioning considering three aerosol modes (Junge-Pankow concept) Dry deposition, scavenging and wet deposition as for aerosol particles in CMAQ No photolytical and chemical degradation so far