RBET - Review Board for Excellence in Teaching

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Advertisements

Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Consolidated Application Budget Detail and Fiscal Issues.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Educator Evaluations Education Accountability Summit August 26-28,
Peninsula School District
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
OCTOBER 25, m-NET Mobilizing National Educator Talent (“m-NET”) is an innovative, nontraditional program to help special education teachers earn.
Common Core Implementation Plan Whittier City School District Board of Education Meeting April 7, 2014.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
PDC Procedures – Individual Growth Action Plan The Individual Growth Action Plan (IGAP) is a plan each individual completes describing professional.
ADEPT Framework
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.
FASPA Conference October, 2010 Implementing a Salary Differential Program.
AdvancEd Standard 2: Governance and Leadership The district has governance and leadership that promotes student performance and school effectiveness.
Austin Community College TEACHER CERTIFICATION PROGRAM It’s all about the Kids!
NCDPI Observation Calibration Training Pilot: Introduction & Demo November 2014.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Preparing.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
LESSONS LEARNED IN PROMOTING EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING AND LEADERSHIP for CHSI 2 ND National High School Leadership Summit Archived Information.
Governor’s Teacher Network Action Research Project Dr. Debra Harwell-Braun
Academic Practicum Winter Academic Practicum Seminar2 Agenda 4 Welcome 4 Burning ??’s 4 Routines & Organizational Systems 4 Overview of Academic.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
Educator Evaluation and Support System Basics. Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal.
Annual CUE Conference 2013 Kelley Day
District One Administrator Institute Elementary Literacy Session August 17, 2005.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Supplemental Text Project Kenn Ward EDL 678 Dr. Pfennig June 2013.
APR 2014 Report: Data, Analysis and Action Plan for Full Accreditation.
No Teacher Left Behind D. Gerald. How would you suggest we, as a nation, provide consistent learning opportunities for teachers and ensure that they are.
MINT MENTORING AND INDUCTION FOR NEW TEACHERS Miami Dade County Public Schools Office of Professional Development and Evaluation.
Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools Federal and State Education Programs Branch.
Greenbush Teacher/ School Specialist Mentoring Model
Grades 7 to 12 Math & Science Specialist Talent Management Strategy
Vision Statement: Career and Technical Education in Arizona adds so much value to the lives of its citizens and the state’s economy that every parent and.
Introduction to the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model for USD 259
Alexander Graham Bell Elementary School
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
The Michigan Merit Curriculum (MMC), Personal Curriculums (PC) and Certificates of Completion (COC): Addressing the Needs of Students with ASD.
Special Education Teachers and Highly Qualified Requirements
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
The School Mentor 9/19/2018.
New Teacher Induction Workshop
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Studio School Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools Federal and State Education Programs Branch.
Implementing Race to the Top
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Superintendent Goals Update MAY 7, 2013
Northwest ISD Elementary Education District Effectiveness Report
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
Campus Improvement Planning
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE RENEWAL PROCESS
Welcome to Your New Position As An Instructor
LESSONS FROM THE FIELD: MIDDLE SCHOOL FOUNDATIONS ACADEMY GRANT
State Examples and Follow-up Data Requests for SOQ Proposals
CSIP/Landtrust
MASTER TEACHER PROGRAM
Presentation transcript:

RBET - Review Board for Excellence in Teaching Recommendations to the Board of Education Dave

Dave Elements of RBET Implementation Plan Based upon the California Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTP’s) will be the guide for both individualized professional development and the focus for the evaluation process.

Individualized Professional Development Professional Growth and the Individual Pierre

Individualized Professional Development (IPD) Teachers develop an IPD Growth Plan depending upon their needs and the site/district needs Opportunities include accredited college courses, independent study, online courses, district-offered professional learning courses, site-based professional learning, book studies, outside professional development activities including participation in conferences Each certificated teacher will develop an individualized program of professional growth activities Pierre

Recommendation Begin discussions/bargaining with district staff and LEA regarding the Individual Professional Development Plan. Pierre Projected Cost – None

Professional Development to Result in Movement Across Salary Schedule Accredited college courses Online modules/courses Independent study District-offered professional learning courses Book studies Outside professional development activities including participation in conferences Dave

Recommendation Begin discussions/bargaining with district staff and LEA regarding additional methods of professional development be accepted to move across the salary schedule. Projected Cost – Unknown Dave

Teacher Evaluation System Working Toward Excellence Rashelle

Teacher Evaluation System Our Evaluation System and Professional Development Process will both align to the California Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTP) Criteria for Evaluation System CSTP Based Efficiency Uniformity/Consistency Meaningful Calibration of Rubrics/Evals Online Entry Immediate Feedback Retain Data Rashelle

Additional Rating Levels to Recognize Excellence Unsatisfactory Emerging Applying Integrating Innovating Rashelle

Recommendation Begin discussions/bargaining with district staff and LEA regarding Evaluation Plan implementation. Rashelle Projected Cost – None

Recommendation Purchase Talent Ed/PowerSchool as the digital platform to manage teacher professional development hours/units and online teacher evaluations. Randy Projected Cost - $70,000.00 per Year

Teacher Career Pathways Teacher Specialist, Model Teacher and Master Teacher Jen

Teacher Career Paths Program Explanation Requirements Criteria Cost Implementation Plan Jen

Teacher Specialist 1. Students in Poverty 2. English Learners Teacher Specialists are highly qualified, highly trained teachers in a specified area who work to develop and deliver professional development to teachers. One teacher in each speciality for North Stockton and one for Lodi, equaling a total of 28. 1. Students in Poverty 2. English Learners 3. Parent Engagement 4. Technology 5. Special Education 6. Physical Education 7. VAPA 8. Science 9. English 10. ELA 11. Math 12. Social Studies 13. Student Engagement 14. Differentiated Instruction Jen

Requirements Maintain confidentiality Three additional work days per school year for planning and implementation. (It is suggested that one of these be utilized for personal professional development) Be available to administrators to plan and implement PD Develop and deliver professional development based on district/school needs that are relevant within their specialty area. Minimum of two per quarter, one of which must be uploaded into the Professional Development Library and aligned with the appropriate CSTP. They must be approved by the PD department in the timeline set forth. Become familiar with the district online PD Allow teachers to visit their classroom during lessons highlighting their specialty, a minimum of three days per quarter. Jen

Criteria Completion of application Minimum five years classroom teaching experience Three letters of recommendation (Minimum of one each from current administrator and teaching peer) Two satisfactory evaluations or one satisfactory evaluation if on a four year cycle Verification of specialized training and education in area of specialty Submission of a five minute preview of PD with adult learners in area of specialty Jen

Projected Cost 28 teachers (14 teachers* x 2 – One each in Lodi and North Stockton) Stipend $3496.00 per teacher $100,632.00 (5% of Cell “D” on LEA Salary Schedule) One day of professional development (est. $300 per teacher) $8,400.00 Total per year $109,032.00 Jen

Model Teacher Model Teachers are highly qualified, highly trained teachers who work with the site administrator and Master Teachers to provide support for teachers on improvement plans and advise/train new teachers. The Board of Education envisions a Model Teacher stationed at most school sites. Erin

Requirements Maintain confidentiality Four additional work days per school year for planning and implementation. (It is suggested that two of these be utilized for personal professional development.) Be available to administrators and/or Master Teachers to plan and implement PD for both staff and individual teacher needs Advise/support new teachers Support teachers on Professional Improvement Plans Develop and deliver professional development based on district/school needs that are relevant. Minimum of two per quarter. It must be approved by the PD department in the timeline set forth. Become familiar with the district online PD Upload one recorded lesson quarterly into the Professional Development Library that align with the CSTP Notify the PD Coordinator of upcoming lessons that may be of interest Allow teachers to visit their classroom during a model lesson, a minimum of three days per quarter Erin

Criteria Minimum seven years classroom teaching experience Three letters of recommendation (Minimum of one each from current administrator and teaching peer) Two satisfactory evaluations or one satisfactory evaluation if on a four year cycle Verified, relevant Professional Development hours supporting requirement Submission of a lesson (ex. video, PowerPoint etc.) Write a narrative/personal statement reflecting the reason for applying Erin

Projected Cost 43 teachers (1 at sites with 200 students – 40 / plus 3 additional for combined sites) Stipend of $4894.00 per teacher $216,333.00 (7% of Cell “D” on the Salary Schedule) Two days of professional development (est. $300 per teacher, per PD) $25,800.00 Total per year $242,133.00 Erin

Master Teacher Master Teachers are highly qualified, highly trained educators who work with site administrators to develop and train other teachers. The Board of Education envisions a Master Teacher stationed at every site with twenty (20) or more teachers (currently this is approximately twenty-one (21) school sites). *(Actually 36) Tammy

Requirements Maintain confidentiality Six additional work days per school year for planning and implementation. (It is suggested that three of these be utilized for personal professional development) Be available to administrators and/or Model Teachers to plan and implement PD for both staff and individual teacher needs Advise/support new teachers Support Model Teachers Develop and deliver professional development based on district/school needs that are relevant. Minimum of two per quarter. It must be approved by the PD department in the timeline set forth. Become familiar with the district online PD Upload two recorded lessons quarterly into the PD Library that align with the CSTP Allow teachers to visit their classroom during a model lesson, a minimum of three days per quarter Meet with administrator(s) prior to the school year to develop a professional development plan based on the school focus May seek/enroll in additional training during the summer and/or school year if necessary (No more than three of the six additional work days may be used for this purpose) Tammy

Criteria Minimum nine years classroom teaching experience Three letters of recommendation (Minimum of one each from current administrator and teaching peer) Two satisfactory evaluations or one satisfactory evaluation if on a four year cycle Verified, relevant Professional Development hours supporting requirements, including leadership and current research based strategies Submission of video of a current lesson Write a narrative/personal statement reflecting the reason for applying Tammy

Projected Cost 41 teachers (1 at each site with 20 teachers – 36 / plus additional 5 for combined sites) Stipend of $6991.00 per teacher $294,626.00 (10% of Cell “D” on the Salary Schedule) Three days of professional development (est. $300 per teacher, per PD) $36,900.00 Total per year $331,526.00 Tammy

Recommendation Accept Teacher Pathway Requirements and Criteria Implement new administrative position to oversee, review effective completion of requirements, and recommend continuation of program for all levels of teachers Tammy

Teacher Pathway Fiscal Impact 2019-20 Teacher Specialists (28) $109,032.00 2020-21 Model Teachers (43) $242,133.00 $351,165.00 2021-22 Master teachers (41) $331.526.00 $682,691.00 2019-20 1/3 Administrator Contract $50,000.00 2020-21 2/3 Administrator Contract $100,000.00 2021-22 Full Time Administrator Contract $150,000.00 2019-20 Substitute Teacher Cost $65,960.00 2020-21 Substitute Teacher Cost $91,180.00 $157,140.00 2021-22 Substitute Teacher Cost $95,060.00 $252,200.00 Substitute Teacher Funding - Teachers to visit classes of Specialty, Model and Master Teachers, available on request - Specialty, Model and Master Teachers available one time per month to conduct lessons in requested classrooms Randy

Recommendation Phase in Approach for Teacher Specialist, Model and Master Teachers, and Administrator Allows sufficient time to interview and select quality individuals Allows for selected teachers to move through the pathway to the next level, therefore building in a consistent foundation of quality Allows time to evaluate implementation Allows time to plan and prepare for human resources impact Allows time to plan and prepare for fiscal impact Randy

Final Thoughts and Questions Randy