2012 FCAT Writing changes and preliminary results

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Credit for Demonstrated Mastery (CDM): Policy Overview & Conversation WS/FCS Board of Education Meeting Paula B. Wilkins & Kenneth Simington January 28,
Advertisements

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Update on the State’s English Language Proficiency Assessments.
TEKS Revisions and the End of Course Exams Tom Wurst March 25, 2010.
An Overview of the Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) January 25, 2014 FREMONT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Educate Challenge Inspire.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program Bilingual.
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement 1 Overview of Proposed School Grading Formula for :
Norton Park Elementary Math Data Overview for 3 rd grade By: Amanda Gilbert.
Changes and Impacts A & S May  Accountability History  Accountability Changes and Impact  Discussion 2.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008.
New Beginnings for CTE in Texas. HB 809 Dissemination of information regarding employment opportunities to secondary school students Effective: September.
Information on New Regents Examinations for SCDN Presentation September 19, 2007 Steven Katz, Director Candace Shyer, Bureau Chief Office of Standards,
“It‘ll Be Here Before You Know It!” What you’ll need to know to get your child ready for High School.
Lyla Springfield 5/2007 FCAT Reading Update CLAS Presentation May 2007.
Overview of SB 736 Legislation Pertaining to Personnel Evaluation Systems and Race to the Top 1.
Lee County School District January 2012 Common Core State Standards: An Overview.
FCAT 2.0 and End-of-Course Assessments 1 Kris Ellington Deputy Commissioner Division of Accountability, Research and Measurement 850/
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Educational Research Association November 29, 2012.
Florida Science Standards Assessment Presentation to Florida Association of Science Supervisors, May 2008.
Essential Skills Transition Planning Derek Brown Manager, Assessment of Essential Skills Oregon Department of Education.
Direct Math Assessment State Department Training September, 2008 Cindy Johnstone Mathematics Coordinator.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 5 Pre-Evaluation Conference Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved Annual District Assessment Coordinator Meeting VAM Update.
The Portfolio ProcessThe Portfolio Process. Why do we think portfolios are the right choice?  Teacher developed and driven  Embedded professional development.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2013 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting State.
Understanding Your Child’s FSA Score
1 Student Assessment Update Research, Evaluation & Accountability Angela Marino Coordinator Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
Florida Department of Education - October 2007 FCAT Science Update Presentation to Florida Association of Science Supervisors October 2007.
Student Progression: Building a K-12 Model Helen Lancashire School Guidance Consultant Student Support Services Project edu.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction January 2015 Jenny Singh, Administrator Academic Accountability.
Title III Native American and Alaska Native Children in School Program Grantee Performance Reporting June 19, 2014 Prepared under the Data Quality Initiative.
Standards Review Update. Standards Review Timeline ELA and Math –Last year, more than 130,000 reviews and more than 20,000 comments were collected on.
Compliance Update July Control Performance Highlights  NERC CPS1 Performance ERCOT’s May score was 146.1; June’s score was May has typically.
South Carolina Succeeds
Spring 2016 MCAS ELA Assessment Updates grades 3-8.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Additional CAASPP Assessments Diane Hernandez, Director Assessment.
Overview of PARCC Field Test 1. Why Are We Doing a Field Test in the Spring 2014? The primary purposes of the PARCC Field Test are to: 1.Examine the quality.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007.
2016 Back-to-School Update Next-generation MCAS and updating our learning standards Westfield Public School District August 23, 2016.
Annual Assessment and Accountability Meeting Updates
Writing and Submitting Student Learning Objectives
2016 Back-to-School Update Next-generation MCAS and updating our learning standards District Name Date, 2016.
Federal Accountability/ AYP Update
2014 School Performance Grades
Regional Assessment Network (RAN) Update
FSA DATA ANALYSIS
January 2015 Jenny Singh, Administrator Academic Accountability Unit
SB 1664 Changes to Personnel Evaluations
Accountability Applications 2017
Update on the State Accountability System
READ Act Data Collection Spring 2018
Welcome to Finance Training
The Portfolio Process.
Your introduction to this year’s English exam.
College of Alameda Integrated Planning and Budgeting Process
Developing Career Field Technical Content Standards
Florida College System Performance Based Funding
Updates on Next-Generation MCAS and Planning for the High School Competency Determination Standard Meeting of the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education,
Timeline for STAAR EOC Standard Setting Process
Academic Growth Model Indicator Update
Parkway School District Tech Plan
City Schools Grading and Reporting Policy Background
2019 Local School District Charter Application Process
Coffee & Conversation December 6, 2018
Strategic Planning Timeline Overview
READ Act Budget Planning Survey
Essential Skills (Required for DTCs, Recommended for STCs)
Essay Reflection List the SPECIFIC strategies you want me to notice that you used to improve your writing on this piece. Explain the biggest revisions.
End of Course Tests (EOCT) “Test-Out” Guidance Letter Presentation
2019 READ Data Collection.
Presentation transcript:

2012 FCAT Writing changes and preliminary results Florida Department of Education, May 2012

Timeline Spring 2010: Legislation requires the school grades writing standard to be a score a student can earn. April 2011: 2011 FCAT Writing Scoring – One Scorer May 2011: School Grading Rule, SBE changed writing standard There was only one scorer in 2011 so a student could not earn a 3.5 SBE increased the rigor of the standard to 4 rather than lowering it to 3. SBE did not discuss keeping the standard at 3.5 as an option since two scorers were not a possibility in 2011. SBE asked that the budget request include a return to two scorers for each essay.

Timeline (cont.) July 5, 2011: Memo to districts noticing the change in the scoring of FCAT Writing in 2012 to increase expectations regarding the correct use of standard English conventions and the quality of details provided as support. Both of these elements had in the past been scored with leniency. July 29, 2011: The Department posted exemplar papers to illustrate the change in expectations, in advance of posting new scoring guides (calibration sets). August 3-5, 2011: The Department convened the Writing Content Advisory Committee (Florida educators) to develop the 2012 FCAT Writing Calibration Scoring Guides for each grade and writing purpose (mode).

Timeline (cont.) August 31, 2011: The Department posted the approved 2012 FCAT Writing Calibration Scoring Guides for school district use. January 2012: Pearson contract amended to return to two scorers for all writing essays April 2012: FCAT Writing Scoring – Two Scorers and increased rigor in scoring May 10, 2012: Final 2012 FCAT Writing student results files approved.

Overview of Preliminary Results 2011 2012 Percentage 4 or above Percentage 3.5 or above Grade 4 81% 48% 27% Grade 8 82% 52% 33% Grade 10 80% 60% 38%

Grade 4 – Percentage of Students at Each Score Point 2011 2012 Cum. Percentage 2011 Cum. Percentage 0.60 1.03 1 .0 0.64 1.41 1.24 2.44 1.5 - 1.4 3.84 2 .0 1.80 5.91 3.04 9.75 2.5 9.47 19.22 3 .0 15.58 32.48 18.62 51.70 3.5 21.07 72.77 4 .0 56.29 19.25 74.91 92.02 4.5 5.29 97.31 5 .0 22.13 1.9 97.04 99.21 5.5 0.62 99.83 6 .0 2.96 0.22 100.00 100.05

Grade 4 – Percentage of Students at or above 3.5 and 4 Year Percentage 3.5 and Above Percentage 4 and Above 2011 n/a 81% 2012 48% 27%

Grade 8 – Percentage of Students at Each Score Point 2011 2012 Cum. Percentage 2011 Cum. Percentage 0.17 0.77 1 .0 0.60 1.70 2.47 1.5  - 1.51 3.98 2 .0 2.40 8.48 3.17 12.46 2.5 10.14 22.60 3 .0 14.82 25.44 17.99 48.04 3.5 18.96 67.00 4 .0 47.14 23.11 65.13 90.11 4.5 6.23 96.34 5 .0 29.60 2.63 94.73 98.97 5.5 0.74 99.71 6 .0 5.28 0.29 100.01 100.00

Grade 8 – Percentage of Students at or above 3.5 and 4 Year Percentage 3.5 and Above Percentage 4 and Above 2011 n/a 82% 2012 52% 33%

Grade 10 – Percentage of Students at Each Score Point 2011 2012 Cum. Percentage 2011 Cum. Percentage 0.08 0.53 1 .0 0.43 1.25 0.51 1.78 1.5 -  1.32 3.10 2 .0 2.56 4.58 3.07 7.68 2.5 8.28 15.96 3 .0 17.25 24.09 20.32 40.05 3.5 22.31 62.36 4 .0 47.96 25.92 68.28 88.28 4.5 7.8 96.08 5 .0 26.62 2.84 94.90 98.92 5.5 0.84 99.76 6 .0 5.09 0.24 99.99 100.00

Grade 10 – Percentage of Students at or above 3.5 and 4 Year Percentage 3.5 and Above Percentage 4 and Above 2011 n/a 80% 2012 60% 38%

Recommended Action Because we now have two scorers, the State Board of Education set a score of 3.5 or higher as the writing performance level standard for school grades. A 3.5 is now a possible score for students since we again have 2 scorers. The rigor of the writing assessment scoring has increased with more focus on the conventions of writing and the quality of details provided as support.