Appraisal Training Hyperlink.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment FOR Learning in theory
Advertisements

SCHOOL LEADERS: THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL INDUCTION
What is an ITP? Individual training plan What is an ITP for a Goldsmiths PGCE student? Progress check, a record of achievement, a log of experiences,
Appraisal: valuing difference, fostering self-responsibility Chris Thornley, New Zealand Teachers Council Kerry Mitchell, The Education Group.
Professor Viviane Robinson The Faculty of Education
Teacher Evaluation Model
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT: ADVICE AND GUIDANCE FOR LINE MANAGERS Monday 1st September C am.
TAKING CONTROL OF YOUR PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT/APPRAISAL 1 NASUWT Member Seminar July 2014.
Appraisal for teachers: Support for professional leaders Workshop Two Open to learning – evidence based discussions.
1 Core Module Three – The Summative Report Core Module Three: The Role of Professional Dialogue and Collaboration in the Summative Report.
Performance management guidance
6/1/ PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT: validating teacher knowledge Dr. Holli Schauber, 2006 workshop.
Appraisal and performance management
Classroom Observations: Open Conversations about your Practice for student improvement. How do we change things? There is some magic stuff being done by.
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
Unit 2: Managing the development of self and others Life Science and Chemical Science Professionals Higher Apprenticeships Unit 2 Managing the development.
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
Aotearoa/New Zealand A Bi-cultural Classroom.. To gain full registration PRTs must participate in an Induction and Mentoring programme supervised by a.
Being Rated as Outstanding for Governance: A workshop for the Cornwall Governor Network Conference Bob Damerell
Welcome to FACT #2 About Teacher Inquiry Article Quick SCAN Read
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
A Support & Supervision Model Joanne Hincks Eileen Paulsen Sharon Rajabi TESL Ontario Conference 2010.
Performance and Development Teacher Librarian Network
Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Introduction to Peer Observations.
Literacy Partner 2007 – 2008 The literacy partner supports student learning by collaborating with teachers and administrators to model best practices and.
The Importance of Teams How to Create Effective Teams and Develop Team Norms.
Learn Local Quality Preaccredited Teachers Community of Practice Moderation Workshop South East Victoria ACFE Region 5 th August 2015.
 “I have to teach the same information skills each year because students do not learn them.”  “I don’t have time to give tests so I do not assess student.
Teaching as Inquiry. Where we are now Departments – every department has planned a departmental inquiry for 2015 that links to the school wide goals HODs,
Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Pulaski County Schools June
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Appraisal It’s about learning It’s about growth It’s about accountability.
Performance Management. Common Misconceptions Appraisal Performance-Related Pay Targets and Objectives Motivation and Discipline.
Then Now  Teaching as Art  Teachers and Teaching  Great teachers are born  How did I do?  Scholarship informs Teaching  Culture of Unexamined assumptions.
MOVING TO T-TESS Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System Copyright 2016.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) End-of-Year Conference.
The First Appraisal as a Principal
What it means for New Teachers
Tenure and Recontracting August 29, 2017
Support Staff Appraisal Scheme (adopted by Governing Body )
Staff meeting Monday 20th February 2017
Dissemination Training
Performance Management System
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
Naumai Haere mai. Ko Kerry Mitchell ahau.
OFSTED and the role of Teaching Assistants
Developing v. Measuring Teachers A Growth Model
St Andrew’s College: Teaching as inquiry 2017
B.A. 4 Placement Overview (Placement 1) 4th October 2016
Accountability and Performance Management
School Self-Evaluation 
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Tenure and Recontracting February 7, 2018
Tenure and Recontracting August 27, 2018
The Call for Action: Coaching and Supporting Mathematics Instruction
Tenure and Recontracting February 6, 2018
Human Resources Management: Module 2
Tenure and Recontracting October 6, 2017
Student Assessment and Evaluation
Teaching as Inquiry 2017:  We are evaluators. We assess our impact.
Information and Guidelines booklets
Standard Four Program Impact
Insert your name and a picture. Change the Design Template.
Boards Self Reflection
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
THE INSPECTION SYSTEM AND THE SCHOOL EXTERNAL EVALUATION
Tenure and Recontracting February 26, 2019
Student Assessment and Evaluation
Reading Paper discussion – Week 4
Evolution, not Revolution – TLC to PDC (and PES)
Presentation transcript:

Appraisal Training Hyperlink

PRACTISING TEACHER CRITERIA Have a go? Can we list the PTCs?

Appraisal components Appraisal Discussions Interpreting evidence Affirmation Feedback Next steps Appraisal Report Overall evaluative judgements/statements Key strengths Concerns Support to be provided Performance Management Re-registration (every 3 years) Attestation (annual for pay progression) Appraisal (annual for growth and development) Process: Criteria established Goal setting Indicators of success identified Timeframes and actions identified Support to be provided Evidence Collected (learning portfolio) Teaching as Inquiry Observations /feedback Evidence of learning(teacher/learner) Student voice Informal feedback Contribution to wider school - feedback from other staff

New Summary Statement APPRAISER ENDORSEMENT: After careful reading of and reflection on the appraisal portfolio, discussion of professional practice and observation of teaching. I am confident that _________________________________ meets the criteria of the Practising Teacher Criteria ( RTC renamed in 2015)and the Professional Standards (STCA)   Signed:_________________________________ Date:________

Portfolio Checklist Evidence Notes Completed/Comments Goal setting Are they stretch ISMART goals?   Exam analysis Senior classes NCEA Junior classes Westlake Exams Classroom observation Reflections from observation? Student evaluations Analysis and reflections from the results? TAI Evidence for inquiry Strategies are described Evaluation Reflection Contribution to learning community Professional Development Is table linked to Report T drive

Portfolio with your appraiser Open note book Select FILE How to share your Portfolio with your appraiser Select share on web or network Select continue Select OK Select invite Select view link, copy link and email to appraiser

Open to learning disposition It’s about a recognition that we are all learners and learning takes place when there are high levels of: Trust Respect Inquiry Conversation Action

Open to learning conversation – components 1. Say what you think 6. Make a plan 2. Say why you think it Respect for self and others Valid Information Internal commitment to decisions 5. Establish common ground 3. Inquire Their reactions Their own thoughts Accuracy (paraphrase/ check) 4. Detect and check assumptions Open to learning conversation – components

http://connect.vln.school.nz/olc Link to Vivanne Robinson lecture on ‘Open conversations”

SENARIOS 1 Goal setting : appraisee has not set herself/himself ‘stretch ISMART goals’, they don’t relate to the schools strategic goals, they are not measureable and will not result in professional growth 2 You have observed a lesson that is 90% teacher talk 3 You have observed a lesson in which there appears to be little connection between the teacher and his/her students 4 The evidence of the TAI is very limited 5 After looking at the portfolio you are not prepared to sign 6 Exam analysis from the previous year shows the teachers results are below the expected level of achievement 7 ?????????