Bob Heile Chair, 802.15, Wireless Specialty Networks November 2016 802.15 Package Supporting Consent Agenda Items for Friday EC Meeting 2016-11-11 Bob Heile Chair, 802.15, Wireless Specialty Networks Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

November 2016 Contents Approval to Forward the Response to 15.3 Comments Received from JTC1 SC6 (slide 3) 802.15.3e, High Rate Close Proximity PHY, to RevCom (conditional) (slide 10) 802.15.4t, Higher Rate (2mb/s) PHY, to RevCom (conditional) (slide 17) 802.15.10, Layer 2 Routing, to RevCom (unconditional) (slide 25) 802.15.4v Regional Sub GHz Bands, to Sponsor Ballot (conditional) (slide 32) Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

November 2016 802.15.3-2016 to JTC1 SC6 under PSDO IEEE 802.15.3 Response to comments received from ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 6 60 day ballot Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

802.15.3-2016 to JTC1 SC6 under PSDO ISO/IEC ballot: November 2016 802.15.3-2016 to JTC1 SC6 under PSDO ISO/IEC ballot: Ballot title: Submission of IEEE Std 802.15.3-2016 High Data Rate Wireless Multi-Media Networks, for fast-track adoption under the ISO/IEEE PSDO Agreement Opening date: 2016-08-23 Closing date: 2016-10-23 Votes cast (18) Votes not cast (1) Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

802.15.3-2016 to JTC1 SC6 under PSDO Results: November 2016 802.15.3-2016 to JTC1 SC6 under PSDO Results: Answers to Q.1: "Do you support the need for an ISO International Standard on the subject?" Yes 8, No 0, Abstain 10 Answers to Q.2: "Do you support the submission of this proposal for FDIS ballot?" Yes 7, No 0, Abstain 10 Comments received: 1 each Italy (UNI) and Ukraine (DSTU), “Abstention” 1 from China (SAC) Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

802.15.3-2016 to JTC1 SC6 under PSDO Comment from China November 2016 802.15.3-2016 to JTC1 SC6 under PSDO Comment from China Comment: “IEEE 802.15.3TM-2016 (N16463) specifies that a secure membership or relationship should be established between the devices in the security models. However, it clearly clarifies that the process of establishing a secure membership or a secure relationship is outside of the scope of this standard. It only specifies the related content about key management and secure communication, which will easily cause that the devices cannot be interconnected due to the undefined method of establishing a secure relationship between devices, and reduce the standard availability.” Proposed change: “Recommend adding the relevant method to establish a secure relationship or providing a method that can be referenced in the document.” Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

802.15.3-2016 to JTC1 SC6 under PSDO Proposed response November 2016 802.15.3-2016 to JTC1 SC6 under PSDO Proposed response IEEE Std 802.15.3-2016 is part of the IEEE 802 family of standards and is compatible with IEEE Std 802.1X. The authentication protocols defined in IEEE Std 802.1X, e.g., the extensible authentication protocol (EAP), can be used to establish a secure relationship between devices. Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

November 2016 802.15.3-2016 to JTC1 SC6 under PSDO Response reviewed and approved by the WG on Monday Response reviewed by the JTC1 SC6 SC on Tues. No changes were recommended Response was reaffirmed by the WG on Weds with a request to seek EC approval to forward the response to JTC1 SC6 The preceding material is contained in https://mentor.ieee.org/802.15/dcn/16/15-16-0768-00-0000-response-to-iso-iec-jtc-1-sc-6-60-day-ballot.pdf Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

November 2016 802.15.3-2016 to JTC1 SC6 under PSDO Move to forward the response contained in 15-16-0768-00-0000-response-to-iso-iec-jtc-1-sc-6-60-day-ballot, slide 5 (and repeated here on slide 7 in EC Doc 15-16-0807-00) to JTC1 SC6 (WG: 34-0-0) Moved: Heile Second: Gilb Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

802.15.3e High Rate Close Proximity (HRCP) to RevCom (conditional) November 2016 802.15.3e High Rate Close Proximity (HRCP) to RevCom (conditional) Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

802.15.3e Ballot History 75 yes, 4 no (94% approval ratio) November 2016 802.15.3e Ballot History Initial Sponsor Ballot (P802.15.3e/D04) Opened: 29-Jul-2016 Closed: 28-Aug-2016 Vote results (pool of 96 voters) 79 responses (82% response ratio) 75 yes, 4 no (94% approval ratio) 0 abstain (0% abstain ratio) 256 comments from 8 commenters 105 marked as MBS Comment resolution database worksheet: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.15/dcn/16/15-16-0585-08-003e-consolidated-sponsor-ballot-comments.xls Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

802.15.3e Ballot History 76 yes, 4 no (95% approval ratio) November 2016 802.15.3e Ballot History Sponsor Ballot Recirc 1: (P802.15.3e/D05) Opened: 06-Oct-2016 Closed: 16-Oct-2016 Vote results (pool of 96 voters) 81 responses (84% response ratio) 76 yes, 4 no (95% approval ratio) 1 abstain (1% abstain ratio) 88 comments from 5 commenters 27 marked as MBS Comment resolution database worksheet: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.15/dcn/16/15-16-0726-03-003e-consolidated-sponsor-ballot-recirculation-1-comments.xls Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

802.15.3e Ballot History 86 yes, 0 no (100% approval ratio) November 2016 802.15.3e Ballot History Sponsor Ballot Recirc 2: (P802.15.3e/D06) Opened: 27-Oct-2016 Closed: 6-Nov-2016 Vote results (pool of 96 voters) 87 responses (90% response ratio) 86 yes, 0 no (100% approval ratio) 1 abstain (1% abstain ratio) 26 comments from 3 commenters 0 marked as MBS Comment resolution database worksheet: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.15/dcn/16/15-16-0789-00-003e-consolidated-sponsor-ballot-recirculation-2-comments.xlsx Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

Why Recirc 3? D06 has 100% approval and 26 comments (non MSB) November 2016 Why Recirc 3? D06 has 100% approval and 26 comments (non MSB) TG3e decided to accept or revise 24 of these comments for the following reasons: The draft will be substantially improved All comments are corrections, not changes in functionality or features The commenters agreed to work closely with the TG to make sure all comments are satisfied There is minimal risk to the schedule Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

Anticipated Schedule Sponsor Ballot Recirc 3: (P802.15.3e/D07) November 2016 Anticipated Schedule Sponsor Ballot Recirc 3: (P802.15.3e/D07) Open: 25 Nov 2016 Close: 5 Dec 2016 Recirc 4 (P802.15.3e/D07, if necessary) Open: 8 Dec 2016 Close: 18 Dec 2016 RevCom Submission 20 Dec 2016 Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

Motion to Forward 15.3e to RevCom November 2016 Motion to Forward 15.3e to RevCom Motion: 802.15 WG has reviewed and approves the CSD [15-14-0716-07-003e] and requests conditional approval from the EC to submit P802.15-3e/D07(or current revision) to RevCom. (WG vote: TBD) Move: Heile Second: Gilb Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

802.15.4t Higher Rate (2mb/s) PHY to RevCom (conditional) November 2016 802.15.4t Higher Rate (2mb/s) PHY to RevCom (conditional) Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

802.15.4t Ballot History 52 yes, 1 no (98% approval ratio) 0 abstain November 2016 802.15.4t Ballot History Initial Sponsor Ballot (P802.15.4t-D04) Opened: 08-Sep-2016 Closed: 08-Oct-2016 Vote results (pool of 65 voters) 53 responses (81% response ratio) 52 yes, 1 no (98% approval ratio) 0 abstain 25 comments from 5 commenters 1 marked as MBS Comment resolution database worksheet: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.15/dcn/16/15-16-0721-02-004t-tg4t-consolidated-sponsor-ballot-comments.xls Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

802.15.4t Ballot History 53 yes, 1 no (98% approval ratio) 0 abstain November 2016 802.15.4t Ballot History Sponsor Ballot Recirc 1: (P802.15.4t-D05) Opened: 28-Oct-2016 Closed: 07-Nov-2016 Vote results (pool of 65 voters) 54 responses (83% response ratio) 53 yes, 1 no (98% approval ratio) 0 abstain 5 comments from 2 commenters 3 marked as MBS Comment resolution database worksheet: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.15/dcn/16/15-16-0721-03-004t-tg4t-consolidated-sponsor-ballot-comments.xls Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

Comments Supporting No Votes November 2016 Comments Supporting No Votes The 2 non MBS comments 1 from IEEE Staff indicating all editorial requirements had been met 1 editorial suggestion which was rejected Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

Summary of the Remaining 3 MBS Comments from One “No” Voter November 2016 Summary of the Remaining 3 MBS Comments from One “No” Voter r-01-2 Comment: macPHYDetect has no meaning Proposed Change: Remove the sentence “This primitive may only be issued if macPhyDetect is set to O-QPSK_PHY.” r-01-3 Proposed Change: Remove whole section 8.4 including 8.4.2 and the table 8-8 r-01-4 Proposed Change: Remove the text “the value of macPhyDetect shall be set to O-QPSK_PHY, ” Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

Summary of the remaining 3 MBS comments from one “No” voter November 2016 Summary of the remaining 3 MBS comments from one “No” voter Disposition of these comments is still under discussion. Regardless, given the nature of the comments, it is felt the balloting can be completed in one (possibly two) more recirculations Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

Anticipated Schedule Sponsor Ballot Recirc 2: (P802.15.4t-D05) November 2016 Anticipated Schedule Sponsor Ballot Recirc 2: (P802.15.4t-D05) Open: 25 Nov 2016 Close: 5 Dec 2016 Recirc 3 (P802.15.4t-D05, if necessary) Open: 8 Dec 2016 Close: 18 Dec 2016 RevCom Submission 20 Dec 2016 Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

Motion to Forward 15.4t to RevCom November 2016 Motion to Forward 15.4t to RevCom Motion: 802.15 WG has reviewed and approves the CSD [15-15-0739-02] and requests conditional approval from the EC to submit P802.15.4t-D05 (or current revision) to RevCom. (WG vote: TBD) Move: Heile Second: Gilb Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

802.15.10 Layer 2 Routing to RevCom (unconditional) November 2016 802.15.10 Layer 2 Routing to RevCom (unconditional) Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

802.15.10 Ballot History 76 yes, 3 no (96% approval ratio) November 2016 802.15.10 Ballot History Initial Sponsor Ballot (P802.15.10/D06) Opened: 13-June-2016 Closed: 13-July-2016 Vote results (pool of 111 voters) 84 responses (75% response ratio) 76 yes, 3 no (96% approval ratio) 5 abstain (5% abstain ratio) 136 comments from 7 commenters 53 marked as MBS Comment resolution database worksheet: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.15/dcn/16/15-16-0475-08-0010-consolidated-sponsor-ballot-comments.xlsx Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

802.15.10 Ballot History 77 yes, 2 no (97% approval ratio) November 2016 802.15.10 Ballot History Sponsor Ballot Recirc 1: (P802.15.10/D07) Opened: 31-Aug-2016 Closed: 10-Sep-2016 Vote results (pool of 111 voters) 85 responses (76% response ratio) 77 yes, 2 no (97% approval ratio) 6 abstain (7% abstain ratio) 56 comments from 5 commenters 2 marked as MBS Comment resolution database worksheet: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.15/dcn/16/15-16-0475-16-0010-consolidated-sponsor-ballot-comments.xlsx Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

802.15.10 Ballot History 81 yes, 1 no (98% approval ratio) November 2016 802.15.10 Ballot History Sponsor Ballot Recirc 2: (P802.15.10/D08) Opened: 23-Sep-2016 Closed: 3-Oct-2016 Vote results (pool of 111 voters) 88 responses (79% response ratio) 81 yes, 1 no (98% approval ratio) 6 abstain (6% abstain ratio) 8 comments from 3 commenters 1 marked as MBS 7 other Comment resolution database worksheet: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.15/dcn/16/15-16-0475-18-0010-consolidated-sponsor-ballot-comments.xlsx Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

802.15.10 Ballot History 83 yes, 0 no (100% approval ratio) November 2016 802.15.10 Ballot History Sponsor Ballot Recirc 3: (P802.15.10/D09) Opened: 12-Oct-2016 Closed: 22-Oct-2016 Vote results (pool of 111 voters) 89 responses (80% response ratio) 83 yes, 0 no (100% approval ratio) 6 abstain (6% abstain ratio) 2 comments from 1 commenter 1 other Comment resolution database worksheet: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.15/dcn/16/15-16-0475-20-0010-consolidated-sponsor-ballot-comments.xlsx Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

802.15.10 Ballot History 86 yes, 0 no (100% approval ratio) November 2016 802.15.10 Ballot History Sponsor Ballot Recirc 4: (P802.15.10/D10) Opened: 27-Oct-2016 Closed: 6-Nov-2016 Vote results (pool of 111 voters) 93 responses (83% response ratio) 86 yes, 0 no (100% approval ratio) 7 abstain (7% abstain ratio) 0 comments from 0 commenters Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

Motion to Forward 802.15.10 to RevCom November 2016 Motion to Forward 802.15.10 to RevCom Motion: 802.15 WG has reviewed and approves the CSD [15-13-0232-04] and requests unconditional approval from the EC to submit P802.15-10/D10 to RevCom. (WG vote: 33,0,0) Move: Heile Second: Gilb Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

802.15.4v Regional Sub-GHz PHYs to Sponsor Ballot (conditional) November 2016 802.15.4v Regional Sub-GHz PHYs to Sponsor Ballot (conditional) Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

802.15.4v Ballot History 55 yes, 2 no (96% approval ratio) November 2016 802.15.4v Ballot History Initial Letter Ballot (P802.15.4v/D01) Opened: 11-Aug-2016 Closed: 10-Sep-2016 Vote results (pool of 96 voters) 62 responses (65% response ratio) 55 yes, 2 no (96% approval ratio) 5 abstain (8% abstain ratio) 46 comments from 8 commenters 31 marked as MBS Comment resolution database worksheet: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.15/dcn/16/15-16-0597-08-004v-802-15-4v-letter-ballot-consolidated-comments.xls – sheet LB127_Comments Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

802.15.4v Ballot History 56 yes, 1 no (98% approval ratio) November 2016 802.15.4v Ballot History Letter Ballot Recirc 1: (P802.15.4v/D02) Opened: 15-Sep-2016 Closed: 30-Sep-2016 Vote results (pool of 96 voters) 62 responses (65% response ratio) 56 yes, 1 no (98% approval ratio) 5 abstain (8% abstain ratio) 9 comments from 2 commenters 4 marked as MBS Comment resolution database worksheet: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.15/dcn/16/15-16-0597-08-004v-802-15-4v-letter-ballot-consolidated-comments.xls – sheet LB129 Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

802.15.4v Ballot History Letter Ballot Recirc 2: (P802.15.4v/D03) November 2016 802.15.4v Ballot History Letter Ballot Recirc 2: (P802.15.4v/D03) Opened: 23-Oct-2016 Closed: 7-Nov-2016 Vote results (pool of 96 voters) 64 responses (67% response ratio) 58 yes, 1 no (98% approval ratio) 5 abstain (8% abstain ratio) 11 comments from 3 commenters 1 marked as MBS MBS Comment subsequently withdrawn -> 59 yes, 0 no Comment resolution database worksheet: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.15/dcn/16/15-16-0597-08-004v-802-15-4v-letter-ballot-consolidated-comments.xls - sheet: LB130 Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

November 2016 So Why another Recirc? Vote is now unanimous, but it was felt that addressing the non MBS comments would result in a better standard. In essence these comments relate to how to make the standard less confusing and easier to understand Impact to schedule should be minimal to none. Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

Anticipated Schedule WG Letter Ballot Recirc 3: (P802.15.4v-D04) November 2016 Anticipated Schedule WG Letter Ballot Recirc 3: (P802.15.4v-D04) Open: 14 Nov 2016 Close: 30 Nov 2016 Recirc 4 (P802.15.4v-D04, if necessary) Open: 3 Dec 2016 Close: 18 Dec 2016 Start Sponsor Ballot (assuming recirc 4 is not needed) 9 Dec 2016 (or sooner) Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

Motion to Forward 802.15.4v to Sponsor Ballot November 2016 Motion to Forward 802.15.4v to Sponsor Ballot Motion: 802.15 WG has reviewed and approved the CSD [15-16-0131-01-0000_15.4v-sub-GHz-CSD] and requests conditional approval from the EC to submit P802.15.4v-D04 (or current revision) to Sponsor Ballot. (WG vote: TBD) Move: Heile Second: Gilb Bob Heile, Wi-SUN