Water Framework Directive, Habitats Directive and Inland Waterway Transport Marieke van Nood WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European Commission.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Water.europa.eu Water quality in the Danube basin Third Conference on the EU Strategy for the Danube Region 21 April 2010 Marieke van Nood Water Unit DG.
Advertisements

1. 2 Content Principles of the Water Framework Directive WFD and Agriculture WFD and CAP.
Module 3: Environmental Objectives, Programme of Measures, Economic Analysis, Exemptions Environmental Objectives Yannick Pochon Afyon, 2015.
The EU Water Framework Directive and Sediments The Water Framework Directive was transposed into law in EU Member States at the end of Nearly two.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive 17th March 2010, Newcastle North Sea Stakeholders Conference Leo de Vrees European Commission (DG Environment,
Water.europa.eu Assessment of the River Basin Management Plans – preliminary findings Conference on River Basin Management Planning Ankara, 28 February.
EU Water Policy Sustainable water management for generations to come.
Hydropower and the Water Environment Peter Gammeltoft European Commission DG Environment, D.1 Water 2nd Workshop on Water Management, WFD & Hydropower.
International Network Network of Basin OrganizationsInternationalOffice for Water PARIS Paper of Mr. Jean-François DONZIER Paper of Mr. Jean-François DONZIER.
1 EU Water legislation PEIP National Workshop – Montenegro Budva, May 2008 Dagmar Kaljarikova Policy Officer for Turkey, Montenegro, NGOs and REC.
Fish migration from a Water Framework Directive perspective
The European SEA Directive Simon Marsden School of International Business, University of South Australia Module 1: Basics of SEA.
THE MANAGEMENT PLAN IN PRACTICE Case study. RBMP Detailed publication process in the directive...  art. 13: general rules  annex VII: detailed contents.
River Basin Management Planning Cath Preston Senior Planning Officer (River Basin Planning) 2 nd March 2006.
Water.europa.eu Water Framework Directive - a framework for Community action in the field of water policy Marieke van Nood WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European.
EU Project: Trans-Boundary River Management Phase II and Phase III for the Kura River basin – Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan ( Transboundary.
Addressing the double challenge EU accession process, an opportunity to address water sector challenges 2016 Danube Water Conference 12 May 2016, Vienna.
Building WFD into impact assessment Richard Sharp Geomorphology IEMA webinar Thursday 31 March 2016.
EU Update/CIS England WFD Stakeholder Forum 4 April 2008.
Environmental policies in Europe
Environmental Objectives- Article 4.7
EU Water Framework Directive
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Climate Change and River Basin Planning
Water Framework Directive and Flood Risk Management
SSG on Climate Change and Water SCG meeting May 2008 Marieke van Nood, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European Commission.
Guidance on application of Article 4.7
EU Water Framework Directive
WFD and Hydromorphology
Informal meeting of EU Water Directors
1. Implementation of the Water Framework Directive: notifications & infringements, RBMP assessments for the agricultural sector Expert Group on WFD & agriculture.
CGBN Co-ordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature
EC GUIDANCE ON IWT AND NATURA 2000 CHAPTER 3
CIS Work Programme WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European Commission.
Update on RBMP&FRMP adoption and reporting Assessment of RBMP&FRMP
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
2009 European Water conference SCG meeting 5-6 November 2008 Maria
Commission report on Art. 8 WFD Monitoring programmes
River Basin Management Planning
NATURA 2000 and Water Framework Directive (CIS )
Progress Drafting Group on Environmental Objectives and Exemptions
CASE STUDY: A SPECIFIC CASE OF NON-ACHIEVEMENT OF THE OBJECTIVE
WFD and Hydromorphology
Ongoing work on CIS Guidance Article 4.7
Green Paper on Adaptation and
CIS Strategic Steering Group on Climate Change and Water
Legal issues in WFD implementation WD meeting 16 June 2008 Jorge Rodríguez Romero, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European Commission.
Pilot River Basin Water Framework Directive.
Comparison of methodologies for defining Good Ecological Potential
Alternative Methodology for Defining Good Ecological Potential (GEP)
Overview of Article 6 procedures under the Habitats Directive
Environmental objective document –
Water Directors meeting Warsaw, 8-9 December 2011
EP Pilot project Comparative study of pressures and measures
Meeting of the WFD Strategic Co-ordination Group 11 March 2009
Water Directors meeting Spa, 2-3 December 2010
Working Group on Estuaries Working Group on Rivers
Legal issues and compliance checking in WFD implementation SCG meeting 5-6 November 2008 Jorge Rodríguez Romero, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European.
THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE (WFD)
Compliance checking of RBMP An inventory of questions
Water Framework Directive implementation: RBMP assessment
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Concept paper on the assessment of WFD River Basin Management Plans
Frequently asked questions Part II: Coordination of monitoring under WFD and BHD Workshop: Biodiversity and Water - Links between EU nature and water.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Frequently asked questions Part I: Objectives and differences in scope of the WFD and BHD Workshop: Biodiversity and Water - Links between EU nature and.
What does it mean to have a forest in a Natura 2000 area?
SCG May 2005 CIRCA review.
Results of the screening of the draft second RBMPs
Assessment of Member States‘ 2nd River Basin Management Plans
Presentation transcript:

Water Framework Directive, Habitats Directive and Inland Waterway Transport Marieke van Nood WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European Commission

Overview presentation Main WFD objectives Links WFD, HD, IWT Implementation, good examples & guidance Conclusions

Main WFD objectives

WFD – general principles Protecting all water bodies, including transitional waters and coastal waters. Covering all impacts on waters. Achievement of good status in all water bodies and no deterioration of status. Good status: Ecological status Chemical status Quantitative status Water quality defined in terms of biology, chemistry and morphology Attention paid to socio-economic impacts, e.g. through a process of duly justified exemptions Slide 4 4

Diversity of uses, aspirations, pressures and impacts Nature protection Tourism Agriculture Flood protection Industry Waste Water Drinking water Navigation & hydropower 5

WFD Timetable Transposition into national law Dec 2003 Administrative arrangements Dec 2003 Environmental analysis: Analysis of characteristics Assessment of human impacts Economic analysis of water use Dec 2004 Monitoring programmes Dec 2006 Public Participation starts Dec 2006 Significant water management issues Dec 2007 Draft river basin management plans Dec 2008 Final river basin management plans Dec 2009 Measure to be applicable at the latest Dec 2012 Implementation, adjustment 2015 till 2027 A number of significant deadlines have passed since the adoption of the Directive in 2000, however this year 2009, sees the most important rear for river basin management in Europe. At the end of 2008 draft River basin Management plans had to be prepared, and a 6 month consultation period had to start. At the end of 2009, this process shall lead to the establishment of river basin management plans for all river basin districts across EU and neighbouring countries where applicable. To answer what happens when the Member States do not implement the Directive as they should, the following slides will show how the Commission proceeds in checking implementation and if necessary follow)-up with legal action. Slide 7 7

River Basin Management Plans Principles 1-flexibility in WFD objective setting 2-integration with other policies 3-consider a wide range of measures 4-transparency in decision making 5-6 year cyclic approach Notes for the Speaker: More information on the Directive, the implementation process and also the guidance documents are available on the internet.

Links WFD, HD, IWT

Heavily modified water bodies In case changes to the hydromorphological characteristics of that body which would be necessary for achieving good ecological status would have significant adverse effects on (e.g.) navigation, and In case the beneficial objectives served by the artificial or modified characteristics of the water body cannot, for reasons of technical feasibility or disproportionate costs, reasonably be achieved by other means, which are a significantly better environmental option: A water body can be designated as heavily modified and good ecological potential can be achieved instead of GES. Slide 10 10

Exemptions Time derogation (art 4.4) Lowered objectives (art 4.5) Phased implementation to 2021 or even 2027 depending on technical feasibility and disproportionate costs Lowered objectives (art 4.5) Depending on technical infeasibility, disproportionate costs and/or natural condition New modifications for sustainable human developments or physical alterations of surface water bodies, or alteration level of ground waters (art 4.7) Benefits overriding public interest, consideration of alternatives – better environmental option Slide 11 11

New modifications WFD allows for deterioration by new modifications under strict conditions: No better environmental options Project is of overriding public interest/outweighing water protection benefits All mitigation measures are taken Project and reasons are reported in RBM Plan Other water bodies are not impacted/other objectives not impaired Often related to Habitats Directive Article 6.3

New modifications What do we expect in plans: Assessment of project on all biological quality elements Use WFD monitoring data and/or expert judgement Assess alternatives and describe whether there are no better environmental options (e.g. type of measure, location of measure) Describe overriding public interest/comparison to foregone water protection benefits Describe assessment of mitigation measures -> Article 4.7 assessment in early stage

New modifications What do we expect in plans: Assessment of project on all biological quality elements Use WFD monitoring data and/or expert judgement Assess alternatives and describe whether there are no better environmental options (e.g. type of measure, location of measure) Describe overriding public interest/comparison to foregone water protection benefits Describe assessment of mitigation measures -> Article 4.7 assessment in early stage

Links WFD - HD Most stringent objective applies (e.g. HWMB GEP - more measures may still be needed under HD) Assess water impacts for HD and WFD together Make use of possible synergies (e.g. monitoring fish, defining measures for RBMP and Natura2000 management plans) Proposed future CIS activity on Biodiverstiy and Water is

Good examples and guidance

Good examples and guidance exist WFD: Guidance on application of exemptions http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/env/wfd/library?l=/framework_directive/guidance_documents&vm=detailed&sb=Title Guidance on pressures from navigation, hydropower, flood protection http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/env/wfd/library?l=/framework_directive/thematic_documents/hydromorphology&vm=detailed&sb=Title and Joint Statement Danube - Platina

EC Guidance documents Natura2000 + important guidance on compensation (Art. 6 (4) 1818

How to integrate IWT - ecology Early consideration of requirements WFD & Habitats directive - Planning at river basin level, for e.g. consideration of alternatives - Use best available information about mitigation measures - Early involvement stakeholders and public Use case by case approach to integrate IWT requirements and ecological requirements

More information Thank you very much! Water Information System for Europe: www.water.europa.eu DG ENV webpages: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water WFD - Circa webpage: http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/env/wfd/library?l=/framework_directive&vm=detailed&sb=Title Or contact us: Marieke.van-nood@ec.europa.eu Thank you very much!