Suggested Guidance for OPUS Projects Processing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Best Practices for Real-Time GNSS Network Administration Webinar July 31, pm ET RTK/RTN Precision vs. Accuracy & Occupation Time Mark L. Armstrong,
Advertisements

Experimental Results from “BigAnt”, a Large Format Antenna for High Quality Geodetic Ground Stations Gerald Mader National Geodetic Survey (NGS) Silver.
ADJUSTMENT COMPUTATIONS
CEG GNSS THEORY AND PRACTICE Stuart Edwards/Matt King Q1 – double difference component of the question was generally well answered with the double.
Theoretical foundations of ITRF determination The algebraic and the kinematic approach The VII Hotine-Marussi Symposium Rome, July 6–10, 2009 Zuheir Altamimi.
Survey-mode measurements and analysis M. Floyd K. Palamartchouk Massachusetts Institute of Technology Newcastle University GAMIT-GLOBK course University.
Better Positions and Improved Access to the National Spatial Reference System  Multi-Year CORS Solution  National Adjustment of 2011  New NGS Datasheet.
GTECH 201 Session 08 GPS.
OPUS Projects Manager Training Step 3 : Session Processing Step 3 : Session Processing.
DISCUSSION SESSION 3: FUTURE PPP USER SOLUTIONS GNSS PPP W ORKSHOP : R EACHING F ULL P OTENTIAL J UNE 2013, O TTAWA What will near-term PPP user.
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR GEO-INFORMATION SCIENCE AND EARTH OBSERVATION The Global Positioning System Bart Krol / Jeroen Verplanke.
OPUS Projects (beta) status and plans Improved solutions for simultaneous or repeated observations harvest data from multiple observers share upload &
Mission Planning and SP1. Outline of Session n Standards n Errors n Planning n Network Design n Adjustment.
OPUS : Online Positioning User Service
A New & Improved National Spatial Reference System Refinements of the North American Datum of 1983 through the Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National.
Part VI Precise Point Positioning Supported by Local Ionospheric Modeling GS894G.
NGS GPS ORBIT DETERMINATION Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic.
Titelmaster Geometrical and Kinematical Precise Orbit Determination of GOCE Akbar Shabanloui Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, University of Bonn.
10/7/ Innovative Solutions International Satellite Navigation Division ION NTM 01 Capabilities of the WAAS and EGNOS For Time Transfer SBAS, an Alternate.
How Does GPS Work ?. Objectives To Describe: The 3 components of the Global Positioning System How position is obtaining from a radio timing signal Obtaining.
Best Practices for Real-Time GNSS Network Administration Webinar March 20, pm ET Key Considerations and Concerns When Using OPUS Projects to Position.
Part Va Centimeter-Level Instantaneous Long-Range RTK: Methodology, Algorithms and Application GS894G.
OPUS : Online Positioning User Service
SVY 207: Lecture 13 Ambiguity Resolution
B ≥ 4 H & V, KNOWN & TRUSTED POINTS? B LOCALIZATION RESIDUALS-OUTLIERS? B DO ANY PASSIVE MARKS NEED TO BE HELD? RT BASE WITHIN CALIBRATION (QUALITY TIE.
Tools to help complete “Height Mod” Surveys OPUS & OPUS Projects Joe Evjen, Geodesist, NGS Height Modernization Eastern States Regional Tuesday, March.
What is OPUS Projects? Introduction PSLS Webinar May 20, 2015 Dan Martin Northeast Regional Geodetic Advisor.
National Geodetic Survey – Continuously Operating Reference Stations & Online Positioning User Service (CORS & OPUS) William Stone Southwest Region (UT,
Real Time Network Activities at The National Geodetic Survey Neil D. Weston National Geodetic Survey, NOS, NOAA Silver Spring, Maryland January,
P. Wielgosz and A. Krankowski IGS AC Workshop Miami Beach, June 2-6, 2008 University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
A Geodesist’s View of the Ionosphere Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey Silver Spring, MD.
Airborne GPS Positioning with cm-Level Precisions at Hundreds of km Ranges Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey Silver Spring, MD National Geodetic.
GSI Japan - 21st of June 1999 GPS-Positioning using Virtual Reference Stations - Theory, Analysis and Applications Herbert Landau Spectra Precision Terrasat.
How Errors Propagate Error in a Series Errors in a Sum Error in Redundant Measurement.
Short-session Static and Kinematic Processing Short-session static: GAMIT processing, sessions 1-3 hours long Kinematic: TRACK processing, coordinates.
Towards optimizing the determination of accurate heights with GNSS APRIL 14, 2015 Dan Gillins, Ph.D., P.L.S. and Michael Eddy, Ph.D. student.
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 Modes of GPS Positioning Aim of this lecture: –To review and compare methods of static positioning, and introduce methods for kinematic.
Survey-mode measurements and analysis T. A. Herring R.W. King M. A. Floyd Massachusetts Institute of Technology GPS Data Processing and Analysis with GAMIT/GLOBK/TRACK.
GNSS Background for OPUS Projects Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey Silver Spring, MD GNSS Background.
GPS ANTENNA CALIBRATION AT THE NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY Dr. Gerald L. Mader Geosciences Research Division National Geodetic Survey, NOS/NOAA Silver Spring,
The Global Positioning System
IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Strategies for Weekly Routine Generation of Combined IERS Products Markus Rothacher.
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
Reference Frames Global Continental Local -- may be self-defined
Proof of liveness: an example
Thomas Herring, IERS ACC, MIT
Deep Feedforward Networks
Adjustment of Trilateration
Permanent GPS Stations and their Influence on the
Basic Error Analysis Considerations
Introduction to GPS Global Positioning System
Chapter 3 Raster & Vector Data.
Appliance of IceCORS network 2017 by Dalia Prizginiene
Switching Techniques In large networks there might be multiple paths linking sender and receiver. Information may be switched as it travels through various.
Dissemination Workshop for African countries on the Implementation of International Recommendations for Distributive Trade Statistics May 2008,
SVY207: Lecture 16 GPS Field Procedures and Computations
Kinematic GNSS Systems Units 2, 2. 1, and 2
KINEMATIC GPS AND AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION PROBLEM
Kinematic Data Processing
Kamil Teke and Johannes Böhm
Troposphere and Clock Parameterization During Continuous VLBI Campaigns Kamil Teke1, 2, Johannes Boehm1, Hana Spicakova1, Andrea Pany1, Harald Schuh1 1.
Making a good thematic map – Extracting or collecting geographic data
The Global Positioning System
OPUS Projects Manager Training
Neural networks (1) Traditional multi-layer perceptrons
GNSS Background for OPUS Projects
CORS-Based Coordinate System WHAT IS CORS
Survey Networks Theory, Design and Testing
Online Positioning User Service Review and new developments
Multiobjective Optimization
Presentation transcript:

Suggested Guidance for OPUS Projects Processing Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey Silver Spring, MD

Suggested Processing Guidance Guiding Principles Let’s review some of the material from the background discussion which we’ll call our Guiding Principles. Suggested Processing Guidance

Suggested Processing Guidance Guiding Principle - 1 Precision is independent of baseline length The accuracy of the IGS orbits, the ionosphere-free combination of the phase data, and the modeling of the troposphere essentially remove these effects as a function of baseline length. Suggested Processing Guidance

Suggested Processing Guidance Guiding Principle - 2 Precision depends on observation span More data means better phase bias determination leading to better integer-fixing, more multipath averaging, better troposphere solutions and better coordinate precision. Suggested Processing Guidance

Suggested Processing Guidance Guiding Principle - 3 Session network designs must include both short and long baseline lengths Short baselines optimize amount of observations by mutual visibility of the satellites and long baselines are needed to decorrelate the tropospheric adjustments on the short baselines. Suggested Processing Guidance

Suggested Processing Guidance Guiding Principle - 4 GNSS measurement errors are independent, they do not propagate through a network GPS measurements are not like total station measurements and there are no inherent connections between the receivers in a project. Suggested Processing Guidance

Suggested Processing Guidance Guiding Principle - 5 Relative positions must be with respect to a single reference mark or reference network The relative positions of project marks should take advantage of common-mode errors, connect to the same Hub and not introduce chains of dependencies that are not inherent in the measurements. Suggested Processing Guidance

Basic OPUS Projects Options Network design Hub mark selections Tropospheric modeling Included CORS Constraints Suggested Processing Guidance

Suggested Processing Guidance Network Design Each session requires that baselines be defined. Baselines are defined by selecting Hub marks. Every mark that is not a Hub tries to connect directly to Hub. Only 1 Hub per session. Make the Hub a CORS if at all possible. Rover positions are relative to constrained marks. Suggested Processing Guidance

Suggested Processing Guidance Hub mark Selection Minimize observations lost to the need for mutual visibility by keeping the distance to the Hub < ~100 km. To meet the previous requirement, spatially large projects might require different Hubs be used in different sessions. All Hubs should be present in all sessions. Suggested Processing Guidance

Suggested Processing Guidance Troposphere Modeling Model style can be either Step-offsets (SO) between intervals or Piecewise Linear (PWL). In the spirit of avoiding discrete steps transitioning from one tropo interval to the next, PWL troposphere adjustments are preferred - nature does not move in discrete steps. Troposphere correction intervals. Adjustment interval may depend on local conditions, but, generally, 7200 sec is preferred (which is equivalent to 2  3600 sec intervals but without the discrete step). Suggested Processing Guidance

Suggested Processing Guidance Included CORS Only one, or a few at most, CORS will be Hubs. Distant CORS must be included in all sessions for troposphere decorrelation. The included CORS, particularly those used as Hubs, should be present in all sessions. Although it is not necessary to use all CORS uploaded by OPUS, more included CORS implies less dependence on a single CORS and a better tie to the NSRS. Suggested Processing Guidance

Suggested Processing Guidance Constraint Weight The choice is almost always between Tight or Normal constraint weight for the CORS. Many CORS display seasonal motion which makes Tight constraint weight suboptimal. Many CORS have poor velocities which makes Tight constraint weight suboptimal . Because multiple CORS will always be used (at least 1 Hub + 1 distant CORS), Normal constraint weight seems preferred. Know your CORS. Suggested Processing Guidance

Example 1: Connect marks directly to Hubs. Yes No Suggested Processing Guidance

Example 2: Create a single reference network. Session 1 Session 2 Network No +  Session 1 Session 2 Network Yes +  Suggested Processing Guidance

Suggested Processing Guidance Example 3: A single Hub example. Distant CORS for tropo decorrelation Only this CORS is designated Hub Suggested Processing Guidance

Suggested Processing Guidance Hub Selection Do not connect a project mark with just a few hours of data to distant CORS (too few mutual observations). Take advantage of their continuous data collection by using CORS as Hub(s). Suggested Processing Guidance

Suggested Processing Guidance Network Components Think of project as having 2 components: Local network Think precision - get best relative positions. Reference network Think accuracy - multiple CORS tie the local network into NSRS. Suggested Processing Guidance

Suggested Processing Guidance Local Network Think precision - get best relative positions: Use common-mode errors to your advantage. Use identical antennas when possible. Keep baselines short maximizing simultaneous observations. Use a single Hub per session. Use the same Hub for all sessions when possible. Include at least one distant CORS to stabilize tropo corrections. Normal constraints. Suggested Processing Guidance

Suggested Processing Guidance Reference Network Think accuracy - multiple CORS tie the local network into NSRS: Include the Hub(s) and distant CORS in all sessions. Multiple CORS remove single reference mark bias. Normal constraint weights allow for small variations in positions typical of CORS or any mark. Suggested Processing Guidance

Suggested Processing Guidance Example 4: Multiple Hub example. GSVS2011: The survey used a limited number of receivers to from Austin to Corpus Christi. This distance required that multiple hubs be used to minimize data lost to mutual visibility. Marks used as Hubs were included in all sessions. Each session’s Hub connects to all marks in the session including all marks used as Hubs in other sessions. Distant marks connect to the session’s Hub. Result: Consistent relative positions for project marks. All CORS contribute to aligning the project to the NSRS. Suggested Processing Guidance

Suggested Processing Guidance Example 5: Same project, two designs. Can you identify the advantages and disadvantages of these two network designs? TOP (a poor design) Advantages: Multiple CORS. Maximizes mutual visibility (but gain is minimal). Disadvantages: Marks are daisy-chained. Multiple Hubs. No distant CORS to stabilize tropo corrections. BOTTOM (a good design) Single Hub. No daisy-chained marks. Mutual visibility loss (but loss is minimal). Suggested Processing Guidance

What About A Project Hub? Project Hub = a mark specifically occupied to act as a Hub for a project. This implies you’ve planned ahead and recognized that there is no suitable CORS. Good! Project Hubs are used similarly to CORS Hubs: Use one project Hub if at all possible. Project Hubs appear in all sessions. A project Hub’s occupation must span its entire session. A project Hub’s occupation must sufficient to remedy mutual visibility data loss to the more distant CORS. Because project Hub are unconstrained, sessions should include multiple local and/or distant CORS to better tie the project Hub into the NSRS. Suggested Processing Guidance

Example 6: Single project Hub Not too bad … … but much better Suggested Processing Guidance

Suggested Processing Guidance Quick Summary At Project Level Add all selected distant CORS. Add all selected hubs to each session if necessary. Select PWL, 7200 Tropo. Select Normal constraint weighting. Select Network Design: User At Session Level Select 1 Hub. Include all Hubs from other sessions, if any, (but do not designate as Hubs) Include all distant marks. Omit unused CORS. Constrained CORS only. Suggested Processing Guidance

Suggested Processing Guidance Last Advice Think about how you’ll process the data before you take the data. Let the data tell you the position, not the Data Base. Suggested Processing Guidance 26