Drawing of Sufficient Detail (DOSD)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preparing a Curb Ramp Project December 15, Tiers of Project Types Non-Signalized Curb Ramp Reconstruction - Typically utilizing standard plans.
Advertisements

Constructability Review
Drawings of Sufficient Detail
EFCOG Electrical Improvement Project Electrical Hazards Awareness Briefing Excavation and Trenching Module 5.
Bangor Water Districts Experience With Gas. Bangor Water Districts Experience With Natural Gas.
Georgia underground marking standards
Exhibit A and B Duane Fournier Utilities Regulation Engineer Safety and Engineering Section (515)
Weekly Risk Report & Performance Metrics
FAA 29th ANNUAL AIRPORT CONFERENCE. Presenter’s Background Structured Design Unstructured Design Design Activities Special Concerns Lessons Learned Benefits.
Utilities in MaineDOT’ s Right of Ways. MaineDOT’ s Jurisdiction All State and State Aid roads. All Facilities and.
MAJOR REVISIONS TO THE POLICY FOR ACCOMMODATING UTILITIES ON HIGHWAY RIGHTS Presented By: Mark Attaway March 29, 2011.
CE En 112 Engineering Drawing with CAD Application
Greenfield District Utility/RR Engineer, INDOT
LPA – Utility Coordination Natalie Parks StructurePoint November 20, 2013.
A New Paradigm for Utility Coordination Kenny Franklin INDOT Director of Utilities and Railroads.
IDM Chapter 104 Utility Coordination Joe Gundersen Senior Utility Engineer, INDOT August 21, 2014.
Work Plan Development Aschalew Aberra Highway Utility Engineer, INDOT November 20, 2013.
Mike Baumann Statewide Utility Engineer January 22, 2015.
A New Paradigm for Utility Coordination Kenny Franklin INDOT Director of Utilities and Railroads.
October Training 8 HR Ref. Content Overhead Utilities Risk Assessments Task Safety Environmental Analysis Health and Safety Plan Components of a HASP Questions?
HIGHWAY/UTILITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW ROADWAY CONFERENCE APRIL 20, 2009.
Permit Process.
CE303: Introduction to Construction Blueprint Lab.
IDM Chapter 104 Utility Coordination Joe Gundersen Senior Utility Engineer, INDOT November 19, 2013.
Kentucky Transportation Cabinet
IDM Chapter 104 Utility Coordination Gail Lee Utility and Railroad Engineer, INDOT June 10, 2015.
CE303: Introduction to Construction Blueprint Lab.
Construction Review LaVon M Marshall Greenfield District Utility/RR Engineer, INDOT June 11, 2015.
LPA – Utility Coordination Natalie Parks, P.E. American Structurepoint, Inc. December 19, 2013.
Implementing Program Management Standards at Duke Energy.
Environmental Site Assessments Hazardous Materials/ Regulated Substances Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Coordinating with Project Managers Cassie Reiter, P.E., ENV SP Utility Coordinator/Project Manager CMT Engineers and Consultants June 2016.
Contractor Utility Coordination WisDOT Projects February 18 th, 2016.
Construction Review LaVon M. Marshall Greenfield District Utility/RR Engineer, INDOT June 22, 2016.
A New Paradigm for Utility Coordination Kenny Franklin VP of SUE Development Blood Hound.
LOGO HOW TO FIND THE RIGHT HANDYMAN The Benefits The Questions Contact Information Goes Here Even the handiest of homeowners find that they need to have.
Planning Your Demonstration
Georgia underground marking standards
Tolerances Introduction to Engineering Design
Annual Performance Management Cycle Management Training Tutorial
Utility Cost Estimating In Practice
Common Surveys Used For Commercial Real Estate Transactions
Fall Hazards.
Fire Protection Survey Procedure
Introduction to Drafting and Design
Introduction to Drafting and Design
ISO 9001 Awareness Training.
Tolerances Introduction to Engineering Design
TxDOT Utility Related Issues
Utility Considerations on Transportation Projects
Chapter 15 Site Plan Layout.
General comments: These projects are locally owned and the LPA should be involved and informed throughout the project. The project agreement is between.
Fall Hazards.
Tolerances Introduction to Engineering Design
Research Phase, Indiana 811, Initial Notice, Verification
Print Reading.
Science Fair Science Fair 2008.
Construction Review.
Work Plan Development.
AS 9100 Awareness Training.
Tolerances Introduction to Engineering Design
A Paradigm for Utility Coordination
Working Drawings Chapter 12.
County Wide Safety Program
105 Indiana Administrative Code Article 13
Construction Considerations
Fall Hazards.
Project Manager / Utility Liaison
ACEC Designer Training
ACEC Designer Training
Presentation transcript:

Drawing of Sufficient Detail (DOSD)

Answer to DOSD 105 IAC 13-3-3(c)6 states that the Work Plan shall include the following… “A drawing of sufficient detail and scale to show the proposed location of the facility relocation.” Thus…Detailed, Scaled & shows Relocation 2

Example 1 (not too helpful) Hand drawn lines and vault? – no annotation – station, offset, elevation? Is it drawn to scale? Importance to identify items on plans. 3

Example 2 (more helpful) 5

Example 3 (most helpful) Plan view – shows station, offset, and elevation Proposed utility pipeline has been drawn to scale to prove/show it is correctly being relocated. 6

Example 3 (continued) Cross Section - Proposed utility pipeline has been drawn to scale to prove/show it is correctly being relocated and out of conflict with the proposed project. In this case, the pipeline utility was going to perform this work prior to the Contract being Let and was not keen to hiring a surveyor so they/we were trying to identify the depth below the existing ground (must be very careful when dealing with depth). We had to verify that the plan’s existing ground (surveyed 8 years prior) still matched the in-the-field conditions. Once that was confirmed, then there was confidence that a depth of 8 ft at the proposed R/W would be sufficient control for the utility to use as the control to install the new pipeline.

Purpose of DOSD? To enable the Utility Coordinator and design staff to determine if the proposed facility relocation will resolve all known facility conflicts with the proposed design without causing additional conflicts with other utilities’ facilities or with the project. Establish – Everyone knows where everyone goes in engineering/ construction terms! X,Y, Z and time 7

Components #1 #1 - Must use the INDOT Plans “INDOT Plans” refers to the use of the design alignment, stations profile, construction limits, right-of-way. Provides a consistent base line that everyone is working from. This is the only way that anyone looking at the drawings can see if the relocation plan addresses all of the conflicts. 8

Component #2 How can they be submitted? May mark-up the PDF provided by the Designer May mark-up a hard-copy provided by the Designer May provide a CAD file that uses the Base files as provided by the Designer May provide a PDF of plans on their title block Must be drawn to scale with corresponding annotations – Station, Offset, Elevation! Keep in mind.. Does everyone have Adobe Pro? Everyone know how to set a scale in Adobe prior to drawing? Adobe Reader DC (newest version – April 2015) - support website says you have access to the measure tools if original PDF creator enabled the measurement tools. Adobe XI (current version @ INDOT) - 9

Component #3 Uses the project alignment for Stations and Offsets, noting: Poles, anchors, and guy wires Fire hydrants, valves, THRUST BLOCKS! Crossing Station only unless termini are in the right-of-way. Vaults, hand holes, manholes – more than symbols on the plans – drawn to scale X, Y, Z Bore Pits – real construction dimensions Control cabinets, pedestals Crossing Station – if not perpendicular to the alignment, then an angle should be provided 10

Drawing of Sufficient Detail – #3 Uses the project alignment for Stations and Offsets Hand drawn?...Be careful here - is it to scale? Are the annotated dimension and drawn items the real outside dimensions? Plan view scales are typically 1 inch = 20 ft or smaller scales which makes drawing items by hand less than 10 feet very tricky or inaccurate. When control is critical due to other sensitive items in the area, verify it by using CADD! 11

Component #4 Provides Elevations For all underground facilities Maximum elevation at top of facility when under pavement, structure, or ditch Minimum elevation at bottom of facility between facilities or proposed project construction Not _?_-feet below grade…which grade? 12

Component #4 - continued Provides elevations This is the only way that anyone looking at the drawings can see if the relocation plan addresses all of the conflicts. 13

Component #5 Provides cross-sections showing facilities, distinguishing between: Aerial or underground Proposed facilities Existing facilities Retired facilities Existing facilities to remain Existing facilities to be removed 14

Component #5 – continued Provides cross sections showing facilities 15

Component #6 Method of installation Direct Bury – estimated construction room Bore Pits – approximate size (W x L x D) and locations Type and size of pipe to be installed Any critical clearances needed Note any areas of concern or special need Examples: Holding a pole, holding/protecting a conduit bank, etc. 16

Component #6 – continued Method of installation 17

Importance of DOSD? Must know WHERE the facility will be as it relates to the proposed design Must know if required clearances are met Must know environmental commitments have not been compromised Must know potential constructability issues Must know facilities are within proposed ROW Must know if conflicts with other relocations 18

Plan Interaction Process

What if Utility Can’t do DOSD? Some utilities don’t have the personnel, expertise or experience to produce a DOSD Meet live if possible Do it with them Recommend hiring a consultant If we must, do it for them Include in the Risk Report to the PM Escalate to the Authorized Rep and/or OSA 20

What if Utility Won’t do DOSD? Some utilities refuse to provide a Drawing of Sufficient Detail Identify why they will not provide a DOSD Escalate to the next level at the utility Escalate to INDOT OSA who will escalate to Director if necessary Document EVERYTHING Include in the Risk Report to the PM 21

What if Utility Won’t do DOSD? Try to gain concurrence from the utility representative when providing the station, offset, and elevation Contact a supervisor at the utility if cooperation is still not achieved Document EVERYTHING 22

A Few Notes… The rule does NOT make clear what is a “Drawing of Sufficient Detail” Utilities may have a different perspective or definition of DOSD Utilities have not received training on what is expected on DOSD Work with the utilities to achieve a DOSD 23

Benefit to Utility Coordinator? Changes in DRAWINGS of SUFFICIENT DETAIL: “Everyone knows, where everyone goes!” “No Surprises” during INDOT construction Assurance any required relocations only occur once You, each utility company, and the Designer are all speaking the same language