Session: 9 On-going Monitoring & Follow Up

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

DATA DEMAND AND USE: S HARING I NFORMATION AND P ROVIDING F EEDBACK Session 5.

Advertisements

Nigeria Case Study HIVAIDS Specific Slides. ANALYZING AND INTERPRETING DATA.

Rwanda Case Study Additional Slides on Stakeholder Involvement.

GENERATING DEMAND FOR DATA Module 1. Session Objectives  Understand the importance of improving data-informed decision making  Understand the role of.

Begin with the End in Mind

LINKING DATA TO ACTION Session 6. Session Objectives By the end of this session, you will be able to:  Identify priority decisions and programmatic questions.

Dissemination and Use of Results from OVC Program Evaluations Florence Nyangara, PhD MEASURE Evaluation/Futures Group Dissemination Meeting, September.

DETERMINANTS OF DATA USE Session 2. Session Objectives  Explain the data-use conceptual framework  Highlight the determinants of data use  List potential.

UNDERSTANDING DATA AND INFORMATION FLOW Session 4.

U SING G EOGRAPHY TO S TRENGTHEN THE D ECISION -M AKING P ROCESS.

Increasing district level evidence-based decision making in Côte d’Ivoire Tara Nutley MEASURE Evaluation / Futures Group Mini University, Washington DC.

Building Capacity on Program Evaluation in Latin America: The Experience of the Partnership between Mexico’s National Institute of Public Health (INSP)

Technical Approach to and Experiences from Strengthening National Monitoring and Evaluation System for Most Vulnerable Children Program in Tanzania Prisca.

Strengthening Health Information Systems: Creating an Information Culture Manila, June 14, 2011 Theo Lippeveld, MD, MPH,

Case management versus M&E in the context of OVC programs: What have we learned? Jenifer Chapman, PhD Futures Group/MEASURE Evaluation.

PLACE Method Priorities for Local AIDS Control Efforts 1 1 MEASURE Evaluation, A Manual for implementing the PLACE Method.

Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation. Learning Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Define program components Define.

WHY IS THIS HAPPENING IN THE PROGRAM? Session 5 Options for Further Investigation & Information Flow.

Introduction to Group Work. Learning Objectives The goal of the group project is to provide workshop participants with an opportunity to further develop.

Data Use for Gender-Aware Health Programming Session 1: Setting the Gender Policy Context.

Unmet Need Exercise  Review the trends in CPR. What do you conclude about the performance of the FP program in each country?  Review trends in unmet.

MEASURE Evaluation Data Quality Assurance Workshop Session 3 Introduction to Routine Data Quality Assessment.

MEASURE EVALUATION Session: 7 Developing Action Plans Based on Results Data Quality Assurance Workshop.

Building New Institutional Capacity in M&E: The Experience of National AIDS Coordinating Authority V F Kemerer Getting To Results IDEAS Global Assembly.

Data Use for Gender-Aware Health Programming Welcome and Introductions.

Data Demand & Use: Information Use Map Webinar Series #2 Tuesday, January 24, 2012 Presenters: Eric Geers and Tara Nutley.

Monitoring & Evaluation Capacity Strengthening Workshop WORKSHOP INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW.

Integration of Community Based Services It seems like a good idea, but how to make it work? Molly Cannon Palladium/MEASURE Evaluation September 28, 2015.

Management of RHIS Resources

Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 9:

Difference-in-Differences Models

Ensuring Data Quality for Monitoring and Evaluation

Data Quality Assurance Workshop

Introduction MODULE 2: Indicators and Data Collection and Reporting

Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 5:

RHIS Design and Reform ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 10:

Data Quality Assurance

Session: 5 Using the RDQA tool for System Assessment

Session: 8 Disseminating Results

Fundamentals of Monitoring and Evaluation

The PLACE Mapping Tool Becky Wilkes, MS, GISP Marc Peterson, MA, GISP

Training of Trainers on the OVC Household Vulnerability Prioritization Tool.

Measuring Success Toolkit

MEASURE Evaluation Using a Primary Health Care Lens Gabriela Escudero

Monitoring and Evaluation of HIV/AIDS Programs Workshop Overview

Introduction to Comprehensive Evaluation

Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 4:

Overview of the RHIS Rapid Assessment Tool

Session: 4 Using the RDQA tool for Data Verification

Complementing Routine Data with Qualitative Data for Decision Making: Understanding the "Why" Behind Program Data Day 1 - Session 1 Note to Facilitator:

Assessment Training Session 9: Assessment Analysis

Training Content and Orientation

Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 3:

Introduction RHIS Design and Reform ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS

Introduction to Health Informatics:

Introduction to the PRISM Framework

Information Systems for Health:

Information Systems for Health:

Introduction to Health Informatics:

Session: 6 Understanding & Using the RDQA Tool Output

Introduction MODULE 7: RHIS Governance and Management of Resources

Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation

Siân Curtis, PhD OVC Evaluation Dissemination Meeting,

Data and Interoperability:

Use of Information for Decision Making

Measuring Data Quality

Introduction to Health Informatics

Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation

EHRs and Privacy Protection in LMICs

Monitoring and Evaluation in Communication Management

Presentation transcript:

Session: 9 On-going Monitoring & Follow Up MEASURE EVALUATION Data Quality Assurance Workshop Session: 9 On-going Monitoring & Follow Up

Topics to Cover The benefits of Supportive Supervision after the RDQA Monitoring trends and performances

Ongoing Monitoring & Follow up The RDQA Process Data Verification System Assessment Interpret the Output Develop Action Plans Disseminate Results Ongoing Monitoring & Follow up

What is Supportive Supervision? Focus on problem solving, encouragement and learning Validate and improve data collection process Identify problems and difficulties Assist region/district/village health worker in implementing solutions Joint problem solving Provide technical assistance and guide program development Focus on follow up, actions items, etc… Open the RDQA Tool to show a quick overview of each worksheet

Purpose of Supportive Supervision Monitoring assess implementation of recommendations Training teach/focus on competency development/group approach Mentoring coach/focus on moral/competency development/individual approach

What does Supportive Supervision Consist of? Supportive supervision should be considered as capacity building, not as evaluation and giving sanctions Assessment of practices (through observations, discussions, records and outputs review). A participatory discussion of observations, highlighting both positive and negative findings. A discussion on a small number of weaker areas that everyone agrees they can improve. A discussion of the strategy and steps for implementation, including what each level of the system staff must perform. A written record of the joint agreements on changes (improvements) that all are committed to, to be followed-up afterwards.

Data Management Principles related to Supportive Supervision Data Quality Collect what is needed Make good use of what you collect Empower staff to both collect and use data Promote data quality so that staff produce accurate, reliable, complete and on time data/reports Provide feedback on data collected and outputs / outcomes

Follow up Data Verification Recommended that they be conducted at all sites included in the RDQA Additional sites may be included at M&E Officer’s discretion Dependent on time and resources available

Track Progress Over Time Plot verification factors for the indicators accessed on a line graph to see whether or not they have improved Can do the same for reporting performance

Ongoing Monitoring & Follow up The RDQA Process Data Verification System Assessment Interpret the Output Develop Action Plans Disseminate Results Ongoing Monitoring & Follow up

Questions & Answers

MEASURE Evaluation is funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and implemented by the Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partnership with Futures Group, ICF International, John Snow, Inc., Management Sciences for Health, and Tulane University. Views expressed in this presentation do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the U.S. government. MEASURE Evaluation is the USAID Global Health Bureau's primary vehicle for supporting improvements in monitoring and evaluation in population, health and nutrition worldwide.

www.measureevaluation.org