Shukui Zhang, Matt Poelker, Marcy Stutzman

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY
Advertisements

1 Introduction to Plasma Immersion Ion Implantation Technologies Emmanuel Wirth.
05/20/ High-Current Polarized Source Developments Evgeni Tsentalovich MIT.
GaAs and CsKSb Photocathodes for DC Gun
Rong Xiang I I Photocathodes for Rossendorf SRF gun Rong Xiang for HZDR SRF-gun team 1 st Topical Workshop on laser based particle.
Chapter 8 Ion Implantation Instructor: Prof. Masoud Agah
ECE/ChE 4752: Microelectronics Processing Laboratory
Section 6: Ion Implantation
PST 2007 BNL 1 Development of High- performance Polarized e- source at Nagoya University. Nagoya University M.Yamamoto, S.Okumi, T.Konomi N.Yamamoto, A.Mano,
Metal photocathodes for NCRF electron guns Sonal Mistry Loughborough University Supervisor: Michael Cropper (Loughborough University) Industrial Supervisor:
TRIGGERING EXCIMER LASERS BY PHOTOIONIZATION FROM A CORONA DISCHARGE* Zhongmin Xiong and Mark J. Kushner University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI USA.
Introduction Current and proposed linear colliders, energy recovery linacs and light sources require high quality electron sources. In particular, low-emittance.
High Current Electron Source for Cooling Jefferson Lab Internal MEIC Accelerator Design Review January 17, 2014 Riad Suleiman.
SILICON DETECTORS PART I Characteristics on semiconductors.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Strained Superlattice.
E. Pozdeyev1 Ion Back-Bombardment in RF Guns Eduard Pozdeyev BNL with contributions from D. Kayran, V. Litvinenko, I. Ben-Zvi.
D.-A. Luh, A. Brachmann, J. E. Clendenin, T. Desikan, E. L. Garwin, S. Harvey, R. E. Kirby, T. Maruyama, and C. Y. Prescott Stanford Linear Accelerator.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility M. Poelker,
Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry A look at SIMS and Surface Analysis.
The CEBAF 200kV Inverted Gun P. Adderley, M. BastaniNejad, J. Clark, J. Grames, J. Hansknecht, J. McCarter, M. Poelker, M. Stutzman, R. Suleiman, K. Surles-Law.
Catania 11 ICATPP october, 2009 Como 1/12 Catania Comparative measurements of the performances of four super bialkali large.
09/10/2007 Polarized Source for eRHIC Evgeni Tsentalovich MIT.
Global Design Effort 1 Polarized electron source update Axel Brachmann, John Sheppard, Feng Zhou, Takashi Maruyama, -SLAC- Matt Poelker -Jlab- LCWS/ILC.
Effect of Re Alloying in W on Surface Morphology Changes After He + Bombardment at High Temperatures R.F. Radel, G.L. Kulcinski, J. F. Santarius, G. A.
High Intensity Polarized Electron Gun Studies at MIT-Bates 10/01/2008 PESP Evgeni Tsentalovich MIT.
DC photogun vacuum characterization through photocathode lifetime studies Marcy L. Stutzman, Philip Adderley, Joseph Grames, Matthew Poelker, Ken Surles-Law.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Lifetime Measurements.
Non-conservation of the charge lifetime at high average current R.Barday University Mainz, Germany INFN Milano-LASA 4-6 October 2006.
A high-peak and high-average current, low emittance, long lifetime electron source* for ERL applications Xiangyun Chang June 9, 2015 Patent applied for.
Spectral Response of GaAs(Cs, NF 3 ) Photocathodes Teresa Esposito Mentors: I. Bazarov, L. Cultrera, S. Karkare August 10, 2012.
4 th Electron-Ion Collider Workshop, Hampton University, Monday May 19 th, 2008 CEBAF Load-Lock Polarized Electron Photogun Joe Grames & Matt Poelker (Jefferson.
CEBAF Polarized Electron Guns Marcy L. Stutzman for the Jefferson Lab Polarized Source Group.
COPPER PHOTOCATHODES DEVELOPMENTS AT ASTEC R. Valizadeh Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Science & Technology Facility Council, UK.
Operated by Jefferson Science Associates, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Polarized Electron Beams.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility M. Baylac,
11/12/20151 Status of high intensity polarized electron gun project at MIT-Bates Evgeni Tsentalovich MIT.
Issued: May 5, 2010 Due: May 12, 2010 (at the start of class) Suggested reading: Kasap, Chapter 5, Sections Problems: Stanford University MatSci.
SPES Target Group Data…… INFN-CISAS-CNR collaboration The Ablation Ion Source for refractory metal ion beams A preliminary design.
DC Sputtering Disadvantage #1 Low secondary electron yield
Characterization of He implanted Eurofer97
Pull Force Measurements of the Magnetized Beam Solenoid
S. A. Rastigeev , A. R Frolov, A. D. Goncharov, V. F. Klyuev, E. S
Dissociation of Molecular Ions Studied by
Introduction and Goals
“Semiconductor Physics”
Ampere-class, High Quality RF Electron Source
MBE Growth of Graded Structures for Polarized Electron Emitters
Seok-geun Lee, Young-hwa An, Y.S. Hwang
M. Hernandez-Flores1, M.A. Mamun2, and M. Poelker2
GaAs Photocathode Development
DOE Plasma Science Center Control of Plasma Kinetics
Prof. Jang-Ung Park (박장웅)
Strong infrared electroluminescence from black silicon
Study of bialkali antimonide photocathode on NB substrate at Jlab
K2CsSb cathode tests at Jlab
Study of bialkali antimonide photocathode on NB substrate at Jlab
Further Measurements of Photocathode
June 9, 2015 Patent applied for.
Basic Semiconductor Physics
Magnetized Electron Beam for Ion Cooling at JLEIC
Atomic hydrogen exposure of strained layer GaAs photocathodes
ELIC Injector Working Group High-P, high-I source issues (DC)
Studies of Emittance & Lifetime
1.6 Glow Discharges and Plasma
Wei Liu Brookhaven National Laboratory
Basic Principles for Design of Ignition Systems
Hydrogen and Ultra-High Vacuum
June 9, 2015 Patent applied for.
LLGUN2 Biased Anode Commissioning
Presentation transcript:

Shukui Zhang, Matt Poelker, Marcy Stutzman The effects of ion bombardment on bulk GaAs photocathodes with different surface-cleavage planes Wei Liu Shukui Zhang, Matt Poelker, Marcy Stutzman Jefferson Lab

Ion back-bombardment in photo-gun Ion back-bombardment is the dominant lifetime-limiting mechanism of modern DC high voltage photo-gun Ion back-bombardment: the residual gas within the cathode/anode gap  ionized by the electron beam  accelerated to and implanted into photocathode  decrease the QE of photocathode (reduce the operating lifetime of photocathode) The electron ionization cross section change with the electron kinetic energy that ranges from 0 to 100 (even to 350) keV. Hydrogen is the dominant gas species inside a modern photo-gun QE map of photocathode in CEBAF J. Grames, PRST-AB 14, 043501 (2011) Electron impact ionization cross section for 𝐻 2

H-ions implantation into GaAs photocathode H-ions implant into the GaAs with different depth that depend on the H-ions energy When H-ions energy > 500 eV, they knock out the Ga or As atom leaving the vacancy in these positions Higher energy ions penetrate deeper into the GaAs and do more damage to the crystal structure compared to lower energy ions Hydrogen ion distribution within GaAs Vacancy distribution within GaAs

Experimental apparatus The chamber was baked at 200°C for 36 hours to achieve a high vacuum pressure: 10 −11 Torr The H-ion was provided by a Pyrex glass dissociator in which the molecular hydrogen was dissociated using an RF-inductive discharge created by a 12 turn coils The H-ion was accelerated by the negative voltage on the cathode and implanted into the photocathode Schematic and photograph of the UHV test apparatus

Ion trajectory from ion source to cathode The ions have initial energy with different directions Two bias-voltage are supplied on the cathode independently, and a picoammeter connected the voltage power supply to monitor the ion current (dose) at the cathode. The ion trajectory at different bias-voltage are different -100 V on the cathode -10 kV on the cathode

Experimental Photocathode samples (100) (110) (111A) Dopant GaAs-Zn Orientation (100) ±0.5° (110) ±0.5° (111A) ±0.5° Carrier concentration (a./c.c.) 1.0~1.3E19 1.3~1.4E19 1.1~1.14E19 Resistivity (ohm.cm) 6.6~7.7E-3 6.1~6.6E-3 7.17~7.38E-3 Mobility (cm2/v.s.) 74~80 71~74 77~78 Thickness (µm) 600~650 475~525 500~550 The samples were cleaved into 15×15 mm squares and attached to a sample holder fixed by a tantalum cap The specifications of three bulk GaAs samples with different surface-cleavage planes Three bulk GaAs samples with different surface-cleavage planes were used for this work This work serves to assess which cleave plane surface provides the highest QE and best resistance to ion implantation damage 13mm

Ion channeling for three GaAs surfaces Ion channeling: the positively charged particles (like the hydrogen ions) tend to follow the direction between two neighboring crystal planes The effective atomic number density for the (100), (110) and (111A) GaAs cleave planes are 8/ 𝑎 2 , 4 2 / 𝑎 2 , and 4 3 / 𝑎 2 , respectively. Ion channeling would be enhanced for GaAs (110) which possesses the smallest atomic number density (i.e., the most open space between crystalline layers) Schematic of the GaAs crystal for three surface-cleavage planes, viewed at normal incidence. From left to right, (100), (110) and (111A). 𝑎=5.6535Å

Experiment process Heat sample to 550°C for 1 hour and then cool to room temperature (RT) Activate the photocathode by applying Cs and 𝑁 𝐹 3 to the surface using a standard yo-yo activation protocol QE was mapped using a low power green laser beam and QE vs wavelength was measured Heat sample to 200°C for 30 minutes and then cool to RT The sample was biased at either 100 or 10,000 V and exposed to H-ions of a prescribed dose The sample was heated and re-activated multiple times to observe QE evolution

QE Vs wavelength for three samples The cleave planes (100) and (110), with equal amounts of Ga and As atoms at the surface, provided the highest QE, approximately 21% at the laser wavelength of 532 nm The cleave plane (111A), comprised of only Ga atoms at the surface, provided the lowest QE, approximately 19% at 532 nm QE versus laser wavelength for three bulk GaAs with different surface-cleavage planes, measured before ion implantation

Typical QE map of photocathode For 100 V ions: QE degradation was uniformly distributed across the sample For 10,000 V ions: QE degradation was focused on to a specific region of the sample Typical QE maps for bulk GaAs (111A) sample. (left) after third activation following implantation with 100 V H-ions. (right) after the third activation following implantation with 10,000 V H-ions

QE evolution for three samples Both 100 V and 10,000 V H-ions degrade the QE The QE degradation associated with 10,000 V ions was significantly greater than caused by 100 V ions Heating the sample to higher temperature and for long time restore QE For 100 V ions: QE could be completely restored by heating sample; For 10,000 V ions: only a fraction of the QE could be restored T (°C) 250 370 490 550 t (min) 20 30 60 QE (532 nm) versus heat cycles for bulk GaAs with three different surface cleave planes

QE ratio evolution for three samples The GaAs (110) - i.e., the sample with the most open space between atoms, and therefore the sample supporting the highest level of ion channeling - exhibited the highest QE ratio The GaAs (100) - i.e., the sample with the least open space between atoms, and therefore the sample supporting the lowest level of ion channeling - exhibited the lowest QE ratio QE ratio (532 nm) - samples implanted with 10,000 V H-ions to samples that were not exposed to H-ions for bulk GaAs with three different surface cleave planes T (°C) 250 370 490 550 t (min) 20 30 60

Summary Bulk GaAs was activated to QE near 20% at 532 nm. GaAs (100) provide the highest QE, and GaAs (111A) provide the lowest QE Both high and low energy H-ion implantation reduce QE Cleave plane (110) was the least sensitive to ion bombardment and cleave plane (100) was the most sensitive The best choice for a photo-gun using bulk GaAs would be cleave plane (110) Plane Max QE (532 nm) Recovered QE (100 V) Recovered QE (10,000 V) (100) 21.16 19.09 6.27 (110) 20.89 20.18 7.58 (111A) 18.67 18.4 6.34

Thank you for your attention