Trial profile Luc F Van Gaal, Lancet 2005;365:1389.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Metabolic Syndrome in Non-Diabetics Vilanova Fillat, M.B. Falguera Vilamajó, M. Garriga Badia, A. Miró Vallvé, N. Cebrian Aiguadé, C. Escardó Font, C Bacompte.
Advertisements

Trial profile Fox K et al. Lancet 2008;372:
Rimonabant: New therapeutic option for managing cardiometabolic risk.
Effectiveness of interactive web-based lifestyle program on prevention of cardiovascular diseases risk factors in patient with metabolic syndrome: a randomized.
Cardiovascular Disease in Women Module III: Risk Assessment Tool.
A Randomised Double-Blind Study of Weight Reducing Effect and Safety of Rimonabant in Obese Patients with or without Comorbidities A Randomised Double-Blind.
* Plus–minus values are means ±SD. † Race was determined by the investigator. ‡ The body-mass index is the weight in kilograms divided by the square of.
Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes FIELDFIELD Presented at The American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, November 2005 Presented.
Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) The Lancet, Vol 344, November 19, 1994.
SPARCL Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels trial.
Arterial Biology for the Investigation of the Treatment Effects of Reducing Cholesterol 2 ARBITER-2 Trial Presented at The American Heart Association Scientific.
VBWG PROactive: Study design Dormandy JA et al. Lancet. 2005;366: Charbonnel B et al. Diabetes Care. 2004;27: Objective: Assess the effects.
The University of Wisconsin Medical School The Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention Treating Tobacco Addiction in a Subject concerned about Weight.
02-15 INFC Substitution of raltegravir for ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors in HIV-infected patients: The SPIRAL study* 1 Date of preparation:
 2010 Cengage-Wadsworth Preventing Cardiovascular Disease Chapter 11.
4S: Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study
Trial profile Prakash Deedwania, et al. Lancet 2006; 368:
Trial profile The FIELD study investigators, Lancet Published online November 14, 2005.
Number of participants with diabetes by trial Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaborators Lancet 2008;371:
Patients’ Assignments,Values at Screening, and Baseline Efficacy and Safety Values - PartI JP Després, N Engl J Med 2005; 353:
Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Switch from TDF to TAF GS-US Study GS-US Study
From ESH 2016 | LB 3: Davide Agnoletti, MD
The SPRINT Research Group
C-CORAL Study: elbasvir/grazoprevir for genotype 1, 4, 6
RESULTS OF THE RIMONABANT IN OBESITY (RIO) PROGRAM AT 1 YEAR
Martha Carvour, MD, PhD March 2, 2017
Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease
Switch from TDF to TAF GS-US Study GS-US Study
ASSOCIATIONS OF METABOLIC SYNDROME COMPONENTS WITH CRITERIA FOR THE CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS OF THE METABOLIC SYNDROME AS PROPOSED BY THE NCEP-ATP III Metabolic.
Comparison of baseline characteristics in participants who subsequently had an incident cardiovascular event or new-onset diabetes in the Prospective.
National Cholesterol Education Program
End point Rimonabant 20 mg (n=339) Placebo (n=348) p Weight (kg) -5.3
Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)
AIM-HIGH Niacin Plus Statin to Prevent Vascular Events
Effects of High Density Lipoprotein Raising Therapies on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, with or without Renal Impairment:
The Fight Against Obesity as a Disease: Tackling the Core of the Condition.
The following slides highlight a discussion and analysis of a Satellite Symposium presented at the 55th Annual Scientific Session of the American College.
The "Metabolically Healthy Obese"
Switch from TDF to TAF GS-US Study GS-US Study
Can Primary Care Physicians Take the Lead in Combating Obesity?
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
Metabolically Healthy Patients With Obesity
EVITA Trial design: Smokers admitted with an acute coronary syndrome were randomized to varenicline 1 mg twice daily (n = 151) vs. placebo (n = 151). Study.
Placebo group 5-mg rimonabant group p 20-mg rimonabant group
Trial profile John A Dormandy et al. Lancet 2005;366:
Estimated Number of Cancer Cases (in Thousands) Attributable to Excess Body Mass
Relative risk of major events with atenolol vs placebo
Jun M, et al. Lancet 2010 Epub May 10
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. doi: /nrgastro
Aspirin and Cardioprevention in 2018
Efficacy and safety of niacin/laropiprant
The Fight Against Obesity as a Disease: Tackling the Core of the Condition.
Trial profile GISSI-HF investigators. Lancet 2008; Aug 29 [Epub ahead of print]
Trial profile GISSI-HF investigators. Lancet 2008; Aug 29 [Epub ahead of print]
Comparison of INSTI – Phase 2
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
NGM282 in NASH: 3 mg vs 6 mg QD (phase 2)
Flow of Patients Through Trial
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
Baseline Characteristics, Blood Pressures, and Laboratory Values
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
Addressing Cardiovascular Events:
The ACCORD Study Group. NEJM 2010; Epub March 14
PROSPER: trial design                                                                                                                                                                 
The percentage of patients with baseline BSA ≥ 3% in the ITT population who achieved (a) PASI 75, (c) PASI 90, and (e) PASI 100 during the 24-week double-blind.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Translating Data From Trial to Practice
Presentation transcript:

Trial profile Luc F Van Gaal, Lancet 2005;365:1389

Baseline characteristics Luc F Van Gaal, Lancet 2005;365:1389

Change from baseline in bodyweight (A) and waist circumference (B) Luc F Van Gaal, Lancet 2005;365:1389

Changes in metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors in ITT population Part I Luc F Van Gaal, Lancet 2005;365:1389

Changes in metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors in ITT population Part II Luc F Van Gaal, Lancet 2005;365:1389

Changes in metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors in ITT population Part III Luc F Van Gaal, Lancet 2005;365:1389

Changes in selected metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors in patients who completed 1 year follow-up Part I Luc F Van Gaal, Lancet 2005;365:1389

Changes in selected metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors in patients who completed 1 year follow-up Part II Luc F Van Gaal, Lancet 2005;365:1389

Changes in selected metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors in patients who completed 1 year follow-up Part III Luc F Van Gaal, Lancet 2005;365:1389

Proportion of patients who lost 5% and 10% of baseline weight at 1 year *p<0.001 vs placebo. †p=0.002 vs placebo. Luc F Van Gaal, Lancet 2005;365:1389

Mean percentage change from baseline in HDL-cholesterol (A) and triglycerides (B) *p<0.001 vs placebo. †p=0.002 vs placebo. Luc F Van Gaal, Lancet 2005;365:1389

Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in the ITT and completer populations at baseline and after 1 year of treatment Luc F Van Gaal, Lancet 2005;365:1389

Patients reporting adverse events (≥5% in any treatment group) Luc F Van Gaal, Lancet 2005;365:1389

Serious adverse events by system organ class during the double-blind period of the trial Luc F Van Gaal, Lancet 2005;365:1389

Patients reporting adverse events leading to discontinuation Luc F Van Gaal, Lancet 2005;365:1389

Hypothetical model of role of central and peripheral components of endocannabinoid system in regulation of food intake and peripheral metabolism Luc F Van Gaal, Lancet 2005;365:1389