Understanding logic, structure and documentation of the project

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Il Project Cycle Management :A Technical Guide The Logical Framework Approach 1 1.
Advertisements

3 rd Financial Managers Seminar Brussels 19 May 2010 Eligibility period and reporting eligible expenditure.
Proposal Development Guidelines for Signature Grantee Semi-Finalists The Covenant Foundation.
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals The Covenant Foundation.
Accountability in the EU Accounting for performance – How to account for policy and regulatory impact EU Accountability Conference 14 October 2014 Manfred.
Parts of the project proposal
Project funded by The European Union Government of the Republic of Serbia European Integration Office INDUCTION TRAINING SEIO GENERAL FRAMEWORK CREATED.
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME SUCCESS FACTORS FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT: focus on activities and partnership JTS CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME.
KA2 – Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of good practices Capacity Building in the field of Higher Education (CBHE) Application and selection.
Programme/ Project Title Programme/ Project Leader Project Team Members.
1 CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT Lecture 5 Monitoring Review Evaluation.
2014 AmeriCorps External Reviewer Training
CONCEPT PAPER RESULT BASED PLANNING. RESULT-ORIENTED PLANNING Overall Objective/ Goal Specific Objective/ Purposes Expected Result/ Output Activities.
This project is funded by the EUAnd implemented by a consortium led by MWH Logical Framework and Indicators.
1 Framework Programme 7 Guide for Applicants
May 12 th Monitoring and Project Control. Objectives Anticipated Outcomes Express why Monitoring and Controlling are Important. Differentiate between.
Considering the Costs of MUS Interventions. Direct Costs v. Opportunity Costs Direct Costs Expenditures and investments to achieve a particular outcome.
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.
MOD 6050 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND FUND RAISING TOPIC – PROPOSAL WRITING AND FUNDRAISING (WK 6 &8) LECTURER: DR. G. O. K’AOL.
Promising Ideas and Issues to Consider in Reaching Reading and Literacy Goals Logistics of supervision, training, support to teachers Sakil Malik Director.
EuropeAid How to benefit from EC grants? ‘Calls for Proposals’ Thematic Operations EuropeAid Cooperation Office.
EuropeAid How can an NGO benefit from EC grants? ‘Calls for Proposals’ Thematic Operations EuropeAid Cooperation Office Athens, 25 September 2008.
Narrative reporting: good practices. Joint Technical Secretariat Seminar for Beneficiaries February 2012 Narva, Estonia.
Aaron Zazueta Chief Evaluation Officer 2013 EVALUATION IN THE GEF.
UK Aid Direct Introduction to Logframes (only required at proposal stage)
Project Management Learning Program 7-18 May 2012, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Writing Project Report Multi-Purpose Reporting.
ETCF-II is implemented by EUROCHAMBRES& TOBB TOBB ETCF-II is co-funded by the European Union and Turkey 1 CIVIL SOCIETY DIALOGUE- EU-TURKEY CHAMBERS FORUM.
Advice on Data Used to Measure Outcomes Friday 20 th March 2009.
Statistical manual 2012 Statistical manual for project and programmes of the EEA and Norway Grants 2009 – August
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals The Covenant Foundation.
M&E TRAINING MODULES Different tools for different applications.
1 Tempus Tempus Workshop Sarajevo 7 June 2006 « Good practice in Preparing an Application » Anne Collette European Training Foundation Tempus Department.
Statistical manual 2012 Statistical manual for project and programmes of the EEA and Norway Grants 2009 – 2014 Riga 5 March
Grant Application Form (Annex A) Grant Application Form (Annex A) 2nd Call for Proposals.
Proposal Development Guidelines for Signature Grantee Semi-Finalists The Covenant Foundation.
Key Components of a successful Proposal OAS / IACML Workshop on Technical Assistance. San José, Costa Rica May 8, 2007 By: José Luis Alvarez R. Consultant.
DG Justice and Consumers Project Modifications DG Justice and Consumers.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Allison Nichols, Ed.D. Extension Specialist in Evaluation.
Recommendations on project/action design and structure.
Building an ENI CBC project
M&E Workshop for Full Proposal
Num Dum Case Study.
RCA Project on Establishing a Benchmark for Assessing the Radiological Impact of Nuclear Power Activities on the Marine Environment in the Asia and Pacific.
Interreg V-A Romania-Bulgaria Programme
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 8. Routine monitoring.
Annex G1 template - Output-outcome-impact logic overview
Measuring Outcomes of GEO and GEOSS: A Proposed Framework for Performance Measurement and Evaluation Ed Washburn, US EPA.
Project Proposal Template
11/18/2018 ANNUAL performance PLAN (2018/19) NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE – 02 MAY 2018.
FP7 SCIENTIFIC NEGOTIATIONS Astrid Kaemena European Commission
12/5/2018 ANNUAL performance PLAN (2018/19) NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY Select COMMITTEE – 19 June 2018.
FP7 SCIENTIFIC NEGOTIATIONS
Information session SCIENTIFIC NEGOTIATIONS Call FP7-ENV-2013-two-stage "Environment (including climate change)" Brussels 22/05/2013 José M. Jiménez.
Information session SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL NEGOTIATIONS Call FP7-ENV-2013-WATER-INNO-DEMO "Environment (including climate change)" Brussels 24/06/2013.
Session 9 Recap on LFM and IL.
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Project Management Training
Format for an Action Plan
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee - Labour
Logframe Consultation seminar on the preparation of full Application Form for LSP 6 December 2011, Tartu.
What is your impact pathway?
Civil Society Facility and Media Programme Call for proposals: EuropeAid/162473/DH/ACT/Multi Webinar no. 3: Preparing effective Concept Note.
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
How is an M & E framework derived from the logframe?
Introduction to HPMP.
Gender Training Workshop Name of Institution Place Date
M & E Plans and Frameworks
Presentation transcript:

Understanding logic, structure and documentation of the project Project Management and Implementation Training for Grant Beneficiaries and Partners TC Programme Belarus-Ukraine Kyiv, 27.11-01.12. 2017

Contents of the Application Annex A Grant Application Form Annex B Budget Annex C Logical Framework

Grant Application Part B. Full Application Part A. Concept Note Annex A Grant Application Form

Indicative Action Plan Full application Description Work Packages Description Indicative Action Plan

Budget Budget Sheet/Table 1 Budget Sheet/Table 2 Budget Sheet/Table 3 Types (means) and amounts of costs Justification and estimation of costs Sources of funding

Logical Framework (LFM) Annex C Logical Framework Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) (ref. date Current value Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs:

Project about the change better change project good good change bad A project is instrument for delivering actual change This change must bring concrete benefits These benefits must be measurable/evaluable The ultimate value of the benefits must significantly exceeding the project costs

Project components PROJECT impact outcomes outputs activities input Primary and secondary, long term effects produced by the Action Likely or achieved short-term and medium-term effects of an Action’s outputs Products, capital goods and services which result from an Action’s activities Project operation requiring utilization of assigned resources Physical and non physical resources (financial, administrative, regulatory, facilities, equipment and etc.) outcomes project outputs activities input

Contents of the LFM Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) (ref. date Current value Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) (ref. date Current value Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) (ref. date Current value Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) (ref. date Current value Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) (ref. date Current value Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs:

Project implementation logic Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) (ref. date Current value Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: impact Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: outcomes outputs activities input

Inputs: means and costs Budget Sheet 1 Budget Sheet 3 LFM Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Budget Sheet 2 Part A. Concept Note

Indicative Action Plan Activities Part B. Description Work Packages Part B. Description Indicative Action Plan Budget Sheet 2 LFM Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Part A. Concept Note

Outputs Part B. Description Work Packages Budget Sheet 2 LFM Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Part A. Concept Note

Outcomes Part B. Description Work Packages Budget Sheet 2 LFM Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Part A. Concept Note

Impact Part A. Relevance LFM Part A. Concept Note Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Part A. Concept Note

Working planning: Detailed Action Plan Part B. Description Indicative Action Plan

Working planning: Financial Plan Detailed Action Plan Financial Plan Budget WS1 WS3

Coordination of documentation Full Application Detailed Action Plan Concept Note Action Plan Financial Plan Budget WS1 LFM Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: Intervention logic Indicators Baseline (ref. year) Current value (ref. date Targets Sources and means of verification Assumptions Overall objective: Impact Specific objective(s): outcome(s) Outputs Activities Means: Costs: WS2 WS3

Thank you for your attention. Georgui Baranets georgui. baranets@eaptc Thank you for your attention! Georgui Baranets georgui.baranets@eaptc.eu