Chief School Officers January 2019 State Updates.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Advertisements

(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
CAC NOVEMBER 13, 2014 Common Core State Standards and Universal Design for Learning.
New York State’s Teacher and Principal Evaluation System VOLUME I: NYSED APPR PLAN SUBMISSION “TIPS”
STAAR Alternate is the state assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities.
Texas State Accountability 2013 and Beyond Current T.E.A. Framework as of March 22, 2013 Austin Independent School District Bill Caritj, Chief Performance.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Understanding Changes to Assessments for APPR Purposes Theresa L. Gray, Coordinator Integrated Education Services (IES) Erie 2-Chautauqua-Cattaraugus BOCES.
Targeted Efforts to Improve Learning for ALL Students.
NYS Assessment Updates & Processes for New Social Studies Regents Exams September 18, 2014 Candace Shyer Assistant Commissioner for Assessment, Standards.
Ramapo Teachers’ Association APPR Contractual Changes.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
1 Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Standards (OCIS) Update Holiday Inn Albany, New York October 15, 2010.
Student Learning Objectives It’s Been a SLO Summer.
Science & Technology Grades Spring 2007
Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Standards (OCIS) The Albany Marriott Albany, New York September 15, 2010.
ID Conference August 11, 2015 Act 55: the Biennial Budget You will also be able find the summary document here:
Master Teacher Program Presenters:Ginny Elliott Winifred Nweke.
Highlights of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Waiver Renewal Application.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. District Assessment Coordinators Annual Meeting September 8, 2015.
BOCES Advisory Council for Curriculum & Instruction NYS Board of Regents Adjustment Options to Common Core Implementation Teresa Prendergast, Ed.D. Garden.
The APPR Process And BOCES. Sections 3012-c and 3020 of Education Law (as amended)  Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) based on:  Student.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2013 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting State.
Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Standards (OCIS) The Albany Marriott Albany, New York December 2, 2010.
October 2009 Oregon Department of Education 1 Diploma Options 2009.
Fall 2010 Mathematics Standards of Learning Assessment Update - 1 -
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Math Results.
APPR: Ready or Not Joan Townley & Andy Greene October 20 and 21, 2011.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
January 15, Utilization of the Personal Curriculum.
May Education in the Budget Evaluation; Tenure; Tenured teacher disciplinary hearings; Teacher preparation and certification; and Intervention in.
APPR Updates Office of Teacher/Principal Quality and Professional Development.
APPR Updates Office of Teacher/Principal Quality and Professional Development.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Annual Assessment and Accountability Meeting Updates
Opening Frame The Issue Labels Traditional Cert Pathways
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
Volusia County Schools
High School Exiting CREDENTIALS
2007 Article VII # ELFA 8 Education, Labor, and Family Assistance
The NEW Distance Education Guidelines
Update to the Diploma Requirements
Test Accommodations.
Update to the Diploma Requirements
Graduation Options RSE-TASC Jennifer Cacioppo, Transition Specialist
Updates to the New York State Diploma Requirements
Erie 2 Regional Curriculum Council March 14, 2012
North Carolina State Board of Education Update
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
ELE PROPOSED REGULATIONS and the LOOK ACT
APPR Overview 3012c Draft Revision March 2012
Common Core State Standards: A Statewide Dialogue
ECDS Early Childhood Data System Texas Student Data System
IEP Basics for Parents and Families
Multiple Pathways to Graduation for General/Special Education Students
2019 Local School District Charter Application Process
Common Core State Standards: A Statewide Dialogue
Creating Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Elmira Heights Central School District
WAVE Presentation on Draft ESSA Plan.
Grade 3 Reading Student Portfolio
Marybeth Casey, Director
2013 Grade 3 Reading Student Portfolio
ECDS Early Childhood Data System Texas Student Data System
Santa Ana Unified School District Dept. of Research and Evaluation
Annual Professional Performance Review APPR
District Assessment Report
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Chief School Officers January 2019 State Updates

Special Education Update Chris Suriano (Assistant Commissioner for Special Education) reviewed the restructuring of the Office of Special Education (OSE) with the DS’s and the manner in which this affects the new RFP’s (for former RSE-TASC, SESIS, PBIS and ECDC) The change in the Office of Special Education was designed to improve the ways that students with disabilities are supported and will be markedly different (SEQA and other regulatory bodies in particular). The reorganization is a complete restructuring of the special education organization at SED. This will effect how they monitor and assist districts beginning immediately. More to come when we get a new OSE organizational chart.

Substantial Equivalency Training on Substantial Equivalency will be held in our region on a date to be determined. Anyone who will be participating in the review process should participate in the training.

Curriculum and Instruction Civic readiness initiative: A civic readiness task force has been working on defining civic readiness, creating criteria for a seal of civic readiness, exploring capstone projects, and exploring the concept of creating a designation for districts that provide exemplary programming. An editable format Next Generation Leadership Standards roadmap has been posted so that districts may use it to record progress. The Road map can be found at http://www.nysed.gov/common/nysed/files/programs/curriculum-instruction/editable-roadmap- 011019.pdf New toolkits for professional development have been published on standards and the instructional cycle and on establishing a standards-based IEP. They can be found at http://www.nysed.gov/common/nysed/files/programs/curriculum-instruction/standards-based- iep.pdf New high school science course maps are being developed and will be used to develop regents exams and course guidance. A timeline for new science assessments was also posted. They can be found at http://www.nysed.gov/curriculum-instruction/science-standards-implementation- resources High school guidance resources on multiple pathways and CDOS are also available. They can be found at http://www.nysed.gov/curriculum-instruction/news/new-math-and-ela-standards- implementation-resources-available

Teacher and Principal Evaluation The bill that was proposed last year on APPR was passed by the Assembly §783 and Senate §1262. The full text of the proposed legislation contained in the bill can be found here: https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2019/s1262 It has been signed by the Governor. A summary of the Bills provisions is as follows:

NYS SENATE SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1 of the bill would establish a new subdivision 16 of section 3012-d of the Education Law to make the use of state-created or administered tests optional instead of mandatory. This includes all state created or administered tests including the grades three through eight English language arts and mathematics state tests and the high school Regents examinations. Additionally, the Commissioner would be required to promulgate regulations for alternative assessments that may be used to determine a teacher or principal's evaluation in place of the state- created or administered tests. The selection and use of an assessment in a teacher or principal's evaluation must be subject to collective bargaining. Furthermore, this section allows school districts to keep their current APPR plans until a successor plan is negotiated and entered into, ensuring districts do not lose their state aid increases. Section 2 of the bill modifies subdivision 4 of section 3012-d of the Education Law to eliminate the use of the state-provided growth model in a teacher or principal's evaluation. All teachers would be required to have a student learning objective (SLO) consistent with a goal-setting process determined or developed by the Commissioner as the first subcomponent for the student performance category. Section 3 of the bill modifies subdivision 5 of section 3012-d of the Education Law to eliminate certain rules pertaining to state-created or administered tests used to determine a teacher or principal's overall rating. Section 4 of the bill modifies subdivision 7 of section 3012-d of the Education Law to eliminate certain rules pertaining to state-created or administered tests used to determine a teacher or principal's overall rating. Section 5 of the bill modifies subdivision 10 of section 3012-d of the Education Law to provide conforming language. Section 6 of the bill makes permanent provisions prohibiting state-administered grades 3 through 8 standardized English language arts or mathematics assessments scores to be included on a student's permanent record. Section 7 of the bill provides the effective date as immediately.

Professional Development (Learning) Plan Regulations Amendments were made to the proposed regulation on Professional Learning Plans in response to the comments received. As a result, the proposed regulation is going back out for public comment this month for another 30 days. The amendments added language to the CTLE component that would extend the number of hours that a mentor could receive for mentoring a first year teacher to 30 and for a student teacher to 25 (Currently 25 and 15 respectively). The provision that disallowed receiving both a stipend from the college for supervising student teachers and CTLE hours was removed. Changes were also made in the area of allowing some members of the professional development teams to not attend all meetings.

Substitute Teacher Regulations After a significant amount of discussion at the BOR meeting the item on substitute teaching was not voted on. The Commissioner indicated that this item will be held until more discussions are held with Board of Regents members. There is a lack of understanding on the part of many members of the Board of Regents on how substitutes are hired and used in schools outside of NYC and the other Big 4. The Commissioner indicated that if a district has an issue of health and safety because of the lack of a substitutethe DS should contact the Commissioner to talk about a potential solution.

Education Law 2D Regulations The regulations on Education 2D are out for comment and the Commissioner urged everyone to review the regulations and provide comments. The power point and regulations can be found here http://www.regents.nysed.gov/common/regents/files/119p12d1.pdf There are multiple that implications of these regulations for school districts and BOCES that Superintendents etc. have to understand. The Commissioner asked that staff in the component districts read the regulations and respond to them. You can respond to the 2D regulations at regcomments@mail.nysed.gov and the notice of public comment can be found at https://govt.westlaw.com/nyreg/Document/Id010f7e823b011e9ba8fe7f346046a7f?vie wType=FullText&originationContext=documenttoc&transitionType=CategoryPageItem &contextData=(sc.Default)&bhcp=1

180 Day Calendar Brian Cechnicki reviewed the changes to the spreadsheet and the website. You have all seen the model calendar as we piloted it from He suggested that all districts should start using the spreadsheet as it may need to be submitted to SAMS starting this year. If you have not already done so Please make sure that check calendars to ensure that they meet the requirements. Superintendents will need to sign off that they are in compliance and that signing off on it knowing that you are not in compliance is a Part 83 offense