Source Screening and Measures Sheets for WG/E Brussels 21/10/10

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Water.europa.eu Review of priority substances under the WFD Chemicals and Water Workshop European Environment Agency Copenhagen 6-7 December 2010 Helen.
Advertisements

Chapter 2.1 Definition and classification
Jerevan November Tailing dams inspection Juliane Knaul Legal Expert, Agency of Mining, Geology and Minerals of Brandenburg, Germany AGENCY.
Law approximation and implementation in Hungary Ministry for Environment Department of Integrated Pollution Control Nicosia, May 2001 Andrea Nám, desk.
Discharges of Dangerous Substance Directive 76/464/EEC and “daughter” directives Multilateral Screening Meeting - Croatia and Turkey Chapter 27 – Environment.
1. Panama is in the industrial phase of transition. Describe the expected trends in the country’s birth and death rates. 2. Describe one advantage and.
Harmonization and Implementation/Enforcement of Environmental Legislation in the field of Industrial Pollution Control in Latvia Ilze Kirstuka Director.
European Commission, DG Environment Unit B.1: Water, Marine and Soil EU Substitution Conference - Hamburg, 13/14 June 2002 Slide 1 EU Conference on Substitution.
Chemicals and Water A European Environment Agency (EEA) perspective Rob Collins Water Group EEA.
Environmental Engineering
Water Seminar – 14 April 2010, Athlone European Communities environmental objectives (Groundwater) Regulations 2010 S.I. 9. of 2010 Colin Byrne Water Inspector.
Table 3 SWMI – Water Matters –Topics – 1Dangerous Substances 2Forestry 3Septic Tanks (Unsewered Properties) Shannon International River Basin District.
Preview of the Draft River Basin Management Plan SERBD Advisory Council September 2008.
Commission’s Communication A renewed vision for the pharmaceutical sector Peter Korytár European Commission – DG Environment Uppsala, 11 November 2009.
Emission control in Bulgaria The involved institutions at national and local (sub-national) levels in Emissions inventory are Ministry of Environment.
Ministry of Waters and Environmental Protection, ROMANIA 1 BERCEN 1 st Exchange program – November 2002 Croatia PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS IN COOPERATION.
Definition, sources and causes
«WATER QUALITY & EU POLICY» KATHERINE-JOANNE HARALAMBOUS NTUA Professor «WATER QUALITY & EU POLICY» KATHERINE-JOANNE HARALAMBOUS NTUA Professor NATIONAL.
Water.europa.eu Policy update with regard to Priority and Emerging Substances SOCOPSE Final Conference Maastricht, June 2009 Jorge Rodriguez Romero.
Draft Guidelines on Best Available Techniques (BAT) and Best Environmental Practices (BEP) Dale Evarts BAT/BEP Expert Group Stockholm Convention: Regional.
MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification Environmental.
THE GEOGRAPHY OF POLLUTION. GROUNDING INDUSTRY AND POLLUTION As a country develops, it industrializes, and industrial waste products are major polluters.
ERT 319 Industrial Waste Treatment Semester /2013 Huzairy Hassan School of Bioprocess Engineering UniMAP.
Lesson 1.5 Pg
Page 1 Annexes of the Directive 96/61/ES on IPPC Agency on Integrated Prevention Ms. Lucie Svobodová Integrated and Planned Enforcement of Environmental.
1 Short overview of the implementation of IPPC, LCP, Seveso II, Waste Landfill and Incineration directives Short overview of the implementation of IPPC,
Ukraine Petro Nakhaba All-Ukrainian Public Organization “ Chysta Khvylya ” Deputy Head Kyiv, Ukraine Contaminated Sites Management Joint UMOE-DEPA Project.
1 Review of the IPPC Directive and related legislation Second Meeting Of Working Group E On Priority Substances 17 October 2007 Filip FRANCOIS – DG ENV.
June 2009 Regulation on pesticide statistics Pierre NADIN ESTAT E1- Farms, agro-environment and rural development
Priority Substances - Source Screening and Measures Sheets Tenth Meeting of Working Group E on Chemical Aspects 24 June 2010.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 27 – Environment Bilateral screening:
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 27 – Environment and Climate Change.
1.5 Nature of pollution. Pollution is The addition to an environment of a substance or an agent (such as heat) by human activity faster than it can be.
ENVIRONMENTAL DUE DILIGENCE
What is the problem? Emerging understanding:
Exposure Modelling Day 1.
Soil Pollution 2: Electric Boogaloo -The powerpoint-
Annexes of the Directive 96/61/ES on IPPC
WELCOME.
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Relationship between EUROWATERNET and the Water Framework Directive, and for broader water reporting Steve Nixon ETC/WTR.
Principles and Key Issues
Project Briefing for WG/E Brussels 15/03/10
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
Groundwater legislative framework
Agenda item 8b WISE SoE reporting 2015 state of the play
Anna Hall Senior Groundwater Advisor
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
SOIL CONTAMINATION.
Han Blok, Royal Haskoning
Purpose Independent piece of legislation, closely integrated in a larger regulatory framework (complement to WFD): prevent deterioration protect, enhance.
Review of the WFD priority substances list
Environmental Law and Regulations
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
Reporting for MSFD Article 13 and 14 –
Proposed EQS Directive
European Commission DG ENV Unit C1 Water
Groundwater monitoring within the WFD
Draft examples of possible GES Decision criteria Descriptor 9
Report on the application of the POP Regulation
Background document: How to build the Inventory of Emissions, Discharges and Losses: main elements and compilation of existing datasets (2007) DG on inventory.
Drafting group Mixing Zones
Reduction of total releases from unintentional production of POPs
Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC
Part I.
13th Working Group E meeting March 2011 Jorge Rodriguez Romero
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
WG Hazardous substances * Marine Strategy 19 November 2003
Benoît FRIBOURG-BLANC, IOW
Data specifications for IED Annex II Module 4
Presentation transcript:

Source Screening and Measures Sheets for WG/E Brussels 21/10/10 Technical Support for the Impact Assessment of the Review of Priority Substances under Directive 2000/60/EC Source Screening and Measures Sheets for WG/E Brussels 21/10/10

Introduction Source-screening and measures sheets For new substances only (Sheets for existing substances were done by WRc/Milieu) Draft sheets were circulated by the Commission on 18/08/2010 Initial responses requested by 10/09/2010 Further responses requested in October Updates to the sheets will be made based on feedback

Source screening and measures sheets Purpose To identify sources of substance to the water environment For each source, to identify existing measures for emission control Approach Concept paper on the control of emissions, discharges and losses of priority substances and priority hazardous substances in the framework of article 16 of Directive 2000/60/EC Source screening Account for production, uses, disposal, historic Sources classified by risk of whether they may result in or contribute to failure of WFD objectives Identification of relevant legislative / policy measures control or supporting

Classification of potential failure of WFD objectives Source/pathway may result in or contribute to potential failure of WFD objectives Not enough quantitative information available to allow classification in category 1 or 3; source/pathway will be reviewed as more data become available No potential release from source/pathway, or source/pathway does not contribute to potential failure of WFD objectives

Summary of sources Diffuse sources- especially for agricultural, and also for those with emissions to air Point sources- production, use and disposal Historic contamination- may apply to substances such as heptachlor, PCBs that are no longer used/emissions heavily controlled Atmospheric emissions- substances such as PCBs and dioxins may be emitted to air and then deposited to water

Overview of main measures - pesticides Control Directive 91/414/EC (pesticides). Regulation 1107/2009, which will replace 91/414/EC regarding the placement of plant protection products on the market Directive 2009/128/EC establishing a framework for Community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides Directive 98/8/EC (biocides) Supporting Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009 concerning statistics on pesticides Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin; and amendment Regulation (EC) No 149/2008, setting maximum residue levels for products in Annexes II, III and IV Substances are considered to be registered under REACH, i.e. Article 15(1) of REACH applies

Overview of main measures-pharmaceuticals Control Regulation 470/2009 laying down Community procedures for the establishment of residue limits of pharmacologically active substances in foodstuffs of animal origin, and Regulation (EU) No 37/2010, on pharmacologically active substances and their classification regarding maximum residue limits in foodstuffs of animal origin Directive 2008/1/EC (IPPC) concerning integrated pollution prevention and control (codified version) as amended by Directive 2009/31/EC. Industrial production is regulated by the IPPC Directive (chemical industry). Support Directive 2000/60/EC and Directive 91/271/EEC, amended by Directive 98/15/EC and EC Regulation 1882/2003): indirect effect through increasing treatment at STP Wastewater improvements under UWWTD - Council Directive 91/271/EEC concerning urban waste-water treatment (also applicable to Birds and Habitats Directive , Shellfish and Bathing Water directives.) Directive 2001/83/EC (medicinal products for human use) and associated guidance on environmental risk assessment, EMEA/CHMP/SWP/4447/00. Also amending directives in 2004 (Directive 2004/27/EC on human medicine) and 2010

Overview of main measures- 'industrial' Control Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). Registration, specific restrictions and possible authorisation Directive 2008/1/EC (IPPC) concerning integrated pollution prevention and control (codified version) as amended by Directive 2009/31/EC. Industrial production is regulated by the IPPC Directive (chemical industry). Voluntary initiatives Support 2004/35/EC on the prevention and remedying of environmental damage Regulation (EC) No 166/2006 concerning the establishment of a European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register and amending Directives 91/689/EEC and 96/61/EC

Overview of main measures- disused substances Control Stockholm Convention and Regulation 2004/850/EC Supporting Directive 1999/31/EC on the landfill of waste Waste framework Directive 2006/12/EC (which is the codified version of Directive 75/442/EEC as amended). Directive 75/442/EEC on Waste; Directive 91/689/EEC on hazardous waste; Decision 2000/532 establishing a list of wastes; and decision 2001/118/EC Regulation (EC) No 166/2006 concerning the establishment of a European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register and amending Directives 91/689/EEC and 96/61/EC Supporting- 2004/35/EC on the prevention and remedying of environmental damage

Responses on draft sheets Additional information on cyanides and measures from industry "International Cyanide Management Code For The Manufacture, Transport and Use of Cyanide In The Production of Gold" (Cyanide Code) is a voluntary UNEP initiative for the gold mining industry endorsed by the EU. Control – Environmental Impact Assessment Directive Control – Directive 2006/21/EC on management of wastes from the extractive industries. Updates from Latvia Aclinofen and zinc – emissions data Updates from Portugal Changes to risk category - dioxin, PCB, 17 alpha, cyanides, HBCDD and zinc (mostly noting cases where risk category should be increased to 1)

Portugal comments (1) Source / pathway Current Proposed Comments Dioxins S3 Due to agricultural activities (via leaching erosion, spills, direct drainage discharges) 2 1 Dioxins could be present in sewage sludge originated from domestic wastewater, due to the secondary reactions involving organochlorinated compounds, in particular, in laundry wastewater. Since sewage sludge is used as fertilizer, dioxins could be deposed on agriculture land. Therefore, the risk category will be 1, according the methodology proposed for categorisation of importance of sources and pathways (see references). S8 Discharges in sewage effluents or storm water as a result of households consumer use The substance is not used in the home; it could result from the formation of by-products from chemical reactions that involve organochlorinated compounds (e.g. bleaches). Regarding the methodology for categorisation, the substance does not falling under category 1 or 3. S9.2 Large industrial point sources, direct or via STP (IPPC installations) 3 IPPC installations include solid waste facilities that are not coved by S10.1 (landfill without wastewater treatment) or S10.2 (Incineration with wastewater treatment). Dioxins can arise by thermal processes or from incomplete combustion processes involving chlorine or chlorine compounds, i.e., unwanted reactions that may occur in the solid waste deposition and treatment. Therefore, these installations are potential sources with direct discharges to surface water (with treatment) or to sewer. Regarding the methodology for categorisation, the substance falls into category 1. S10 Solid waste treatment S10.1 Landfills (or old waste deposits) Idem S10.2 Incineration

Portugal comments (2) Substance Source / pathway Current Proposed PCB S3 Due to agricultural activities (via leaching erosion, spills, direct drainage discharges) 2 1 Due to low solubility in water and the lipophilic nature of PCBs, these compounds tend to concentrate in sewage sludge originated from urban wastewater. Since sewage sludge is used as fertilizer, PCBs could be deposed on agriculture land. Therefore, the risk category will be 1, according the methodology proposed for categorisation of importance of sources and pathways. S8 Discharges in sewage effluents or storm water as a result of households consumer use The substance is not used in the home; The main sources of PCB in urban wastewater are atmospheric deposition on soil and runoff along with industrial emissions (e.g. leachates from landfills without treatment). Regarding the methodology for categorisation, the substance does not falling under category 1 or 3. S10 Solid waste treatment 3 Most current emissions from wastes and waste disposal. PCPs can also arise by thermal processes as a by-product. During solid waste management occur the production of leachates and/or aqueoses effluents. Thus, regarding the methodology for categorisation, the substance falls into category 1. S10.1 Landfills (or old waste deposits) Idem S10.2 Incineration 17--ethinylestradiol In secondary STPs the average removal is about 82% (according the substance dossier), therefore is expected that part of these reduction could be due to concentration on sewage sludge. Since sewage sludge is used as fertilizer, 17--ethinylestradiol could be deposed on agriculture land. Therefore, the risk category will be 1, according the methodology proposed for categorisation of importance of sources and pathways.

Portugal comments (3) Substance Source / pathway Current Proposed Cyanides S3 Due to agricultural activities (via leaching erosion, spills, direct drainage discharges) 3 1 Cyanides could be present in sewage sludge originated from domestic wastewater, due to the secondary reactions involving organcyanides, nitro compounds (e.g., nitrites, nitrosamines) and chlorinated compounds. Since sewage sludge is used as fertilizer, cyanides could be deposed on agriculture land. Therefore, the risk category will be 1, according the methodology proposed for categorisation of importance of sources and pathways (see references). S8 Discharges in sewage effluents or storm water as a result of households consumer use 2 The substance is not used in the home; it could result from the formation of by-products from chemical reactions that involve organocyanides, nitro compounds (e.g., nitrites, nitrosamines) and chlorinated compounds. Regarding the methodology for categorisation, the substance does not falling under category 1 or 3. S9.2 Large industrial point sources, direct or via STP (IPPC installations) IPPC installations include solid waste facilities that are not coved by S10.1 (landfill without wastewater treatment) or S10.2 (Incineration with wastewater treatment). Therefore, these installations are potential sources with direct discharges to surface water (with treatment) or to sewer. Regarding the methodology for categorisation, the substance falls into category 1. S10 Solid waste treatment According the Section 2, diffuse sources include migration from landfill. S10.1 Landfills (or old waste deposits) Idem

Portugal comments (4) Substance Source / pathway Current Proposed HBCDD S3 Due to agricultural activities (via leaching erosion, spills, direct drainage discharges) 3 1 This substance presents a low solubility. Hence, in sewage it will tend to adsorb in sludge. Since sewage sludge is used as fertilizer, HBCDD could be deposed on agriculture land. Therefore, the risk category will be 1, according the methodology proposed for categorisation of importance of sources and pathways. Zinc 2 Since sewage sludge is used as fertilizer, zinc could be deposed on agriculture land. Therefore, the risk category will be 1, according the methodology proposed for categorisation of importance of sources and pathways.

Next steps Update sheets based on comments and amendments received Provide justification of 'risk' classification for measures Issue final sheets